Writers have always served as a wellspring of inspiration for the world. That is precisely why we must seek to be better at our craft.
The past few decades have witnessed a devastating decline in literacy, decency, accuracy, and proficiency when it comes to the written word.
When a world leader is so inarticulate that listening to him speak is likened to, “watching a drunk man attempt to cross an icy street” the standard of what is expected in the realm of communication is clearly lowered.
Yet after replacing such a conspicuous example with an articulate, educated, thoughtful leader the standard for professional journalism has barely seemed to change. Why?
Because writers often fail to recognize that influence is an enormous power and it is that power which writers can skillfully wield. When writers conform or adapt to the status quo of any age they forfeit this singular power and severely diminish or lose whatever influence they could have exerted in their generation.
Influence is a far greater power than any form of authority. Historically speaking, empires come and go but the inspiring written word endures for ages - outliving and often proving to be an integral factor in the rise and fall of the empires that sought to rule forever.
Think on that for a moment please.
As a writer you possess the power to influence. A power which is greater than the mere ability to command.
Governments and other forms of authority may be able to command outward obedience or allegiance but writers can capture and move the human heart.
The pen truly is mightier than the sword in the long run.
Writers move people to think, to feel, to believe, to hope, to brilliance, and to action. People change their minds, their beliefs, and their lifestyles based upon some written word that has inspired them. And the change that one person experiences is often passed on to another and to another and to another because of that same written word.
A writer’s reach extends far beyond the writer’s geographical locale. The reach may surpass anything the writer ever intended or dreamed possible in their life - especially in this age of the world wide web.
With all of this power to inspire, to move, to motivate, and to influence shouldn’t we aim higher than we have been?
If we aim at the moon we may hit the lamppost. If we aim at nothing worthwhile we will surely hit it.
It’s easy to settle for sensationalism, yellow journalism, and hype. It’s what we we have been raised on and inundated with for years. But just for a moment consider this: Should writers and editors seek to conform to the standard and pitiful status quo of our literary times or should we seek to aim higher, to improve upon what has been left to us, and to leave an even better form and future to those who will follow?
We don’t need to be preachy but we should be passionate. The desire to impress may be better replaced with the desire to leave lasting - even lifelong - impressions.
Not everyone is gifted to compellingly comment on current events, nor to write spellbinding fiction, nor to delightfully entertain others with satire. But no matter what our chosen form we can all seek to inspire. We can all strive to improve our craft. We can all conspire to be better at what we do. Whether we inform or entertain we can seek to allow those who read us to soar.
When I was young I was introduced to Socrates, Aristotle, Plato, Homer, and other masters of words. Deep inside I always wondered where were their contemporaries in our time? It may be arrogance to believe that any of us could stand among such giants of history but isn’t that far preferable to dwelling comfortably with the unethical, ill-mannered, moral midgets of our day?
I deeply admire so many of the writers in this forum. I believe you possess incredible gifts. You inspire me to write better and to be a better person.
But I believe we all can still improve. We can write better. We can edit better. We can choose better topics and communicate our responses to those topics in a more thoughtful and insightful way.
This forum must take care not to become an inbred, self-aggrandizing, commentary on itself and its writers. It can and should be so very, very, much more. OS offers a wonderful opportunity for thought and feeling and motivation and instruction and education and laughter to find wings and take flight.
To those of you who have inspired me to be my best I offer my humble heartfelt thanks. Open Salon can be a place where we all strive to better the world of writing - whether it be fanciful or factual in its focus. This is something I believe we can do. This is something I believe we must do or we’ll risk losing our precious opportunity to influence our world for the better.


Salon.com
Comments
Your thoughts are so elevating and inspiring. Yes, we can (to paraphrase our well-spoken President) seek to persuade, to share perspective, to set alight and offer change rather than the insipid fare of reality shows and just plain bad writing.
OS is unique. I do feel that you are right and that we have an opportunity here to make a difference or, at the very least, give voice to it.
Thank you, Dennis!
Kind regards,
Stephanie
Thoughtful, inciteful and intelligent without hitting me over the head. Great post. You are absolutely right. We have a power and it's important to remember that.
I remember that all the time - you've said a version of it here that is more inspiring at a higher level but to get where you say we should go/be (and I agree), you have to follow this guy's advice. There's just no getting around it.
Everyone who is good at their profession has usually learned much at the hands of others who are also quite good at the profession - I've had 2 or 3 really inspiring professional mentors. But the cool thing about writing is, there is such a wide field to choose from for mentoring - you can read literally hundreds, thousands of writers and enrich yourself with their unusual points of view (John Irving), their workmanlike capabilities (John Grishman) , their soaring prose (Chang Rae Lee, Michael Ondadtje), their brutal economy that communicates as much with that isn't said (Josephine Hart).
"This forum must take care not to become an inbred, self-aggrandizing, commentary on itself" - yes, that could be a cancer here, if we're not careful that it not be.
Thanks, Dennis, this really made me think and reflect on the more important reasons why it's important to be good. It reminds me of one of my favorite sayings (from Lincoln): Whatever you are, be a good one.
I believe words are far more powerful than any of us realizes. "In the beginning was the Word, and the word was with God, and the word was God." It is words that create new worlds, words which create the universe. It is very important that we think about the words that we use and put out into the universe. If the words we are using do nothing but create strife and conflict, we should seriously consider shutting up - until we come up with better words.
Any time someone comments on something I have written, I realize that it is indeed a very powerful thing to have someone read your words. It's an incredible responsibility, even on a small scale.
"This forum must take care not to become an inbred, self-aggrandizing, commentary on itself and its writers. It can and should be so very, very, much more. OS offers a wonderful opportunity for thought and feeling and motivation and instruction and education and laughter to find wings and take flight."
How is it that if you aim at something really lofty and miss? But you aim at nothing at all and you hit it? Is your "aim" only reliable when its directed at nothing? Why can't you aim at nothing and strike gold? I think history has revealed just as many instances of individuals just stumbling upon fortune, greatness and innovation as those settling for nothing but the pinnacle of success.
But just for a moment consider this: Should writers and editors seek to conform to the standard and pitiful status quo of our literary times or should we seek to aim higher, to improve upon what has been left to us, and to leave an even better form and future to those who will follow?
We should always seek to aim higher. This mindset led the Wright brothers to flight, and ultimately led us to the moon. So as creative people we should always reach for the stars.
No, reaching for the stars would be attending to that part of your game where you are most deficient. It would be making yourself the best damn basketball player you CAN be.
I can't possibly fathom what would be wrong with that....
I am so very grateful to read what you wrote. So incredibly tired of trying to sift through the base to find something elevating and helpful, or at least informative. I believe there are many writers who really want to write better, but get shot down as being high minded when they try. Then, too many give way to whatever seems to be "selling" at the moment. I also believe that lots of readers just give up searching because the majority of readily available journalism is so frivolous and empty. Hopefully, this will be used to encourage each of us to give way to our "better angels," as they say, and really try to be our best selves, which may be one of the kindest things we can do for others. Thanks.
Stephanie,
Thank you very much for your thoughtful comment and kind words. I think your statement, “To make a difference, or at the very least, give voice to it” is what matters most to me. With so much talent and such an opportunity the potential to make a huge difference is great.
Mary,
Thank you for your incredibly kind comments and for your clear insight. You wrote, “It's easy to forget... to throw out words like yesterday's garbage. But the words, once out there, can never be retrieved... like gossip”
This is so true Mary. Each of us can add to or subtract from the impact our generation can still make. That may be a daunting task but it’s also a thrilling challenge as you know.
Gary,
Thank you so much for taking the time to read the piece and for your kind remark.
Roger,
I smiled reading your comment regarding “thick skins.” This is true. I feel writers must be sort of chameleon-like in this way. We are better served perhaps by being thin skinned while writing and thick skinned after we publish those pieces. Thank you for your thoughtful reply.
Julie,
Thank you for your kind comment. If I tried to hit anyone over the head with words I’d probably miss. We really do have an awesome power as writers. It’s one I trust we can use in our time effectively.
Sactogator,
Thank you for your comment. I really admire you reading as you do to your daughter. My daughter had many books memorized before she could read them herself. To this day she loves to read. You’ve made a wonderful choice and given your daughter an inheritance that money cannot compete with.
Theodora,
Thank you for your very kind words. I, for one, would not characterize your writings as “fluffy” dear lady. Your emphasis on love is appreciated much.
Saturn,
Thank you for taking the time to read this piece. You are one who offers consistent edifying to this community. I’m grateful.
Sandra,
Thank you for your thoughtful reply and observations. The advice you received from that writer is something I strive to live by when I write. Words, sentences, and phrases should not simply be a means to get somewhere else. If we attempt to make each sentence and phrase something that can almost stand on its own merit then the individual pieces can provide for a wonderful whole.
Thank you for the Lincoln quote. One of your favorite sayings just became one of mine.
Monsieur Chariot,
Your comment is deeply appreciated. Dr. King used the metaphor of what we contribute to the universe when it comes to violence and nonviolence. Your remarks are so true. Words have the power to be incite-ful or insightful. Strife and conflict are easy fare to serve. Edification and encouragement must come from hearts that embrace those virtues - as you know so well.
Brenda,
Thank you for your kind comment. I love your application of this to even seemingly “routine” tasks.
Kent,
I have read your fine and incredibly thoughtful post. I especially loved your use of the term “echo chamber.” I’ll reply at length as soon as I am able. Until then I rated it and was grateful to be able to do so.
I tried in this piece to include “editors” as an aside focus. I’m sure my intent was primarily to encourage the writers because that is the only aspect that I feel we as writers can actually control. Nudging editors can be a very good and helpful thing. Them nudging us to pursue more excellent goals is also a fine policy. Thank you my friend for your caring concerns and great contributions to OS.
Jeanette ,
Thank you for such an insightful reply. Your words, “It's an incredible responsibility, even on a small scale” summarize the heart and intent behind so much of what I tried to write here.
grif,
Thank you for your kind comments. Though I feel all writing is autobiographical to some extent I also believe that when writing (other than actual autobiography) becomes focused primarily on the authors something magical is lost. This is a wonderful community with incredible potential. My consideration is that we don’t become focused on ourselves and our differences with one another in lieu our writing.
Citizen Justice,
Thanks for stopping by. I think the difference lies between depending on luck and being fueled by intent.
Bill,
Thanks so much for your kind remarks and for your comment about the Wright brothers. This is so true and really does have application to almost all phases of life. Writers have the distinct advantage of being able to describe worlds where there are no limitations and to encourage the real world to believe that with hope, determination, and hard work, very few need to exist.
I love a guy who knows his hoops :)
Chey,
Thank you for your very kind words. I could not agree more that the temptation to give in to what is fashionable at the moment is not always the wisest choice.
Writers do indeed need to speak to their generation in a way that can be related to and understood widely. But I also believe that writers can help shape their generation for the better by the inspiration they provide.
Thank you very much for your kind encouragement.
I wish I could hand you a bouquet of red roses for this post and shake your hand. I think this says so much about the art of writing itself. Excellent writing is a goal we can all strive for. Realizing that we can all make a difference, even in some small yet important way. All of us. Even me. I try with each post to do more. I try to aim at the best writing I can. And improve with each new one. All writers can.
I thank you for the insightful post here and hold up my spring water and say good on you.
A++++++++rated
Thank you for your thoughtful comments and kind words.
The heart of the piece is certainly that each of us who write can have a profound influence and make a difference as you have described. Thank you so much for affirming that and for expressing your thoughts in such a encouraging manner.
JK,
Thank you very much for taking the time to read the post and to reply. I absolutely agree with you that “people” not just writers can and do have the power to influence and impact others. This is true and can never really be repeated enough.
I attempted to address that issue to some degree in an earlier post titled: “We Need To Be Better People.” This post, however, was directed specifically at writers as this is a writers forum. The article was intended to nudge us as writers in a direction I hope we all can benefit from.
Fantastic post.
This is so very true. And I thank you for having written it—it needed to be said.
Rated!
scupper,
Thank you for your encouragement.
Duaneart,
I really appreciate your comment. I share your desire wholly. And you are one heck of a talented artist - by the way.
Wordsmith,
I’m grateful you concur about the need to avoid that difficulty. There’s just to much talent here to become inbred and focused on ourselves.
Lady Miko,
That’s some powerful advice to be sure. Thanks for posting.
Kathy,
Thank you for the kind affirmation.
Rudyard Kipling; speech to Royal College of Surgeons, 1923
And yet, for many, it is hard to avoid the sensationalism often granted the elusive EP and FP.
Great post. rated.
Thank you for very much your comment. I love that quote from Kipling’s address.
Comparing sensationalism and true journalism are like comparing fire and fruit. The fire may grab the attention more readily but no one has ever lived off a diet of flames.
Put another way, in broad sweeping generalizations, is Hamlet going to do as well as a play in, say Mississippi as it will in New York? Maybe...but I don't know about that. Death of a Salesman (which is as good as Hamlet in many ways) will do better in Mississippi than Hamlet would