Sarah Palin wrote her 400-page book in four months. (Or she got a head start before she announced her resignation. Maybe she was lying and did quit early for the big-book paycheck.
Pub date has been moved up to Nov. 17.
Yow. I wonder if it will read like she pounded it out without thought. We spent ten months just editing my book. (My editor, Jonathan Karp, has said publicly, that to do a book right, he likes a year for editing.)
Sarah's comes out seven weeks from now, which is a minimal period the publisher usually needs for production, so either the four months includes writing AND editing, or no editing.
No editing? Nobody spits out perfection. Hemmingway had a very strong editor. And if ever there were a rambler in desperate need of an editor . . .
That's not the worst sin--I can blab, too, but I know it, and sought good editors in my agent and editor, and listened to their advice. Since we met her late last summer, I have never gotten a whiff of Sarah Palin believing that she has any flaws. She's all right, all the time.

Salon.com
Comments
Good point about the editing process, though. You've been there, so you know how it works.
But no doubt the book will be a best-seller.
It would take someone with major skills and talent to eke out 400 pages about Sarah Palin. I'm far more interesting and would only rate 200 pages, at best. ;)
R
You’re a great asset to the OS community. Thanks for all that you post and continued good luck with “Columbine.”
“I wonder if it will read like she pounded it out without thought.”
Unless it’s the work of a team of ghost writers that’s pretty much a given. I mean we’re talking about Sarah Palin, right?
To steal a phrase Paul Begala used describing President GWB, listening to Sarah Palin trying to construct a coherent sentence is like watching a drunk man trying to cross an icy road.
Rated and appreciated.
i bet she contributed pages and pages of "prose"--maybe even most or all of the first draft of each chapter, and then shuttled them to a rewrite guy. sarah strikes me as the type who believes she can do anything, with or without training or preparation. write a book? how hard can that be?
i would also be shocked if we don't hear her voice in there, and who could duplicate that?
(OK, i know the answer to that one: tina fey. hahaha. but isn't she already occupied?)
This book will be published just in time for the whacky Right to buy for Christmas.
Yeah, Travel, the book could provide a lot of comedy. I bet a whole lot of standups are delirious today.
(The morning after the Grammy's, Kathy Griffen posted a short msg on her facebook page. I think it was just, Thank you, Kanye. hahaha. Later, she clarified the obvious: she was thanking him for being such an ass, handing her great material.)
I like her.
Yeah, she wrote this book like I wrote Columbine. Sheesh.
There's no way a publisher is going to commit resources to a Palin stream of consciousness. [we've all seen this, yes? http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2009/07/palin-speech-edit-200907?currentPage=1]
That said, with all of her stipulations for a recent fund-raising dinner, one where it's assumed the top bidder actually _likes_ her - things like no tough questions were on the list - there's no way she'd let some ghost writer put words in her mouth.
400 pages ain't nothing if you're using 20 point fonts and including 200 pages of pix, 50 pages of Bible quotes, and another 50 pages describing that "rat" Levi Johnson.
Hell's Bells, how the heck does one become a ghost writer? (I mean other than actually dying yet continuing to blog.) I can quote scripture with the best/worst of them............calling Glen Beck.
And yes it was rushed to print
I once knew a writer, something of a hack I guess, who (this was a long time ago) rolled several sheets and carbon into his typewriter and produced first-draft material. Well, this was after much writing experience and, it being fantasy, he was making it up as he went along. Wait a minute - the latter could apply here...
Publishers have no trouble at all committing resources to promote books like this. With all the wing-nuts out there, they are guarenteed to make a profit. And, Dave, contrary to what you might think about her large advance detracting from what other writers might earn, it's overwhelmingly successful sales by books just like hers that underwrite advances for unproven new talent.
And I agree that it would be a hell of a lot more fun if she'd written the damned thing herself. I'm chuckling just thinking about it......
Chapter 2: Katie Couric is mean
Chapter 3: Why I should be America's point guard
Chapter 4: I'm the most mavericky person I know
Chapter 5: Now I can buy all the clothes I want and nobody can make me give them back!
...
The fun will begin when the press and blogging community gets a chance to fact-check it.I'm betting on more than one significant lie per chapter.
Dave, contrary to what you might think about her large advance detracting from what other writers might earn, it's overwhelmingly successful sales by books just like hers that underwrite advances for unproven new talent.
Ginny, I think you must be responding to someone else. I don't believe I said that. I'm actually conflicted. There are two schools of thought on celeb books: 1) the make a lot of money and feed the system. Assumption there: the # of dollars out there to buy books is highly elastic, and they expand it. 2) There is a relatively finite amount of book-buying dollars out there, and a finite amount of shelf space, review space, attention space. These books suck up a tremendous amount of it, and squeeze out quality books.
I'm not at all certain where the truth lies. I'm guessing closer to #2: that there is some elasticity in the amount of dollars, but way less than the amount sucked up by these books. And the shelf/review/attention space is finite and key ways shrinking. It definitely squeezes books out there.
How much these things keep books interesting to the public is very hard to gauge. (Also hard to gauge: the impact of reading crappy books on the decision to read/buy more books. We know from Hollywood that hits tend to generate more hits. When the public has been happy with recent movies they've seen, they want to go back for more. After a slew of dogs, it beats the whole market down for awhile.)
That makes sense. Many people only have time for a book or two a year. If they buy a great one and are wowed by it, they will likely buy/read again sooner. If it's a vapid, empty account, even though they chose it, they will still be turned off on books.
Hmmmmmm. I am coming down closer to your original statement, though I had not said it.
i didn't notice the "rouge." it took me awhile to figure out what you meant, because i'm a terrible speller and can never get those diphthongs to work. (i had to look up diphthongs--is that an ironic spelling?)
i could have easily made the same mistake, but it's still funny as hell.
http://open.salon.com/blog/chantal_laurent/2009/09/30/momment_of_zen_palin_going_rouge
Yeah, but your book contains facts, research, and thoughts that connect logically from one point to another! SP only has to blab about herself, which as far as I can tell is her #1 favorite topic of all time, plus Alaska. (Also. Too.)
And given how much her fans love her looks, I'm betting on at least 50 pages of photos that chart her ascendancy from A to B.
It seems like a LOT of people really really hate this broad, but here's another way to look at it: Like Kathy Griffen! Palin is actually good for us liberals. She is more polarizing than Hilary EVER was. Most of the conservatives are terrified of her, and that's great, right?
And the folks that would buy her book surely won't buy mine (when I finish it----and will likely send me hate mail based on the title alone) nor any other reader/writer posting here that has a book in stores.
I say enjoy the show! She's getting more than her fifteen minutes of fame, I'll grant you that, but watching someone make a fool of themselves over and over again is kinda fun. I'll bet we're going to have a blast with the book!
JB-- heres my idea-- maybe you should be a ghostwriter!!
I'm an editor for a small publisher. (nonfiction, esoteric technical subject, small readership).
Yes, a good editing job takes many months.
I'd bet my Chicago Manual of Style that Sarah P. doesn't have an editor, she has a babysitter, and editor, and a ghost writer. They follow her around. They interview her. Then they write everything down, build the book, and give it to her to review. By "work" it means she has to read the drafts and offer comments.
That babysitter, editor, and ghostwriter are working their asses off. They might get a credit at the beginning. Maybe at the end. No, I cannot believe that Sarah P. wrote a book at all. Someone did it for her.
Yup, that's speed writing without a whole lot of thought, supposedly "written" by a woman who has never believed she had any cause to doubt the rightness of her view point.
I don't hold out great hope for the quality of the end product. Alas, there are Teabaggers out there who will be certain it's "Great Literature" and feed her ego even as they pad her bank account.
Didn't the book come out at #1?
Shoot me now, please.
The thing is, at the rate these people actually read the books they buy to impress others on their coffeetables, ...The book WILL BE THE COFFEETABLE!
They got this to press so fast, and there was no way to "Dumb Down" the prose to the LCD as it is already originating from the LCD type of "Real Modern Day Amercian Mind", that I bet the coffe stains from the ghoster are still on certain pages in the entire run of the first editions.
At the very least, with this rush to press and lack of editing, it will certainly be "a one of kind read". Maybe it will become the new third grade primer for states like Texas that dictate the textbook industry's library.