Deborah Young

Deborah Young
Location
Small Coal-Mining Mountain Town, Colorado, U.S.A.
Birthday
July 30
Title
Sole Proprietor
Company
Western Colorado
Bio
Varied & Sundry

MY RECENT POSTS

Deborah Young's Links

My Blog Entry Index
Great Posts to read!
FEBRUARY 22, 2011 8:29AM

Privatizing Planned Parenthood

Rate: 7 Flag

Planned Parenthood is going to have to privatize. After a long and lucrative ride as the recipient of taxpayer dollars for abortions and other services, that ship is about to sail. Away. 

The GOP-led House passed an amendment Friday night that would eliminate federal funding for Planned Parenthood. Not ALL funding. Just tax payer monies. 11 democrats voted in favor; 7 republicans voted against. The measure passed 240-185.

Yes. Planned Parenthood has the right to operate. Yes, they have the right to provide services. Yes they have the right to offer abortions. But what they don't have the right to is federal funding. Federal funding is not a right; it's a dream come true, it's a Godsend for some and it's like money that falls from the sky right into your bank account. But during the worst economic free-fall in American history, somebody, a lot of somebodies, are going to have to bite the bullet. And instead of screaming for money that isn't there, how about using all of their lawyers and doctors and big heads and millions of dollars of surplus $ and just privatize their clinics and continue selling their services without the huge entitlement mentality?

Abortion is a constitutional right, it is not going away. But asking every tax payer in America to fund it during hard times is a hard case to sell. 

The Federal government does not have to fund my abortion or my car or my education.  

There are several issues that complicate the abortion controversy in America and they are never going to go away. They are facts. And because of these facts, the time has come to stop federal funding. Let Planned Parenthood join the free market and abortions can still be had for all. You just might actually have to pay for one.

One of the complicating issues is that Margaret Sanger who founded Planned Parenthood and lobbied for the whole concept of birth control did so for one purpose:  the extermination of American blacks, immigrants and indigents. She wrote about this in Pivot of Civilization, stating they are "human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning human beings who never should have been born." Her writings and views are both numerous and well-known. According to her, the purpose of birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds" which she wrote about in 1921.

Plannedparenthood 

In A Social History of Birth Control in America by Linda Gordon, she is famously quoted as saying, "We don't want word to get out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."  

Sadly, Sangers vision isn't too far off course in 2011. According to the Pro-life Action League website, abortions by race of the mother are broken down: 

  • White 40%
  • Black 31.7%  however, they are only 12.9% of the U.S. population.
  • Hispanic 20.1%
  • Asian/Pacific Islander 6.4%
  • Native American 0.9% 

So 12% of the population is having 31% of the abortions. This has not gone unnoticed in the Black community. 

"Let's be clear. Funding Planned Parenthood with U.S. taxpayer dollars is equivalent to justifying the use of tax dollars to help the Ku Klux Klan buy rope so they can secure their victims in the backs of their wagons," writes Walter Hoye of the Issues4Life Foundation in 2011. 

Another complicating issue is that while the Abortion law passed in January of 1973, sonograms that showed the fetal heartbeat at 6 1/2 weeks were just becoming a tool that could be used by doctors and in hospitals in 1972.  It would take several years for them to become widespread and used consistently. An example of a recent sonogram reading:  "The uterus measures 10 F cm in length. There is a intrauterine gestational sac with a single F live fetus with a fetal heart rate of 153 beats/min. The fetal crown rump F length measured 0.89 cm (6 weeks 6 days). A yolk sac is visualized." 

Showing a fetus' heart beating at 6 1/2 weeks contradicted the physicians who testified in support of Roe vs. Wade. They falsely claimed that aborted fetuses were only unrecognizable clumps of tissue with no feelings. This fallacy alone has fueled much of the anti-abortion opinion in the U.S. If indeed we are merely vacumming out a clump of cells, that's one thing. But when we now have a window into a womans uterus and can see a beating heart and a thumb-sucking fetus along with its gender at 11-12 weeks, it presents a whole other set of moral questions.

Add to that the new technology that allows doctors to save the life of a premature child. And that a new generation of parents are using their babies' 2 month sonogram as their babies' "first" picture for the babybook. You have a hard time convincing them that is not a child.

Another complication: According to the May 2009 Gallup Poll, 42% of Americans are Pro-Choice and 51% are Pro-Life. So the 51% are telling the 42% - it's your constitutional right but nothing says I have to pay for it! 

Radio Talk show hosts often comment on the fact that it is not religious people nor conservatives who are having abortions. Abortion goes against their religion and their values. So liberals are vastly over-represented and anti-abortionists like to point out, ironically, that liberals are aborting themselves out of existence. 

And yet another issue that complicates the abortion choice is....adoption. What did women do in America for the first 196 years before abortion became a constitutional right? Two things. They became parents or they put their child up for adoption. Coat hangers no longer remain a desperate choice in a society that not only accepts unwed mothers but celebrates them. Yes, in 1973, unwed mothers were still fairly taboo. Fast forward to the 2011 in the 21st century and you'd be hard pressed to find a scarlet letter anywhere in this country. Also, in the 21st century the quality and quantity of birth control options have improved exponentially allowing women to have a much better chance at preventing accidental pregnancies than in 1973. Times do change.

So when pro-choice supporters scream about coat hangers, pro-lifers see that adoption is a perfectly reasonable alternative and one that is historically accepted if you cannot afford to have your abortion.

When you give your unwanted child up for adoption, you are still free to live your life uncomplicated by an unwanted child, as well as giving that child life and giving a couple a child they will happily raise. 

There are always three options: Parenting. Abortion. Adoption. And they are here to stay. But the time of federal funding to abortion clinics is over. In America, nothing is impossible. Privatize, Planned Parenthood, just privatize.

 

 

 

 


 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Putting yourself out there early this Tuesday morning. Deb I can't find much to agree with here, but I respect your right to say what you believe.
It hasn't passed the Senate yet... so, who knows.
Dear moron, guess how many abortions Planned Parenthood have performed in their history. The answer ZERO. Stop listening to the propaganda of the brainless talking heads on faux "news" and think for yourself for once.
Nothing should be touched and we should not have men deciding what we can do with our bodies and that we should pay for it.
Rated with hugs
Good grief...so much to dislike about this post, so little time.
Please be kind to Deb, she has been nothing but kind and supportive with me. I'm grateful she is putting more information up because I want to understand all points of view. This is her point of view, I have mine. It will take me time to sort it out and continue my comment as I have a different POV to express.

Thank you Deb, for this post. I still struggle with completing the other thing because I'm having so much trouble with my brain function and comprehension. I'm very grateful for the words you sent.
Disagree. Strongly.
I don’t think other women were wrong to abort, I believe in souls and I believe the soul will continue and find another parent. Perhaps the same ones, I have no idea, I also believe when I die I will still exist but not have a body. These are my personal beliefs, I have no idea why they are inside me.

There is an ugly seed of envy in me when others can grieve (and I know they do) and get past it, and I can’t. I have friends and family who have had abortions, each one of them struggled long and hard to choose. It is a huge burden to choose even if you don’t want to be pregnant, but it was the right choice for them. I know adopted children who were abused, that was part of my choice to abort. Once I give my baby away I cannot protect it. I did not want my baby to have a childhood like mine. I must live with my choice which was wrong for me, I pray my baby found a better mom as I kept the others and couldn’t find a good enough job or the right kind of husband to take good care of them, or me.

Luckily we were never a social burden as I was strong enough to work two jobs and take care of them. Some moms are not as lucky, perhaps they are ill and can’t work two jobs to feed their kids, or stand to be abused to support their family. I am not special, I am lucky to have been strong and healthy and very smart.

I have issues with where my tax dollars are spent too. I have always paid an enormous percentage of my income on food, housing, utilities, gasoline and used clothing. My tax dollars are very very precious to someone like me. I have little left over to waste on luxuries.

I have to pay taxes for airports but have not had excess to waste on a vacation since the mid 1990’s. Instead business people are jetting all over the globe daily sending away my job and I’m paying for it.

I have to pay taxes for funding colleges so that businesses can have workers with the latest skills. Are we to start funding manufacturers re-tooling their equipment too?

I have to pay taxes for loans and grants so people who birth control did work for can receive a publicly supported education and make more money than those like me.

Those educated people and profitable businesses can purchase all the things my tax dollars supported. It is supposed to be for the public good, I don’t care if doctors go to college if I can’t afford to pay for doctors or medical research. It doesn’t benefit those like me. I need my money to eat, not waste on luxuries I can’t afford.

My personal point of view might be that we should privatize all the things that many people don’t benefit from. For all I know the child who held the final key to curing cancer or diabetes got addicted to crack and died in a ghetto 10 years ago. It won’t change my life, if I get diabetes or cancer, I don’t have enough savings left to pay for it and I will just have to die.

I rarely eat sugars so if there is research I don't want it focused on diabetes, I want it focused on heart disease (family history and I still smoke a little), I have zero family history of cancer. If I do get ill, when I’m dying I won’t even have saved a lot of money in taxes or memories of vacations and buying nice cars to console me.

I have no idea where we start to draw the line, I can’t seem to find the right point of view. It all seems like an endless circle to me, perhaps it's just my brain not working properly.

Thank you for your post, I know it's not easy to have a different POV. It would be easier for me if we were all the same.
Might I suggest you review the School House Rock song "I'm Just a Bill". The lower House has passed a bill, how much do you want to bet it on it's chances in the Senate?
This Bill is not law yet so no defunding yet, hope that helps.
Without getting into the abortion debate I would say that Congress' vote, along with others (PBS, NEA) is a "pissing in the ocean" strategy of budget cutting. This gives the House the opportunity to cut or gut programs that they hate, under the guise of "we're broke" even though these cuts will do NOTHING to solve the debt crisis. When Mr. Boehner & Co are willing to take on Medicare, Pentagon, SS, etc, then I'll take this seriously.

As usual though, even when we don't agree, I love your writing!
Ocularnervosa,

Before calling someone a moron, you should check your facts before you mouth off. While not all Planned Parenthood clinics perform abortions, some do. here are the stats from Planned Parenthood themselves

http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/AR_2007_vFinal.pdf

You need to stop getting your fcats from Huffington Posts
Rated because it's well-written, though I disagree with pretty much all of it.
I also rated on the basis of excellent writing - nothing to do with the concept.
♥R
Except there are three very important points you're not acknowledging here:

1) The federal government already DOES NOT fund abortions. This was strictly encoded in the Hyde Amendment, and taken even one step further in the Health Reform Act. Not one single penny of federal money goes towards abortions, period.

2) Abortion only accounts for *3%* of Planned Parenthood's services (http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/PP_by_the_Numbers.pdf). 3%!! The other *97%* of their services include providing contraception, STD diagnostics and treatment, and general health care (e.g., annual exams for women). Increasing access to affordable contraception *demonstrably* reduces the number of abortions - why on earth do you want to *decrease* contraception access - and increase the number of young men and women who suffer from undetected and untreated cancer and other diseases due to the loss of affordable health services - in the name of reducing abortions?

3) The same bill which defunds Planned Parenthood also eliminates all Title X family-planning services (see: http://www.americanindependent.com/170239/house-votes-to-block-all-funding-to-planned-parenthood). The vast majority of Title X funding is used to provide women's health care and contraception access at health department clinics. Within your home state of Colorado alone, 46,400 women received Title X-funded contraception in 2006, over 40,000 of which was at health department clinics (stats here: http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/title-X/CO.html). So even if PP privatizes, what are these other 40,000 (in one state alone, not to mention the other 49) supposed to do?

It is the height of nonsense to reduce contraception and increase the disease and mortality rate amongst young men and women in the name of "preserving life".
PP doesn't only provide abortion services, and not all PP does provide services. As you live on the Western slope, it reminds me of the time I lived in Crested Butte in 1991 and a friend of mine, 16, got knocked up sleeping with her 34 year old boyfriend- if one date makes one a boyfriend. She grew up mormon, in Texas, and wanted sex, so her mom let her marry with the requirement she use birth control (as her mormon husband was also into drugs, alcohol, hitting her and pushing for porn and anal, I know this, as she told me why she got divorced). She wasn't allowed back in church around other teenagers, as she was too mature. She was sent to live with her cousin, who lived in CO. Granted, cousin was a 30 something man who didn't know how to control her. She snuck out with his friend, slept with him, and ended up pregnant. I know, I had to buy her the kit because I was old enough. They had to drive her 5 hours to Denver to get her an abortion. Cousin had to pay for it, and take the time off from work, and spend the days getting there and back. She was really lucky, as she didn't have a job, an education (remember, married at 14). The abortion wasn't free, they rarely are, but they are subsidized to make sure the clinic is standing, there is a doctor, and the patient is provided adequate care. All medical care in this country is subsidized by federal funds- and medicare and medicaid are far more costly and less effective than birth control and abortion services in terms of the impact they can have on allowing people to grow up and become productive tax paying citizens instead of living off of welfare. Defunding Title X means more poverty and less education and less wages and less contribution to Medicare and Social Security. It also means competition between poor babies and poor old people for food. Who do you think is going to win that one? When it comes down to life and death, I guess death panels just mean having to learn to steal food and health care from other people, winning by default.
Where do the girls of Montrose get their abortions? Paonia, Leadville, Durango, Silverton, Gunnison? How many miles away and hours must they drive, or have to hitchhike (a common practice) to get services?
Here's the text from the Planned Parenthood website page on abortion:
There are two kinds of abortion in the U.S. — in-clinic abortion and the abortion pill.
Abortions are very common. In fact, more than 1 out of 3 women in the U.S. have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old.
If you are pregnant, you have options. If you are trying to decide if abortion is the right choice for you, you probably have many things to think about. Learning the facts about abortion may help you in making your decision. You may also want to learn more about parenting and adoption.
If you are under 18, your state may require one or both of your parents to give permission for your abortion or be told of your decision prior to the abortion. However, in most states you can ask a judge to excuse you from these requirements. Learn more about parental consent for abortion.
Only you can decide what is best for you. But we are here to help. A staff member at your local Planned Parenthood health center can discuss abortion and all of your options with you and help you find the services you need.
I think the issue is that the anti-abortion folks want to prevent the mere talking about abortion as an option.