Broad Humor

Women and Comedy

DktrShe

DktrShe
Location
Boston, Massachusetts,
Bio
Witty academic, writer, performer, proud Feminist (and she can cook)

Editor’s Pick
MAY 13, 2010 10:57AM

So Long Silverman: Comedy Central Chooses Dicks Over Chicks

Rate: 21 Flag

In three short seasons she dated God (rumor has it He's quite cheap), tackled terrorism one hit and run at a time, introduced the world to homeless chic, accidentaly became mentally disabled, almost married her dog, and single-handedly poured a boat load of lemon juice in the historical, leaking chest wound that is the Holocaust.   Sarah Silverman did television her way, which was often tasteless, unihibited, crass, crude, inappropriate, and sometimes, ok, most of the time, completely self-indulgent.  It was also smart, edgy, playful, provocative, silly, and endearing, much like Silverman herself. 

This week Comedy Central announced it would not renew Silverman's show for a fourth season, citing the following reasons: because and umm, so there.  The network has not released a statement about their decision to axe the show, only alluding to an issue with earlier negotiations for the show's third season hinging on cost, which almost forced Silverman to walk.  A deal was struck between Silverman and the network, but the show's mid-season move to a 12 a.m. timeslot signalled its death knell.  Who in comedy would know anything about those politics? *Ahem*

The Sarah Silverman Program was a refreshing departure from the starchy, greasy, male-centric, dorm room humor clogging up mainstream network time slots.  Like it or hate it, Silverman strove to innovate with her comedy, pushing the limits of characters, stereotypes, and forcing us to take on her twisted, ironic, absurdist perspectives on big issues like hypocrisy, racism, and religion.  That Silverman achieved her level of television success for three season is remarkable, that she did it as a female comic is even more significant, proving that women are more than capable of driving content and sustaining creative, original, and marketable material.

The cancellation of Silverman's show leaves an aching gap in comic programming for women, an absence made more palpable by the announcement of Comedy Central's prospective 2010-11 line-up.  The shows include "Big Lake" with Will Ferrell and Adam McKay about buddies who dream up wonky schemes to save their hometown; "Nick Swardson's Pretend Time" starring stand-up Nick Swardson and featuring irreverant, perverse sketch work that includes a recurring piece about a gay robot (it will probably feature a lot of scenes involving getting hit in the crotch too); and "Workaholics" about a group of office drones played by Adam Devine, Anders Holm, and Blake Anderson described on TheWrap.com as "a three man spring break." Awesome. I mean totally, wicked awesome, bro.  I can hardly wait to see who they will get to play the "hot" secretary, the "hot" but aloof chick from accounting, and the "hot" Latina cleaning woman.

Sarah's exit from Comedy Central underscores the lack of support at the executive level around women in the business.  It also illustrates a depressing reality that viewers would rather watch a low-production show of a comic snarking on internet trends (Tosh.O) than an inventive, risky, and unsettling program that made them laugh and think.  

Then again, maybe this is a blessing in disguise for Silverman and for women comics who, released from the constraints and bullshit of corporate showbusiness, can finally get around to doing great, original, exciting work on networks or other media platforms that recognize their value and worth  (Yes Oprah and your shiny new OWN enterprise, I'm talking to you). And who knows, they might actually get the acknowledgement and success they deserve in the process.  

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I wonder if there's any connection between this cancellation and Sarah's controversial (if not hysterical) comments at the TED conference, where she was asked to come and talk about adoption, but ended up offending a lot of people by stating that, if she were to adopt, she would choose to adopt a mentally retarded baby (which everyone applauded) who was terminally ill (which everyone found distasteful)

In other words, Sarah didn't play the PC-at-all-costs game, to her credit.
I'm sure that definitely factored into things. But then we have South Park drawing death threats and criticism for their recent foray into religious content. Is it a ratings game? Pure showbusiness crap politics? Fear of alienating advertisers? I doubt we've seen the last of Sarah on the small screen. :)
I dunno, Jeff Dunham suffered a similiar fate, for I suspect similiar reasons, and he seems to have fallen off the planet recently

Sarah's show is much better though
Sarah Silverman is fearless and brilliant - a modern day Andy Kauffman. As good as Dave Chapelle.

There's a reason that the show is re-broadcast on Logo, the gay network, because we get her kind of biting humor. Straight men don't like Sarah because she's hot, so they want to screw her, but she's scary so they can't because the thought of her makes their wieners shrivel. Some women don't like her because she makes jokes about retarded babies, and that makes their wombs ache.

Gay people don't want to fuck her, and we love retarded baby jokes; a match made in heaven - or hell...
Aaaand now I've got the "Pancakes, Please!" song stuck in my head. I'm going to miss that show...Will we at least still have Demetri Martin around next season?
I admit that I hadn't watched her Comedy Central show. However, I did see her interviewed on Real Time last week, and she definitely comes across as a smart and pretty complex person. It looks like comedy is one of the few remaining "boys' clubs". I hope she is successful elsewhere.
She's been picked up by LOGO. They've been advertising the hell out of it for months. Not sure that she didn't choose to go to LOGO because they offered her a good deal and CC is not saying because they'd be embarrassed for just being cheap.
I LOVE HER. I WANT HER TO LIVE W ME EVEN CELIBATE EVEN IF SHE'S MARRIED EVEN THO I AM. I LOVE HER BRAINS HER LOOKS AND HER VULNERABLE-BRAVADO.
Yay. More shows about emotionally stunted “bros”. Get ready for gay jokes, fart jokes, gay fart jokes, and bimbos.

I'm going to have to have drug-fueled sex with my imaginary friends for weeks to get over this sadness.
I, too, Love Sarah Silverman. I saw her interview about that whole TED thing... I mean, Really, they hired Sarah Silverman - what did they expect her to do??? And TED - they're supPosed to be outside the comfy envelope, aren't they?

All this protection of mythical, FICTIONAL, terminally ill retarded babies... I'm getting sick and tired of that and almost all other kneejerky political correctness. Gimme some farts and warts and seminally-fueled humor ANY TIME.

GO SARAH!
I LOVE Sarah Silverman and her show never failed to make laugh so hard I sometimes peed myself.

Comedy Central has always been a boy's network. It goes with the territory, I suppose. Some people still believe a woman can't be funny, but Sarah (and countless other female comics) have disproved that theory time and time again.

I don't receive the LOGO network, so I'm hoping they'll broadcast the shows somewhere I can watch them. If not, I'll be the first in line when the next season is released on DVD.
Given that she's just released a memoir that looks like it's going to be spending a lot of time on the best seller list, this seems like an oddly timed decision. I agree with you that the history of women comedians is not a pretty one. But this doesn't seem to me to be a case of someone being underappreciated because she's a woman. I have no doubt she's going to do fine.
I think we give the media to much credit. It is about money not quality of programming. It is show business and business means profits. If Silverman could generate profit then they would continue to air the show. Big audiences mean big pay checks.

It does not matter to the network what they run as long as it maximizes revenues for the time slot. If you spend a dollar and make 10 cents that is 10% gross. If you spend 10 dollars and make 70 cents that is 7 times the revenue, but the margin is less.

Why do you think the airwaves are full of reality and clip shows? They are cheap to produce so even low ratings still generate larger profits compared to shows with higher production cost. Plus if you can produce 5 shows for the cost of one Silverman show that is 5 times the programming to air with a greater potential for profits.

Networks gave up on their image decades ago.
I'd give room/board any time, too, to Margaret Cho. Some dinner table talk, her, Sarah, me....
WHAT!!???!! Sarah's show was one of the coolest things Comedy Central ever aired. What a bunch of cretins.
I am not a fan of her *comedy*, but I am a fan of her strength and independence. Perhaps this is a refrain I find myself repeating, too often, about the various quirky maverick women in the entertainment world. The ones where you can, actually, tell the difference between them and everyone else. I may not care for their style, but that is irrelevant to me, I care that they are there making their mark. I saw Amy Sedaris eat up another show she was a guest star on last night, and thought about how she is routinely better than everyone else in the cast- woman or man- and probably why she doesn't get her own primetime show. Jenna Elfman is not a comedian, nor are half the women who are routinely cast in comic roles. Sarah may be tasteless for many, but she is gifted and unique.
Yikes. I think Sarah Silverman is dreadful. I've watched that show and found it idiotic and beyond unfunny. I never liked her humor(too mean, and desperate to be accepted by the guys etc) but the fact that her BFF, Tig Notaro, is a complete psychopath who has devastated my life... doesn't further endear her to me.
Seriously, she chose a total monster as her "best friend," and has probably enabled her to do the damage she did. Cancellation might have to do with karma.

P. S I wore silverman's pants a few times. loooong story.
She actually mentions deciding to leave Comedy Central in the book. LOGO saved the show by underwriting the budget after Comedy Central decided to cut it drastically.
Right. Male performers never get canceled.
It is all a ratings game, and Silverman's show never got the ratings. South Park does, and so Comedy Central is willing to put up with a lot more crap around South Park than Silverman. At the end of the day, TV is about ratings, not about quality.
Three seasons seems like a pretty good run for a show this far off the beaten track, female star or not. But the question I have is: Do sitcoms generally draw more male viewers than female? If so, it could explain why networks are more wary of going for female stars. I've never seen any statistics, but it seems to me that the people I meet who can quote Monty Python from memory tend to be men.

To try an analogy: Europeans watch a lot of football (soccer), but ignore the women's game. Male football has a built-in audience, consisting mostly of men who have been following the sport since childhood, but these viewers won't ditch their favourite male team to watch women instead. So unless you can recruit an audience of women who didn't watch football before, female soccer is stuck with low ratings. It could be that female comedians are running into a similar problem - not really discrimination as such, but an environment where men have a natural advantage because they make up most of the audience. It's a bit like a man trying to take on Oprah and Ellen.

Or maybe I'm just a male chauvinist. I really enjoyed Silverman's show, though, despite an overdose of poop jokes. Very original stuff.
I don't get her humor. She never made me laugh, and I love a good laugh. But I'm sorry she's been cancelled because she has a good following.
Comedy requires disjunction, yes, but finesse too. Sarah S. is just too beautiful to be thought funny, whether as a seven year old potty mouth, or a "sad sack". Carol Burnett, on the other hand was a genuine genius; some of her sketches were all too realistic, but still funny.
*I* wonder if there's any connection between this cancellation and Sarah's comedy actually sucking. I'm sorry but her sh*t gets tired real soon. people don't read too much into this, she's just not that funny, period.
Silverman may be some kind of hipster goddess, but she is not funny.