A good chunk of every medical visit is spent writing prescriptions. Before we had an electronic medical record, this was often an arduous task, leading to serious writer’s cramp. Now the computer makes it easier on the doctor, but it doesn’t seem to have much effect on the patient. A recent article in the Journal of General Internal Medicine highlighted what most doctors have suspected all along, that a good chunk for these beautifully printed, fully legible prescriptions never make it to the drug store to be converted into actual pills. The study utilized an electronic system to trace nearly 200,000 prescriptions. Between a quarter and a third of prescriptions were never filled.
If a patient has a gassy stomach or some toenail fungus, ignoring a prescription won’t change much. But if a patient has diabetes or coronary disease, forgoing medications could be devastating.
I often ask my patients why they don’t take their medications. Although cost is sometimes mentioned, the far more common replies are, “I don’t like taking medicines,” “I don’t want drugs in my body,” “I don’t trust these medications.”
To a large degree I agree with them: medications have significant side effects, we should only use them when we need them.
But then I see that my patients have no qualms about anything marketed as an herbal medication or a nutritional supplement. They take milk thistle, saw palmetto, valerian root, hawthorn, feverfew, glucosamine, co-enzyme Q, lecithin and carnitine without reservation.
“It’s natural,” they tell me, trying to reassure me.
“Arsenic is natural too,” is my standard reply. “So is snake venom and poisonous mushrooms.”
“No but these supplements come from plants. They are organic.”
I try to point out that many of our medications like aspirin and digoxin come from plants. They are “natural.”
But there is no piercing the logic. For a substantial number of people, medicine from a prescription is automatically suspect. But if it comes from a health food store, there’s not a hint of concern.
Don’t get me wrong: I’m highly skeptical of the pharmaceutical companies. There’s no question that the primary profit-motive biases data. There are shoddy practices out there, and frequent recalls. I’m also a firm believer in healthy diet, good nutrition and taking care of one’s body.
Nevertheless, the chemicals that are marketed as medications are subject to vastly more testing and quality control rules. The chemicals marketed as herbs or nutritional supplements are subject to almost nothing. The people dispensing advice on these supplements require no training or licensing.
I could put anything from my spice cabinet or local garden into a bottle, label it Dr. Ofri’s Vital Health Booster, plop a price tag on it, sell it freely on the Internet and potentially finance my children’s college education.
I try to tell my patients that they should be skeptical about anything that goes into their bodies, whether it’s a prescription from me, a nutritional supplement, a can of Coke with 14 spoonfuls of sugar in it, or a “low-fat” snack item whose ingredients require a PhD in chemistry to decipher.
No matter what I say, though, many of my patients will continue to slip my prescriptions quietly into the garbage because they don’t “trust” medications. This skepticism can actually be healthy; I just wish it extended to all things in a bottle, even things marked as natural.
Bottom line: if you are not going to take your prescribed medications, at least let your doctor know. She or he can tell you which of these medications are crucial and are probably worth taking, even if they aren’t “natural.”
************
Danielle Ofri is a writer and practicing internist at New York City’s Bellevue Hospital. She is the editor-in-chief of the Bellevue Literary Review. Her newest book is Medicine in Translation: Journeys with my Patients.
View the YouTube book trailer.
You can follow Danielle on Twitter and Facebook, or visit her homepage.


Salon.com
Comments
And I agree that skepticism is a great and healthy thing, but it's so weird that it's so often couched in the naturalistic fallacy. When I worked with psych patients, I could wrap my head around crazy people who didn't want to take drugs because it made them feel like they weren't themselves anymore, but if a normal person told me they didn't want to take doctor-prescribed medication for a physical problem just because they were skeptical, I don't think I could fully understand. If you're skeptical, get a second opinion, or go read some of the peer-reviewed literature.
And yeah, I'm sure some of these same people have no problem drinking a soda.
It's a doctor that will probably be the person most people get their last advice from and it's not good either.
I think quite simply the main reason people don't take their medicine is that it was prescribed by a doctor. It's our only chance to fight back.
However, I think it's disingenuous to state something that we have to take at your face value. To broadly state that a quarter to a third of 'scripts go unfilled, and then in the next paragraph equate the decision process about that script between a toenail fungus and diabetes is a bit of a stretch when applied to the generalization. Perhaps you can cull something from the citation that indicates that perhaps 80 to 90% of the diabetic patients get their scripts filled while the toe problem people only fill 30% of their scripts?
I don't know what the numbers are of course, it's not my field, but my skeptic radar went up with the juxtaposition.
(I will say I would tend to lean toward your advice more than some other ::ahem:: doctors that have posted on this site though.)
To compound this injustice is the hiring of part show girl part woman of the night to hawk the medications to the male physicians. In the few visits which I make to the doctor's office, there are always the tall ,provacative reps dressed in the tight pant suit uniform waiting to offer the latest sample....It is strange how no rep is above 30 years of age and it is also a fact that virtually none of the reps have a medical background but do have the" look" to convince..
Dr. Ofri, these are but a few reasons why patients do not take their medications...
Doctors are often not aware that, say, a 7-day-course of Levaquin or a 30 day course of Lexapro costs over $120.00, even for people with prescription drug coverage. People come to the pharmacy expecting their $10.00 copay and are hit with a bill of $140.00. They just walk away and we restock the pills.
We would always advise patients to contact their doctors to discuss alternative prescriptions that were cheaper. Sometimes the "lady" at the office would just tell the patient to make another appointment to speak with the doctor! Like someone who can barely get off work is going to do that. Or the doctor wouldn't want to compromise on his/her "ideal" treatment.
Physicians are wise to keep in mind that non-formulary drugs are often covered at very low rates, even by "good" insurance, and that sticker shock sends a lot of people home without their medications.
I wholeheartedly agree with the comments about the pharmaceutical companies. There are plenty of meds out there for conditions that are not really illnesses and don't need to be treat. There is all sorts of manipulation to sell meds. And lots of drug rep influence. (Full disclosure: we forbid drug reps in our clinic.)
We should not take any meds that we don't need. Regular exercise and healthy diet would probably solve many of our medical ills. (If you think getting someone to take meds is hard, try convincing them to make major lifestyle changes!)
My point on this column was to look at one particular aspect of medication "non-adherence,"--the belief of some people that anything on an Rx pad is poison and anything from a health-food store is safe.
(Me, I love health-food stores. But I go there for food, not for meds.)
With all due respect , Dr. Ofri, your point is understood quite well; it's just that there are other very valid reasons as to why the community does not trust medications. This topic is not black and white but deserves an in- depth discussion.
In general, I've had doctors tell me when a minor problem is not worth fixing. As in, I'll write a prescription for restless legs syndrome, but it might be easier to just live with it or to make these changes to your lifestyle.
I doubt the people demanding drugs for non-problems, like restless legs, are the same as those who don't take prescribed medicine.
And it's worth noting that anyone who gardens realizes that the taste of your vegetables change, even grown in the same soil, depending on the weather. Too much rain and your pumpkins will be flavorless. Too little and your cucumbers will be bitter.
It should come as no surprise that the chemical content of herbs will vary. A medicine will have be formulated to give you a certain amount of the active ingredient. Not so for herbs.
I've been here, in PA, for about six months. Today in fact. I lived in Jersey for 33 years, where my marriage and a subsequent relationship collapsed around me. The first four months of my exile to this white trash shithole in Bristol PA were the most horrid of my life. I did not actively consider suicide but I prayed ever night--prayed--to wake up dead. Eventually I found a psychiatrist and a PCP who turned out to be my first line. I could not get to see the psychiatrist but the PCP, a nurse-practitioner, took one look at me and put me on Abilify. In four days the major depression began to lift: too late to save my career but not to save my life. I got my appetite and sex drive back. I began to feel human.
Then I discovered that UnitedHealthIDon'tCare will not cover the med under Part D because it's not a generic. It's $558 a month. So that was out. We got it down to $90 and it is still too much for someone who is basically unemployable but hasn't figured out how to work the Disability goldmine yet. So the shrink and I have to find an alternative.
Dr. Ohri, my opinion is that providers--including drug companies--don't give a shit. "It's good for your illness." Well, not at those prices. Neither is Seroquel because it gives me stroke symptoms, and the old reliable Paxil/Xanax combo from years ago made me both mildly priapic (hey that wasn't SO bad) and borderline psychotic (that WAS bad). Why won't I take stuff. Precisely because I am desperate for help, for an income, for a LIFE. Meds make it better if the meds work. Abilify works. But when that Japanese whorehouse and Squibb combine to make it unaffordable, they can live with the consequences of paying for me via Medicare as a visitor to the wacky ward. I don't take what I cannot afford.
Many years and many doctors later, I have a great doctor with a very sophisticated understanding of diabetes and the willingness to work WITH me. It's been a long self-education process, and I've come to the conclusion that most of the so-called "remedies" in the holistic section are useless, if not downright dangerous.
On the other hand, I'm taking a ton of medications for a couple of different conditions. I'm a real crank about adding any more pills to my already way-too-big collection. I challenge my doctors on every prescription. And I respect my doctors because they don't have a "take it and shut up" attitude--they explain to me what the drug will do, what to look out for, what the consequences of not taking it would be.
Unfortunately for doctors, most patients are not born researchers. They read an advertisement, they check out an internet site, and they think they've done their research. Their informational flaws are enhanced by a well-deserved distrust of drug companies.
Many years and many doctors later, I have a great doctor with a very sophisticated understanding of diabetes and the willingness to work WITH me. It's been a long self-education process, and I've come to the conclusion that most of the so-called "remedies" in the holistic section are useless, if not downright dangerous.
On the other hand, I'm taking a ton of medications for a couple of different conditions. I'm a real crank about adding any more pills to my already way-too-big collection. I challenge my doctors on every prescription. And I respect my doctors because they don't have a "take it and shut up" attitude--they explain to me what the drug will do, what to look out for, what the consequences of not taking it would be.
Unfortunately for doctors, most patients are not born researchers. They read an advertisement, they check out an internet site, and they think they've done their research. Their informational flaws are enhanced by a well-deserved distrust of drug companies.
Yes, be skeptical. Prescriptions aren't the answer for everything. But knee-jerk dismissal is not rational.
And Penrose, restless leg syndrome is real. I haven't found exercise to be any help for it. Nor will I ask my doctor for Restasis.
If the system wasn't so marketing oriented the trust would be higher and people would feel that they were be given a drug for the right reasons and not for the economic benefit of the owner of that expensive silver car in the parking lot.
Just felt the need to have that repeated, as it seems the perfect summation.
Currently, the number one selling drugs worldwide(500 million users) are cholesterol lowering drugs(Statins)which may do more harm than good(See: The Cholesterol Myth by Dr.Ron Rosedale, Atrogin-1 gene expression by Dr. Vikas Sukhatme and Thief of Memory by ex NASA flight surgeon Duane Graveline and Dangers of Statins by Mercola)
1. People who take prescriptions for serious conditions that need to be controlled
and
2. People who take herbal remedies without a clear understanding of the science behind it (or lack thereof)
There are other groups...
3. People who take lifestyle prescription drugs with real side effects for non-life threatening and non-debilitating conditions that in previous generations were considered a minor inconvenience.
4. People who take over the counter drugs however they feel like, deliberately not following the directions because they think they are inherently "safe" no matter how they are used.
The last time I went to a doctor and got a prescription for something other than an antibiotic I had a prescription that could be refilled 3 time. I got a half fill once because of the price. I was unemployed and there was no way I could pay $100 a month.
In retrospect that was a good thing, as the drug was Celebrex. It actually didn't have any effect on the inflammation/arthritis it was supposed to treat. I later found I could control that through diet. My quality of life is greatly improved, though I won't say the changes I accidentally discovered are not drastic. You do what you have to do. I suspect that if I told the doctor that my problems greatly improved after I gave up gluten that he would try to convince me to take drugs instead.
In case you have any interest in patients' real lives, I'll tell you why I usually don't take meds. It's because I took Prednisone for fifteen years for eczema. Did it help? Not at all. When I went off the Prednisone, the eczema came back about ten times worse than before. Luckily, an acupuncturist cured me of eczema five years ago. (That's something Western doctors can't do. Wouldn't even claim to do.)
Then there was the dentist who decided that I needed pain medication to get through a dental procedure. I slept through almost the entire procedure, staggered home alone, and took a looong time to get back to anything approaching bowel regularity.
Of course, my problems are very small potatoes compared with the problems of those who have been permanently injured by meds. (Remember thalidomide? How about Fen-Phen?)
Dr. Ofri, you aren't paying attention!
In fact, the herbal companies' hands are so tightly tied that reading their promotional material is hillarious - how do you promote a product when you're not allowed to say what it does?
(I imagine their marketers are reaching for the valerian even as we speak...)
Have a look at this site, it's a Swiss one called A.Vogel: http://www.avogel.co.uk/venaforce/index.php
"Everything -" it seems "- but to the point"