By now we have nearly all heard about the raucous town hall meetings over health care. In today's Washington Post (August 11, 2009), for example, Sen. Arlen Specter, meeting with the public in a Lebanon, Pennsylvania town hall meeting, reproducing a similar scene that greeted him in Philadelphia last week, we have this revealing excerpt:
"’You have awakened a sleeping giant,’ said Katy Abram, 35, a stay-at-home mother from Lebanon. ‘I don't want this country turning into Russia, turning into a socialized country.’
“Specter fielded 13 questions before someone voiced support for the health-care reform efforts. Questioner No. 14, Marilyn Boogaard, said she was nervous to stand up and say something positive about Democrats' health plan for fear of being booed.
"’I almost didn't want to ask my question because it's so intimidating,’ said Boogaard, 58, a nurse practitioner from Lebanon.”
At the town hall that Obama was going to attend, MSNBC reported:
“Outside the event where President Obama will conduct his town hall, there is an anti-Obama protestor with a gun -- a pistol strapped to his lower leg.
“The local police chief said it's legal for the man to have a registered handgun -- as long as it is not concealed. What's more, he is on private property, a church yard, which has given him permission to be there.”
On Friday Oklahoma Representative John Sullivan (R) questioned Barack Obama's birth certificate's authenticity at another town hall, further fueling and legitimatizing the moronic Birthers’ frenzy.
WTF?!
Some people look at all of this and think “This is crazy.”
It is crazy, but there is a deadly underlying method to this madness. The intimidation and bullying, thuggish, atmosphere fueled by alarmist, fabricated, lying, and distorted propaganda from the organs of right wing extremists at Fox News, the Christian fascist movement and the motley crew of fascists working in collusion with the GOP leadership, are purposeful, engineered, and extremely dangerous.
As Marilyn Boogard cited in the Post article says, she was afraid to say something positive about the Democrats’ plan because of the lynch mob attitude being whipped up. This is remarkable if you think about it: in town halls, where polite discourse is the norm, people who support the majority party in Congress and the party that holds the White House are almost too scared to speak up in the face of worked-up-into-a-lather conservatives who think that Obama’s an illegitimate president, a socialist, that the Democratic Party is chock full of traitors, and that the country's going to become another Russia.
When a movement seeks to take power, they do so in steps. By this point all too many steps have already been taken to fascist norms. The transition from being afraid to speak up to being physically shut up is a short step indeed.
The following article, written before the Town Hall fracases, is must reading in its own right and particularly in conjunction with these latest developments:
Is the U.S. on the Brink of Fascism?
By Sara Robinson, Campaign for America's Future,¨ Posted on August 7, 2009,
“All through the dark years of the Bush Administration, progressives watched in horror as Constitutional protections vanished, nativist rhetoric ratcheted up, hate speech turned into intimidation and violence, and the president of the United States seized for himself powers only demanded by history's worst dictators. With each new outrage, the small handful of us who'd made ourselves experts on right-wing culture and politics would hear once again from worried readers: Is this it? Have we finally become a fascist state? Are we there yet?
“And every time this question got asked, people like Chip Berlet and Dave Neiwert and Fred Clarkson and yours truly would look up from our maps like a parent on a long drive, and smile a wan smile of reassurance. ‘Wellll...we're on a bad road, and if we don't change course, we could end up there soon enough. But there's also still plenty of time and opportunity to turn back. Watch, but don't worry. As bad as this looks: no -- we are not there yet.’
“In tracking the mileage on this trip to perdition, many of us relied on the work of historian Robert Paxton, who is probably the world's pre-eminent scholar on the subject of how countries turn fascist. In a 1998 paper published in The Journal of Modern History, Paxton argued that the best way to recognize emerging fascist movements isn't by their rhetoric, their politics, or their aesthetics. Rather, he said, mature democracies turn fascist by a recognizable process, a set of five stages that may be the most important family resemblance that links all the whole motley collection of 20th Century fascisms together. According to our reading of Paxton's stages, we weren't there yet. There were certain signs -- one in particular -- we were keeping an eye out for, and we just weren't seeing it.
“And now we are. In fact, if you know what you're looking for, it's suddenly everywhere. It's odd that I haven't been asked for quite a while; but if you asked me today, I'd tell you that if we're not there right now, we've certainly taken that last turn into the parking lot and are now looking for a space. Either way, our fascist American future now looms very large in the front windshield -- and those of us who value American democracy need to understand how we got here, what's changing now, and what's at stake in the very near future if these people are allowed to win -- or even hold their ground.”
The rest of this article can be found at AlterNet.


Salon.com
Comments
God forbid any of these freaks should actually be a little socialized.
Now I'm wondering how long it will be before there are comments decrying partisanship, name-calling, lack of civil discourse, the sheer meanness of calling someone facist. All the ugliness is facilitated by the fear of pointing out that the emperor is stark, staring nekkid.
Safe Bet: "Sweet dreams are made of these/who am I to disagree..."
Nerd Cred: I suspect that even as you wrote the last paragraph that some people on the right were already doing as you predict.
While this was all foretold many months ago, sometimes it sucks being correct.
Highly Rated
The fascists are mobilizing their shock troops and they have been cultivating and preparing for this for years. The handwriting is on the wall in great big letters. Carol is right that the only way to respond to the developing and rapidly evolving situation is a mass mobilization from the other side, by people who won't accept this fascist wind and who demand a different path. The Democrats aren't, and aren't capable of, responding appropriately. The people must do this.
Gracie: Very nice juxtaposition.
Norwonk: Yep. What could go wrong? : )
Public D: You're welcome!
It seems that the Bush years watered down the word "Facism" by using it in connection with "Islamo- . . ." (a weird word indeed!) and now I hear "Liberal Facists" and "Socialist Facists" whateverthehell that means. But by watering it down, it just isnt as scary to Americans born and bred with the idea of "Greed is good" and "Rugged Individualism."
But SOCIALISM - now there is a word that hasn't lost any of its power. Truly a shame that a centralized hegmonic dictatorship used it in the name of their country "Union of Soviet SOCIALIST Republics" and really made it a bogeyman. Because in my mind, I fear facism, and government of by and for the multi-nationals and Wall Street way more than I fear a government that might want to deliver "socialized" services like medicine (or fire or police protection or roads etc)
Good piece Dennis.
Robin: I think that what we are in right now has definite fascist characteristics. These characteristics are rapidly becoming more prominent and substantial.
We are in a kind of transitional period with remnants of (bourgeois) democracy existing alongside of more openly bourgeois dictatorship, with the latter eating up the former. I say "openly" because dictatorship has always been a part of bourgeois democracy. But what has been happening is that a fascist wing of the bourgeoisie has gotten the upper hand, even in the face of their electoral defeats, and the non-fascist wing has been co-operating and colluding with the fascist wing.
I wouldn't call Obama a fascist, but his national security state measures are clearly in consonance with Bush's policies. Indeed, Obama has gone further than Bush, even while rhetorically Obama feints to the "left," but only rhetorically.
You ask how I feel about Marxism. I wouldn't be able to really understand what's going on without it.
Marxism is based on materialism and dialectics and as such provides the most powerful analytical tool available. That's materialism in the philosophical sense: ideas don't come from out of thin air, they come from material interests and material activity. Dialectics, if I were to try to state this in a very brief way, is the view that everything can be divided into two. It is based on the fact/observation that all matter and energy in the universe - in other words, all things - can only be understood in relation to their opposite. These words that I'm writing, for instance, can only be comprehended or even written because their opposite exists in the form of a white background. Without the black of the letters and the white of the background, nothing could be writ or understood. So too music and sound consist of sound and silence in combination. There is no such thing as complete silence or complete sound. They exist and can only exist in relation to each other. Another way of putting this would be to say that all things consist of frequencies, a back and forth or up and down fluctuation. So these, in a nutshell, are the philosophical foundations of Marxism. There is, of course, much more that could be said.
I just thought that needed to be repeated. I am reminded of a children's exhibit in the Holocaust Museum which outlined these steps in very clear terms. I have seen this coming since 9/11 when I saw academics and media figures silencing themselves because any dissenting opinion was labeled as "unpatriotic". My stepfather, an engineer for a major defense contractor and a liberal living in a red state, told me back then he was afraid to put any liberal bumper stickers on his car, because he was concerned what might happen to the car or to him. This is a serious problem, and very few seem to even get it. Thanks for getting it, and writing about it. I agree that change will have to come from the people, but as I recently posted, people do not change anything until the pain outweighs the fear. I dread to think how much more pain it will take to overcome that fear.
In times of crisis people's fears and pain do not necessarily drive them in the direction of progressive/left solutions, witness the polarized atmosphere in Germany in the 1930s where fascism and communism contended. Demagogues of the right know this very well and they stoke fears.
Building a movement of resistance and that actually has an alternative vision of a just society (because trying to go back to the immediately prior status quo of Democratic Party-style "democracy" won't do it) is the only way that we can repolarize the situation in a good way instead of the very bad dynamic that we now see. Waiting for more pain to somehow produce more resistance is, unfortunately, a recipe for disaster. People need to steel themselves and step forward now and help to lead others...
With all due respect, Professor.
Marxism...I'm just taking another (of many many) looks at that...especially around the subject of labor. I was a physics major, so naturally, Marxism in theory makes a lot of sense to me.
I agree with you in most respects. I agree that socialist ideas will now become important.
I have been for some time ill and one of very important person for me had a dangerous illnesss and I have been busy with that matter. Still I'm exhausted.
I will comment more, when I have fixed some other things which are now late.
So in terms of stepping forward to lead change, as you say, how do you do that when most people don't seem to agree change is needed? I do what I can to support a vision of an alternate and more just society, by talking and writing about it endlessly, and by living it the best I can. I don't know what else to do beyond that. I had to take myself out of activism because I cannot bear the personal cost of the abuse by the police. I think there are many people who would take action if they thought it would make a difference in a concrete, effective way, but none of us knows what that way is right now.
But now I think I've talked myself around to one of your exact points: people stepping up and leading others. In thinking of my earlier references to India and Civil Rights, I think of MLK and Gandhi, who did exactly as you say and stepped up to lead. Or one could say it was a matter of someone finally breaking down into "I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore", as Rosa Parks did, and then a million million others agree and join in. I don't know but I'm trying to figure out if there is anything more I can DO that would help. If anyone could come up with an effective means for positive reform I would join in a heartbeat. If I could come up with it myself I would.
Apologies for the very long comment but as you can see I am quite passionate on the topic but rather lost and frustrated as to what action I can take besides blogs and protests and being abused by police. I appreciate your viewpoints, and any chances to discuss with anyone are always helpful!
Robin: Did you know that Engels wrote a book on math? And The Dialectics of Nature?
Hannu: Hope you feel better...