Dr. Ayala's Blog

The latest science of healthy food and healthy living

Dr. Ayala

Dr. Ayala
Location
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Title
V.P. Product Development
Company
Herbal Water
Bio
I’m a physician (Pediatrics and Medical Genetics), artist, and mother of 3 school age active kids. I recently co-founded Herbal Water Inc. (www.herbalwater.com) with my husband, Albert. I am a serious home cook, and love to entertain. My expertise is vegetarian food (I have been a vegetarian all my life). I strongly believe that eating healthy and enjoying good food go hand in hand. My main interests are science, nutrition and art, and I am overall a very curious person that tries to learn something new every day. Dr. Ayala (Ayala Laufer-Cahana M.D.)

Dr. Ayala's Links

New list
Editor’s Pick
MARCH 15, 2010 7:29AM

Want milk? Lactose intolerance shouldn’t stop you

Rate: 5 Flag

Milk 003

Are most Americans lactose intolerant? Do all dairy products contain lactose? How critical is it to stick to a lactose-free diet?

Although most of us know someone who is lactose intolerant, and “lactose intolerance” frequently comes up in health-related conversations, there are many myths and misconceptions regarding this common digestive issue. I’d like to take a look at this malady and at the findings of a recent National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus conference on lactose intolerance, where experts in many medical fields pored over the relevant medical literature, discussed findings and developed a state-of-the-science statement that includes a few surprises.

(This post is about the common form of lactose intolerance—primary lactose intolerance—and is not about lactose intolerance that arises from illness or intestinal injury, or the rare cases of babies born unable to digest lactose.)


Lactose and lactose intolerance

Chemistry moment (this won’t take long): Lactose is a two- molecule sugar (or disaccharide) made up of one molecule of glucose and one molecule of galactose. In order to absorb lactose our body needs to break the bond between the two simple sugars using the enzyme lactase.

Lactase is abundant in the human intestine in infancy, but its level declines with age in many people. Lactase production is a fascinating example of our body’s ability to turn genes on and off; while the genetic code for producing lactase is in the cell, the cell can turn off production partially or completely.

Those of us with lower levels of lactase don’t break up some or all of the dietary lactose, which will reach the large intestine undigested; there, bacteria will happily feast on the sugar and produce gasses: carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane. Undigested sugars can also draw water from the intestinal walls, causing bloating and diarrhea.

But low lactase by itself doesn’t define lactose intolerance; most people who have low lactase don't experience signs and symptoms (the common ones being diarrhea, abdominal pain, gas, bloating or nausea). Only people with both low-lactase levels (measured by a health professional) and associated signs and symptoms have, by definition, lactose intolerance.


How common is it?

Surprisingly, the NIH panel concluded that we don’t really know.

Many people with low levels of lactase have no symptoms. Many people with gastro-intestinal symptoms attribute symptoms to lactose intolerance even if they haven’t demonstrated deficiency of lactase; their symptoms may very well be due to other reasons.

What we do know is that low lactase varies across ethnic groups, occurs less frequently in European Americans and more frequently in African Americans, Asian Americans and Native Americans.


Do people with lactose intolerance need to avoid lactose?

Let’s start with an explanation of the big difference between lactose intolerance and serious food allergies or gastrointestinal immune diseases such as celiac.

Food allergies can cause life-threatening systemic reactions after exposure to minute amounts of the offending food. Likewise, the intestine of a celiac patient suffers changes to its surface—changes that can lead to malabsorption, anemia and even cancer—even if exposed to very small amounts of gluten.

But not absorbing some of the sugars in our food is part of everyday life for all of us.

Beans, for example, contain sugar chains—called raffinose oligosaccharides—which no human can break down. The sugar polymers are digested by bacteria in the gut resulting in the well-know bean related flatulence—the butt of many jokes—and can also cause symptoms resembling those of lactose intolerance.

Some people experience no discomfort after eating beans while others limit their intake of beans because large amounts cause them symptoms. There are even individuals who experience such great discomfort that they choose not to eat beans at all. Our individual anatomy and physiology, our intestinal microbial flora, as well as the way we perceive pain and social awkwardness differs a lot. And by no means are beans unhealthy—they are in fact very good to eat!

Milk contains a considerable amount of lactose, much more than the undigested sugars in beans, but the bean analogy can perhaps explain some of the symptom variability we see with lactose intolerance.

So how much milk can people with lactose intolerance tolerate?

The NIH panel looked at the best studies, and concluded that most lactose-intolerant individuals can take in 12 grams of lactose (the equivalent of one cup of milk) in a single sitting with minimal or no symptoms and can tolerate larger amounts if the lactose if ingested with meals or spread over the day. A quart of milk (50 grams of lactose) ingested without food in one sitting will induce symptoms in most lactose-intolerant people. There’s also some evidence showing that the body gets used to lactose, and can tolerate more lactose if routinely exposed to it.


The most important long-term health consequence of lactose intolerance may be calcium deficiency

There are many ways to eat healthy, and dairy is by no means necessary for a balanced diet. Balanced Asian-type and vegan diets are perfectly healthy with little or no dairy. Calcium sources—both naturally occurring or in supplements—are plentiful. (Foods rich in calcium include collard greens, turnip greens, kale, bok choy, soybeans, okra, broccoli, some fish, cultured soy yogurt, tofu, almonds, and calcium-fortified orange juices, soy milks and cereals.)

But dairy products are by far the most prevalent—and least expensive—source of calcium in the Western diet. Since many people with real or perceived lactose intolerance avoid dairy products, they may consume inadequate amounts of calcium and vitamin D (which is added to milk), leading to weaker bones and osteoporosis.

Therefore the diagnosis of lactose intolerance should be made judiciously, and the treatment plan should include assuring that dairy avoidance, if necessary, won’t lead to nutritional deficiencies.


Lactose sources

Milk products vary greatly in their lactose content.

Milk itself has a lot of lactose, but aged cheeses have very little (most of the lactose is drawn away in the whey, and what’s left in the curd is fermented by bacteria and mold). Yogurt with live cultures contains bacteria that break down lactose, and therefore causes fewer symptoms. Butter and full-fat cream cheese contain almost no lactose.


Practical tips

If you think you have lactose intolerance:

Talk it over with your doctor; getting an accurate diagnosis for your symptoms can be important. Some of the causes of recurrent abdominal pain are treatable and it’s not a good idea to commit to an elimination diet for the wrong reason.
If you do have lactose intolerance:
Find a reduced-dairy eating plan that controls your symptoms, while enabling both good nutrition and enjoyment of food.

Eat dairy products with less lactose (cheese, yogurt) and spread your dairy consumption throughout the day. Consume dairy as part of a meal.

Make sure you get enough of the nutrients usually found in dairy, especially calcium.

Consider using lactase products; these are dietary supplements that help digest lactose.

Above all, listen your body—treatment and diet plans can’t ever be one size fits all. Find what works for you and stay healthy!

Dr. Ayala


Read more from Dr. Ayala at  http://herbalwater.typepad.com/ Follow Dr. Ayala on  Twitter 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Bad pun aside, this was an enormously helpful article. Thank you for it.
Extremely interesting and helpul piece for those who are lactose intolerant, very much apprecited .
Thanks for all that information, even though I thrive on lactose, being a dairy ranch baby. Did you mention goat milk and those products? I've heard they are supposed to be easily digested.
@Penrose
Goat’s milk is reputed to have higher digestibility, and the fat and protein in goat’s milk are different from those in cow's milk.

Lactose, however, is present in all mammalian milk (breast milk included), and its level in goat's milk is only slightly lower, so for lactose intolerant people goat's milk offers little advantage.
I hesitate to post -- as a skeptic I am leery of the word "herbal" -- but this is a first-rate exegesis, I learned a lot, and the writing is bright, breezy, but not condescending. You have the Touch for accessible science/med writing. Please tell me you aren't into woo-woo homeopathy etc?

Great post, either way!
@Greg Correll
Thanks! I'm evidence based-committed to it!
I use culinary herbs as foods--because they taste good and are good to eat:)
Huzzah! As do I ; I am an avid organic gardener (and bemoan the paucity of evidence for better nutrition in heirlooms), and lover of culinary herbs.

(Evidence. Yay!)
Ayala,
Great topic and very clearly presented. I think lactase supplements (such as Lactaid) are a great way for people to be able to continue to enjoy dairy products.
Linda
@Greg Correll

Balancing that study that showed no nutrition advantage with organic are a bunch showing organic foods are more nutrition—so you can take your pick.

I think we’re still in the process of finding out whether organic is more nutritious, but what’s pretty sensible to say is that eating herbicides and pesticides adds nothing to our health, and that conventionally raised crops degrade the land and waterways and aren’t sustainable.
Thank you for your informative and helpful article!! I was amazed to learn that "Lactase production is a fascinating example of our body’s ability to turn genes on and off; while the genetic code for producing lactase is in the cell, the cell can turn off production partially or completely." This most likely explains why for years I couldn't go near a cow, let alone a scoop of ice cream---and now I have no symptoms of intolerance. Will pass it on!
I often wonder how cows have such strong bones even though they dont drink any milk after they are babies. Do we really need to drink milk to get our Calcium??
Good post.
"Want milk? Lactose intolerance shouldn't stop you."

Maybe not, but animal cruelty should!

Regarding vegetarianism vs. veganism, man is the only species that drinks the milk of another species. All other species drink the milk of the mothers of their own species until they are weaned. Cow's milk is the perfect food—if you're a baby calf!

To mass produce cow's milk on a large scale via factory farming, cows have to be kept continually pregnant, giving birth, and lactating. The cows are genetically bred to produce excess cow's milk for humans. Male cows (bulls) are useless to the dairy industry, so they become veal. By supporting the dairy industry, one indirectly supports cow killing.

In a posting entitled "humane dairy??" appearing on AlterNet on August 22, 2009, provoked writes:

"Of course it is impossible to source any 'humane cheese' or dairy --- In order to be economically viable the females must be kept constantly impregnated. This is a traumatic and painful procedure... The industry calls the restraining mechanism 'the rape rack'. The cow also indures pain at birth as any animal does. Her calf is seperated from her at only a few days/hours old. This causes immense distress as the milk was intended for her baby. Her baby depending on sex is either female and placed within the herd (if needed) or sent to slaughter immediately with undesirable male calfs. The 'lucky' male calves get to spend a few months in a dark box, fed an anemic diet then sent to slaughter. There is absolutely no way that 'humane dairy' can ever exist. www.humanemyth.org "

The meat-eaters, especially, "exactly," are ready to find fault with us in this regard: do we love all animals, or only some animals (e.g., cows) and not others? And if we really do love the cows, why do we contribute to their death and suffering just to drink their milk?

Can children be raised without cow's milk? YES! Half the world's population (blacks and Asians in particular) are lactose intolerant, and can't digest milk after infancy. Dr. Michael Klaper has written books on vegan nutrition, pregnancy, and childbirth.

Vegetarians do cause far less cruelty than meat-eaters, but a nonviolent philosophy would carry greater weight from vegans.

One of the first books I read on the subject of vegetarianism while in college was A Vegetarian Sourcebook by Keith Akers (1983). Describing the environmental damage caused by raising animals for food: topsoil erosion, deforestization, loss of groundwater, etc. as well as the economic inefficiency and waste of energy and resources in raising animals for food in an age of exploding human population growth, Keith Akers foreshadowed John Robbins' Diet for a New America (1987), which was nominated for a Pulitzer Prize.

In A Vegetarian Sourcebook, Keith Akers writes:

"Using grasslands for livestock agriculture creates great environmental problems, which greatly limit its usefulness. Grazing systems require ten times more land than feedlot agriculture, in which animals are simply given feed grown on cropland. Grazing systems have to be extensive in order to avoid the catastrophic consequences of overgrazing—which renders a piece of land unsuitable for any purpose.

"Overgrazing and the consequent soil erosion are extremely serious problems worldwide. By the most conservative estimates, 60% of all U.S. rangelands are overgrazed, with billions of tons of soil lost each year. Overgrazing has also been the greatest cause of man-made deserts.

"Even if we grant grazing a role in a resource-efficient, ecologically stable agriculture, milk should be the end result, not beef. Milk provides over 50% of the protein and nearly four times the calories of beef, per unit of forage resources from grazing.

"'When only forage is available, then egg, broiler and pork production are eliminated and only milk, beef, and lamb production are viable systems,' state David and Marcia Pimentel, scientists and authors of Food, Energy and Society. "Of these three, milk production is the most efficient.'

"An ecologically stable, resource-efficient system of grazing animals for human food could not be anything faintly resembling today's livestock agriculture. It would be a smaller, decentralized, less intensive system of animal husbandry devoted to milk production."

This is what the Vedas (Hindu scriptures) say as well: an acre of land, a cow and a bull, and you're all set! The Vedas also warn that when a population is sinful, their land becomes a desert...and overgrazing does lead to topsoil erosion, which in turn leads to desertification.

So it may be possible to have animal agriculture (devoted solely to milk production) on a small scale—like in ISKCON, or the Amish. But the rest of humanity, with an exploding population in the billions, will have to be vegan.

According to the editors of World Watch, July/August 2004:

"The human appetite for animal flesh is a driving force behind virtually every major category of environmental damage now threatening the human future--deforestization, topsoil erosion, fresh water scarcity, air and water pollution, climate change, biodiversity loss, social injustice, the destabilization of communities and the spread of disease."

Brother David Steindl-Rast, a Benedictine monk, similarly says: "...the survival of our planet depends on our sense of belonging--to all other humans, to dolphins caught in dragnets to pigs and chickens and calves raised in animal concentration camps, to redwoods and rainforests, to kelp beds in our oceans, and to the ozone layer."
Great post and simple enough for anyone to understand.

I also think people should not judge others about their choice of food. I was a vegeterian for five years and I did so because I too believe I was a better person to not hurt innocent animals. Having said that it just became too difficult for me to continue and I now sometimes eat meat and I often eat dairy.

Mr. Murti I suspect you come from a country where women are treated like garbage, are murdered for trivial reasons, and where millions die from starvation and simple diseases. As much as I care for innocent animals I remain more concerned with my own species.
thanks for writing this. one note on your suggestions, fermented milk products, hard cheeses, and soy are major migraine triggers. otoh, I consider lactaid a wonderful development.
Very good information. But I have to wonder--do people really not get told these things by their doctor when they're diagnosed? Or is "lactose intolerance" one of those things most people self-diagnose?

I have the gastrointestinal doubleteam of lactose intolerance and ulcers; both developed when I was a teenager, so the doctors did a LOT of tests to confirm both (and I received many many lectures about this sort of thing). At least all the antacids I eat make up for the milk I had to give up!
This is a very practical and well-written article on the subject, thank you! The bean analogy is very helpful for any readers who aren't lactose intolerant, gives a little perspective.

They've been hard to find in the United States for a while now, but the easiest way to use a lactase supplement is to obtain a liquid form and mix it directly into the milk and wait for your lactose-reduced milk to be ready to drink!

Here's a new lactase supplement that's come on the market recently:
Seeking Health Lactase Drops
Dr Ayala -

Useful post for such a growing population of people who are lactose intolerant. I used to be until I started taking probiotics.

One of my theories on lactose intolerance is related to antibiotic use.

Yes, we have genes that make lactase enzyme for us and later in life, those genes tire out and no longer produce.

However, we have beneficial bacteria in our guts which digest lactose for us. If we continue to take these beneficial bacteria in plentiful numbers, then we should be able to digest lactose more easily.

Problem is antibiotics are prescribed so often that even children are lactose intolerant and so are infants even though their genes are likely producing lactase enzyme just fine. Why are they lactose intolerant? Routine antibiotic use? Perhaps.

I wrote an extensive article I'd like to share with you and your readers. It goes more in depth on my theory and also provides some suggestions to treat lactose intolerance:


Keep writing!

In health,
Dr Ben