Although inadvertently perhaps, White House press secretary Robert Gibbs performed a great public service when he complained about the "professional left" that will not give this administration proper credit for its legislative accomplishments. And he insulted a wide swath of the Democratic base in the process. He apologized and later stood by his statement, but it's the type of thing you just can't take back. Not unlike that proverbial tube of toothpaste, you just can't put it back in.
This was a showdown in the making, and should be welcomed. On the one hand there's the base that worked hard to get Obama into office, and now pushes this president to do more. On the other hand, there's a White House that is simply dumbfounded. The Obama administration apparently cannot understand why its supporters are not in awe over its ability to politick, compromise, and water down great legislation into mediocre laws, without getting anything for it in return. There seems to be a sense of arrogance emanating from the White House, this attitude that the base should just be happy and stop complaining. After all, Obama is much better than Bush, and look at what he has achieved in only a little over a year and a half -- health care reform, student loan reform, a recovery act that prevented the nation from sliding into a depression, and so on.
To be sure, the accomplishments to date are considerable, and we should not ignore them. But at the same time, the base always expected, even demanded great things from this president who campaigned as a change agent. And the dire problems America is facing require some urgent, forceful, audacious leadership.
But far too often this administration appears to want to play it safe, hedge its bets. For example, the economic stimulus, however well intentioned, should have been much larger. Other times the Obama White House negotiates with itself and gives away far too much, as was the case with the public option. Or the White House will try to bargain with rabid conservatives who have no intention of working together, and would like nothing more than to bring down this presidency. And one gets the impression some of these Republicans would bring down the entire nation just to win an election.
This leads us to the issue of jobs. Part of the problem is the White House is entertaining the foolish proposition of cutting the deficit during a time of recession. At this rate, we might as well put another nail in the coffin that contains what is left of the U.S. middle class.
You know how bad it's getting here in Third World America because the mobs are coming out with the pitchforks. Now, don't get me wrong, people right now have every right to be angry. This recession is unlike any other in recent memory, certainly since the Great Depression. There is no rebound this time, no jobs magically coming back with an upturn of the business cycle, much as the tides faithfully ebb and flow each day. There is no relationship between the fortunes of Wall Street and the plight of the common folk, so it seems. And those who are at the top don't need the rest of us, except when it comes to gaining at our expense.
The handiwork of Democrats and Republicans alike, years of regressive policies have amounted to highway robbery of working people. Deregulation wrecked and plundered the economy, and eviscerated Americans' life savings and home equity. Unemployment is the highest it has been in years, and long-term employment is at disturbing levels, with nearly half of the unemployed out of work for at least six months. College graduates begin their careers in a mountain of debt but with no jobs. Moreover, a trickle-down policy has resulted in the greatest gap between rich and poor in modern history, and a nation that ranks among the least upwardly mobile of the advanced nations.
So now, what is supposedly the world's greatest nation cannot afford to keep its schools open. State and local governments are out of cash, and some localities are grounding up the streets into gravel because they can no longer afford to maintain the roads. State austerity measures--including layoffs of government workers and cutting of important programs--will only exacerbate this economic death spiral.
These are the times when hate groups and unscrupulous politicians suit up for the ugly days ahead, preying on the fears of low information Americans. Bereft of solutions, the ultra-right is doing what the ultra-right does, which is to tear apart the country with an "M-G-M." strategy: blame the Mexicans, Gays and Muslims for all your problems, with the actual or perceived threat of violence thrown in. Of course, blaming that poor undocumented worker for your plight will not help you, but isn't that what scapegoats are for? And the Fourteenth Amendment be damned, they say.
Surely, we can and should assign much blame for our woes on George W. Bush, who bankrupted the nation with two wars and a massive tax cut for the wealthy. However, Bush is no longer running for office. President Obama must realize that he will be judged if he cannot deliver on jobs, and rightly so. Progressives are trying to do him a favor by ensuring that he is not a one-term president, but he refuses to take the hint. A fighting spirit is lacking. At this rate, President Obama is well on his way down that road, despite the phalanx of incompetent empty suits found in abundance on the other side. To this extent, the base is doing what a good base should do.
President Franklin D. Roosevelt came into power after a failing Herbert Hoover who meant well, but either had the wrong ideas, or his good ideas were too little, too late. Roosevelt enacted a massive New Deal program based on relief to the unemployed, economic reform, and recovery through federal spending. The measures were sweeping, and helped cement a Democratic coalition for decades.
But as F.D.R. once told labor and civil rights leader A. Phillip Randolph during a discussion on the future of the country and the plight of African-Americans,
"You know, Mr. Randolph, I've heard everything you've said tonight, and I couldn't agree with you more. I agree with everything that you've said, including my capacity to be able to right many of these wrongs and to use my power and the bully pulpit. ... But I would ask one thing of you, Mr. Randolph, and that is go out and make me do it."
Once again, the base is making a president "do it," so to speak, for his own good and ours. The party faithful did not vote for good speeches alone, or milquetoast policies and lukewarm, half-hearted solutions to a crisis situation. Nor did they vote for "drill baby drill," or the escalation of a senseless war in Afghanistan, or Wall Street lackeys controlling the till. Certainly, they did not vote for a U.S. that spends as much on military as the rest of the world combined, as other nations beat us in expenditures for science, technology and infrastructure. But they did vote for the active role of government in making things right, as only government can do.
The "professional left" simply wants its F.D.R. in the form of Barack Obama, because that's what 2008 was all about, after all.


Salon.com
Comments
Clinton was a centrist, so is Obama.
In that, Obama is FDR -- Franklin Delano Reverse.
But seriously, in my darker moments, I see President Obama (who I volunteered for in '08) as the new Neville Chamberlain. And anyone who knows English history knows what happened when Mr. Chamberlain tried to negotiate peace with Machiavellians.
For those of us who have lived in the gothic vestiges of the feudal South, we long ago saw the things you speak of, the dangers of upper classes dividing and preying on those below. As the nation became more and more like Dixie, we feared what lay ahead.
That poisonous fruit is now growing. The blooms began to fall during the last regime and many of us saw the need for an FDR type to tend the garden. That's what we thought we were getting with Obama but it appears he was indeed more like his predecessors than we wanted to believe.
Looks like we may all pay the price for his ambition and the partisan politics of Democrats who care more about chalking up tally marks than accomplishing anything substantive.
Rated.
My disappointment in President Obama has caused an apathy in me that I used to despise in others. Now that I know I can't count on him to change things, I don't believe any of them.
Lezlie
There is a brain drain in progress. I have friends in other countries who are beckoning us with the promise of jobs.
My daughter moved to Europe to teach English when W was re-elected (and earned an advanced degree in Germany). She's currently teaching English in Kosovo.
My friend Rebecca, a PhD in Medieval Literature, teaches English in South Korea. I could teach English in Korea or a host of other countries, or there are opportunities available for substance abuse counseling. Jobs are plentiful, but I imagine that's only true for a short time. Both Rebecca and Lynne have complete medical care.
We have nothing left here. No family in this state (CA), one part time minimum wage job for the two of us and our pets, no health care, and bleak prospects for finding better. I'd join you with my pitchfork, but I had to sell it on eBay (along with everything else of any value) to pay for food and gas.
I can't drive the car because I have outstanding tickets and my license is expired. If I get caught, they will impound the car, which is okay because my tires are so bald as to be dangerous. NO TREAD at all.
My credit has gone to hell. With tickets on my record and very bad credit, I'm not sure I can get a job even if I get an interview. Twenty-seven beautiful resumes went out three weeks ago that would have ordinarily gotten me many calls, and I have had NONE.
You can read it all here: http://www.open.salon.com/blog/leslieca/2010/08/12/should_i_be_uneasy, but you get the idea.
Nice piece though.
Also the decision to sue Arizona over this SB1070 nonsense is on Obama's 'plus column.'
I agree with your assessment. The WH is getting arrogant and needs to remember the progressive base put them there.
Fortunately for the future of the country, what you call the "base" is simply not numerous or resourceful enough to call the shots. May it always be thus.
Do many of us who lean to the left understand that when we lionize minimal administrative accomplishment we are also settling for a "better than nothing" (the phrase I've heard numerous left leaning pundits use to rationalize their expressed appreciation for the little this administration has managed to do) nation? I think, unfortunately, not. Your post reminds me that I am not alone.
Again, thank you.
it was the intent of the writers of the constitution that nothing get done. they were already on top of society and did their best to freeze the nation at that point, with great success.
The reason President Obama's poll numbers are dropping, along with Congress, is people are waking up and hearing the song like Marina. Hopefully those you now berate for jumping from President Obama's ship can steer it away from the rocks of ruin we are heading for.
When people voted for the ship to go a new direction, they didn't vote for it to head for the rocks.
The Obama administration seems to have forgotton this old adage at their peril, "You should dance with the one that brung you." And if you're smart, you don't stomp on their feet.
With so much of the progressive community having completely accepted the basic "pull-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps" principles of capital, it's no wonder we ended up with a disappointment like Obama rather than a new FDR to provide counter-values to the age of global neoliberalism and neoconservatism. And this IS about the values of the system we want, as you point out. FDR was speaking of social rights, and the social values that underpin them, when he spoke of human rights. The individual has become an insidious concept, shilled by the weirdos who keep recommending further privatization and "liberalization" of trade as the preferred fixes to the present crisis. Obviously the only rights they're interested in are those of the corporation, the only individual that matters to them, and then only as an tool for financial speculation and not as an agency to employ real people.
rated.
The planconsisted of a lovely blue tablet, when placed into an eight=ounce glass of water produced a wonderful, thirst quenching glass og H20. When we cut production
BOKO
August 15, 2010 09:40 PMA friend and I lost out onn a great economical scheme a while back.
The planconsisted of a lovely blue tablet, when placed into an eight=ounce glass of water produced a wonderful, thirst quenching glass og H20. When we cut production, people complained they had nothing.
Sorry for the double-post. My tired hands hit the wrong button, and I stubbed my tou kicking the pulbic option out the window.
In this retiree-intensive community, I know quite a few Greatest Generation Democrats who were hoping for Obama to be FDR in 2008. What they discovered after the election is that the hippie flat-earth wing of the party still rules. You can look this up under "Sunrise Powerlink".