As with many films that deal with multiracial identity, L’Autre Dumas is not without controversy. The casting of white French megastar Gerard Depardieu as Dumas has angered France's Representative Council for Black Associations. The Representative Council is upset because this casting choice renders Dumas visible in a way that can be likened to blackface used in minstrel shows. The Council is offended because Depardieu had to darken his skin for the role and wear a wig to change the texture of his hair. The Council is also offended because this is not an isolated or national event. They cite a historical privileging of whiteness in film, as characters of mixed race have largely been played by white actors. Most recently for instance, though her performance was approved by Mariane Pearl, Angelina Jolie was criticized by some for playing the Afro Cuban/Dutch wife of slain Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in the 2007 film “A Mighty Heart.” In fairness, Jolie claims some Native American and mixed race ancestry on her mother’s side.
Speaking at the Berlin Film Festival last month, Depardieu stated that the argument over the race of the actor in the film's title role is "unnecessary." For the actor and producers it’s about finding the right person for the role regardless of that person’s authentic racial background. But, as noted here and elsewhere, many disagree. Karen Bowdre, a film scholar from the University of Indiana, Bloomington says that the choice is part business decision. “Depardieu was probably cast because he is who he is, has a following and perhaps box office clout. The producers/directors, etc. couldn't find—or didn’t look for—a qualified (popular, bankable) mixed race actor to play the part.” Bowdre says the casting decision is also part colorblind. “On multiple levels it shows how, even in France, the industry continues to privilege whiteness while being able to think they are progressive because they chose this subject matter.”
Research I conducted for my new book about mixed race representation and passing, Things Said in Passing, confirms Bowdre’s point. I learned that Hollywood has a long and complex history of casting white actors in mixed race roles. To cite a few examples, Lena Horne was passed over in favor of Ava Gardner for a role as biracial singer Julie LaVerne in 1951’s Show Boat and in favor of Jeanne Crain to play the protagonist in 1949’s Pinky. Anthony Hopkins was recently cast as mixed race/black turned Jewish college professor in 2003’s The Human Stain.
What’s emerged from my research is a trend in how racial categories and appearances can limit and expand actors’ opportunities and audiences’ interpretations. Multiracial actors like Halle Berry are honored for their portrayals of black roles as in Monster’s Ball. However, it's definitely less acceptable for them to play racially ambiguous and/or white roles, as Berry planned to do by playing Tierney Cahill in Class Act. Cahill was a white teacher from Reno, NV who accepted a challenge from her sixth grade class to run for Congress in 2000. Another emerging trend is that obvious exceptions to this rule seem to be found in Vin Diesel and Keanu Reeves. These actors seem unaffected by pressure to demand roles that proclaim a specific racial makeup.
Berry’s, Diesel’s and Reeves’s experiences raise important questions for audiences both onscreen and off screen. Namely, should films double as racial Rorschach tests? Can white actors pass as mixed race and vice versa? In another blog post on the matter, Carlton Jordan quotes Sonia Rolland, an actress who is part-Rwandan and a former Miss France. "Dumas had quite African features. In this film, they are hiding his history, blacking him up and putting curls on a Gaulish head. In the midst of our debate on national identity, it seems that no-one is shocked apart from a few blacks and half-casts." Lindsay Dawkins, a mixed race woman from San Diego, CA says, “I don’t know what to think really. This happens all the time in movies. I guess I’ve just been desensitized and no longer get offended.”
Should we, like Lindsay, no longer be offended? Is Depardieu’s latest role proof that we’ve truly entered a post-racial era? Does the media industry need to take responsibility for its formations of mixed race subjects, forging of interracial relations, and imagining "ambiguous" identification in today’s increasingly diversifying world?
I guess we’ll find out in time. Probably when we see who is cast in the inevitable Barack Obama biopic—someone who looks like Djimon Hounsou, Will Smith, Wentworth Miller or Tom Cruise. I wonder who Dumas would choose.
Marcia Dawkins's Blog
dunaton
Marcia Dawkins
- Location
- Los Angeles, California, USA
- Birthday
- December 31
- Bio
- Award-winning writer and educator interested in how people figure out who they are. She shares what she's found--and her fresh perspectives on media, identity, religion, rhetoric and politics--through a variety of creative outlets. She resides on the web at www.marciadawkins.com
MY RECENT POSTS
- TV Appearance re Interracial
Relationships
July 03, 2011 04:08PM - Devils, Doppelgangers and
Darkness from Eminem
July 02, 2011 10:17AM - Giving Loving Day It's Due
June 12, 2011 01:48PM - Feature in TIME Magazine
February 17, 2011 01:43AM - The Powers and Problems of
Passing as a Boy
September 21, 2010 05:05PM
Marcia Dawkins's Links
- New list
- My website
Alexandre Dumas has always been one of my favorite writers. Works like The Three Musketeers, The Count of Monte Cristo and Georges took me on countless adventures in worlds and times much different from my own. But there’s a kinship I’ve always felt with the author despite our differences in gender, nationality and history—being of mixed race. Dumas was the grandson of a freed Haitian slave and a French nobleman. When describing his racial profile to a man who insulted him for being different he’s reported to have said, “My father was a mulatto, my grandfather was a Negro, and my great-grandfather a monkey. You see, Sir, my family starts where yours ends." Though my own background is different from Dumas’s, and feels even more complex, that multiracial kinship is one of the reasons why I look forward to the U.S. release of the new biopic that opened in Paris on February 10th, L’Autre Dumas, or The Other Dumas.
Marcia Dawkins's Favorites
Updates
-
Memorial Day in Washington, D.C.
-
Inspiration for more comedy on Big Salon's "oy vey"
-
When to drop the "one-drop rule"
-
the torpid droopy balls of os, etc.
-
Woman at the Pool
-
Last Dinner On the Titanic
-
Announcing the Salon-Alternet Investigative Fund
-
Why Aren't Men More Outraged by the Oral Contraception Issue

Salon.com
Comments
"Race" is a false concept. "Races" are simply families, grown up. What we call "racial" traits are simply family traits extended more widely.
As a writer/filmmaker I have strong feelings about this subject.
Obviously decisions about lead roles are primarily based on box office draw. But the larger issue is why there are so few "other than white" actors who have box office draw.
I blame the fact that there is a dearth of black, Latino, Asian and mixed race decision makers in entertainment. And the few that exist seem to love to cast blacks and Latinos and Asians in stereotypical roles. They're "black" movies in which the characters couldn't be anything except black.
In my writing and producing I try very hard to cast non white actors in roles that could be any race - especially if it's a challenging role. It can't always be done but it could be done more often. But sadly, it's not. So we never reach a place where the plethora of non
...we never reach the point at which the plethora of non-white actors (and there are many many talented ones out there) establish enough visibility and popularity to be a box office draw.
The solution, I think, is not in Hollywood, sadly. They will continue to go with what is culturally "expected". I think independent filmmakers and some minority of filmmakers in Hollywood (perhaps) will need to take the chance on casting "other than white" actors in roles that could very easily be a white actor.
Rated.
I understand your point, but I wonder how many French actors of mixed race have the gravitas to pull off Dumas. I'm not at all certain Depardieu can carry it off.
It's a sticky wicket, and in most cases, I completely concur with your stance. For example, I simply cannot see Tom Cruise playing President Obama. (Though he tore it up as a meganasty producer in Tropic Thunder, which was quite outside his normal oeuvre. And I know, I Know, that movie features the extremely offensive/extremely funny Downey Jr.'s performance)
In sum, I recognize and appreciate the information you bring to us here. thank you!
When did contempt for negroes and coloreds with dark skinn and negro dialects leave the stage??
On the issue at hand Dumas was a Black man under the old rules and in the post racial era..GD is out of order making black face fashionable again...
Are there no actors of mixed heritage that can play this role?
But! Did anyone object when Denzel Washington played the role of Don Pedro, the Sicilian prince of Aragon, in Shakespeare's "Much Ado About Nothing"...I bet not enough people saw that film to care.
As a filmmaker who attempts to match the best person to the role no matter what the background ( with some adjustments to make the film seem believable) I think you'll just have to wait and see if the great Depardieu can pull it off.
I agree with HenryR, and the great Anthropologist Ashley Montagu , that "race " is a false concept.
This piece is another victim piece. Empower yourself...let go of your need to be special.
There was absolutely NOTHING "victim piece" about this post.
My Nana (grandmother on my mother's side) passed as white; her mother was black. My grandmother on my father's side was half Cherokee. I have written on this (http://open.salon.com/content.php?cid=68908, and http://open.salon.com/blog/greg_correll/2009/04/02/trying_on_white).
Thank you for this.
First, yes indeed 'white privilege' permeates euro-american and many other cultures, and yes indeed it sucks and should be leaned into like a wind.
And, in terms of the portrayal of an actual person, such as Dumas, it would of course be preferable for the actor to be able look quite a bit like that person. (That is not at all the same as saying that the actor should have the same or similar genetic/biological or socially constructed "race" combination.) The key to good acting however, is often less in the appearance of the actor, but in the actor's ability to make their 'acting' invisible and for the viewer to suspend their disbelief and 'buy' the character.
Further, yes indeed we are all 'mixed race', with some of us meeting expectations for what that's "supposed" to look like, and some of us not (speaking as a Viking, Cherokee, German, Tibetan here - also known as 'white'), thus that should not be a reasonable criteria for much of anything, including a particular acting or any other job or role.
Part of the narrative of both 'race' and 'ethnicity' is that people in particular racial or ethnic categories are expected to be automatically more authentic representatives of a particular culture.
That was perhaps never true and is certainly far less true now. (I have often found that I know more about Japanese culture than a "Japanese" person born and raised in Southern California for example, but far less than someone of any race born and raised in Tokyo.) Culture is a process quite different than race or ethnicity.
By the way Idid not read it, not enough time. Probably because the majority of the people that you are writing about are not worth it and some are here today and gone tomorrow IE: Halle Berry, Angelina Jolie, Tom Cruise, who the F cares?
03/05/2010 Burgess Dillard
The problem is not who can play what, it's who may play what. It's again, like most racial social questions, about the power and the access.
The Brazilians who are almost all mixed in the 3rd largest city in Brazil flock to this 2.5 year old and rave about him because of his white color. My son who was raised with African-Americans in family and friends just gets furious because they practice the "whiter is better" game in Brazil, while out of the other sides of their mouths say they are so proud of being mixed. It wasn't what he expected. So, he gets pissy with them and states the truth that his American family wanted him to be darker to give him more protection from the sun in Brazil and Texas. Cultural gasps!
He will come back and forth between Texas and Brazil on summer vacations and may end up here, who knows? I suspect that he would have to sit down with people when he is older and tell them his racial mixture because they will never pick it up just looking at him. All of our friends know because I was so excited at his coming (first and probably last grandchild) and background. What do you all think?
(ignore cameleon; he's just one of those temporary OS aberrations)
2) Ask yourself what Jews would say if someone suggested that only actors of "Jewish blood" should play Jewish or part-Jewish characters? They wouldn't tolerate it. They are not that stupid. If they were stupid, they would try to retain the old "Aryan/Non-Aryan" division of Europe and try to put a "positive" spin on it ("Non-Aryan pride," maybe?). They know that such a rule (even if legally unenforceable but morally intimidating) would send a negative messages that 1) Something is wrong with "Jewish genes" and 2) If non-Jews are not eligible for Jewish roles, perhaps the opposite is or should also be true.
3) The job of an actor is, by definition, to pretend to be someone he is not. Anthony Quinn was mostly Mexican with an Irish grandfather, but he played Greeks, Russians, Italians, Eskimos and numerous other ethnicities. Anthony Hopkins, a Welshman, has played Spaniards, medieval Anglo-Saxons, former U.S. presidents Richard Nixon and John Quincy Adams, a psychotic serial killer and numerous other roles that have nothing to do with his personal lineage. His competence to play all these roles has not been questioned except in the case of his role in "The Human Stain" in which blacks and some of their liberal allies denounced him as a "white" playing a "black" role even though the character in question was predominately white and identified as such.
The first issues that the movie makes it seem like Dumas didn't write his own work. This brings about the next issue. The French term for ghost writer is écrivan nègre. So, even if he is being portrayed by a white actor, the film still displays him as a, let's be nice and say, Negro writer in how he has to be discussed in the film.this creates Avery strange mirroring to me.
As for the other issues for French society at large, it is important to remember that the council and other organizations are newish movements, not really gaining momentum until ~2006. The bigger issue for all the people I was able to speak with really was the liberties taken with history. I think most people, for better or for worse, understand why they chose who was chosen. However, when we discussed some of the language being used by the council to describe the problem, they became quite upset because they truly disagreed with certain terms.