Incidental Findings

Medicine, Culture, and Life

Danielle Ofri

Danielle Ofri
Location
New York, New York,
Title
Physician
Bio
Danielle Ofri, M.D., Ph.D. is Associate Professor of Medicine at New York University School of Medicine and an internist at Bellevue Hospital, the oldest public hospital in the country. She is co-founder and Editor-in-Chief of the Bellevue Literary Review. Her newest book, Medicine in Translation: Journeys with my Patients--is about the experience of immigrants and Americans in the U.S. health care system. She is the author of two collections of essays about life in medicine: Incidental Findings: Lessons from my Patients in the Art of Medicine and Singular Intimacies: Becoming a Doctor at Bellevue. Danielle Ofri's writings have appeared in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, the New England Journal of Medicine, the Lancet, and on National Public Radio. Danielle Ofri is currently working on a set of essays about medicine, while several unfinished novels in various states of disrepair gather prime New-York-City dust under her bed. Ofri lives with her husband, three children, cello, and black-lab mutt in a singularly intimate Manhattan-sized apartment. Danielle's homepage is www.danielleofri.com

MY RECENT POSTS

APRIL 6, 2010 11:16PM

The End of Private Practice?

Rate: 4 Flag

A recent article in the New York Times noted a steady migration of doctors from private practice to hospital-owned health systems. The main driving force appears to be economic, that it is too difficult to run a business, especially when much of that entails fighting multiple insurance companies for reimbursement.

Some of the older physicians interviewed expressed “puzzlement” at younger doctors who chose salaried positions rather than private practice, with the suggestion that salaried doctors are somehow less committed.

When I chose to be a salaried physician after my training, I viewed it as a natural choice to express my commitment to medicine. After all, I wanted to practice medicine, not run a business. One beautiful thing about being salaried is that I have absolutely no financial conflict of interest with regard to my patients’ care. Nothing that I recommend or prescribe alters my income. This is very reassuring both to me and to my patients.

What intrigued me most in the article was the observation that “as doctors move from being employers to employees, their politics often take a leftward turn.” The article noted that the American Medical Association finally gave a “tepid” endorsement of the Obama healthcare reform.

With the shift toward the left among physicians, perhaps there will be a stronger momentum toward a single-payer-plan. Nearly the entire world has found this to be the most equitable way to deliver healthcare, to ensure that health care is available for everybody.

Only in America is health care a profit-driven enterprise. Though this may finally be changing.

********

Danielle Ofri is a writer and practicing internist at New York City’s Bellevue Hospital. She is the editor-in-chief of the Bellevue Literary Review. Her newest book is Medicine in Translation: Journeys with my Patients.

View the YouTube book trailer.

You can follow Danielle on Twitter and Facebook, or visit her homepage.

 

Her blog, Medicine in Translation, appears on Psychology Today’s website.

 

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Danielle, just in recent weeks I've been watching with interest as private practices have been shifting in the winds of proposed change. Thanks for addressing this.

Peripherally, I noticed tonight that St. Vincent's went down.
Hi Danielle. Private practice has been unsustainable for a long time in California. I chose to work for a multispecialty group for many of the same reasons you also chose to avoid private practuce, and I agree with many of your sentiments here. I disagree, however, with your observation that only in America is healthcare a profit-driven enterprise. It is by far at its most extreme here. But I think there is a profit motive in most places, including in Canada and the UK, where there is a parallel private healthcare system alongside the safety net of national health care.
Linda, I'll have to look into it - I think there is some limited private medical care available here in Canada, perhaps in Alberta. There isn't any widespread parallel system as I understand there is in the U.K. If I wanted to see a doctor not in our system, I have no idea where to go. (And why would I want to? Everything is available under our system - well, probably not boob jobs, except for reconstruction.)

For both of you - doctors here are mostly still private single-person practices. But the paper end of it here is much simpler and the single payer (government) simply pays submitted bills unless they look suspicious in some way.

(No need to say how much better it is for the patient, who can go to any doctor and who pays indirectly thru taxes, so that there is no medical insurance attached to jobs or that can be denied for pre-existing or bills that will bankrupt people, etc. etc.)
Thank you for being who you are and doing what you are doing.
While you are correct when you mention that too many doctors put dollars in their pocket ahead of patient care you forget to mention the latest culprit of greed- the hospital administrators. So while doctor's salaries fall, somewhat because there is no private practice alternative, hospital administrators are taking home million plus salaries.

Finally, big hospitals are purchasing private practices, at huge prices, to control patients.