Through a glass darkly...

Closely following the signs of the times

DJohn

DJohn
Location
Virginia, United States
Birthday
December 30
Bio
Marine, Christian, Libertarian and forty-something, suburban dad trying to make sense of the world around him.

MY RECENT POSTS

DJohn's Links

Salon.com
JANUARY 21, 2011 9:48AM

Obama 1.0 Failed. Get Ready for Obama 2.0

Rate: 3 Flag

It is all the talk in the media now that Obama's approval numbers are on the rise and he is making a comeback. Even Joan Walsh of OS wrote about it earlier in the week.

The turning point the experts say: the Tucson speech. The non-political, politcal speech and event that marshalled in the beginning of the 2012 campaign.

What most people are missing though is the signifigance of what all this means. The REAL story isn't that Obama is making a comback at all. In fact, he isn't. He is just giving the American People what they want: conservatism.

For the first two years of his presidency Obama didn't really govern as much as he dictated, bullied and steamrolled anyone or anything that got in his way. He pushed his agenda regardless of the will of the American People and single handedly created a new political movement in America: the TEA Party.

His brand of Chicago politics was not well received and he was met with extreme resistance both on the Hill and in fly-over country.  However, the opposition, the GOP, did not have the numbers in Congress to do anything about it and they could not stand in his way of anything. The Dems were running the show and they had the numbers to do it.

So with little care as to what the country wanted they forged ahead with their liberal/progressive ideas, the People be damned. Obama, for his part, allowed them to run cover for him so that he could stay out of the fray for the most part and let the Dems take the abuse. It didn't work.

The mid-term elections in November 2010 would be a referendum on Obama and the Dems in Congress and the People spoke loud and clear. The result was an absolute repudiation of the policies of the last two years and the balance of power moved back into the hands of the GOP.

Obama called it a "shellacking" and he looked like a whipped dog when he gave that speech from  The White House. He looked defeated and he was. The only remaining question now was what would he do about it. Would he dig in and fight back or would he pull a "Clinton" and move quickly to embrace the change?

Well, now we have our answer: he pulled a Clinton. For the next two years there will be disagreements between him and the GOP but he will make sure that they aren't BIG disagreements and he will do his best to coddle the GOP and make it seem like he has learned from his mistakes.

He will look to embrace centrist and even right wing ideas so that he can appear to be a President of the People. Right now he is only focused on one thing: re-election.

Obama is embracing Big Business and will most likely start to move in the direction of the fiscal conservatives. He is reshaping his team to look more like Wall Street than Main Street and he wants to appeal to the big campaign donors out there because he needs to start raking in the money for the 2012 election.

Without a doubt, the results of the November 2010 election proved that the America People do NOT want progressive ideas to take hold here in America and they fought back against them. Obama, for a while, will act like he got the message and put those ideas on the back-burner. He now realizes that Obama 1.0, while ambitious, was a failure.

He is still a progressive and aims to institute more and more of the progressive agenda when he gets a chance but for now he needs to fly below the radar. His first goal is to make the American People believe that he is not really an idealogue. If and when he gets reelected he will then have lame duck status and will not be beholden to anyone. THAT is when he'll be at his most dangerous.

Obama 1.0 was a fantastic failure but the "bugs" were eventually worked out. Obama 2.0  is a Trojan that once implanted, will be the virus that really causes the havoc.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Wow, stopping the bush recession from turning into the bush depression is a fail. Keeping the banks from collapsing is a fail. Saving GM is a fail. Getting us out of bush's quagmire in Iraq is a fail. Passing health care despite the Republicans is a fail.

Darn if only we had more success like the three bush recessions, the two failed wars (one started with blatent lies), ignoring the warnings and letting the worst terrorist attack in American history to occur, committing treason by exposing a CIA agent and all her contacts just to get revenge for being proven a liar, a VP who not only shoots someone in the face and obstructs justice but then forces the victim to apologize for being shot on TV. Yep, we could use more cons "successes" in this nation.
I am suspiscious of both the right and left wings. They are great for new ideas. But this world, is far, far too complex to be reduced to any simple philosophy.
Pay no attention to ocularnervosa. He's a fool.

Obama has many serious issues ahead. Gas prices are a ticking time bomb. California is a disaster. Pension funds are another bomb waiting to explode.

It isn't going to be pretty.
It is Clinton 101, but it's also very much NOT an endorsement of conservatism. The number bump comes from the speech, and will fade soon. In the absence of effective government, people will settle for "centrism," which is yet another gauzy sentiment that fades after it produces no tangible result.
Americans still want "left," economically, as usual. That Obama won't deliver on it is a different subject.
Tea Peeps and Repub Congress' numbers also suck, so it is chuckleworthy, though true to form, that your gas-sniffing Political Oracle projection sees it as 'Merica endorsing your viewpoint.

As true political analysis, the burning question to be drawn from your post is:
Is this your first year of following politics?
No, this is not djohn's first year following politics, but as he says in his bio: "trying to make sense of the world around him."

you can't do that standing on your head with your head up your a*s.
Although there have been disappointments with O'Bama, he's done a far better job than the last administration. I have to agree with ocular. Bush and cronies all but destroyed this country. I think we're still paying that price and when folks are frustrated they'll grasp at anything; hence, the tea party, etc. Just because they scream the loudest doesn't mean they are in the majority, despite what the elections said. Too, I have to wonder what will happen when the promises that were made by the baggers don't pan out, as the won't.
Berdina-So then Bush must have been a dictator. I mean after all the President doesn't make laws. He only signs them. Presidents can only wield as much power in a Republic as they are given. Congress hates Bush but gave him the tools he needed to do what he wanted done. They should be happy with him. After all the federal government grew to an amazing new size thanks to him. Isn't that what you want? Bigger government?

Besides, you and I both know that Obama is only following his script. He is just the puppet who does what his masters tell him to do. Do you think they will let something like an election get in their way? They have plans for this country...big plans.
"Besides, you and I both know that is only following his script. He is just the puppet who does what his masters tell him to do. Do you think they will let something like an election get in their way? They have plans for this country...big plans."

They said pretty much the same thing about W. Personally I believe the puppeteer remains the same. Only the puppet changes.

Only complete change in campaign funding and corporate lobbying will change the problem. The same people that owned W now own Obama. Bush with a tan...

Regardless of the face in charge, you appear to forget that there was an ongoing crisis preceding the change of power. The crisis existed before Obama took office and came from the administration that preceded him. This small detail has had a major impact in government policy, the rise of the Tea Party and most everything impacting the US since the Fall of 08.
sg2292-"Personally I believe the puppeteer remains the same. Only the puppet changes. " I could not agree more.