Donna Carbone

Donna Carbone
Location
South Florida, USA
Birthday
April 21
Title
Owner
Company
Writers Bloc
Bio
Married for thirty six years and the mother of the two grown children, I began writing at the age of ten. My first success was winning a poetry contest in grammar school. From that moment forward, I realized that the written word was as vital to my survival as food and air. I am presently working on two books, one of which I hope to finish before I die. A number of my poems have graced A Long Story Short, and I have been published in the Lucidity Journal. Each day inspires me...what I see, hear and experience.... if it stays in my mind, I write about it. __________________________________________ "To believe in something not yet proved and to underwrite it with our lives: It is the only way we can leave the future open." (Lillian Smith)

MY RECENT POSTS

MAY 29, 2011 12:33PM

Journalistic Ethics

Rate: 5 Flag
drupal analytics

 

Press Releases and Plagiarism

 by Donna M. Carbone/freelance writer and owner of Write For You, LLC


As a freelance writer struggling to get my fledgling LLC off the ground, I use every avenue available to get my work noticed. Recently, I’ve begun submitting press releases for an organization I respect to our local online and hard copy media outlets. For the most part, the information is favorably received and published with no acknowledgement of my involvement, which is as it should be. Press releases by their very nature are anonymous -- it is the information that is important not the author. A good press release generates “tickle,” fostering an irresistible urge in an inquisitive reporter to delve into the story further.

When I write an article based on something I have seen in the newspaper or heard on the television, I always credit the source. For example, if I am using data from an Associated Press article, I will say, “According to an article by AP Reporter (whoever) in the (publication)…” and I will set that information off in quotes and often italicize it. Taking credit for someone else’s work is never acceptable, especially when the only effort put into a report is the use of the cut and paste tools in the Microsoft Word program.

Plagiarism is rampant in all aspects of society from the academic work to the internet, where there are few safeguards to protect a writer. This is more than “just” the appropriation of someone else’s thoughts and words; it is outright theft and is pursuable in a court of law. Unfortunately, the burden of proof really is a burden and really is hard to prove, so most cases go unchallenged. When discovered, the most we can hope for is that a knowing reader will question the writer’s character and (lack of) integrity and spread the word.

The Columbia Journalism Review (1983) published a study in which it was reported that approximately 50% of all articles in the Wall Street Journal had come from press releases. The Journal would take credit for the report by publishing it verbatim under a staff reporter’s byline. (The old cut and paste technique.)

Allow me to reiterate what was written above. The study was published in 1983 – twenty eight years ago. At the time, plagiarism was estimated at 50%.  Does anyone believe the practice has become less prevalent? Just because something is done over and over again doesn’t make it right, but repetition seems to have anesthetized the little guy sitting on our shoulders who goes by the name of “Conscience.” One definition of conscience found in Webster’s Dictionary is: “the part of the superego in psychoanalysis that transmits commands and admonitions to the ego.”

If I understand this correctly, the ego and the superego go to war with each other. The ego arms itself with denial, while the superego’s strength is found in an individual’s definitions of right and wrong.

The superego barrages the ego with guilt in an attempt to conquer its less than noble goals; but the ego, believing it can “get away with it,” is unstoppable and eventually decimates the superego, banishing conscience forever.

The world seems to grow less concerned with morals and ethics with each passing year. Is it increased competition and the quest for the almighty dollar that has made unconscionable behavior the norm? Or… is it the use of social media that has caused us to adopt unprincipled behavior? Has Facebook made us faceless? Have MySpace and Twitter returned us to the days of the caveman, when a sturdy club was all that was needed to get what we wanted?

In researching this article, I came across a very worthwhile post on the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism website: http://cronkite.asu.edu/about/plagiarism.php

Be sure to take a few minutes to read and educate yourself. To summarize, here is part of the article, which applies to this topic.

“Press releases are a common way for journalists to get information. A good reporter will use the press release as a starting point, going on to do his own reporting and gathering his own quotes.  If you do use information from a press release, however, the rules of attribution apply.”

When a reporter with a byline picks up my press releases and uses them word for word as his/her own, I find it both rage inducing and flattering. Obviously, if someone is willing to take credit for my work, I must be a good writer.

There are times, however, after seeing my words accredited to another author, when I actually feel physically beaten – as though that reporter has taken his/her computer and “clubbed” me over the head. I often want revenge, but then I remember these words, by Walter Cronkite. They are a excerpt from a 1996 interview with Kira Albin:

Albin: How do you want to be remembered?

Cronkite: Oh, as a fellow who did his best. I'd like to be remembered as a person who tried to give the news as impartially, as factually, as possible, and succeeded most of the time.

Me, too.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I've started to include the disclaimer below at the bottom on all my press releases:

The information in this press release is original content and the exclusive property of Write For You, LLC. It is permitted to use any or all of this release verbatim provided attribution is given to the originator. The use of any or all of this release in its original format without attribution under another reporter’s byline is plagiarism and will be pursued in a court of law.
Contact: write4you@comcast.net
Years ago, Donna, Hearst editors would mail The Chief, as they called him, the last edition of their papers (there used to be up to 15 editions). That one had been cleansed of press releases--The Chief loathed them, preferring his editors and reporters dug up honest stories.

Hearst, by the way, read standing, turning newspaper pages with his foot. Too vain to don reading glasses.
Interesting, Leon. I wish the editors of the paper in question had cleansed the guilty reporter of my press releases. Of course, if that had been done, the reporter would have lost 90% of his/her article.
I'm with you on this, Donna. There is a legal and ethical way to use somebody else's ideas and words. It is atrribution. That's what I learned in journalism school. When I entered the newspaper business in the late 60s, by-lines had to be earned and were awarded judiciously by editors. Now everybody gets a by-line for everything. Those submitting press releases want their words to get published, and don't mind them being used verbatim, but the right thing to do is attribute them to the source. Good article. Thought provoking. R
Imitation maybe, but plagiarism is not the best form of flattery. Timely piece, and wish you well with your LLC.
♥R
I have just finished another semester in college, I can not tell you how many times it is made infinitely clear to give proper credit to any material, even if it is a sentence of someone elses writing. I am not always clear on citation, but the college surely is, only because of the obvious law suit that it may be hit with for plagarism. If proper credit is not given, then what should any writer be writing for? The intellectual property is of ut most importance, since writing is of a particular nature, that many people either use for information or for influence, but mainly as a first source of business, sharing of ideas and storys, and other important translations. Writing in it's own form of sanity creates and sustains everything that is relevant, so why not give credit to the author who is asked to create works of fiction, or articles based on anything from the economy to new ways for people to utilize resources. Credit is partly due to a whole conglamerate of objectives, that fit most lifestyles, despite the differences, that is what makes conscious such a tight fit, but able to fufill it's own objective. One size fits all when the subject is selective, when the subject is directed at a certain arguement, many a times it is as you stated the egos ability to see past the required argument, if it should be a true argument, the ego is very hard to decieve. This was very helpful Donna, Thank-You for your insights into a rather delicate but deliberate argument for many who partake of the fruits of their labour, citations are the pits. But obviously necessary to interject other argumentation or proof of what ever it is you are attempting to discuss.
I'm pretty heavy on wanting to apply ethics everywhere, I think most people would say. But press releases seem to be about someone trying to plant a story, and legality aside it seems to me that most places doing it have the desire to get that word out there by hook or by crook and are just as happy to have credit taken if the word gets out. I do think use of press releases are bad but not for the reason you cite. They are lazy, to start with, but moreover they launder the fact that the source may have commercial interest and seem to suggest that an independent analysis would yield the same result. That seems a severe problem but independent of copyright and plagiarism.

It goes more to simple credibility. What bugs me most about that is that a few of us struggle to be independent and it's probably a rare commodity, but it's not tracked carefully enough by others that those doing the extra work can profit from it. And so it becomes hard to keep up, and I suspect that leads to more people throwing in the towel and using the marketing kits so easily available.

And on a related note: Just look at how easy OS has made it to pull a feed from elsewhere and how little premium is placed on original content. Do they think OS will distinguish itself by providing the highest volume of material available elsewhere??
Kent:

I understand what you are saying. Ethics are important to me and I've turned down jobs because I could not write falsely about something I did not agree with.

With the incident in question, I just don't understand how the reporter -- who knows me and asked that I send the release directly to him/her -- did not realize that I would be posting to other sites/media outlets under my own name. The chance is slim that someone would notice duplication, but the proof is still out there in cyber space for all to see.

Thanks for reading. I always appreciate your insightful comments.