I live in Mississippi. I am surrounded by churches, there are 3 within one block of my house. Many of my friends on Facebook are from Mississippi. But when I posted a NYT article on my FB page about the Oklahoma abortion bill, I never imagined that anyone would see this law as anything but wrong. The bill forces all women who want an abortion (including rape and incest victims) to undergo a detailed descriptive ultrasound and it allows doctors to hide facts about birth defects from parents. Obviously, I was mistaken and people found my link offensive, I took it down, FB is not a forum for serious discussions on life and morality.
Later in the day, I was chatting with a friend who is very ambivalent about abortions. Both of us are from the same medical school in India and we have seen plenty of MTPs (medical termination of pregnancies). In fact, I believe we were supposed to have assisted in 5 to clear our OB-GYN posting.
In his opinion, there was nothing more heinous than selective female abortion (sadly extremely common in India) . Abortion heinousness had grades, the lowest heinousness was for birth defects incompatible with life, followed by birth defects compatible with life, followed by cases of rape and incest and the most heinous cases were women using it as birth control and selective abortions of the female fetus. He also had serious reservations about 2nd trimester abortions, arguing that 20 weeks is no different from 32 weeks which is no different from a full term baby. "Society has a say in the care of the fetus, it is not the mother who has sole responsibility "
2 years ago, I would have agreed with him. 2 years ago, I found myself pregnant and everything changed. My pregnancy was not easy on me. It was a precious pregnancy after an infertility battle and I was plagued by anxieties. My triple test came out positive and I had to undergo an amniocentesis. The DNA analysis took 2 weeks and they were the worst weeks of my life because for the first time, I had to think of the unimaginable. At that point, I knew that if I had to give up the baby, I would lose myself entirely. And I also knew that I was grateful that I had the option. As it turns out, the amniocentesis results were negative.
How can it be more socially acceptable to abort a trisomy 21 (Downs) baby than a healthy one. Several people with Downs or other congenital defects have fulfilling lives. They may not be "normal" in the 2 standard deviations kind of way but that does not mean they are not happy. There is a point to this, the point being that all abortions are essentially the same. It is an either/or situation . The pregnant woman who thinks that the fetus being female is a grave birth defect is really no different from the pregnant woman who thinks that a chromosomal anomaly is a grave birth defect who is no different from the pregnant woman who thinks that the unwanted fetus is a defect in her long term plans. It is all the same to the fetus who gets aborted. There are no grades of heinousness, all abortions are essentially heinous.
Abortions are a crime against nature like suicide is a crime against nature. Taking a life is a crime against nature and abortion is very very close to suicide. When you have a baby in you, it is a part of you. Killing it would be like ripping your soul.
The same way, there is really no difference between 24 weeks and 32 weeks. A baby is viable at 24 weeks now with the current state of NICU care. But if you go back, the fetus has life from the time of the zygote. There is a heartbeat at 5 weeks, we know that.
Despite this, I strongly believe that the only person who has the right to decide about a pregnancy is the woman who is pregnant. If she has the right to cut off her arm, if she has the right to kill herself, she has the right to an abortion. A woman is more than a womb, she is a living person who has the right to choose if she wants to bear a child. Society does not have a role in this, it is her right and her right alone. I believe that a woman should have the right to deliver the child when she chooses. Let them not kill the baby, just induce labor at 20 weeks, at 24 weeks, at 30 weeks or at 38 weeks. There is no rule that forces a mother to care for her child, she has the option of letting society raise the baby, so be it for the fetus.
It is a hard, terrible soul-ripping decision and the least we can do is offer our sympathy and support. Women who decide to have abortions do not need to be shamed or humiliated. It is a desperate decision, and I have nothing but support for them. "There for the grace of God go I".


Salon.com
Comments
A few comments:
re: the Oklahoma law - it's booshit booshit booshit, and I hate it and have donated money to fight it, to no avail.
The Real reason to make abortion a crime is to disempower half the population, and manufacture ways to continually question their sanity and humanity simultaneously. It's a man's world, baybee.
I had a miscarriage, oh, 17 years ago or so. It was hard. It was difficult, emotionally, physically. But the POC - as they so aptly termed it at the ob/gyn service [the products of conception] -simply weren't meant to "be". As the (female) doctor put it: Who were they - who are anyone - to question that value judgment my body made for me. The POC were not viable. Hmm....
It's not always possible to bear a child. It's not always advisable. It's not always desirable. But to say that every spark of life is precious is belied by the fact that nearly 20 million children - children only - live in poverty each day; 13 million are hungry Right Now. Let's take care of the precious sparks we've got, and stop condemning women for making their own decisions.
I have seen what happens when abortions go wrong, luckily most doctors in the USA have not seen that.
Making abortion illegal is not going to stop abortions, it is just going to make them more unsafe for women.
And yes, the "already born" matter much much more than the "unborn"
Ultimately, you have to draw a line in the sand. Yes, there will be little difference between the fetus/zygote a day before and a day after the line, but that's life.
Because if we get into saying every zygote deserves life, what about all those frozen embyros from IVF?
The idea is as silly as
I'm with Connie, reproductive issues are really about power over the half of the population that bears the burden of motherhood. Equality (or some semblance thereof) can never be reached unless women have control over their own bodies and their reproductive freedom.
There is no neutral here, and inducing an early birth is not neutral. The entire issue of birth and non-birth needs to be managed according to the religion of the mother. Anything less is imposing your value system on another.
And even as to community rights, a child would be raised in the religion of the parent even if the community disagrees, so the notion that a community with unlike views should be able to intervene even to the extent of forcing the pregnant woman to refer to a fetus as a person is already a violation. It frames the discussion unfairly.
The assumption seems to be that every child, given a choice between a world where they might be aborted or a world where they would be allowed to live, would immediately change religions. If this were true, none of us would have a religious philosophy that admitted abortion. But the truth is that many of us believe abortion is rational and appropriate under a variety of circumstances, even necessarily some circumstances that might have precluded our own existence.
There are no easy answers. Alleged killing on one side, and I would allege nothing less than slavery on the other. It's not like there's an easy position and a hard position, there are just complex choices... choices to be left to the women.