Danny Danko

Danny Danko
Location
New York City, New York, USA
Birthday
July 04
Title
Senior Cultivation Editor
Company
High Times Magazine
Bio
I write and edit articles as well as take photos of marijuana gardens and cannabis luminaries for High Times Magazine. Check out my links in the bottom left corner for more info...

MARCH 27, 2009 1:41PM

Danny Danko: "Shame on You President Obama"

Rate: 16 Flag

I'm disappointed in President Obama for the first time.

  This recent commentary on marijuana legalization is a disgrace.

Dear, Mr. President,

 I'm so sick of this "Wink-wink", "Munchie jokes", "Aren't those silly potheads funny?" level of discourse. We expected more from you. 

I didn't expect you to say you're all for it, but how about a nuanced discussion? This was the perfect forum and format to raise some serious questions (as you've done in the past).

 This is one of the reasons, I, as a member of the "online community" you so cavalierly dismiss, sent you money, rallied my friends and family and generally supported your campaign. Please don't make a fool out of me. I already have to hear it from the Ron Paul/Dennis Kucinich contingent, but this will be simply too much to bear. 

Instead of an intelligent response to an obviously popular option, we get this smug, arrogant and flippant remark guaranteed to piss off a portion of your supporting constituency, but also guaranteed to get a cheap laugh from a bunch of imbeciles (including your fawning press corps). 

Why are all these press conferences so buddy-buddy? What happened to the intelligent man who knew how to ask and answer tough questions? Have we really been reduced to banal stand-up comedy from the leader of the free world? 

None of this seems all that funny to me: In Mexico and Colombia, thousands are being tortured and killed every year. Here in the US, children are taken away from their families. Transplant patients are denied life-saving surgery. Loyal dogs are shot dead with no questions asked, sometimes in botched raids at the wrong location. Non-violent prisoners languish away in jails with real criminals. All this over a harmless flower that's been used as medicine for millennia. And yet still, all we get from you are jokes? For shame. 

Well, Mr. President, I put forth to you that this issue, one that myself and many of my colleagues have dedicated their lives to, is not a joke. Will legalization help save the economy? That remains to be seen. Should it be an option on the table? You, yourself have said so many times.
 

Hopefully, Mr. Obama, there will be yet another outpouring of emails, letters and commentary to refute your premise and return the level of discourse to an intelligent and well-researched discussion.
 

Then, Mr. President, perhaps the joke will be on you. 

Sincerely, Danny Danko

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Obama is right of center. He will only continue to disappoint you. Better to send your contribution dollars elsewhere and rally your friends and family to support one of the third parties that has legalization in their platform. Like the Libertarians or Greens. Don't believe the Obama-apologist who say he'll make it right once he wins a second term. They're full of it. Monkey fingered.
Danny

I'm sorry, but I doubt if many American's see this as a high priority at this point. Perhaps you should stop chiding the President and see if you can come up with a more pressing reason for people to find this issue deserving of greater attention at a time when the there is 10% unemployment, the economy is tanking, we have two wars, half of the states are on the edge of bankruptcy, the US is bankrupt, and the price of gas is starting to rise again. As Ryan Seacrest would say, "I'm sorry Danny, but you'll be going home this week!"
I respectfully disagree with you both.

To WCD: Legalization of marijuana would save money at a time when we need every penny. Taxing pot sales could generate well-needed jobs and funds for building and maintaining our infrastructure. I can think of many reasons this issue is deserving of greater attention, some of them listed above (deaths and mayhem in Mexico and Colombia for example).

To BBE: If Obama is right of center then I must be Pol Pot. The 3rd party argument is so tired. They will never win, continuing to sap the strength of progressive democrats to the benefit of real right wingers. Democrats are the only party with the power to make these changes. We must convince them.
Good luck with that. Obama is owned by the corporations that profit from the war on drugs and the war on terror. He will never end either. Too much money being made. Look at how he laughed about it yesterday. Look at how he just committed more soldiers to Afghanistan. You can hope and wish that he will change, but he is what he is - which is right of center. Nice to meet you, Pol Pot.
Those corporations will find other things to profit from or perish.
Danny, you speak for millions and you do it very well.
WorkingClassDemocrat has a point. At the appropriate time however, there should be some effort to legalize pot. I'm a conservative and generally anti-drug, but there should be some reasonable way to have limited legalization of pot.

One thing that should be done immediately is legalize the farming of hemp. This is an incredibly versitile plant. During WWII hemp seed oil was used in military aircraft as a lubricant. I know some farmers groups have been lobbying to legalize hemp. It could become one of the most important cash crops if legalized.
Blah blah blah weed. Blah blah blah outrage. Blah blah blah freedom.

I'm sorry. I just can't get all that worked up about this particular issue at the moment. I'll come join you when the economy's fixed and the christian right has been beaten down some.
Too much is being made of this clip. He was asked if legalizing pot would help grow the economy, to which he accurately answered no. And having heard about this clip without seeing it, I expected some kind of sardonic, evil, mocking tone. It just wasn't there. I disagree with you that now was the perfect time to have a serious discussion about legalizing pot. Um, have you heard about the economic crisis?

Much ado about nothing.
VR, totally agree.
BBE, is also right, did you really think?

Anyway, legalizing pot will take away all the jobs of people selling it. Most of them have records and would not be employed by the corporations that will be taking over the business. I think it legalizing would stir up all kinds of shit. We have a secondary economy and what will those people do without that money?
I think there are two issues here: 1) Would legalizing marijuana help the economy. 2) Would legalizing marijuana and/or decriminalizing drugs end the criminal activities associated with it that are destroying Mexico, funding al-Qaeda, etc.
Obama was asked question #1. I agree with you that his giggling/smirking was weird. Personally, I do not think marijuana should be legalized to stimulate the economy. I do, however, think that something needs to be done FAST to stop the violence in Mexico and the economic benefits of the drug trade in the middle east. Our insatiable demand is the cause. The demand will continue to be there. Decriminalization is starting to look like the solution to me. There is a risk analysis factor here: Legalize to stimulate the economy. Probably not worth it. Legalize to destroy the cartels and stop funding to terrorist organizations. Probably so.
Before his election -- and since, I told anyone on the Left who would listen that they would be disappointed if they thought Obama was going to bring about radical change. Anyone who took the time to read The Audacity of Hope should know better. In that book, he clearly revealed himself as a centrist compromiser.

You see this in his policy toward Wall Street, where he is treating the symptoms rather than cutting out the cancer. And as long as we're talking healthcare, he's doing the same thing with that, when what is needed is to be rid once and for all of HMO's and health insurance companies that overcharge and deny benefits whenever possible.

Still, Obama has made some incremental changes that are very good; reauthorizing stem-call research and requiring environmental impact studies for strip mining are two obvious improvements over the fool he replaced.

He also gives every indication of wanting to reform taxes by requiring wealthy individuals and corporations to actually pay them. But people in Congress will not be anxious to adopt real tax reform because wealthy donors pay to keep them in office. Look for a real battle on this front.

Disappointed as I may be in some of his moves, whatever he accomplishes will be a vast improvement over the Right-Wingnut, Supply-Side, Stupid for Jesus idiocy that has been visited upon us for the much of the last 30 years or so.
Rated
Great post! I would love to look the President in the eye and say, "I didn't expect you to say you're all for it, but how about a nuanced discussion? This was the perfect forum and format to raise some serious questions (as you've done in the past)." Well put, nicely said, and stated with passion from a supporter who has a right to be more than a little miffed and even more disappointed in the "change" candidate.
I like what Mos Def said in his defense last night on Maher. What do people expect him to say 60 days in? YEAH, I'm the first black President and I want to legalize pot immediately.

And he's exactly right. It's all about perception. Whether he meant it or not, give him some time.

I'm just sayin'...
Danny, I don't think we'll solve the problems of endemic poverty in this country without legalization (although not decriminalization, which I think is a cop-out that doesn't address the more important half of the problem). Not to mention the problem of America's drug habit destabilizing Mexico.

But politically, I can't see how this is the time to fight for it. Obama needs all the political capital he has just to deal with the economy. There does seems to a movement afoot to take drug legalization seriously, with conservatives and liberals joining in. I hope, however, that if this issue reaches the point where America can have an adult conversation about it, High Times and NORML will stay as far away from the debate as possible. The last thing America needs in the legalization debate is people whose interest seems to arise from their use.
I am all for legalization, but please, you do a disservice to the cause with your ad hominem attack. There is irony in your casting of Obama as smug, arrogant and flippant. Revisiting the actual question at hand, "will legalization help save the economy?" you suggest "it remains to be seen." I see that as no more of a nuanced or more compelling opinion than that expressed by Obama. I respect you passion, but one must also consider the possibility that those who attempt to "shame" others into change do more to hurt the cause than help.
I've got to agree with you 100% here Danny. While I do think that there are many issues on the table, I feel that the discussion over legalizing pot is an important issue - because it's symbolic of the failed "war on drugs" the US has been fighting for decades. We have the highest prison population on the planet and many of those people in prison are in for drug charges which are often for the use of drugs, NOT the sale.

The feds and plenty of corporations have benefited for years from the "drug war" - not only monetarily but politically as well. Politicians use a tough stance on drugs to get elected regularly and ram legislation that invades privacy and creates more of a police state all the time.

Obama - not Pol Pot, but by no means to the "left" in any way. He's better than the crop of presidents we've had for the past few decades, but not interested in changing the overall order of things. As BBE said, he's beholden to the corporations just like most politicians. They've got no reason to want to change things - there's profit and power to be had.
What I don't understand about Verbal and Stellaa's comments is that it would SOOOOOOOO amazing to stick it the right wing nut jobs, including the one here, by legalizing the pot their kids smoke. Maybe they would even take it up again and chill out some. Maybe Rush Limbaugh would get hooked on it and chill out too.

To Stellaa's point about jobs though, why couldn't drug dealers work as, I don't know, drug dealers!? People would still be buying this stuff. I mean, you're allowed to make your own beer and wine, why not grow your own and sell it your friends? There would be jobs for those people. Keeping jobs in a black market is not a viable argument against legalization. It might be nice to have a thriving black market that many are involved in around Berkeley, but that shit ain't gonna work anywhere else.

I have post about this in other places, but I think the big impediment to legalization is not the drug that is cannabis, but the plant itself. It is a miracle plant that can provide medicine, oil, fiber and does not require a great deal of input to grow. I mean, it is a weed. There are too many companies and industries that are exposed to risk if it becomes legal to grow and process cannabis. Chemical companies that make synthetic fibers. The olive oil industry. Pharmaceutical companies. They are the ones standing in the way. Not law enforcement. The law enforcement officials will make just as much money off of fighting cocaine and other, harder drugs. Either way, I'm not holding my breath on this one. I think we have a long way to wait.

It's just sad to me that so many people have no interest in the freedom of their fellow citizens to live as they wish. As if they just have to wait until it's important enough to other people. I think that's a bullshit attitude. Maybe the women who say that should have to wait until every cares about equal access. You're not setting a very good standard with an attitude like that. I'm sorry for having to say so, but you're not.
I think it is obviously in one sense, not as a high a priority as other issues, although it is not trivial as a matter of having a law governed state. I don't buy the federal power to criminalize a plant in your house at all, unless you tried to sell it, maybe, maybe, and then across interstate lines.
Danny,

You nailed it! There was a time when Obama needed our support but now it's no longer politically advantageous to align with pro-marijuana. I found it as pathetic that his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, went to Mexico to tell them that 30 years of U.S. Gov. drug policy were a total failure, then admitted that the demand-side of the equation is partly to blame but the end result was more of the same old rhetoric.

I don't think that any sensibility will come to this issue any time soon but I do think that the Gov. hears our voice and senses our frustration.
Danny, I too am an Obama supporter, and I was extremely disappointed in his response. But I am even more disappointed in the so called liberals and progressives who just don't get what the War on Drugs is all about. A government that can tell you what you may or may not ingest, harming no other, is corrupt and out of control. The War on Drugs is a tool of oppression, pure and simple, and the sad truth is that too many of us have internalized government propaganda, and are all to willing to have our civil rights taken away.

I dare say, we will not solve the economic crises until we begin to come to grips with the fact that those in power are not on "our" side. That loosening the iron grip of control is at the heart of the attempt to simply legalize and intelligently regulate our drug consumption. It is not (aaaaarrrgghhh!) about a bunch of "stoners" wanting to get high.

Thank you for writing about this. Thumbed!