Debra Sweet's Blog

Stop the Crimes of Your Government
Editor’s Pick
FEBRUARY 6, 2011 9:51PM

G.W. Bush Cancels Europe Speech to Avoid Prosecution, Protest

Rate: 19 Flag

From the Center for Constitutional Rights comes good news…  G.W. Bush has been forced to cancel a speaking trip in Switzerland next week to avoid being charged in a torture case:

“CCR, with the Berlin-based European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights (ECCHR) and Paris-based International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH), have spent weeks preparing a 2,500 page torture case against Bush that would have been filed on Monday, February 7 – the anniversary of the day, nine years ago, when Bush decided the Geneva Conventions didn’t apply to ‘enemy combatants.’ Bush was due to be in Geneva on the 12th, and his presence on Swiss territory is required for the prosecutor to take action.

“The complaint, brought under the Convention Against Torture with the support of 50 NGOs, two former UN Special Rapporteurs on Torture and two Nobel Prize winners, was on behalf of two torture victims, one who is still at Guantánamo.

“Whatever Bush or his hosts say, we have no doubt he cancelled his trip to avoid our case. The message from civil society is clear – If you’re a torturer, be careful in your travel plans. It’s a slow process for accountability, but we keep going.”

In the Guardian UK today:

The visit would have been Bush’s first to Europe since he admitted in his autobiography, Decision Points, in November that he had authorised the use of waterboarding – simulated drowning – on detainees at Guantánamo accused of links with al-Qaida. Whether out of concern over the protests or the arrest warrant, it is an extraordinary development for a former US president to have his travel plans curtailed in this way, and amounts to a victory for human rights campaigners.

Reuters reports today in Bush’s Swiss visit off after complaints on torture:

Bush, in his “Decision Points” memoirs on his 2001-2009 presidency, strongly defends the use of waterboarding as key to preventing a repeat of the September 11 attacks on the United States.

Most human rights experts consider the practice a form of torture, banned by the Convention on Torture, an international pact prohibiting torture and other cruel, inhumane or degrading treatment or punishment. Switzerland and the United States are among 147 countries to have ratified the 1987 treaty.

Bush was to speak at a Jewish charity function.  McClatchy newspapers report:

“Protest organizers told participants to bring an extra shoe, prompting fears that someone might re-enact an Iraqi journalist’s 2008 assault on President Bush in Baghdad. The reporter hurled his own footwear as a sign of contempt.”

Whether the threat of prosecution or the threat of determined mass protest caused the cancellation of Bush’s visit, it’s a sign that people are paying attention, and acting on the necessity of holding Bush accountable for war crimes.

Share/Bookmark

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
The events in Egypt more or less buried this remarkable story. Imagine that: A former U.S. President can't go to... Switzerland???
It's about darned time.

Wish we could extradict him.
Thanks for posting this. Once a criminal always a criminal. I agree with Roger!
This should really be on the cover and make EP!
I wish he had went and gotten taken away into solitary confinement.
Sigh....good ole Shrub. Can't even travel the world. Ain't it a shame...
Sweet!

But, I fear that Obama is going to end up in the same situation. He hasn't done much to change our policies, has he?
His going there would be as if Hitler could have gone to Israel.
Screw you, Godwin.
The analogy is a good one.
Bush is not the first one unable to travel abroad. The road to recovery and reconciliation and rising from the insane and immoral wars that was committed is hard and difficult and long. There was Henry Kissinger who was served with an arrest warrant, and then Donald Rumsfeld. .. I believe we will not see the end of this. There must be accountability for what was done in our name. As someone once said, "In a democracy, some may be guilty; but all are responsible."
Too bad he didn't go, actually. He should be prosecuted.
The protest organizers REALLY BLEW IT! Had they kept quiet, he may have been arrested upon arrival. W in handcuffs and an orange jumpsuit would have been priceless. Damn!!!
Pinochet was able to convince some British judges he was too doddering to be prosecuted. Maybe that could work for W.
I continue to be patient. The arrogance of putting such statemens in his memoir and expecting life for him to continue as usual. There will be a reckoning for Bush and his ilk. What form it will take, and where it will come from I don't know. But it will come.
He needs to be buried in a landfill somewhere so his pervasive stink can't embarrass us anymore. The evidence that 9/11 was an inside job is overwhelming, with available video evidence of the explosion patterns of the buildings. That might explain why he was not surprised when he was told about it. Videos of that, too. What a skunk! I'm not supposed to be hating. It's bad for my heart. But he really stimulates the possibility to be overcome. Thanks for posting this, Debra Sweet. I have shared it on facebook.
Glad this made cover and EP!!!! I also put it on my Facebook page.
It would have been interesting to see it play out, if it did.
This episode underlines a point which I tried to make in my own blog about two-tiered justice. Here we have a person who happens to be an ex-President actually admit to having ordered torture on a class of people, get away with it scott-free. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and some lower level toadies are, by any reasonable measure liable for war crimes. Yet the Justice Department has stated unequivocally that they have no intention of acting in the face of these admissions.

Yes, it would be traumatic for the country to watch a former chief executive stand before the bar of justice, but one wonders which is more damaging: a fair trial or the knowledge - the certainty - that some Americans are simply above the law. Are we no better than a banana republic?
Too bad the plan wasn't kept a Swiss state secret.