While I was in Adelaide in the spring of 2008, I had to refill my expired prescription for lisinopril, a common blood pressure medication. I went to a medical clinic in Norwood, on the retail street called The Parade, a street of bistros and retail stores, to get a new prescription. Since I was not an Australian citizen or legal resident, I had to pay $60 for an office visit. However, I was seen promptly (in less than a hour as a walk-in) in contrast to the two to three months I often have to wait in rural Colorado to get an appointment with my prescribing physician. Prescription in hand, I then went to a pharmacy (called a ‘chemist’ ‘ after the British fashion). The pharmacists/chemists (there were two, a man and a woman) were perturbed when they asked for my Australian universal health care card and I explained I didn’t have one. I was a US citizen in the country on a tourist visa. “Oh my, then I’m afraid we’ll have to charge you full freight,” the man said. Then, observing my grey hair, he added, “Then you wouldn’t have a seniors discount card, either, would you? I’m so sorry.”
“It’s quite all right,” I said. “I anticipated this. I didn’t expect to be eligible for any taxpayer-subsidized discounts.” After all, I’d never been an Australian taxpayer.
“Very sorry, sir,” the woman said. “I wish there were something we could do, but we can’t. We’ll have to charge you the full price, the highest rate.”
The two of them apologized about five times apiece. With no other customers waiting, they both bustled around to fill my order quickly.
When they presented me with the bill (and a final apology), it was less than one- third the cost of lisinopril in any US pharmacy.
During the three months I spent in South Australia, I asked every Aussie I met what they thought of their universal single-payer health care system (called Medicare but covering everyone, of all ages). I must have asked over two hundred people. I deliberately asked each one what they didn’t like about it, what was wrong with it, what were the system’s flaws and failings. the conversations were almost all alike:
“Well, it doesn’t cover dental or optical. If you want coverage for those, you have to pay for a private insurance policy.”
Me: “And what else? What’s the worst thing?”
“If you get referred for elective surgery, they may not be able to get you in right away. You might have to wait up to a month.”
Me: “For elective surgery?! Is that really the worst flaw in your health care system that you can think of?”
“Well, yes…..”
Again and again, in my informal interviews, that was the very worst thing they could think to say about their single-payer universal health care system. Funny how so many countries seem to find workable solutions to problems so many Americans continually claim are intractable and unsolvable. Their per capita health care costs are about one-half of the those of he US despite having better outcome measures and universal coverage.
My contacts were all within the state of South Australia, mostly with white middle-class Australians. I had very little contact with the rich and famous , the destitute, or with Aborigines living in isolated towns of the Outback, so you could say I didn’t interview a representative sample. But white middle class Aussies living in the larger cities are the vast majority of the Australian population.
Too bad Australia is notcloser. Then, like Sarah Palin and her family did for years with “socialist” Canada, I could simply cross the border from the US and get the superior and cheaper health care that isn’t available in the US.



Salon.com
Comments
I simply don't understand the American horror of getting the government involved in the health care, while insurance vultures are fine. Anyway, as I hope to elaborate in a forthcoming post, I've never had any dealings with the government in my health care: it's all between me and the doctor or hospital, and then they send the bills to the government. (And I cheerfully pay the taxes that cover all this, knowing I'll never be bankrupt by medical bills or refused coverage because of pre-existing conditions [like mortality].)
♥R
Libby, I too was impressed with SICKO and sent gift copies on DVD to many friends and relatives. It reaises all the important questions. The section on Jonas Salk sticks in my mind, too--his moral example. It seems like anyone who speaks of a social contract of any kind, or recognizes human interdependency gets called a socialist. Ditto anyone pro-social instead of anti-social. The fantasy that we are 311 million isolated, disconnected, self-sufficient indivduals who occasionally choose to interact is a destructive delusion.
Jeannette: you are absolutely right that no system is perfect but we still need to study and learn from them. The idea that there is nothign to learn from "foreigners" because they are just primitive versions of us is another self-defeating delusion that needs to be challenged.
Myriad: Its' so bizarre when the fear of Big Government isn't matched by an equal fear of Big Corporations, over which we have absolutely no influence and no rights against or appeal from. Rightwingers always leave the Giant Corporations that rule our nations and oru lives out of the equation, as if to pretend they don't exist. Either that, or they are entities that powerless, isolated individuals can "negotiate" with on equal footing for needed services. That's crazy.
FusunA: I think the foreign military adventures are a diversion, an excuse for not addressing our own urgent crises and deficiences. Also, there is this Robinson Crusoe fantasy in American folklore, of each person being an isolated, separate, self-sufficient individual who is not a social being, not a product of society, not inevitably embedded in a social, political, economic network and framework. I sense that in other parts of the world people understand that "we are all in this together;" there is no indivdiual solution for some problems, and therefore we must come together and cooperate for mutual benefit. That simple idea is rejected by many, many Americans.