Today is an odd day for me, a day that brings back a mixture of memories.
It was on this day 35 years ago that a sixth–grade girl from a small town in my home county vanished in broad daylight. Her body was found a few days later. She had been raped, murdered and left in a stock pond.
Her name was Dana Mize. Few of the people I knew had any idea who she was — until she was abducted. And, initially, that was newsworthy because her father was a candidate for county office in the upcoming primary.
I never met her. But I knew people who knew her fairly well. Her family attended First Baptist Church in my hometown, and "FBC," as it was called, was the biggest church in town. Still is, I imagine. And the congregation always has been tightly knit. A few days ago, I mentioned this upcoming anniversary to an old friend of mine who was a member of that church at the time, and he said he remembered feeling a terrible sadness for the family.
That was the prevailing emotion — at FBC and throughout the county and its communities.
It wasn't long after she disappeared, though, that the whispers began. Her abduction, people were saying, had nothing to do with local politics. If it had, the abductor(s) almost certainly would have contacted someone with a demand that her father withdraw from the race or something similar. But no such communication had been received.
It must have been sexual, so the reasoning went — and, it turned out, the reasoning was right on the money.
I didn't want to believe that. I guess most of the people in the area didn't want to believe it, but I had to admit that it made sense.
It's hard to describe what a shocking time that was. One of the reasons why it was so shocking, I think, was the fact that my hometown was still somewhat innocent and naive when it happened. The place often seemed to exist in a bubble. For whatever reason, people in my hometown seemed to believe they were immune to the tragedies of the world.
That conviction never really made much sense to me because tragedies happened there all the time.
Before I was in grade school, a girl I knew was diagnosed with cancer and died a short time later. When I was in third grade, a classmate of mine died of leukemia. A few years later, the son of some family friends was diagnosed with a brain tumor. A tornado ripped through my hometown when I was 5 and leveled several homes (took a few lives in the process).
And those were just a few of the tragedies that touched me personally. In the years when I was growing up, there were other tragedies that affected other people — like any other place.
I guess what made the Dana Mize episode unique was the fact that criminal intent was behind it. The other tragedies could be written off as being caused by disease or random acts of nature or perhaps sloppiness or stupidity. But this was deliberate.
In a large city, the disappearance of a young girl — and the subsequent discovery of her dead and sexually abused body — wouldn't have raised any eyebrows in those days.
But it was different in my hometown. Everyone who lived there had to accept a previously unthinkable truth: Sexual predators must have been living among us, as they do in any other city or town — and, based on statistics, I can only conclude that some of the girls with whom I attended school must have been abused — by their fathers, by cousins, by family friends, who knows?
In my hometown of Conway, Ark., it seems to me that there must have been sexual predators around — even in that seemingly innocent time.
There was nothing terribly special or unique about my hometown. It was a town much like any other town, I suppose. It was mostly a blue–collar town in a mostly blue–collar county. I'm sure young girls were molested, abused, even assaulted there when I was growing up, but those cases were usually handled quietly, away from the public eye.
What did make the Dana Mize case unique was the fact that the perpetrator didn't live nearby. Turned out, he had flown to Arkansas from his home in New Jersey, committed the crime and flown back.
I still don't know what drew him to Mize's tiny hometown of Vilonia — which was much smaller than Conway. To my knowledge, he had never been to that area before.
I have tried, many times over the last 35 years, to reconstruct his movements, and I have tried to figure out how he could just stumble onto Vilonia. I don't know what the odds would have been, but I keep coming back to the idea that — somehow — he must have known that Vilonia was there.
His plane had to have landed in Little Rock. He could have rented a car at the airport and easily driven to Conway, which is along the highway outside Little Rock.
If the trail stopped in Conway, you could chalk the whole thing up to randomness, I guess. But Vilonia is one of those out–of–the–way country towns. You don't just stumble onto it. You have to be going there on purpose.
And the stock pond where the body was found was, as I recall, even more remote.
A complete stranger to the area would be almost bound to get lost after being, to say the least, distracted by a life–and–death struggle, either before or after the sexual assault, and a search for a suitably secluded spot to drop the body.
It seems likely to me that he would have had to ask for directions back to the highway. And someone almost certainly would have remembered giving directions to a disheveled stranger in a rented car whose clothes may have been dirty and/or wet.
Yet my memory is that the perpetrator did all this in a single afternoon, returned to the airport and caught a flight back to New Jersey — and he didn't ask for directions and apparently wasn't connected to the crime until a few days later, when he confessed to his psychiatrist.
He's still alive, I hear. He was convicted of capital felony murder, which often carries a death sentence, but his jury sentenced him to life without parole. He was 34 at the time he committed the crime so he is about to turn 70.
I've heard he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia, the same mental illness that afflicts the man who shot Gabrielle Giffords back in January.
That would answer a lot of questions, I guess. But not all.
I suppose some questions will never be answered.
It was on this day 35 years ago that a sixth–grade girl from a small town in my home county vanished in broad daylight. Her body was found a few days later. She had been raped, murdered and left in a stock pond.
Her name was Dana Mize. Few of the people I knew had any idea who she was — until she was abducted. And, initially, that was newsworthy because her father was a candidate for county office in the upcoming primary.
I never met her. But I knew people who knew her fairly well. Her family attended First Baptist Church in my hometown, and "FBC," as it was called, was the biggest church in town. Still is, I imagine. And the congregation always has been tightly knit. A few days ago, I mentioned this upcoming anniversary to an old friend of mine who was a member of that church at the time, and he said he remembered feeling a terrible sadness for the family.
That was the prevailing emotion — at FBC and throughout the county and its communities.
It wasn't long after she disappeared, though, that the whispers began. Her abduction, people were saying, had nothing to do with local politics. If it had, the abductor(s) almost certainly would have contacted someone with a demand that her father withdraw from the race or something similar. But no such communication had been received.
It must have been sexual, so the reasoning went — and, it turned out, the reasoning was right on the money.
I didn't want to believe that. I guess most of the people in the area didn't want to believe it, but I had to admit that it made sense.
It's hard to describe what a shocking time that was. One of the reasons why it was so shocking, I think, was the fact that my hometown was still somewhat innocent and naive when it happened. The place often seemed to exist in a bubble. For whatever reason, people in my hometown seemed to believe they were immune to the tragedies of the world.
That conviction never really made much sense to me because tragedies happened there all the time.
Before I was in grade school, a girl I knew was diagnosed with cancer and died a short time later. When I was in third grade, a classmate of mine died of leukemia. A few years later, the son of some family friends was diagnosed with a brain tumor. A tornado ripped through my hometown when I was 5 and leveled several homes (took a few lives in the process).
And those were just a few of the tragedies that touched me personally. In the years when I was growing up, there were other tragedies that affected other people — like any other place.
I guess what made the Dana Mize episode unique was the fact that criminal intent was behind it. The other tragedies could be written off as being caused by disease or random acts of nature or perhaps sloppiness or stupidity. But this was deliberate.
In a large city, the disappearance of a young girl — and the subsequent discovery of her dead and sexually abused body — wouldn't have raised any eyebrows in those days.
But it was different in my hometown. Everyone who lived there had to accept a previously unthinkable truth: Sexual predators must have been living among us, as they do in any other city or town — and, based on statistics, I can only conclude that some of the girls with whom I attended school must have been abused — by their fathers, by cousins, by family friends, who knows?
In my hometown of Conway, Ark., it seems to me that there must have been sexual predators around — even in that seemingly innocent time.
There was nothing terribly special or unique about my hometown. It was a town much like any other town, I suppose. It was mostly a blue–collar town in a mostly blue–collar county. I'm sure young girls were molested, abused, even assaulted there when I was growing up, but those cases were usually handled quietly, away from the public eye.
What did make the Dana Mize case unique was the fact that the perpetrator didn't live nearby. Turned out, he had flown to Arkansas from his home in New Jersey, committed the crime and flown back.
I still don't know what drew him to Mize's tiny hometown of Vilonia — which was much smaller than Conway. To my knowledge, he had never been to that area before.
I have tried, many times over the last 35 years, to reconstruct his movements, and I have tried to figure out how he could just stumble onto Vilonia. I don't know what the odds would have been, but I keep coming back to the idea that — somehow — he must have known that Vilonia was there.
His plane had to have landed in Little Rock. He could have rented a car at the airport and easily driven to Conway, which is along the highway outside Little Rock.
If the trail stopped in Conway, you could chalk the whole thing up to randomness, I guess. But Vilonia is one of those out–of–the–way country towns. You don't just stumble onto it. You have to be going there on purpose.
And the stock pond where the body was found was, as I recall, even more remote.
A complete stranger to the area would be almost bound to get lost after being, to say the least, distracted by a life–and–death struggle, either before or after the sexual assault, and a search for a suitably secluded spot to drop the body.
It seems likely to me that he would have had to ask for directions back to the highway. And someone almost certainly would have remembered giving directions to a disheveled stranger in a rented car whose clothes may have been dirty and/or wet.
Yet my memory is that the perpetrator did all this in a single afternoon, returned to the airport and caught a flight back to New Jersey — and he didn't ask for directions and apparently wasn't connected to the crime until a few days later, when he confessed to his psychiatrist.
He's still alive, I hear. He was convicted of capital felony murder, which often carries a death sentence, but his jury sentenced him to life without parole. He was 34 at the time he committed the crime so he is about to turn 70.
I've heard he has been diagnosed with schizophrenia, the same mental illness that afflicts the man who shot Gabrielle Giffords back in January.
That would answer a lot of questions, I guess. But not all.
I suppose some questions will never be answered.


Salon.com
Comments
If this had happened 20 or 30 years later, we could assume that he had made an Internet connection with someone before travelling to Arkansas. But not in 1976, obviously. The trial records I found at Find-a-case mention a few pertinent things:
1. He asked a Conway motel clerk for directions to Vilonia, saying he was meeting friends.
2. He bought a gun in Little Rock, Arkansas.
3. Witnesses saw him stop his rental car next to Dana Mize, then she either got into the car or was pulled in, and they drove away.
4. He didn't fly back to NJ. He drove the car to Oklahoma City, then took a train to NJ. That way he could keep his gun (later found in NJ), and he had some time to clean up the car, or disguise evidence with more mundane road grunge. Altogether, he was away from NJ for eight days--a more believable timeframe for the events to have occurred than just a quick stopover.
None of the records I saw indicate that anyone in Vilonia actually knew him, other than his remark about friends there. Not that they would be likely to admit it if they did. Maybe he met someone from there in a bar in Little Rock or Conway in the days before the murder, went to look them up, and Dana Mize was a "target of opportunity", as they say, for a an armed and delusional schizophrenic who was vaguely preparing to do something bad. You're right though, it is puzzling and the remote stock pond suggests some local knowledge. Why Arkansas? Why Vilonia? I suspect the easiest answer is because the guy was delusional, and one of his delusions was that he could get away with a terrible crime by committing it in an out-of-the-way place where he was not known. But he left an easy paper trail of motel receipts and--seriously, a rental car? I bet he would have been caught without confessing to his shrink.
In the end, though, his own conscience did him in--which proves he knew right from wrong and deserved the jail sentence he got.
source: http://ar.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.%5CAR%5C1982%5C19820524_0043107.AR.htm/qx
Obviously, Gruzen didn't come from the area.
Also, great observation that researching the area from a distance wouldn't have been hard to do in the internet era -- but that was still decades in the future.
And you express another line of reasoning that I heard verbalized often in those days -- the people who insisted that no one from Conway could be guilty. Turned out that was correct, but not, I presume, for the reason that was mentioned most often -- that no one in Conway would have done it.
I am kind of fascinated that he took all the evidence home with him for police to find later. Delusional...and overconfident. (It seems he thought his longtime psychiatrist would be bound by patient confidentiality rules--and he may have been, but was disturbed enough that he called in another psychiatrist who wasn't so close to the defendant, and the latter contacted police.) BTW I had my own brush with a strange and deadly crime in my quiet Canadian suburb a few years before, look up my post "How Not To Rob a Bank" for details.
Bill
My experience profoundly affected me too. I just never felt as safe again.
Motivation: Gruzen was a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic who had been in and out of mental institutions all his life. In 1976, the Supreme Court had just ruled the death penalty again constitutional in the case of Gregg v. Georgia. Arkansas was one of the states which quickly adopted a death penalty statute that met the Gregg test. Gruzen believed that if he committed a murder in Arkansas, he would be most likely to get the death penalty and have it administered. Gruzen had reported similar fantasies to his psychiatrist several times previously.
His Stay in Little Rock: Gruzen checked into a seedy Little Rock hotel, bought a pistol at a pawn shop, and bought an Arkansas Highway Map. He told the clerk at the motel he was a location scout looking for a small town that would have some remote areas around it for shooting an upcoming movie. The clerk pointed out several areas, one of which was Vilonia.
Gruzen was convicted in his first trial and sentenced to life without parole, but the conviction was overturned by the state Supreme Court because of numerous errors by the trial judge. When Gruzen was put on trial the second time, prosecutors could no longer ask for the death penalty because you can't seek a more severe sentence in an appeal.
He was again sentenced to life without parole.
I left the media many years ago, but I've wondered many times about Gruzen's eventual fate. Anyone know anything about how he died?
I vaguely remember your name -- and I appreciate your filling in the gaps in my memory.
In any event, as a male, I continually lament the day-to-day horrors that are perpetrated upon women and girls and can only guess what stresses this subjects them ALL to, growing up and making their way through such a world, a world that makes victims of so many.