Two more days and we'll be at the ninth anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on Bush v. Gore. Depending upon your political orientation you may have either positive or negative feelings about this period in our recent history, but it's my contention that everyone should have a negative view of the decision because of the constitutional ramifications.
One of the books to come out after the decision was Vincent Bugliosi's "The Betrayal of America" which I purchased at the time. The SCOTUS majority in Bush v. Gore is referred by Bugliosi as "The Felonious Five." Bugliosi spells out how the decision was a grab for power under the guise of a court proceeding and threatens everything we stand for.
The author argues they weren't anything more than political hacks in this instance and while normally for states' rights in other cases they were now operating differently in this case. Let us also recall how the majority was suddenly so interested in using the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment this time around and, again, this was unusual for the majority to be concerned with otherwise.
As you will recall. this Supreme Court decision on December 12th effectively stopped the recount in Florida.
If I get my materials together on this next year, I have a lot of archival footage from this historic event and may post an expanded 10th anniversary edition.

Some TV news excerpts from the time of the decision posted by a contributor on YouTube.
Justice Scalia and his "Get over it" interview on 60 Minutes.

Salon.com
Comments
So, I understand mine might be a minority opinion in this case.
We have no one to blame but ourselves for that.
You have "states rights" people for the Republicans coming up with a "novel" equal protection claim to have your vote counted equally in the recount of a federal election, come on.
And then, the Democrats on the Court are all of a sudden vociferous defenders of states' rights.
Really?!
They should have all said "We have a constitutional order that has provisions of these types of disputes in terms of politcal institutions, and the Political Doctrine applies with full force here."
I will say, this is exactly what Harlan the Younger warned about in the Baker v Carr decisions in the sixties. He totally predicted this, although the degeneration of a constitutional order is also inevitable. So, maybe after a defeat in war, secession, civil war, and then union and victory, which is my forecast, we get something better. thanks for reminding people of this shame on the court.
Rated
This changed everything. My overseas friends have never been able to understand how we could be so stupid to elect Bush twice. I'll never understand that either, never.
OEsheepdog, I agree with your thoughts on the historical aspect and the current court!
Cobalt-ic, I recall some funny business in Ohio in the 2004 election but clearly that would not have mattered much if Kerry and Edwards had received a landslide in the votes cast nationwide.
Don, some great insight and additional details! I'll have to do some reading up on what you mention about Harlan the Younger and Baker v Carr.
Shiral, nice to see your agreements with this!
Rick, that is an important and crucial point that you have added here and the "one time only" deal made a mockery of the decision.
Steve, little wonder how Scalia would have handled it if the tables were turned. Thanks for the additional information on this case!
AtHomePilgrim, interesting times definitely includes some events we could easily do without!
Ablonde, as I recall Salon broke the store right away on the butterfly ballots of Palm Beach County and I kept informed on this by reading further accounts on Salon as they developed. As in the 2004 election with Kerry, there should have been far, far more people voting for Al Gore and then the issue in Florida would not have mattered. As it was. the lousy design of the butterfly ballots and other issues gave us the result we should never have had since the newspapers recount later on showed Gore to be the winner. Also, I can see how your friends overseas would come to that conclusion!
Thanks everybody for your great comments here!!
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Oh, really!
The rnc knew stealing florida again would set off an unspeakable stench, so they focused on ohio (and maryland) and succeeded:
"Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted - enough to have put John Kerry in the White House."
ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.
I am " "committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year."
Walden O'Dell; CEO Diebold Inc. (voting machines)