Had the distinct displeasure of seeing your drivel printed in my local paper recently. Although I recognize that all liberals are drooling buffoons, I must say you are one of the more bone-stupid liberals I've ever run across. How is it, I often wonder, that all liberals are so incredibly stupid? Is it in your DNA? Or do you just absorb all this stupidity naturally, while attending government run indoctrination centers (public schools).In any case, I hope that with newspapers going broke all over, in record time, that you soon find yourself living in a cardboard box under the nearest overpass.
Cheers!
That is one of the scores of typical hate letters I receive after one of my newspaper columns is published. In a normal week, I get about 40 such letters (plus a good deal of positive ones), and on top of that, the comments section of my columns - where posted online - are filled with stuff that's very similar. And, of course, there are the hateful - and very personal - comments left by people on some of my blog posts (although, not much here).*
All of it is, inevitably, anonymous - people will say stuff in letters and as anonymous commenters that they never would say in person, much less on a telephone. Some of it is from ideological opponents who hate progressives in general, other batches are from the self-loathers - those who say they are progressives, but angrily lash out at any progressives who are higher profile or more active than them because that somehow makes them feel small. And believe me - I have all kinds, many of them stalker-style in their volume/intensity of email/comments. It's kinda crazy, actually.
I'm a sensitive guy, so all the vitriol does not easily roll off my back - it has a kind of cumulative effect, which gets to be kind of depressing (which I'm sure makes the haters happy). You end up finding yourself hating right back - and then, I fear, after years of absorbing it all, you wake up one day and look at yourself in the mirror and see some awful person like Joe Klein staring back at you.
I go back and forth on how to avoid this future - and how to preserve some semblance of humanity in myself. Some days, I try to respond to the anger, but that only makes things worse, as the hate gets more intense. Other days, I think hard about how to extricate myself from blogging, writing and the media world in general and find a new career. Most days, though, it's just in the middle - I absorb it as an occupational hazard, remembering that you tend to hear more from (and, sadly, listen more to) your opponents than your friends/allies.
I write this not to complain, nor to Broder-ish case for "comity" and "bipartisanship," but to simply point out that I think there is some truth to the idea that the political discourse in this country has gotten toxically coarse to the point where we're not having any kind of discussion about substance at all.
Most often, the haters have succeeded in turning political discourse into a war of attrition against their personal demons -a war won by those who can go nuclear the fastest.
That's clearly been the story of the summer on health care - and it continues to be the story on most major issues. I mean, conservatives are quite literally calling the president's plan to promote the value of education to the nation's schoolchildren a secret socialist plot. All of it has convinced me we are living through one of the darkest periods in the last 50 years - one in which intense hatred has now become an accepted - even celebrated - part of our democracy.
For me personally, if I had to predict, I'd guess that this escalation will ultimately get me out of the writing/blogging/activism game at some point in the future. Ultimately, enough gray hair, chest pain, and hurt feelings just gets tiresome - and dangerous to one's health. But my personal decisions are not really important to anyone other than me and my family. What's significant in the broader sense, I think, is the overall trend and what it means for our country.
I'll put it bluntly: We are becoming a nation of haters - a nation, really, of assholes, or at least dominated by assholes. And sure, maybe we've always been that way - but what's different is that it's become almost impossible to pretend otherwise. There's no more delusions, no more fantasies. Despising one another and ignoring the substance of issues has become the defining mark of Americanness in the 21st century - and that's a tragedy.
* Just to be clear, when I refer to "hate," I'm not referring to disagreements on principle/substance. We have a lot of those here at OpenLeft - and those are healthy and constructive and important. When I refer to "hate," I'm referring to the kind of impulses epitomized in that one rather typical piece of hate mail. Hate is easy to spot - it's like obscenity: you know it when you see it.


Salon.com
Comments
I had to tune out of TV Network News during the Bush/Gore election cycle for my own sanity and I can't even watch The Daily Show without getting depressed.
The lowest common denominator is victorious.
I find myself wondering some days whether Rome in its dying days had its own versions of Limbaugh and Coulter, merrily dragging the empire down into the cesspool.
gah.
I hope you don't quit though. Among other things, it would only give the haters the satisfaction of having taken somebody down.
One day, this madness will be revealed for what it is and the time of illusion will be gone forever.
"We are becoming a nation of haters - a nation, really, of assholes, or at least dominated by assholes."
I will agree with the "dominated by assholes part" of this statement. I grew up in the sixties and I've seen a lot, but I don't think I've seen anything like this. I don't hate the other side and I don't believe you do either. I also don't believe most on the other side are hateful, but the haters scream the loudest and the meek do nothing to silence them. We have been dominated by bullies that understand nothing but bullying. I can scream louder than you can, so I must be right. Utter Bullshit is what I call it.
http://open.salon.com/blog/siobhan_curious/2009/08/31/bloggers_block
I'm not sure the States has a monopoly on, or even a majority of, the haters. I guest posted on a British education blog this summer, and although my posts received only occasional nasty responses, other posts were slathered with vitriol like blood thrown at fur coats. People feel entitled to be assholes on blogs, as though the people they're castigating are not people at all. (At the same time, I suspect that, even though the protection of anonymity may spur them on, a lot of these people are also assholes to the living, breathing people around them, at least those they're close to. Blogs also give a false sense of intimacy.)
And this problem is certainly not confined to conservatives. I wrote a post on Change.org a few weeks ago and was set upon by a pack of progressives who were outraged by the suggestion that students should turn their cell phones off in the classroom. It got really nasty. These people certainly think of themselves as liberals; in fact, one of them dogged me to explain what a troglodyte like me could possibly have seen in Obama, even after it was explained to him a couple of times that Change.org is not Change.com, and has no affiliation with Obama. (And that I am Canadian.)
Like you, I wonder if this will eventually lead me to stop blogging/writing online altogether. The difference between getting a bad review for a book you've just published and getting a rash of hateful comments on a blog is remarkable - the latter hits much closer to home, and it makes you really, really stressed; you watch the stats counter rise with ever greater anxiety. A bad review is a one-shot deal; a slew of nasty comments makes you feel like you're caught in the middle of a screaming mob and you can't escape.
I think this is now a reality for writers, and the more you are read, the more hatred you will receive. One of my favorite bloggers is Yarn Harlot, a Toronto woman who keeps a popular blog about knitting. Every year she writes a post on Canada Day about how much she loves Canada (she's Canadian). A few weeks ago she wrote a long, heart-wrenching post about she now has a reader writing her threatening emails and stalking her online, shrieking that she is anti-American. This is on a KNITTING BLOG.
Forgive me the extremely long comment. This topic has been on my mind a lot lately.
I can't even fathom such idiocy. Other Presidents have addressed kids, but um, they were mostly Repubs. Is it only ok then?
We are a growing nation of haters out of anger, frustration, lack of education, and just plain stupidity. I long for the days when we could talk all sides of an issue and still go out for a bite to eat and we still respected one another.
Hang in there. Your voice is important. It may be a voice that takes uber crap at the moment, but without it, those other louder, and more hateful voices will take over.
please keep doing what you do; we need more smart discourse in this country. Maybe plug Pepto Bismol or Rolaids in one of your next pieces and get yourself a lifetime supply :)
I am so sorry people seem to have lost the art of civil discourse. And yeah--worse--become such.... as*&()^%s
(I took a vow of Non-Violence, so I'm not using any profanity at all).
On my Facebook wall, when I posted the article reporting that President Obama would be giving a speech geared to children... OMG! the "haters" came out in full force.
Please know we care what you have to say. I consider myself a proud Progressive(left of plain ol' Liberal), but I'm moderate on many issues(for example, I support the Second Amendment), and enjoy real discussion.
Please DON'T QUIT WRITING.
If you quit, the "haters" win.
;)
And yes, I concur with your overarching point: we are losing our respect for others in what is becoming a society of echo chambers and alienation.
if you were more even-handed, or just had something useful to say about fixing america's problems, perhaps you would get less flak. in any event, get on with making your living, you're not totally useless.
There is a simmering magma of hate and insanity bubbling just below the surface of humankind. And it erupts in people with psychic weak spots, especially when anonymity and the privacy of your basement hideaway are involved (tho town halls and Fox News brings some of it out into the open). I know I have many hate-mail drafts blurbing and bubbling away, but I am sane (inhibited?) enough to keep from erupting.
Praise, appreciation, general niceness - they don't, unfortunately, have the same urgency to get out.
It seems that screaming the loudest without substance is winning out. I love emotion in pieces, in fact, I find it missing in a lot of political pieces that have substance. And those that have emotion, have hate, and no substance (and are usually coming from the right).
I've found, the hate is the cover for fear. Kudos for the good fight!
I'm a newbie hear, would be honored by your thoughts on my latest piece - You, Mr. Smith, Lincoln. Ciao!
After each day of dealing with evil she came home charged like a lightning rod, ready to unload on me or anyone available. It was difficult. I can imagine the experience is the same.
One thing she taught me: in America, nearly half of all female children are abused, physically and/or emotionally; and at least 25 percent or likely more male children are similarly hurt. These children grow up to be the very angry adult children who generate most of the screaming in society, in person and online.
Note, however, that the numbers are not incidental; they're huge! America, it turns out, is a Nation of Battered Children. The hate and anger felt by these adult children has been repressed by euphoria as the economy grew, as wars occupied emotions, and in general by rules of comity. All of that has evaporated and ours is now a metal to metal society rubbing raw and sparking.
Everyone is down on sex offenders but abuse in the home, where the vast majority occurs, is hardly dealt with at all. It continues to blight young people who grow into adults incapable of compassion or love. The result is as we experience it. The Big Lie of family values needs debunking, but soon it may be too late as the masses of damaged human beings finally overwhelm the rest of us who had either sterling childhoods or at least okay ones.
Think of the Night of the Living Dead. That's America in the 21st Century. Who would have imagined that George Romero's fantasy nightmare would become an allegory and our daily existence?
WS
I think he is apt for you, too, David. This heartfelt post is another turn of the prism, another look at the core phenomena that Craig Ferguson has distilled as a generation thinking it "cool to be young and stoopid". That is, a national wallow in froth, blather, and intellectual parfait, syrup'd over with hate.
The last thing we need is you gone. I can only approximate what it is like to endure this. In your admirably compact way you confess to a sensitivity to this on the personal level, one I share, so I don't know that I could follow this advice personally, in your shoes, but I give it nonetheless:
STAY. Write. Think.
We need you. The global fight against ignorance and oppression goes on. They are tireless. If it helps -- and it helps me -- here are some things:
-- Almost no one LIVES inside this hate, tho it appears they do. They indulge it. Sooner or later, most of them get up from the illusory safety of digital, stretch, and pet the dog. Remember that guy, respond back to that guy.
-- Almost all anger is fear. There certainly are some rageful sadists out there, but not as many as it seems. I know because i was that fear/anger guy at times; I have in the not-quite-dim-enough past indulged in vitriol, got stuck in a days-long online exchange I HAD to win, thrashed in the flesh-pot of self-satisfaction -- but lived long enough, wisely enough, to finally set it aside as a Way. Respond to that guy, hiding behind his wall of words.
-- Trust you are doing it right. I wrote a post recently that called for "retreating gracefully", but AFTER one has made simple attempts. Effective efforts, artful assertions. You do this already. The right people are reading you, and getting it. If their noise drowns out our appreciation lately, take away this: Your posts are coherent, direct, thoughtful. Informative. You have a real gift: the application of honed writing skills to the ever-evolving processes of a fine mind, turned toward justice. A rare gift. We need you.
-- A moan escapes this piece: that this is an original development, growing, destroying us, a unique historical mob. It isn't. One example: Alcibiades, Athens, 5th century BCE. Endless reversals of policy against the Spartans, led by raging know-nothingism, a populace so fearful they hastened to their own destruction again and again, in sometimes opposite directions with short years. So weird that General Acibiades led the Athenians, then the Spartans, then the Athenians again. At his return to Athens he wasn't sure if he was marching into Athens to be torn apart or lauded. The point is: his brilliant words, his command of reality, saved him -- and, historically, us & democracy -- and the venal inciters were cowed.
Cow the venal, David. Plant feet, speak. Brilliant words must command reality, especially now, when reality is rabid and good men & women flee.
We hear you. The rest is fear and fury, signifying biology and incompleteness. The wind will swirl it away.
Do you think that this vitriolic method of communication is coming about because prior to the internet and the popularity of blogging, people mostly kept to like-minded folks? I'm thinking that coming into direct contact with people of wildly divergent views is something we don't know how to do, which is curious considering that we call ourselves a Democracy.
The hate is not just on one side either, no I see it on both sides...Right and Left. There seems to be little middle ground left anymore.
Highly Rated!
And, if your feelings get hurt by the haters, it really is time for you to quit. It's nice you don't actually have to face people shooting at you like our kids in Afghanistan, a war liberals are starting to realize is just another quagmire.
Second, the haters are not really that many, it just seems that way because they are active and vocal out of proportion to their numbers. Take heart that your number of hate letters means you're reaching a whole lot of other people.
I think it's very important to distinguish between the true haters and the people who say a lot of angry things because they are confused, like the Tea Party people and the old Ross Perot crowd, most of whom are really clueless about how government and politics work in America. For those people, it's all about Future Shock. Remember that insightful book? Change disorients them. And as a recent study showed, conservatives just are not wired to adapt to change as readily as liberals. They get upset and sometimes angry. But they're not the real haters.
The real haters are the ones who understand plenty about our government and politics, but believe it should be in their power and administered ruthlessly in extreme right-wing fashion. Winning is the only important thing to them. Some policies are important to them, but mostly they are just tools to power. They don't believe half the things they say. They lie routinely, communicate by vicious rumors and unsourced emails, passed hand to hand among their gullible followers, and sometimes they create Big Lies and fight ruthlessly to have them seen as truth -- like "Global warming is a fraud." They will risk the future of the planet for their own ends.
They are fascists. It is long past the time when we should have understood clearly what that word means, and that people upholding it have a better foothold in this country than at any time in our history.
It's not really personal, and my feelings aren't hurt, but yeah, the general atmosphere of anger, ignorance, stupidity, and short-sightedness in our political discourse gets me down. I've lost almost all interest in commenting on our political situation; I don't have the mental and emotional resources to spare. Not that I'm anyone special, of course.
Over the many years I have been involved in progressive politics, I have found that it's easiest to turn the hurt into righteous anger. It should only make us stronger.
Hang in there. This, too, shall pass -- along with a good health care bill, I continue to hope.
Blow up your t.v.; throw away your paper;
Go to the country; build you a home.
Plant a little garden; eat a lot of peaches;
Try an find Jesus on your own. ---Prine
As for the loons, pity them. Remember how frightened you were when you were small and powerless and knew nothing. I'm just a lonesome Jewboy, but I like to ask my Christer brethren who would Jesus (Yeshua) hate? Who would Jesus kill?
Who would Jesus blog for?
Keep up the good work.
I hesitate to ask given your courageous admission of how this affects you - but - ask I must.
Please keep writing.
Joyce K. Reynolds
J.
I beg to differ. I am at my best when purely angry. Then I speak clearly, concisely, certainly and, most of all, quietly. Perhaps that is "righteous" anger as opposed to fearful, hurt rage. In that latter state, yes, I cannot think.
The political rage we see today isn't new. Remember Father Coughlin? There were more of his ilk in his time but I don't remember their names. In the central Minnesota German community where my mother grew up there were "bund" meetings between the world wars. (They may have been actually called Nazi but I don't remember.) The race riots and lynching in Duluth, MN; the KKK was active in southern MN. (I focus on MN because I'm here but mostly to illustrate that kind of racial rage wasn't purely a product of the Deep South.) Remember the reaction of the working class to "long-haired hippies" in the sixties and the resultant election of Nixon. The rise of labor unions in the last century.
Stupidity, ignorance, rudeness and rage, as another commenter described so much better, have always been a part of human discourse. It's just so much easier to spread it wider now. I wouldn't take it personally. A professional political writer, especially, shouldn't. You're really just a convenient target. If it wasn't you it would be someone else.
p.s. @ Greg Correll: on a nicer note, when I was a kid we had a dog named Sherman Alcibiades. :)
The problem today, in my humble opinion, is the very thing that we applaud and that you mentioned - the anonymity of the postings. Having said that it makes me wonder if I should walk the walk and sign my real name from now on. And if I were a better speller, I might do that.
sjo
Any number of ancient Greeks wondered, and the debate then carried over to our Founding Fathers (with a nod to Abagail Adams and other women like her of the time) whether to limit participation to people having a certain level of education or investment by virtue of property ownership. While I do not support these concepts, the fact that the only thing it takes these days to influence public discourse is to show up with a gun at a health care rally is perhaps a reason to rethink who gets to play. But of course, as long as United HealthCare or Exxon or WalMart get to influence the debate, it hardly matters what indiviuals do and say.
David, the loss of your voice on these subjects would be a major loss indeed. Do not give in to the dark side. Cheney lives there.
The hate is background noise, nothing more. It's a series of obstacles to be negotiated but not dwelled upon. Avoid it like you would other cars on the road. Just as you choose to focus on getting to your destination rather than the hair color of all the other drivers on the road, ignore the white noise of right wing haters.
And to shamelessly mix metaphors focus on the wheat, not the chaff, and you'll be thrilled with the wealth of healthy sustenance you are receiving.
Writing in 2009 requires the development of effective filters. And a highly honed sense of the absurd doesn't hurt, either. Hang in there, David.
Then don't write about politics. You say that you don't write this post to complain, but what is the above if not just that? When attacks have nothing to do with logic or the substance of a debate, there's no reason to pay any attention. As you say, "Hate is easy to spot"--usually in the first sentence--and thus it is easy to ignore.
"the self-loathers - those who say they are progressives, but angrily lash out at any progressives who are higher profile or more active than them because that somehow makes them feel small"
Man, if that doesn't sound gratingly self-important, I don't know what does.
Your main point that there's a lot of hatred in letters and internet comments is far from new. Anyone who follows comments knows this to be the case. Some insight into *why* the level of hate seems to be escalating could have been interesting. But this is just a rehash of pretty much any liberal, non-troll's complaints.
There's a lot of mental illness out there, and very little treatment available, even for people self-aware enough to seek it out. An even smaller subset can afford the pills or whatever. I think a lot of the hate is coming from people are crazy, drunk, off their meds, on drugs.
If the craziness is effecting your work, you should hire a temp to read your letters for you. Tell him or her to give you an executive summary of anything of value, and archive the rest. Put on some nice, loud music, take a vigorous walk, hug a kid or a dog or whatever will love you back, and find your happiness. We need you out here.
Someone else said something like:
"The stupid are confident in their stupidity, the intelligent are unsure in their knowledge".
I mean, even the haters buy your books. Look how many people on the left tune into Rush, Bill and Beck so they can get their daily dose of outrage.
If anyone is interested, David Brin writes about these haters, except he calls them indignation junkies.
"Thank you for fighting the good fight. Too many of us don't have the stomach for it."
Dump comment sections and the whole useless and destructive discourse will vanish at least in respectable media. Letters to editors are different--they have to be signed with a bona fide name and address.
Just dump this comment section, period! Way to go!
The culture (for lack of a better word for it) has always had an underbelly of fierce competition, if not overt violence; what should be the mitigating institutions are part of the problem. Add social anomie and material desperation, as in these times, and it makes civility or simple human decency an act of heroism.
Thanks so much for all you do to uplift us!
Your fan,
Suzan
>
I think you're that guy. There are a lot of soldiers marching in back, quietly choosing battles we can win. For instance, I was sickened by all the letters we got as a school board threatening revolt if our teachers showed the "indoctrinating" video of President Obama encouraging our children to value knowledge and education.
Now I could pick a fight with the lead mom stirring up the anger, but I can tell you with perfect confidence that I would be off the school board in May. So I'm here in back, fighting in the smaller skirmishes - arts funding over astroturf, real science in science class, Huckleberry Finn and To Kill a Mockingbird in the English curriculum.
I think these are important battles, too, but can't tell you how grateful I am for writers like you, smart and eloquent enough to give a voice to civility and reason. Hoping the support here will give you enough encouragement to keep marching.
I'm sorry, but I have to step up to defend Sirota here.
Take a look at just the titles of his pieces:
http://dir.salon.com/topics/david_sirota/
"The rich have never had it so good"
"Ready or not, here comes China"
"Dream big, Obama"
"Waiting for Obama"
"Obama's trail of broken promises"
"Democracy needs a bailout"
"The house that taxpayers built"
"Obama, the healthcare Riddler"
He's taken the left (particularly Obama) to task recently, time and again. It's amusing to me when people project their own behavior onto others.
How much more even-handed must a left-wing commentator be before he is immune to vitriol in YOUR opinion, Al?
Growing up in a Republican household I recall clearly the day I bluntly repeated back what I thought my father had been saying – “So it had been a good thing Kennedy was assassinated otherwise he would have destroyed America, right?” I think my father was a bit taken a back when I said that but he didn't disagree with me. As a kid I thought all Democrats were evil...just like Ohio State fans. Why? Because that's how I imaged my dad felt. I surprised him by growing up and becoming one of those hated liberals. So I don't think we've become a nation of haters, I just think we've always been one from the beginning and it gets passed down generation to generation if we let it and now it's very easy to pass the hate around electronically.
"All of it has convinced me we are living through one of the darkest periods in the last 50 years - one in which intense hatred has now become an accepted - even celebrated - part of our democracy."
In such agreement with you. Unfort, even if you dropped off the journalistic radar, you'd still feel it, I do believe. It's in the air. It's tangible and real, even if you move to Newfoundland. Especially if you're a empath or sensitive type.
With that said, my only two-bit advice is to remember that when you are really tapping into something important, it tends to hit a nerve. In other words, perhaps the negativity can be seen as validation that you are getting to the truth amidst this hateful atmosphere. You're waking the monster. There's a price you pay for that but it's a noble price. You're fighting the good fight.
Also, a little new agey words of wisdom: imagine a glass shield dropping around you, sci-fi style, when you open your email or even when you're writing a piece. This technique has worked for me in countless ways. It's like a magical bulletproof body cover. I truly believe you need spiritual techniques in place the more you put your ass out there - a spiritual "guard" of sorts.
Whenever you feel drained, you can guarantee that it's not just the bastards, it's a disconnect from your own spiritual side.
I've spent the better part of five years writing letters and emails to clients and associates in the name of my two bosses. I'm good at this, and I'm frustratingly kind to those who have complaints.
I'll answer every email and letter with over-the-top kindness while simultaneously restating the pertinent political point that spawned the email or letter in the first place. When I'm not smoothing out misunderstandings and quelling irate clients at my firm, I spend the rest of my time reading about policy and politics. In such, I'm your perfect shield.
Trust me Mr. Sirota, I'm good at this. Please don't stop writing, just hire me, a literal tackling dummy, to take the shrapnel for you. Our public discourse needs thoughtful and constructive minds like yours, so please don't let the chattering class force you from doing what you are so good at doing.
Best of luck, and please, keep writing.
BR
I'm sure I would feel differently after seeing untold numbers of letters like that, but I still think I would maintain my attitude that they are pretty funny.
Actually, the trend I worry about is not so much hate, as hysterical whining and crying about just everything. I cringed when I saw those oldsters at the town meetings, mostly women, screaming and crying about how scared they were and the government wanted to kill them, and on and on and on. All I could think was, "Get a grip, lady." Mean, maybe, but don't parents say the same thing to actual 2-year-olds all the time?
It is very, very difficult for the scrupled to triumph over the unscrupulous. Those of us who don't believe that the ends justify the means cannot whip up public rage with blatant lies and distortions, and with veiled appeals to our worst nature - fear of change, fear of "the other". We can only deploy the weapons of truth, and of a stiff-necked refusal to back down. Oh yeah, and sarcasm.
Our best hope is to call them on their lies, over and over again, and make them look foolish, over and over again, and to keep teaching our friends and our children that other people matter, regardless of who they are and how they live their lives. That belief, of the worth of every person (yes, even Glenn Beck), and the compassion it fosters, is what drives the whole progressive/liberal ideology. We're all in this together. The "other" is us.
"They are unanimous in their hate for me, and I welcome their hatred." - FDR
"One cannot use reason to argue somebody out of a position they did not use reason to get into"
The letters to the editor were uniformly about how great it was that someone shut up that jerk Lennon and how life in America will be ever so much better with him gone. I was amazed. I still am.
The first time I got a death threat in the mail becaus eI made fun of the Promise Keepers, I was doubly flabbergasted. Of course the brave writer forgot to sign the letter and supply a return address.
For fifteen years I worked at a independent free -standing non-profit Health clinic that provided 'well woman" gynecology , HIV & STD counseling and testing and first -trimester abortion services.
Before I joined the clinic as staff I volunteered to escort women(and men ) to the Health Center. At the time in the early 80's the clinic was heavily picketed by anti-abortion demonstrators. By heavily I mean , three times or more a week, with pcketers numbering 35 or more .the clinic was located on a busy corner of a four way intersection a block form a municip[al parking lot. Picketers would station themselves on all four coursners, stop cars and approch the drives holding pictures of bloody fetuses up to the windows , regardless of who was in them (yes children), they would walk backwards in front us as we escorted people ,in our faces close enough to have their spittle spray on us , and they were angry , red faced and mostly out of control . If you 'escorted " long enough , they found out your name , and followed you to your car when you left. this kind of behaviour has been documented at other clinics and far worse . When I began working as a staff meber I cannot conveey to you how many people over the years, media , clients, city managers , police, lawyers, family said "Why don't you just sit down with them and talk , have a dialogue and surely this can all be worked out. " You cannot have a dialogue with someone who doesn't listen , doesn't respond to what you are saying can never admit to any validaty of your position or of you even as a person.
I beleive I tried to the very best of my ability , on a group and individual basis to make this happen . i changed but none of them did or wanted to ,not even when they ened up being our clients.
i share this with you becasue it wasn't just about abortion. In fact I beleive now very little of it had to do with abortion. It has to do with fear . I feel the accountability lies with the peole who fanned the flames of their multiple fears for twenty years. WE have a firmly established "corporate culture " for which fear and fear mongering is SOP. The people speaking out at thse town meeting behave just like those picketers I encountered face to face they may in fact be the same people, and they have had 20 years to refine and hone their scare tactics. The media has been co-opted by this corporate sensibility and so they give the most energy and attention to these people acting out and ignore they truly deperate plight of many of their fellow americans. I suggest to you that you Not read all of the crap sent to you , but sample from time to time and then realize that you are NOT going to be defined by this person cowering in the darkness. It's difficult , but a rigourous self -examination is good for the soul and it is the very thing lacking in most of these people's character. For all their vaunted 'christian " sesnibilities I did not see much christian behavior on the street , or in front of my house or following me in my car, or harassing my children.
I don't have an answer here except to say it's our respeonsibility to live our lives in the most compassionate , thoghtful , , honest and connected way we can. As SARK says so wisely "we are all in the soup together". We have to keep reminfing people of this and lving like we mean it. The Dems and Obama won in Nov. , so we ARE in charge now and we better start acting like it. Just like I couldn't have a dialogue by myself. , we can't have "bi-partisanship " with only one party. Screw that , and lets get something done!
This is one reason I am not really a fan of the ubiquitous Comments columns everywhere. They are, as someone here noted, a "talk at you" place, not (usually) an "engage in dialog with you" place. I miss engrossing conversations in years past on Usenet, because the nature of forum postings is conducive to the back and forth of dialog, and if someone was spewing idiocy a certain amount of social control and peer pressure usually operated to talk them down off the ceiling and get them to actually engage in real discourse (either that, or they self-selected out of the process entirely).
I am wondering if one solution might not simply be something structural: rather than propagate comments fields everywhere (so easy with today's blogging sfw), instead, point comments to forums where people have to log in and have verified addresses. It is much easier to foster back and forth dialog in a forum-type setting.
True this is just one 'fix it' kind of thought, when I know you are lamenting a very real and toxic phenomenon. I've been subject to similar slings and arrows myself so I empathize with the problem. But to my way of thinking, there should be a way to re-organize our public discourse in a way that is more inclined to connect us as real people, not anonymized caricatures that seize upon every opportunity to vent.
Now, *that* would be the next Killer Ap on the net. Sigh.
I just wanted to add that it means a lot to me that someone of your stature can also be sensitive and affected by the hate. I'm very sensitive, which is why I assumed a few years ago that I could never be a writer. It's true that national discourse sucks right now, and it's dominated by the assholes who scream the loudest. Just know that everything I've read from you has been articulate and well-reasoned, which unfortunately is far more than can be said about the dominating discourse.
Okay, so what do YOU call someone who tells you they hope "you soon find yourself living in a cardboard box under the nearest overpass"?
assholes, or at least dominated by assholes.”
We aren’t “becoming” a national of haters, we’ve always been that way, just ask any member of a minority group.
“What's different is that it's become almost impossible to
pretend otherwise. There's no more delusions, no more
fantasies.”
Why would you want to “pretend otherwise?” Why would you want to live a delusion or fantasy? Reality is painful, yes, but it can also be changed. It will not always be this ugly. In the meantime, do what those of us who have also experienced hatred on an extremely personal level do – take a break from the letters, and reinforce yourself by spending time (online and off) with those who reinforce the positive aspects of humanity
The whole point of OS is for people to communicate and not talk *at* each other. By not responding to a single comment, you are essentially rejecting the importance of conversation and expecting the reader to just listen to you without you interacting. Why bitch about comments if you don't respond to any?
Right.
A la:
WMD, "keep the government's hands off my Medicare," No Child Left Behind, welfare CEOs (er, queens), Morning in America, Un-American Activities, Clinton impeachers, chicken hawks.
You are an earnest guy. What you need to do is adopt an asshole persona to deal with the asshole critic. For example- all those hate mail you get- you shold devote a section on your blog where you publish selected hate mail just so you can make fun of and insult these brain dead haters. Don't just take it like a punching bag. You need to fight back. Firing back against right wing loons is like shooting fish in a barrel anyways.
And start answering your comments. Here and on Daily KOS if you ever go back there again.
The backlash will come when this country has finally impoverished itself to the point that consumption, gadgetry, and efficiency for their own sakes are all recognized as pathologies.
DON'T read that crap. Ever. It will make you nuts and ruin your health. And it might make you stop writing.
And then they've won.
Take a look at Joe Klein's piece in the Aug. 31 Time. He suggests the same thing you do. Not so "awful".
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1917525,00.html
I haven't read your column before--I have read some of your stuff online, though. And didn't I see you on Real Time or something like that? I liked what you had to say, especially in a piece you did on why nobody in Washington is even talking about Single Payer.
I agree with what you say about this becoming a nation of (largely) assholes. I have been utterly disgusted with the greed and the stupidity (there's no nice word for this type of bullshit). You must get sick of being vilified for your liberal views--after all, you're in the public eye and more exposed. But truly, every reform supporter with any passion at all is taking at least some of the same hate that you get. I know I am. But I'm at a disadvantage. When I hear a coworker repeating things like death panels or age limits on life-saving procedures or other lies, I do not have the freedom to pipe in and refute them. My reply would only incite ill will in my workplace (even though she started it), and I could lose my job over this stuff. My own mother and father haven't really spoken to me in months over this same crap. (I had the nerve to request they not send me any more bullshit anti-reform, anti-Obama emails, and I had the poor judgement to point out the fallacies in the last one they sent. I was called rude and disrespectful even though I was anything but.) So I do sympathize with you, but I envy your ability to have an outlet for your views that actually gets read and commented on without threatening your livelihood.
The remarkable thing was how quickly it happened. And it started with the same kind of invective that you point to. It seems like we've crossed a line here at home and we're now on the far side of actual discourse -- in the territory of the assholes.
http://blog.sojo.net/2009/09/01/republicans-want-health-care-reform-too/
Steele: "No one will bother to read any of these bills themselves - let's make up a list of the scariest things that could possibly be there. Doesn't matter it if true because no one fact checks on Fox News."
Palin: "A good segment of the Bible belt is opposed to abortion. Tell them this bill requires payments."
Beck: "I'm not saying he's a communist, but did you see his arm looks like a sickle when he bends it? I'm not saying he is, but isn't that a symbol of Russia? Let's use that - a lot of the population remembers McCarthy."
Bachmann: "I already suggested that congressmen should be investigated for patriotism. That was my idea. Come up with your own."
Limbaugh: "Seniors are afraid of losing Medicare. Let's attack the public option, but not tell them they already have it. Yuk, yuk."
Palin: "Stop jumpin’, Rush. There’s no camera in here. I read the bill - a couple of sentences – wasn;t there something about end of life counseling? My witch doctor friend said it sounded like death panels. How about that? That'll scare 'em, you betcha. "
Bachmann: "Okay, now let's take a blood oath and get this plan moving. Sarah and I need to kick him out of office so one of use can be President."
Palin: "You betcha! But I think that will be a Palin-Bachmann ticket, Michelle. (wink)
Don't you kind of miss the peace, love, and folk music of the 70's?
Since you can't tailor a reply to every hate-mail, yet to leave it unanswered is depressing, may I suggest you come up with a short, impertinent passe-partout message to send to all of them? Speaking of the 18th century, how about Dr. Johnson's immortal zinger: "Your wife, Sir, under the pretence of keeping a bawdy-house, is a receiver of stolen goods."
Inflation, compared to depression and "jobless recovery"? Compared to a second Gilded Age?
How maligned those times were. But the Right was appalled, the Middle duped (as usual), and so we got the Great Obfuscator.
Will Moore
Valley Springs, California
I am a person stuck on public assistance and living in poverty because I have a serious chronic illness, diagnosed right when I got off of my parents' health insurance at a young age, and life in poverty is the only way I can get health care and stay alive here in the US. Had I been born in certain other countries (which are smart enough to not let me in now though), I might have a job/career... and/or... even marriage/children now. But I don't know any man wealthy enough to feel comfortable taking on my potential medical liabilities...and the same went for employers, some of whom would have lost their own precarious insurance status if they had taken on a worker like me. I'm not really well enough to have taken on more than part-time work anyway, but I would have liked to have tried a home business. Just to know I tried...
I've been waiting the 23 years since I myself was 23 for meaningful health care reform, and in all this time the stress of the poverty and of watching my productive years be wasted has finally made me sicker than I think I had to be. And the death threats and other special comments I have received from radical right haters on a regular basis have not only shocked me (I am after all a former Republican and I assure you I never behaved like this) now sometimes tip me over the edge into a true major depression, at which point it becomes doctor's orders to avoid a lot of people I would otherwise be happy to be friendly with, and to avoid the media as well!
I am now walking around with a bull's-eye and the words "user of entitlements" tattooed somewhere where only Freepers can see...and oh, do they take aim.
Since I'm now wondering if I'm going to make it much longer, what with living in California, the new "no welfare if we can help it" state, when I do show up in the public arena now it's to fight back. I've got nothing left to lose any more.
The smooth operators who hijacked the GOP c. 1980 and turned it into a proto-libertarian, chronically angry, permanently embittered, armed and dangerous mass of haters, most of whom are passionately fighting against their own self-interest, are the people I really want to talk to one of these days. They ruined my life and the lives of many others and I very much wish I could look them in their cold eyes and tell them just how much I appreciated this.
To their followers I can only say a few things, and those over and over again, in the near-futile hope something will stick.
1. Reaganomics may or may not have been worth a try...in the 1980s. That point is debatable. What is no longer debatable is that sopping up to the wealthiest 1% over and over again did not work, does not work, is not working, is not going to work. Been there. Done that. Ugly t-shirt.
Giving to the rich, and taking from the poor, did indeed kill some of us poor. Don't let anyone lie to you about that. It will kill more. I could easily be next. Ok, you may not miss me. But do not call yourselves followers of Jesus Christ. You've chosen that other master. Which is your right since at least some of us still believe in religious freedom in this country. It's the hypocrisy and lying parts that bring on derision, not your choice of Rush Limbaugh or the dollar sign as your idol.
They came for the poor first, but since at least last autumn if not before, they're now coming for the middle class. Go ahead, give the richest corporations more tax breaks and tell the wealthiest they don't have to pay even as much as they did under most of the REAGAN years. And then scream about how bad your schools are and the infrastructure and resource management (check out our wildfires in CA! as California goes, so goes the nation. Apocalypse soon.)
Kissing the round behinds of Big Business will not solve our problems with climate change. Nor will hiding your head in the sand, or blaming Al Gore for lying to you. And I'm not so sure the rest of the world is going to sit back and watch us ruin the planet because we are too stupid to do anything else. Just sayin'
Responsible adults eat their veggies, brush their teeth, shower regularly, and pay their taxes. As for those who are yelling out the contrary as you drive by their demonstrations in what little time you have after your longest work hours than any other workers in the nation...that is NOT tea they're drinking.
The huge drop in quality of life you are sensing does in fact have something to do with failed economic policies that for some reason just never seem to go away. Like swatting a fly and then, just at the moment of victory, another fly. Well those flies carry germs. And our government, starved of both funds and the respect and proud positive involvement of its citizens, now has to try to cope with swine flu. But just keep voting for those wingnuts. You won't pay any more taxes on your way to the complete breakdown of civilization as you once knew it.
You need to speak your truth and know that you are onto something and touch a very real nerve that these people are simply locked down and incapable of taking in new information, and always fear and loathe those whose voice is clearer and is unafraid of calling out bullshit.
As for the hate mail... scan a few and put the rest aside... but please keep on keeping on! We believe in you!
I have young children and I want their future to include voices and ideas like ours and to be able to call out bullshit without cowing to bullies and sycophants.
Thank you!
:)
Couldn't Agree More.
Excellent article....'bout sums it up.
What astute and remarkable comments (for the most part) you've had here. I particularly agree with those who identify the fear running amok and equate it with the hysteria rising.
If I took the time to quote exactly (my obsessive compulsive order/perfectionist complex), I'd never post this comment, so please be kind with my paraphrasing efforts:
"They drew a circle that cast me out.
Heretic! Rebel! A thing to flout!
But Love and I had the Wit to Win....
We cast a circle that drew them In!
(any smart person out there know who first said this?)
"Never doubt that a small band of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead
E.L. Beck also mentioned this one: "All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing." E Burke
The song that keeps going through my head (a universal 24/7 jukebox) as i read all of this is: "DON'T GIVE UP" by Kate Bush/Peter Gabriel(?) (a black and white music video i saw in the .......... 80's?????)
please some smart person out there in blogoland, teach me how to imbed!
Take care of yourself and your loved ones!
I hope you don't quit, though I would understand. But, we need you! Especially here in Oklahoma, where I live.
Thanks! LOVE LIGHT PEACE JOY!
..Actually.. um, I'm sorry, I disagree a bit.. more than ever now, people are experiencing the creativity of expressive communication on a grand scale... it may be ugly, but it's always been there in peoples heads, waiting to come out. Sorry if it hurts.. I truly am.
90% of the people are not courageous/talented enough to take those hits anyway..
Is it evil to say what's on their minds? I don't know. but I do BELIEVE that it all evens out anyway.
Maybe you would have turned into Joe Klein anyway.
The subjects of your discourse are self-serving cowards, untrained and stupid (My definition of stupid: self imposed ignorance...for whatever reason) - treat them as you would "spam"...for their vitriolic utterances add nothing to the positive progress of our daily lives.
The "clan mentality" of these individuals does not allow them to think "outside the box" which, I believe, keeps them from being influenced bydiffering, or objective, input. I pity their situation...but they should notbe allowed to undermine intelligent discourse.
Keep up the good fight...the "tilting at windmills" can have a positive
outcome:
Just then they came in sight of thirty or forty windmills that rise from that plain. And no sooner did Don Quixote see them that he said to his squire,
"Fortune is guiding our affairs better than we ourselves could have wished. Do you see over yonder, friend Sancho, thirty or forty hulking giants? I intend to do battle with them and slay them. With their spoils we shall begin to be rich for this is a righteous war and the removal of so foul a brood from off the face of the earth is a service God will bless."
One can only wish that "the brood" were imaginary....
btw, Can you imagine how Obama feels? Jon Stewart joked recently that we used to feel apologetic to the rest of the world for our president. And now it's our president who must apologize for us. One could understand if the man is just disappointed beyond belief at the country he leads.
I was profoundly confronted with this realization just yesterday, reading about people hating the president for supporting education, and it literally broke my heart. I became overwhelmed by the hatred and anger in the fight for "control" that the leadership of persons who have such thoughts and send such letters are willing to mislead, miseducation and lie to their constituency, with the only goal being that to obtain control. It's tragic that more Americans do not thing today about what they read and write, but more tragic still that their are persons in position of power who will happily exploit that for their own ends. And it's why we can't give it. It takes an incredible amount of strength and vision and belief in the moral high road to continue the fight in the face of such horrendous and personally inflicted victriol. But we have to be a little bit "more" than ever before, and we have to see... just the fact that they will stoop to these methods confirms that we are winning. that they are desperate. that their path is only growing more and more wrong. and it IS coming more and more clear as so.
My prayer for you is that you learn how not to "receive" it. You choose what you take into your heart and own. And if you choose not to take it into your heart and own it, if you say: HELLS NO THANK YOU! You will learn to laugh a tiny laugh when you see these, set up your own powerful boundary, and leave it lying in the dirt where it was conceived rather than tote it around on your own powerful back. Just leave it there. It's not easy, but it's a lesson I've worked 43 years to learn. And it is absolutely learnable!
Please, please, please don't own their crap - make them tote it around. And don't let this happen: "I'd guess that this escalation will ultimately get me out of the writing/blogging/activism game at some point in the future."
Yours in left-ism :)
Of course, you're right.
Here's a suggestion: when you get letters like that, read your own bio. You're highly respected by millions, have several NYT bestsellers to your credit, national syndication, and many fans.
Plus, you have loved ones who really love you.
The people who "hate" you don't even know you. They also don't think you are stupid, really. They would say that to anyone who disagreed with them.
So remember who you are and what you have done, and think (but don't say) "Screw you, haters!"
Rated.
That is the game -- inflame the ignorant masses so that nothing requiring reason and social responsibility can be easily accomplished. That way, the rich stay rich, no one has to share, and American remains the nation of estranged individuals grabbing as much as they can for no other reason that the fact that society and the economy allow for it.
I feel exactly as you do. The haters are turning me into a hater. Add Ann Coulter, Michelle Bachman, Sarah Palin and Michelle Malkin to the mix and it inflames me beyond the ability to maintain reason. We are a nation divided but I truly believe we can thank Fox News and Rush Limbaugh for that. If the right wing base didn't hear it or see it, they would not read enough or absorb enough to know much of anything about the economy or politics.
So, in my own fit of hatefulness, after arguing all afternoon about keeping kids homes from school on Tuesday I say:
May their ends be as painful as they have made us through their lifetimes...Oh, I hate to be a hater but today, I am letting it all fly from my fingertips....Hopefully, tomorrow will be a better and happier day? Only if I don't read, think or listen...;)
Would it help if you got more love letters? To maybe balance it out some?
Uh, sorry, no.
"oligarchs extending their empire" Ought to refer to the neo-con
grab of Iraq and the Constitution, or the reign of the corporate dogs on Wall Street and Capitol Hill.
"advocating a strong central influence"? As in lobbyist money, or do you mean Homeland Security? Then there's that pesky perennial military-industrial complex.
"the liberal movement" Is there any such a thing? Both the Dims and the Repugs are bought, and in their turn have sold out We the People.
However, calling this period one of the darkest times in the past 50 years is just another bit of hyperbole but this time it comes from the liberal side of the political spectrum.
I would certainly put 9/11/01 and the aftermath of arrests and violation of civil rights ahead of this tempest in a teapot. Also, I'd put the whole Vietnam and Civil Rights era ahead of this. JFK, King, Malcolm X and RFK all being killed within a five year span, race riots in major cities, and countless other faceless, nameless men and women had been victimized by racists. That ranks above this exercise in free speech.
I was born a month before King died. I didn't experience the 60s nor do I pine for that period. Some people know are being led in a demagoguery-Father Coughlin type manner and will eventually tire of this issue and move on to something else to be pissed off about. FDR went through this kind of hatred with the rich calling him a "traitor to his class".
Have liberals forgotten how much vitriol was heaped upon President Clinton during his 2 terms? From the moment he entered office, he endured charges that he was a Communist (from a visit to Moscow during his Rhodes Scholar studies), and that he was an upper-crust, Hollywood-type and out of touch w/ common people (remember the haircut on LAX's runway that locked up the airport for a couple of hours?). This was just at the beginning of FOX News' dominance of the airwaves back in the early 90s.
But, was it o.k. for the conservatives to bash him b/c he couldn't keep his Willy in his pants and swung too much to the Center for the liberals and progressives?
Unfortunately, this is the price we pay for the 24 hour news cycle. It's a monster, and it must be fed.
What is my response to your eloquent, personal statement, David? To use a somewhat vulgar, but apt, expression is "Don't let the bastards get you!"
This will take much self awareness and self esteem on your (and our) parts but is the measure of our quality, intelligence and heart.
As an older citizen, brought up in a civil home and community in the west, this breaks my heart. In the twilight of my life nothing could have wounded me more. I suspect that you, David, as well as all the extraordinary responses you have received feel this chagrin also. Few of these responses were trite, blasphemous or mean.
I shall take a degree of comfort not only in your splendid, personal article, but in the community of thought that it has brought forth.
"What irony that the man who aspires to be remembered as the great conciliator has had such a polarizing effect on our nation. Never in our nation’s history has one leader caused this much upheaval in such a short period of time. Are we really this far apart on matters of politics, matters of race or both?"
I can think of a guy (but don't take this as a comparison, just a response to your inquiry): Abraham Lincoln.
Even before he took office, 7 states had left the Union and 4 more left soon after.
It isn't just in writing. It's any profession that deals with the public. There is virtually no job where the public cannot act as you described.
Keep your spirits up, we need you, a voice of clarity (at least to us bone stupid, drooling buffoon liberals) and compassion (uh oh, sissy lib word) out of the midst of this howling wilderness. (Wait a bit and I'll start quoting Allen Ginsberg...) I do want to add to others here that times before have been as scary, we just didn't have the internet to spread the hate around at lightening speed. Reading about the days before JFK's assassination: the crazy, murderous anti-commie plots going on in Dallas; reading a biography of Jefferson, just as much muckraking, scandal mongering and attempts to destroy others political lives with total lies. So hang in, be one of the sane voices, please.
If nothing else, try to keep in mind that the more hate that you receive in response to your work means that you are hitting home with them! You are making inroads, and therein is the beauty of the work......albeit painful.
Chin up good strong soldier. You are loved and respected by the masses that DO support you, and that wish we were as strong and as articulate as you are.
Onwards, ever onwards! It is truly worth the fight honey....
Address the ISSUES baby, step up and offer solutions to real problems or step the fuck off. Attacking someone's clearly stated ideas without offering real alternatives is so stupid and immature that you sound like........Sarah Palin?
Imagine the kind of uproar we'd have in the White House if the right accused Michelle Obama of being an adulterer. Thankfully, that hasn't happened!
But this brings me to my theory which is not that we have become a meaner nation, but that the left has come to believe that offensiveness and hurt feelings are more important than standing up for what is right. We, the American public, need you to stand up for what is right. So the right has become rabid in their desperation to retain control. So what? Leave them to their tantrums. Name-calling is what children revert to when they have no rational argument. Why should we let that deter us?
I agree with Layne Redmond. I've been thinking a lot about this very subject this weekend, and I'm glad that you've written about it, David. What I'm beginning to see is that the hate is more than "spontaneous" -- it seems to be a deliberate tactic, a kind of cyber-bullying. The haters, the bullies, the screamers are deliberately trying to increase their power by shouting loud and terrible lies, knowing that the way the media is now structured, their lies and hatred will get legitimized by being broadcast.
There are people who deliberately get up early in the morning to be the first to post some barely literate attack-rant on every liberal article on Salon or on the liberal opinion pieces in the Washington Post. The purpose isn't to share an opinion; it's to pee in the pool. When a few of them do it, it makes it unpleasant for others to go there.
I'm happy to say that I think Salon may have cracked down on this phenomenon recently. I was nauseated by the comments following Ted Kennedy's death. I wish that someone had put in a filter to flag all references to "Mary Jo," "Kopechne," "Chappaquiddick" or "rot in hell," to look at them, see if the posting had a modicum of reason, and throw out the rest. (Please, right-winger, don't tell me for a second that you give one r**'s a** about that girl. If it had been a Republican senator instead of Ted, you would have been calling her a slut every time someone mentioned her name.) It seems that I can go to Salon's letters and read them again without having to take a shower.
We need to start calling this game out. We need to make a big, big stink about it to the advertisers on all of these shows. Otherwise, where will it end? Do we need another Oklahoma City bombing? How long can we just stand by and allow people to make millions by deliberately whipping impressionable people into a frenzy?
And yet, with all of that, you didn't seem to feel much hesitation before covering me with the same kind of nasty, hyperbolic, insulting language that you (rightly) object to here. One wrong doesn't excuse another. When people feel free to insult the messenger instead of the message, nothing is really accomplished other than stirring even more anger and resentment.
As I said in my open letter to you today, I hope you will choose not to become what you decry.
Peace to you.
If these so-called people hate you, then you are on the right side of history! Take heart!
http://www.jenmen.com/2009/07/wheres-love.html
http://dooce.com/2009/09/16/your-momma-said-you-ugly
She's on to something.
You are in a line that needs much resilience. All good luck!
I also believe that the media feeds into people's frustrations, whipping everything into a frenzy 24/7. The human psyche is fragile, and it is assaulted by turning on the radio, the television, driving on the freeway, crowding into the subway, waiting on line at the post office.
Maybe it's time we started turning things off and tuning into each other.
classified ads |employment|student jobs
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
I posted a little commentary on this issue here the other day:
http://open.salon.com/blog/clarkk/2010/01/20/political_discourse_preaching_screeching_or_art
I have to disagree, Mr. Sirota. The decisions you make regarding your work are very important to everyone in this country. We need people who are brave enough to speak out. We need you.
The collective angst of America has become a very negative force, and you are feeling that negativity. I am truly sorry about the haters, but please don't give them what they want -- and you know what they want. They want you to shut up. They want to take away your right to free speech because what you say makes them uncomfortable.
Thank you for all that you do. ~M. Roller, Tallahassee FL