
Ground rules for participating comments in the open dialogue on race:
1. ABSOLUTELY NO PERSONAL ATTACKS
2. NAME-CALLING OR FINGER-POINTING ARE PROHIBITED
3. READ COMMENT(S) THOROUGHLY BEFORE RESPONDING
4. STANDARD OPEN SALON RULES APPLY
5. VIOLATORS WILL BE TOWED
HYPOTHESIS
Society creates scapegoats as the personification of its hatred, fears and frustrations. In doing so, society projects its frustrations onto others, rather than lashing out at the actual source of its problems. Therefore, sacrificing the scapegoat serves to preserve the status quo, but does not solve society's problems.
Earlier this Spring, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a report called “Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment.” The report warned about the increase in hate group activity. The current economic downturn and the election of an African American president have provided recruitment opportunities for White supremacist and radical right-wing groups. According to DHS, “the consequences of a prolonged economic downturn—including real estate foreclosures, unemployment, and an inability to obtain credit—could create a fertile recruiting environment for rightwing extremists and even result in confrontations between such groups and government authorities similar to those in the past.”
We've walked down this troubled road before. In the 1990s, angst over a recession fed paranoia, and conspiracy theories about the end times, martial law and the suspension of the U.S. Constitution. That environment led to the targeting of government buildings and law enforcement, resulting in the deadly 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. It was the largest terrorist attack on U.S. soil before September 11, 2001, in which a bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by domestic terrorists claimed 168 lives and left over 800 people injured.
According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, in 2008 there were 926 hate groups in the U.S.— more than a 4 percent increase from 888 groups in 2007, and an over 50 percent increase since 2000, when 602 groups were active.
The DHS report notes that disgruntled veterans from the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are recruited by white supremacist groups, exploited for the training and skills they acquire in the military. Remember that Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh was a veteran of Operation Desert Storm in 1990-1991.
These right-wing groups are united by their hatred of immigration and a frustration over perceived government inaction on the issue, and they perpetrate hate crimes against Latinos. There has been an increase in anti-Latino hate crimes in recent years, and the amassing of weapons by militia members who were plotting to kill Latinos. For example, a Wyoming militia member was arrested in February 2007 after he expressed his plan to travel to the U.S.-Mexico border and kill immigrants who were crossing into the country. And in April 2007, six militia members were arrested for allegedly planning a machine gun assault on Latinos, and for weapons and explosives violations.
And with their hostility towards gun control legislation—including assault weapons bans and proposed universal handgun registration—these groups stockpile weapons and ammunition, and engage in paramilitary training.
This toxic climate also poses a risk to President Obama. The election of the first black president has caused concern among extremists, and has provided a useful recruiting tool for these groups. The Southern Poverty Law Center notes that during the 2008 presidential campaign, then-candidate Obama received more threats than any other candidate in recent memory. Can we forget the blood-lust at the McCain-Palin rallies, in which crowd participants called Obama a terrorist and a traitor, carried around Obama monkey dolls and called for his death? And moreover, several white supremacists were arrested for plotting to assassinate him or threatening to do so.
Racially tinged anti-Obama sentiment — which goes far beyond a mere honest disagreement over policy — was on full display among the recent anti-tax “ tea parties” throughout the country. Conservative politicians have supported these events, in which racists, fringe groups, conspiracy theorists, Secesh, and those who deny that Obama is a U.S. citizen--not to mention other elements of the Republican Party's shrinking base--come out to play.
The DHS report was good, maybe too good, in predicting what was about to happen in America. Republican lawmakers demanded an apology from DHS secretary Janet Napolitano. Then there was the assassination of Kansas doctor George Tiller by a gunman with affiliations to the extremist anti-abortion group Operation Rescue.
Then there was the recent attack on the National Holocaust Museum in Washington, DC by an 88-year old white supremacist named James von Brunn. Von Brunn--who served 6½ years for pulling out a sawed-off shotgun at the Federal Reserve headquarters and threatening to set off a bomb and take hostages--killed a security guard in the museum with a rifle (see photo above). In a note found in his car, Von Brunn, who does not believe Obama is a citizen, said "The Holocaust is a lie. Obama was created by Jews. Obama does what his Jew owners tell him to do."
And in a story that has received only minimal attention, three members of the Minutemen American Defense (an anti-immigration and self-appointed border patrol group), were charged with murdering a Latino man and his 9-year old daughter, and wounding his wife, in a border town in southern Arizona. The two men and one woman from this group conducted a home raid on their victims, anticipating that they would find drugs and money to take.
So, right-wing hate groups, domestic terrorists if you will, are taking advantage of an economic recession, a structural crisis which resulted from years of policies of upward economic redistribution. They blame the immigrants, the blacks, the Jews, the Muslims, the Arabs, Obama, the so-called abortionist baby killers, and others for their problems and the nation's woes. Not unlike the Klan during the Jim Crow days, they receive at least tacit approval from conservative politicians. Fifty years ago there were the Southern Dixiecrats, members of the White Citizens Council who participated in the scapegoating and demonization of African Americans for political gain, but kept their hands clean while their unwashed terrorist brethren burned black churches and lynched civil rights workers.
Today, we have Republican lawmakers--and their media surrogates at Fox News and right-wing talk radio--who rail against a "socialist" and even "fascist" president who they claim is bringing down the country. They scapegoat affirmative action, abortion, gays and immigrants, and demonize a Latina U.S. Supreme Court nominee just for the hell of it. And some demonize the federal government and talk about secession. And they keep their hands clean, so they think, while their untutored associates take matters into their own hands.
Such are the consequences of a political strategy-- the Southern Strategy-- that demonizes people of color and makes raw racist appeals to the Republican base to win elections for the GOP. Due to demographic and generational shifts, the base is all that is left now, those people who responded to the scapegoating and demonization in the first place. And they are becoming increasingly extreme and hateful, and in some cases violent.
Any thoughts?


Salon.com
Comments
I'm reminded of the research that I did in the late medieval/early modern period. During that time, scapegoating was also prevalent. Scapegoats were needed to understand why the Black Death (first to go through Europe in 1348), crop failures, invasions by other nations, and everyday disasters (loss of a lover, financial losses, crop losses) happened. Franciscan Observant preachers, such as Bernardino da Feltre, blamed the Jews. Bernardino da Siena blamed those who tolerated "sodomy". Other jurists, such as Pierre de Lancre in Tableau de l'inconstance des mauvais anges, blamed women who practiced withcraft and, once again, Jews for all the troubles that befell his neighbors.
In earlier times, it was believed that the tolerance of these people would lead a righteous god to destroy cities. Are we dealing, do you think, with similar thoughts among those who practice such forms of scapegoating? Do they believe they are serving god by their actions? Are they cleansing America of threats to our role as the City on the Hill?
Because, to paraphrase Camus, I tried to understand the origin of evil and I got nowhere.
I want to make one thing perfectly clear, which supports exactly what you are saying in this post David about scapegoating.
Immigrants DO NOT TAKE "OUR" JOBS. Immigrants ACCEPT JOBS. They can't take jobs that aren't first offered to them. Why don't those on the "right" focus their anger where it belongs...American businesses that hire illegal immigrants so that they can make more profit while paying their workers a less-than-living wage. Immigrants aren't taking American jobs, American companies are giving them away...scapegoating.
This game is rigged; or, as Obama observed, ‘someone has their finger on the scale’. A clandestine network of lobbyists uses their influence to insure favorable legislative outcomes. Meanwhile, the mainstream media provides cover by continuing to give face time and ink to right wing demagogues (or shall we call them demi-Gods?) whose role it is to convince the public that the poorer elements of society are continually conspiring to unfairly improve their lot in life by taking that which they have not earned or are not entitled to.
In 2005, 1% of the US population accounted for 21.8% of all income, as measured by adjusted gross income on tax returns filed with the IRS. The top 50% of the population accounted for 87.17 of all income. For the same year, median net worth by ethnicity was as follows:
White 141, 000
Black 21,000
Hispanic 19,000
(Rounded to the nearest thousand)
While one can cite legitimate reasons why this gap persists, there are clearly stakeholders who have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. In fact, a look at the trend line over the past few decades shows the gap widening, as opposed to narrowing. Yet, the media continues to bombard us with stories of challenges to affirmative action and creeping socialism, stoking fears that we are in the midst of a massive redistribution of wealth.
As a child, I lived in a number of segregated communities in NYC. Watching the news, I wondered why some White people were so adamant about keeping people of color out of their community. Years later, I came to realize that race was just a cover story. The bottom line was maintaining property values. IMHO, it’s always has been and will always continue to be about a dollar bill. In order to keep the shell game going, there must always be a scapegoat.
This is both an exhilerating and frightening time in America, and I fear that Obama's election has brought out the crazies on some level. What's truly unfortunate is how irresponsible the Palinite media (Fox, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, Hannity etc.) have been in this regard, Surely Shep Smith isn't the only person on that side of the aisle (though I'm not entirely sure Smith is on that side of the aisle) who sees what's happening.