dunniteowl's post-modern philosophical musings

The More Familiar I Become, the Stranger I Get

dunniteowl

dunniteowl
Location
Bastrop, Texas, USA
Birthday
October 11
Title
Supreme Commander of the Universe
Company
The Best Company in the World
Bio
Matriculated from: School of Hard Knocks and Diablo Valley College (AA in Communications Tech.) Done all kinds of things for work. Painted sidewalk curb address numbers, sold shoes, USAF Radio Electronics Tech, Semiconductor Tech for AMD, Intel & SEEQ Technologies, worked at Stanford Linear Accelerator upgrading motherboards for Beam Current Magnet Control, IBM building "Industrial Strength" Voice Activated Dialing networks, server systems and intranets, sold greeting cards, nuts, grapes, newspapers and found pets, janitored, worked in fast foods, pizza and data entry. I even clerked at a 7-11 and also ran a big searchlight for those events at night. Also worked at a zoo, where I pretty much did everything you can do at a zoo other than be eaten. Some of those critters do bite. I write and have been since 1972. I have written poetry, fantasy, science fiction and horror stories. I also have come to enjoy essays relating to human experience, the future and being good stewards of this planet. I believe I'm funny sometimes, so chuckle occasionally at my weird jokes and allusions. Very into science and technology, love logic and reason. For some reason, though, I am also a certified Shaman. I can cast horoscopes and read Tarot cards as well (from the expressions on people's faces and their responses, I am apparently quite accurate most of the time.) Love photography: You can find me here: http://s52.photobucket.com/albums/g31/dunniteowl/ and here: http://www.viewbug.com/my-account/photos (if those don't work properly, just go to the main pages and do a search for 'dunniteowl' I am the only one on the internet as far as I know.) I also love game design, starting with board wargames, card games and RPGs. Please comment if you feel like it. I don't care about being "tipped" and don't even really understand it as a function. I signed up on Open Salon so I could have a wider outlet for my writing and hope that you find it of interest at all. This bio is a reflection of things to come, so be prepared.

MY RECENT POSTS

Dunniteowl's Links

Salon.com
MARCH 19, 2012 10:04PM

Are We Doomed? (Seriously, Are We?)

Rate: 12 Flag

I warn you, dear reader, this missive is not for the light of heart or those who wish to gossip about the latest whatever in the news.  This is for those of you out there who believe in a better world.  Not that it's here or that we're on our way, to be sure.  It is for those of you who believe that there is still good, that people still strive for it, that people can change -- and that they do, in fact, rise more to the challenge than to descend into predation when we need to survive.

 I cannot explain from whence this writing came, honestly.  I had this most strange and powerful of experiences, I shit you not.  I was listening to music and I heard a song from a band I really like, though hadn't heard this particular one.  Something in it struck me just so.

 I found myself sobbing uncontrollably, crying like a child, tears running down my face, my hands holding my head, shoulders shaking and this choking wail of a cry coming from between my open lips.  And I just couldn't stop -- I literally leaned right into it and let it come.

During this -- extremely conscious moment -- epiphanic episode, I was aware that I cried from despair, from heartache, for the beauty I see around me, for the love and honor of people I have known, for the joy and incredible happiness I have seen and experienced -- and while I cried this, I cried it for me and for everyone in the world, knowing that I am just one more person in a world full of people.

And then I started writing.  I wrote non-stop and I think it might have literally been pounded out in about an hour and ten minutes.  I was on FIRE!  I re-read it just a few moments ago (I wrote this four days ago) and I made a few small changes here and there and am now presenting it to you, my fellow Open Salon readers, my fellow humanitarians, my fellow travelers on the great spaceship, Planet Earth.

 I ask only that you read it completely before commenting -- even if that means you come back to it a few times.  Honestly, this isn't about ratings or views, it's about spreading a knowing around to as many as I can and I just know this one, if you're ready for a heavy read, will knock you on your ass -- metaphorically in the philosophical sense, I hope.

It started because I was thinking about all the bad news we've been seeing and reading and writing about lately.  It's so easy to forget that there are good things going on, good news happening and good people out there still trying to make life better.  So I hope this missive, written in a moment of ecstatic passion borne of some rupture in the fabric of the universe in a location typically referred to as my brain, will cause you to look anew around you and wonder.

Thanks

 

  Are We Doomed?  

 

 

     No, this is not about the quixotic freak, wandering around the streets with a sign proclaiming:

The End is Near!

 

     This is a serious question we must begin to ask ourselves as a race of beings with an arguable level of intelligence to be able to consider the idea.

 

     Are we doomed?  By doomed I mean, of course, to be fated to extinction through our own inability to solve our own problems, all created from previous attempts to solve other problems in the process of surviving as a race, a nation, a people, tribe or family.  By doomed I mean also, without equivocation – through our near instinctual desire to be drawn into a sense of security by being around persons of power, in the same sense the herd draws a sense of comfort from the strongest males just being nearby – that we allow those of power in our race to imitate lower forms of animal behavior – simple, pure self-interest at all costs.  Even if that means the entire herd must perish.

 

     Leaving religion and religious doctrine out of this for the moment, mankind has been the same general being for something close to 250,000 years.  In other words, a child born that long ago is genetically and morphologically indistinguishable from one born today for all intents and purposes.  What is the longest any one civilization has survived in what we know of recorded history?  How many others that we know of lasted as long?  How many dead ones do we know of the world over?  How many more are out there, buried under more than thirty thousand, sixty thousand or a hundred twenty thousand years of detritus, sand, mud, volcanoes, oceans or mountains since their demises?

 

     In evolutionary terms, mankind is a tiny blip on the radar; less stable and successful over time than, say the dragonfly, which has been around over three hundred million years compared to our quarter million year status.  I mean when you look at it like that it has to make you wonder: Are we doomed?  Seriously, are we simply fated to have our lights doused in the foreseeable future, because we, as a race, simply don’t give a flying fuck enough to actually do something about ensuring the survival of the species, even though we have the power to consider our fate?

 

     Is there any argument out there that is actually BIG ENOUGH for any person, regardless of their culture, status, religious view, gender or upbringing to deny future generations a safe, vital and balanced planet, economy(ies) and culture(s) that support our desire for individual expression, our apparent need for human company and our responsibility as individuals to recognize that all the true, life-giving needs of a being should be something we strive to provide to all, irrespective of any other consideration beyond they are our fellow humans and deserve to eat, just as we all do?

 

     I don’t think there is.  That said, it’s clear that this is truly the crux of humanity’s largest issues with suffering, war, famine, disaster, repression, oppression, suppression, domination, manipulation and control in our world of mankind today.  So while I see my fellow man as just that, deserving of all the rights I believe we all have in common as living, breathing, thinking and feeling beings of the same race, I am aware that I am not the only one that does so, and – more importantly – that I am aware that there are a decent chunk of my fellow humans who would watch me die if it meant they’d live another day.  There’s another, thankfully smaller, chunk of humanity who would kill me before they shared with me.

 

     Which one of these views is the right one?  Doesn’t it really depend on the scale of the situation?  In some cases, like the Donner Party or the tales of men lost at sea for months in lifeboats, isolated tribes or groups starving to death we abhor the idea of eating each other, but, when it comes right down to it, if the circumstances warrant that some survive as long as possible, we can understand it.  It makes us shudder and we don’t like to talk about it, but we all know that, if the situation calls for it, there’s almost always going to be at least one in a crowd who’s willing to strike the fatal blow so the rest may live.  Or so we’re lead to believe in tales of the survivors of such things.

 

     Are we doomed to forget how many others out there, lost and feared dead, disappearances of entire tribes and peoples that there may actually be even more of those groups out there who died and none survived, because to eat another person is such an act of base survival vanity that they would all rather die before they ate anyone?  Are we doomed to think, (because those who survive such instances without cannibalism under such extremes are so very few) that we all must believe there is this dark ‘live or die’ mentality in each of us and that we must always fear it winning us over?

 

     I don’t think we do.  I don’t think we are.  And again, that said, this does not mean that everyone out there will agree, that everyone will even believe that such optimism in humanity is warranted or that it’s even remotely possible to have a world that we could actually share as a race of beings.  Well, I believe we are that race of beings intent on ensuring our longevity, our survival, and our ascendancy to higher planes of understanding and intelligence by keeping our planet as healthy and productive for us as is possible.

 

     We don’t need all of us to think this, though it would be nice in reaching consensus on what is a better way to live.  I believe it is with solutions oriented, compassion driven answers to our life’s challenges as a race of beings, dominating and using the resources of our planet as easily as a deer munches leaves or cattle graze grass.  We do this and there is a clear benefit to using many of our resources in the manner in which we do.  There is still a large portion of the population that believes that profit, power and money are the reasons we do these things – and while that may be a part of the equation, humanity is not generally known to be a frivolous or selfish race until just very recently – this time, at least.

 

     Not everyone has to think this way, either, for it to have its impact.  And this is the reason we must ask, “Are we doomed?”  Because as much power, beauty, transcendent energy and emotion as there are in the things we do that makes us understand ideas and ideals like: love, compassion, respect, goodwill, honesty, integrity and trust, we are all sad witness to the fact that there is a power – and a sort of shocked awe – in anger, hatred, indignation, righteous outrage, insanity, unchecked loss of touch with our reality.  These things and more can wreak havoc and disaster on entire populations in some form or another.  You only have to read a history book to see how papered our forefathers are with the patents of deceit, hate, lust, envy, greed, selfishness and other things that caused a large portion of society to suffer needlessly.

 

     Through all that, we have progressed.  There are still enough people out there in this world, from all walks of life, from all communities, nations, cultures and yes, even religions, that still believe more in the common goodness of all mankind, who are still tolerant of others and respect their views, even if they don’t believe in the same things.  There are more people out there who enjoy and entertain a lifelong outlook of “live and let live” over most all other day-to-day philosophies you can choose to examine.

 

     The difference is that it’s easy to forget that there are people out there who don’t agree with you.  When you forget that someone might not see things your way, it becomes much easier to scoff at their views, dismiss what they have to say as ignorant or unenlightened and thus, without any merit, either.  This closes a mental door in our own points of views, perhaps helping to solidify a stronger resistance to changing this idea in the future, because right now we hold it to be more “right” than another thought on the same subject.

 

     When these kinds of agreed upon ideas and thoughts are expressed in the words of someone else, we tend to nod and then, without even really thinking about it, begin exploring where we meet and diverge on a series of issues we might find of mutual interest, based on this first one.  We begin to mentally, though possibly completely unconsciously, tailor our responses to try to find common ground on issues – or in the opposite case where you immediately dislike someone’s stated point of view, you look for more ways you might disagree.  These things are two sides of the same coin.

 

     When we find we have run into something we don’t much care for, don’t like or even can say we hate, our reactions can be pretty strong.  They can also be of such a nature as to override or sidestep our normal sense of common courtesy.  This sort of emotive and nearly instinctive overreaction to a situation is not beyond our control or our ability to recognize that it might have it’s appropriate place at times in our lives.  The difference, which makes it easy to forget that people don’t think like you do, is the same reason it’s easy to become complacent about your points of view amongst nothing other than those who see things the same.  What if, while you all agree to see things a certain way, you’re still really wrong?

 

     How many people sacrificed animals, people, family members even, to appease the Gods, or to make an emperor happy, or to show worshipful loyalty and obeisance to a religion’s head human mouthpiece in all of our history?  How many wars have been fought over religions contesting the right to property of certain lands considered Holy to other religions?  How many wars have been fought on behalf of kings and heads of states where not a wound one would the leader ever suffer, win or lose?  How much suffering do you have to read about to make you realize two things:

 

     There has to be a better way to live than this! (and)

 

     Are we doomed?

 

     I think we might be doomed.  I think it’s certainly possible.  I think, so far, we have been extremely lucky as a race.  No natural calamity has managed to wipe us off the face of the planet.  We have lived long enough and are smart enough to break past the bonds of our planet’s gravity.  We explore, seek to know new things, ask questions and keep trying to understand more about our world, our place in it, and how to make a better world, a better life, a better chance to survive.

 

     Are there enough of us doing this?  Are we doomed to repeat, to a grander scale this time, a catastrophe, perhaps even of our own creation that may very well wipe us off the face of the planet?  Will we simply be unable to best the challenge, as in a planet killing asteroid, a massive solar storm, the changing of our magnetic poles, a crustal slip of the mantle of eight hundred miles, the loss of the land ice on the planet, the hole in our ozone, poisoning our waters and lands, nuclear warfare, crop failures on a massive scale, global warming or increased levels of radiation from the sun?

 

     I mean, when you put it like that, yeah, at some point in time, we’re doomed to fail.  All of our history shows this to be the case.  You are born, you live, then you die and after that – no-one really knows.  This is just as true of businesses, family lines, tribes, nations, corporations or ideas.  They’re born, they live and at some point, they die.  In the eventual and infinite sense, we all must perish from this plane of existence.  Everything that comes after that is moot to all of us here in this life, irrespective of religious views or lack of same.

 

     Are we doomed?  Are we fated to argue, fight, kill and demean our fellow humans simply out of lack of belief in their ideas, their views and their perspectives on the world?  Is it our fate to suffer at each others’ hands all manner of ill-conceived and vicious methods devised in rooms for the sake of a few to control the many?  Can we break free of this cycle of abuse?  A cycle that is destructive of the ends of the survival of our race.

 

     I think through ensuring the survival of the planet as much as possible, while looking at ways to exit our home world should disaster be all but inevitable, that we are working on these things for the benefit of all mankind.  While we explore the reaches to which we can apply ourselves we can examine our way of living our lives and our philosophies applied in our day-to-day living and honestly ask ourselves, “Is there a better way to live than this?”  And if no answer presents itself in short order, don’t freak out, be patient.  Meanwhile, the other question I admonish and encourage everyone to ask is, “Are we doomed?”

 

     Like I said, I don’t think we are doomed.  I think we could be, though.  It’s definitely a possibility.  I think the more we ask these questions of ourselves, our society, our world, and even of our philosophies we base our ethics, morals and standards of value upon, the better we all will eventually end up being.  The rest of those of us who don’t want to ask those questions and who tend to follow those we feel might be good, strong or charismatic leaders need to remember to ask those same two questions.

 

     After all, shouldn’t even the mildly curious be wondering:

    

     Is there a better way to live than this?

 

     Are we doomed?

 

     Don’t we all stand to lose if we are doomed?  Don’t we all stand to gain if there really is a better way to live than this?  And while I once again admit that I am aware some folks don’t feel the way I do about their fellow human beings, I choose to believe that we can do better.  I believe we have to strive to do better.  I believe that, as a race of beings, it is our genetic, moral, cultural and racial imperative to make the world a better place for everyone.  If we all benefit we all benefit – it’s not a complicated concept.  It’s obvious on it’s face.

 

     And if we’re all doomed, then we’re all doomed.  Doesn’t that imply some important moment to reflect on the actions of our lives to consider if we really have done all we can, is there any way out of this, can we survive this?  You see, at the end of the day, no matter what I believe happens after my soul departs this world, this reality, this plane of existence, I see absolutely no reason to tolerate and continue to put up with those things that make a people suffer without cause.  We can effect change in this world and we can do it together.

 

     While our history, what little of it we have in recorded form, shows we are rife with ills and troubles, it also shows we are rife with the promise of great potential for caring, love, rational and reasoned thought, guided by wisdom, compassion and experience, while tempered in the evanescent hope of man’s ability to change, rise above his ills and achieve, at least once in a while, that great potential to amaze with wonder and joy.

 

     With this outlook, if we are doomed, we can all celebrate our accomplishments as much as we can and then have one hell of a party.  There’s no need for war, suffering, abuse or control – we’d be free to just live.  Money would mean nothing and while some might choose to fight, murder, pillage and destroy in a nihilistic frenzy, I think it would be far less than any authorities might choose to have you believe.  I think, on the whole, those who really wish to harm and destroy will do that fairly quickly and those with no real stomach for it will stop when they lose their leaders.  It would stop.

 

     If we are doomed, I’d like to think, as with mankind’s general nature during most calamities, we’d end up reaching out and embracing, sharing our last moments, no-one has to eat anyone else to survive and we could just spend our last days, years or moments in reflection on what we have done to that point.  What else could we do if we are wholly unprepared for a disaster?

 

     If the answer is, we are not doomed, then we must answer, “Is there a better way to live than this,” as satisfactorily as we can.  If we cannot ask those two questions regularly as a race, I wonder, “What will become of us as a race?  Are we doomed?  Is there a better way to live than this?”

  

     Repeat reading this as required until you get it.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Owl, maybe if the world population growth can get under control, and all of us learn to live more sustainably, things will work out. There are an ocean of good things happening all around the world with sustainable agriculture, green innovations, cooperation among artists, health care workers, activists, agriculturalists, etc...There was this really interesting TED talk about population, which you might like: global population growth ...the speaker says he is a "serious possibilist...it can be done." :)

Another really interesting blog here on OS, which posts about many new green technologies around the world every day is:

earthtechling

Someday maybe far into the future, humans won't be here anymore, but hopefully we will fade out gracefully when the time comes and leave a beautiful, living planet behind. Who knows? :)
THE END IS NEAR
believe it or not humanity probably went through this once before based on scientific evidence. probably the toba eruption from 70k yrs ago cause a massive evolutionary bottleneck in the human race in which it went inches away from extinction. true story. but not well known right now. yes, humans individually can be quite smart but collectively can be quite stupid. well anyway there are 7B and it only takes a small number to continue the human race. a better question might be "are we causing a self-inflicted population bottleneck event to become likely" and thats quite debatable.
D, I have to know what song you were listening to! I've had similar experiences when listening to George Harrison's "Love Comes to Everyone" and watching "Casablanca," vacillating between dark cynicism and hope. By the way, say hi to the friendly folks at The Coffee Dog for me, and best of luck to all of us. We'll need it.
I think we are doomed, but I also think things are getting better all the time and will continue to do so.

Over 99% of species that have ever lived on earth have become extinct, and there is no reason for homo sapiens to be any different. Yes we are more intelligent than any others before us, but there could be more intelligent species in 2 million years. Also, there are too many unpredictable events beyond our control that could wipe us out. And eventually the sun will turn into a red giant and burn us all up in 2 billion years or so.

So we are definitely doomed, but not likely any time soon, and we have a lot of time to make things better before that happens.
The question, "Can't we do better than THIS?!", has long been one of my 'key' questions in life. The only way that I could see to answer that question was to try to come up with a society based upon a socio-economic system that I thought could point the way. It was not my intention to have the system that I devised be accepted as any kind of a "perfect" system that would lead to some sort of a utopia.

It was my intention only to prove that it IS possible to devise better than we have now; a step forward in our civilizing of ourselves. I felt, and still feel, that if I, an average Joe, could envision a better form of society, then that meant that it ought to be possible for those much better at this sort of thing to do so.

I have written quite extensively here on OS about some of my ideas. Since so many people consider the economic side of things to have the greatest importance (I don't), I have called my concept "Citizens' Capitalism". It could have just a easily been called, "A Step Forward" or "The Roles of Co-operation and Competition In Human Development."

The response I get is, "Yup, nice idea, but people will never go for it."

What you have made abundantly clear here is that, while not necessarily doomed, we MUST change our ways if we are to avoid that fate. That so many people consider any such change to be impossible does not bode well for our chances of survival, I'm afraid.

.
Boy if I could only share some answers that made sense here I would.
I think we are all currently too distracted by our devices and that valuable time is slipping through our hands.
.........(¯`v´¯) (¯`v´¯)
☼•*¨`*•.¸.(ˆ◡ˆ).¸.•*
............... *•.¸.•* ♥⋆★•❥ Thanx (ツ) & ♥ L☼√Ξ ☼ ♥
⋆───★•❥ ☼ .¸¸.•*`*•.♥ (ˆ◡ˆ) ♥⋯ ❤ ⋯ ★(ˆ◡ˆ) ♥⋯ ❤ ⋯ ★
We could go, as a species, as a planet, at any moment, without any howdy do, just as you or I could go in any given flicker of time. Even if we clean up our act and live the way we should and can live in the time we have left that won't avert our eventual inevitable doom, individually or together. It would be nice if we could maximize the positive qualities of life in the time we have left, but at the moment I see that prospect as doomed to succumb to the forces of unmanageable collective id and ego. Thoughtful piece, Niteowl.
Thanks everyone! Lessee, I'll try to get this in order and be uncharacteristically brief.

vzn: yes, there's plenty of biological cross checking that indicates about 65-80 thousand years ago, mankind was reduced to approximately 60,000 worldwide, trapped in isolated areas across the world. There's no telling, really, if we'll ever know if those folks caused their own problems. As I said, man has been essentially what he is today, genetically -- and that includes our ability to reason, think and logic things out-- for 250,000 years. Longest lived single civilization? About 1,200 years or so.

This only means that Buffalo Springfield was right: We have all been here before, we have all been here before... How many times in that period could we have started from scratch, built a powerful culture and then have it erased in some fashion? In 250,000 years?

clay ball: I saved the links. I have TED Talks streaming on my ROKU to my TV. Now, as technophilic as I am, I am also somewhat pessimistic in my view of technological "progress" in that the latest devices are mostly distractions deviod of any serious value over, say, a SONY Walkman back in 1980.

The ROKU, however, is probably one of the smartest uses of web streaming technology and the infrastructure that supports it. Now that said, just because I CAN play it on my smartphone, doesn't mean I'm inclined to do so. I'm listening to Pandora Internet Radio as I type. Awesome -- I'm a smashing DJ for 60+ years of musical eclectica, from Screaming Jay Hawkins and Smokey Robinson, Check Berry, Elvis Presley, Carl Perkins, Patsy Cline, all the way up to Smashing Pumpkins, Pink, The Jetts, Dave Matthews and others, with pretty much everything in between.

So if I am doomed, I'm going to have Prince serenade me while I party like it's 1999. :)

(So much for uncharacteristically brief. I think I blew that in the third sentence.)

Daniel: It's a Moody Blues song and, sadly, I am forced to internet search it first. (Imagine the voice of the Star Trek (original) series computer: working...) [side note, my computer connection is being worked on by my carrier and my connection is so flaky this is taking a LOT longer than I thought it would...]

Gaaah! Over an hour later... Justin Hayward and John Lodge of the Moody Blues as the Blue Jays: I Dreamed Last Night.

I have every Moody Blues Studio Album up to Sur le Mere with the exception of: The Magnificent Moodies and a few compilation albums (*which I generally hate, but hey, it's the MOODY BLUES, right?) So I hadn't heard this until just the other day (even though it's almost 37 years old as well.) Up until recently I hadn't even thought to check to see if they performed under other names.

So there you have it. My whole musical and ethical take on the Moody Blues alone could be an entire book length exploration, so the impact of this song sort of caught me off guard as it sort of ties a lot of things together in the biopics of the band's members. Digression complete.

So if I walked in there, ordered a coffee and said, "Oh, by the way, Daniel Rigney says, 'Hi,' " they'd all know who the hell I was talking about? You know they're in downtown Bastrop now, right? (See how 'up-to-date' I am? I think it's been there in town for about two years now. Not really sure. I know I miss Scooters, still.)

Yes, Jeff, all true (as far as we know it to be) but I think that's sort of my point. I think, once again, we are at a cross roads of how or what kind of legacy we might leave behind to future generations. Are we going to be remembered as the generation who ruined the planet, or are we going to be remembered as the forefathers of a revolution of behavior that changed humanity from a pathetic and cautionary tale of intelligence gone awry to one aware of it's potential and determined to achieve it?

Sooner or later, the ticket gets punched. The dance is over and the lights are turned on for Last Call. Some chick gives you her number, but it's a wrong number -- ahem, sorry. Never mind that last bit.

skypixie0: twin sons of different mothers, it seems are we. And that's a shame, because the more you make me nod my head in agreement, the more I am honor bound to question what makes me agree in the first place. There has to be a better way to live than this. I know there is.

I heap all sorts of implied blame on "the wealthy" of the world, but make no mistake, I don't mean them all and I don't even mean most of those who consider themselves wealthy. This world is dominated and controlled by a tiny segment of the overall population and irrespective of their nations, their cultures, their religious views or their politics (if they could honestly be said to really have any beyond a certain strategic gaming level) they do so for only one reason: to maintain power, control and the illusion of importance to everyone else around them -- even though the vast majority of the world's people don't even know these kings and queens.

It only takes a few of them, somwhere in the middle to start to make efforts on behalf of all of us to sway a measure of public opinion. If anyone doubts this, look at the news today. Look at the way public opinion is being shaped and formed on matters of national interest and world politics right now.

If we could manage to convince just a few more people with some clout, perhaps we can manage to pilot our world a little saner for a while. Maybe just long enough for most of us to realize that, in order to be able to live better, we require not everyone's complete agreement, rather, simple acceptance will suffice. The world's majority tends to simply go with the flow on issues of advances, better ideas, new technology -- hell, the majority of the world, most of the times, just wants to be able to sit back, relax and take a breath without feeling pressured to do something else, or the stress of wondering how they're going to make ends meet. I'm part of that majority most of the time. Hell, all the time as far as my situation in the physical strata of humanity goes. So I totally relate.

Algis, I know what you mean. Life and this world's situation is really as simple as a Zen question, like, "What's the sound of one hand clapping?" It's as simple as just letting go of these illusory beliefs of superiority (except me, I really am better than most everybody -- seriously, what's not to like?) or that we're necessary to make the world run right or something, or even that guy who'll never take a sick day, vacation or time off so that he can make sure the company doesn't fail while he's out of the office.

You know that guy's neurotic, you know it, the whole office knows it, but he can't see it, because he's certain that without him, the company would just fall apart. No amount of facts, evidence to the contrary or friendly admonition that he's replaceable will change his mind. To have a calmer, smoother and more trouble free life, all he has to do is admit his infinitesimally small level of significance in a big, scary world, and let go of those efforts of control and domination of a condition so far beyond his grasp that if he did, it'd be like a huge weight lifted from his shoulders.

You could explain it, show films about how it is for others in the same situation and condition; and you could logically show him how his life would be better, how it's not now, and all he has to do is just let go of those false notions.

And he won't. He can't. It's that kind of Zen where you are your own worst enemy to peace of mind, because you just can't let go of something you know is false, logically, but your heart won't accept it as anything less than the pillar of belief that holds your world together.

Those are the people I wish could share what that moment that shook me was like. Those are the people I desperately wish to reach -- and know I cannot without the attempt.

Chicken Maaan: yes, we could all go out in an instant, together or separately at any given moment in time. Yet, most of us treat each day like an onerous chore to get through instead of the gift of life it can be. Many of us are stuck just trying to survive in a world that has been created to promote our suffering, our misery and our continued indentured servitude to others -- to create an economy that is designed to advance the interests of a few at the cost of many and, while that seems to 'just be the way it is' couldn't we all start asking to have that change? Shouldn't we all be looking for ways to make life better, irrespective of our coming inevitable demise? Shouldn't we, if we're going to do anything at all, be at least following the Evolutionary Principle of Cooperative Survival?

It's obvious people are genetically inclined to be social, primarily herd-like group creatures. Of course, we have other aspects of animal group behaviors -- we mimic damn near everything we see in nature, after all -- that serve to allow some to treat the rest of us as if they own us and are in charge of our hearts and minds. And, due to our primarily social nature, we herd-like majority tend to allow those who seek power to have it -- after all, we're not really interested in it ourselves -- and instead, we should be looking askance at all seekers of power and making them prove their suitability to lead by making them perform all sorts of Herculean (though I would prefer Sisyphian tasks for all politicians myself) tasks to validate their high sense of their worth.

But, we just don't care enough about it to worry about it until it's affecting us daily, ruining our lives, livlihoods and destroys our tranquility of the norms of our lives. I have been as guilty of that as anyone else I may care to point my finger towards.

All I'm really asking is:

Are we doomed?

Is there a better way to live than this?

No matter what answers we may derive from these questions, we should seek to answser them again and again and again, as long as we have breath to draw and thoughts to burn calories in our heads, then we should be asking and seeking to answer these two questions. It's part of our survival imperative, if you go the evolutionary route of thinking. It's part of our moral imperative if you choose to follow any primary religious doctrine ever written that promotes a god with rules to follow for living peaceably amongst our fellows.

So these two questions are fit for science and religion. They are just as valid for rich or poor, black, white, red, yellow, brown, man or woman or anything potentially in-between. You can ask them in Chinese (pick your dialect or post it Wei-Bo) or in French, German, Russian, Tagalog, Japanese, Somali, Boer, Afrikaans, Swahili, Portuguese or Spanish.

So let's get people asking these two questions if we can, just by asking them ourselves. We have to get people talking first. Then we plant the seeds. Hopefully, the nurturing process will begin to become apparent. If not, I'll just keep at it, I guess.

In the end, this is nothing more than recruiting for the side of "I DO give a flying fuck enough to care" side of the equation and I hope it brings in even one more person.

Thanks again everyone for reading and commenting!
Rated.
Owl, I'd have liked to spend more time responding, however my schedule right now forces me to delay that. I'll do that, most likely by expanding on the topic I initiated in my post "Time For Us All to Shuck The Riot Gear".

The concept that we can get beyond what our primitive programming, designed to to let survive, not thrive in the potential of our capacities, is rejected by many. That does not mean it will take their agreement for it to happen. It will take enough of us agreeing that it can and the number who will comprise that critical mass, may be much smaller than anyone, optimist or pessimist, may believe it has to be.
Samasiam: Yes, your
"Time For Us All to Shuck The Riot Gear"
post is what sort of made me realize that this stuff's time seems to have come.

I had read a few other posts and I had been mulling something along these lines already. This was not that post I mentioned in my comments on your blog on that subject. I guess it might as well be, as it dovetails a lot of what I've been thinking and feeling lately and how it can all be changed.

I wish I could write it better, simpler. Oh, wait, I think I can.

Be Excellent to Each Other!

I have come to believe that while our differences can be acrimonious, what really screws up the soup is all our similarities. Not that we like the same things, or the same people, or even the food, but that we're similar, across the board, in how we attempt to justify our way of thinking over others (I'm doing it now) and find others who agree so that we self-validate and other-validate our points of view.

We're also very similar in how we get discouraged, embittered, hurt, are somewhat self-centered, hurt others unintentionally, intentionally and without thought as often as not. We get stubborn, careless, so focused on what we want that we never stop to take a moment to consider if what we want is something we should even actually get.

These are the similarities that cause us the greatest strife. We know what we're thinking (*usually) and we tend to forget that not a single person on this planet has taken Mind Reading 101, or if we did, we used remote viewing to fail it, so it may not be so obvious what we mean to others. And vice versa.

I'd love to hear (read: read) more stuff on these lines and possibly hit upon more philosophical as well as consciousness based ideas for change. Sometimes the only way to promote change is to promote it -- talk about it. I am very interested in the things others think would make the world a better place. (Is there a better way to live than this?) and how to think critically and thoughtfully in ways to improve our odds of survival (Are we doomed?) in any given scenario we can dream up.

If we act as if we are prepared to meet violence with more violence, for example, don't we project the idea that we're already expecting it? It's a sad tale of anecdotal evidence that when situations come along that start off peaceful and turn ugly, it's almost always someone agitating due to expectations of violence or the desire to cause it. Ruins it for the rest, on both sides in equal measure.

So we show up in decent, nice clothes (if we have them -- at least clean clothes when possible, right?) we march and we stand and stay and we don't stop and, if necessary, we get louder to be heard. Are we missing an opportunity, though, to project our ideas, ideals and desires for better living?

I think maybe Open Salon and other such writing venues can act as something of a springboard or incubator of these ideas put into something akin to a mandate for action in simple, yet effective ways.

Of course, I predicate all that on the premise that, while I know there are others out there who may be diametrically opposed or shades of difference less, I don't have to sway all them. I just have to sway enough of the center mass to change the inertial direction of our path -- and they'll listen to most anybody. More so if they're remotely funny, passionate or eloquent.

Looking forward to hearing more of your views in this particular moment.

Thanks for reading and commenting!
Very nice piece raising some really important questions about our apparent inability to save our species from the impending calamity.
Owl,
It occurs to me that perhaps the question, "Are We Doomed" is just too large a question for a great many people to handle. It's on the order of, "What Is The Purpose of Man's Existence?", if you see what I mean.

Considering all the possible things that could bring an end to mankind, it is virtually certain that we will, at some point, have our atoms scattered back into the universe from which they came. So the logical answer to that question is, "Yes, we ARE doomed." I wonder if the real question is not, "Are We Doomed To Cease To Exist By Our Own Hand?"

Even that more specific question is a very difficult one to contemplate.

Your other question, however, has real, slap-in-the-face, relevance. "Is There A Better Way To Live Than This?", is the magic question. This is the question that we can actually think about no matter who we are, how we are educated (or brainwashed), our gender, age, status, etc., etc. We may not all do much very reasoned or constructive thinking about this question, but we CAN all wrap our mind around it and give it SOME thought.

I love this question because it is sure to bring a majority of people to realize that we aren't actually "doing it right" as we are now. It makes them aware that they are not alone in thinking this; AND, most importantly, it starts them thinking of HOW we could do things better.

I don't mind that people will come up with all sorts of weird and wonderful ideas. That's great! It will indicate that they are giving it real thought. Once that becomes common some of the better ideas will be evaluated by them and some changes will then seem as natural and necessary as breathing.

I would suggest that, as the originator of this question, you begin to organize the spread of it. Let's get behind you - I will - and do all in our power to propagate this question. The conversations it will engender will open some minds, start others to working, initiate a method of thought that just could save mankind from ceasing to exist by his own hand.

What do you suppose would happen if all of us who have read this blog and commented on it, were to each do a blog with, "Is There A Better Way To Live Than This?", as its title. Yup, every one of us. Just that line. No more. Let people read that line on a few blogs and they are sure to start to think about this. Some will begin to blog about it, I think. That will spread the idea even further.

Owl, this CAN be done!!!

Over to you.........
.

.
skypixi0: I think your suggestion is excellent. Perhaps this is:
dunniteowl's Open Call: Is There a Better Way to Live Than This?

The objective is to take a view of how one sees the world today and imagine it better -- what would you change to make things better? How would you present the ideas? What reasoning goes behind why you think it's a better way to live than what we currently hold as the "norm?"

Definitely food for thought.

As to our Doomedness, I leave that to others more thoughtful. I ask, though, specifically, again and again in my essay, Are we doomed to... and then I list a series of issues and travails brought on by man against man. It's not nature we're battling -- unless of course you count it as part of the natural of order of things for a species to prey upon itself for a percentage of profit.

I do believe, though, that there are more folks out there who do care about others, think we should let each other be as much as we can, prevent people from harming others and say, "hello" as you pass them by on the street. These are the people to appeal to in this case.

Our doom could be simply that we fall prey to our own habits of neglect, ambivalence and prideful ignorance of consequences beyond getting something up front. The latest issue in Congress is the JOBS bill which has nothing to do with jobs, unless of course you still believe that we should deregulate, provide greater tax relief and reduce oversight on the financial and stock industries so that, once again, folks can take that money they're not paying Uncle Sam use it to create more jobs, and, because we're not making them spend money on extra nasty accountants who can keep two sets of books, they'll save even more and be much more likely to create more jobs -- somewhere else, I'm sure.

It's funny, the data surrounds us, pervades our knowledge bases, such as academia, the internet (it's out there, but you gotta figure out what to do with it) and special cadres of experts in specific fields of study -- and we, as a society, apparently have no interest in all this science, psychological assessments, case studies and long term life studies that allow us insights into the human mind's general workings.

Is there a better way to live than this? Can't we glean something about human nature that makes life better for everyone from all that data? Can't we all see the clear benefits of clean air, water, soil and food? Isn't it obvious that fuel efficiency, regardless of the price of fuel, is a better way to live? Can't we all agree that people being afforded the best health they can, through knowledge, education, training and determination to produce only the best, safest to eat, healthiest and most nutritious foods is a win for everyone?

It always amazes me at how easily some can be convinced that an idea is bad because it's expensive -- but you'll hardly see anyone turn down a Rolex watch just because it's expensive -- in fact, it's a gew gaw most people strive to be able to afford. Me? My thirty five dollar Timex does the trick quite nicely. I don't need something to shout, "LOOK HOW MUCH MONEY I HAVE!" I just need it to help me keep track of time.

I would feel this way if I had Apples 100 BILLION dollars. (Hey, with all that money, shouldn't they automatically be creating more jobs?)

Great idea skypixi0! Let me mull it over a bit.
Are we doomed?

How could we ever be “doomed” when the idea for this treatise sprang into your head from nowhere? Where did it come from exactly? How did “it” manage to convey it’s importance upon you to the point of tears, and then create a deep desire to rise up to the challenge of invoking the hope of world change? Ideas like these—the “magic” of life, that bring despair but also hope and determination—are brought to you courtesy of your infinitely creative mind. A mind that will solve these problems. One second, one hour, one day, and one act of kindness at a time. YOU can change the world, even if it is through the supposed “inaction” of slipping ideas like these into the consciousness of your readers.

Your life changed in an instant because of a single idea. And others’ lives will too. Eventually.

And, if we are too late—and the world sets itself into a brand new cycle of renewal—that creative energy you possess is still somewhere, since energy is never destroyed.

I am late to this post but it’s a good one. I’m rating it because it’s so “real,” and, also, because somehow your mind and it’s creative energetic force lured me here so that I could be inspired.
"This is for those of you out there who believe in a better world. "

love it ~ thanks so much ~
My opinion is, "Yes, in the long run." and Yes, in the short run." We have a population of ~ 7 billion growing exponentially, a planet whose resources are not only not growing, but are largely depleted, and a human nature dictated by genes that are very good at insisting on reproduction. There also seems to be a large part of humanity that will always deny this even when the facts are staring them in the face. Seehttp://www.open.salon.com/blog/pottery_doc/2011/01/31/is_it_time_for_another_plague

Thinking of fleeing to the stars is an exercise in pure fantasy. I enjoy it, but it defies all laws of physics as we understand them. R
That link was supposed to be:

http://www.open.salon.com/blog/pottery_doc/2011/01/31/is_it_time_for_another_plague
Amy, thank you for the comments. I have been changing in this manner for a very long while in this reality, this body, this lifetime.

I must admit the whole, "Are we doomed?" concept leaves very little room for wiggling around and positing a message of hope, but there it is, in all point of fact: Hope. Hope is the glue of the people where, in history, smaller amounts of people have managed to resist the forces of greater numbers, greater power, greater overall agreement and persevere. The world isn't changed by the masses; it's changed by singular individuals who push for new things, change, accordance and living with principles that promote a successive win-win non zero-sum game of life.

That's all the tech talk for what I call the Philosophy of Living:
Live as well as you can
With as many others as you can
Without stepping on anyone else's toes.

And yes, energy cannot be destroyed and, though it's form doth change with the cycles of entropy, it somehow manages to place it's form into that of higher order beings known as life, wherein all that energy, once dumped off as heat, is somehow encapsulated into a body that has a brain that thinks, ponders, wonders and speculates.

What an amazing thing that is, when you get right down to it.

Heidi, also thanks for commenting. This Hope's for You!

excrito por nada, one of our biggest problems is that of the greed of enterprises, which requires overproduction of material products for nothing more than the sake of driving others, also overproducing, out of business, all the while leaving more things on the shelves of every retail outlet of every kind with more than we need to survive or even have a reasonably decent lifestyle for all those 7+ Billion people running around on the planet. People who, for the most part, are all essentially being controlled or perhaps only benignly neglected, by those in this world who wield power and control for no other basis than to acquire a bit more.

I don't know that going to the stars is physically impossible. In fact, I'm going to disagree on that point and only state that if the world's governments spent half as much on space engineering, technology and research as they do on new and more effective ways to kill each other, we'd already be colonizing Mars, Orbit, the Moon and possibly be mining the asteroid belt by now.

The NASA budget amounts to .1% of our defense budget. And with that paltry sum, we went to the Moon several times, built things that spun off new technology and ushered the world into the Communications and Computer Age. Imagine what could be done if we only quadrupled NASA's budget! In that shifting of funds, the military spending would be reduced by a whole .5% and would not affect the military's budget in any noticeable way.

Of course, the whole population issue is one of a genetic imperative. Then again, we can control our population and the resources we use better, because we already have solutions that can effectively deal with those issues -- we simply have to choose to do so.

In the meantime, thanks for commenting and reading. A message of hope, I believe, should always begin with a contemplation of our mortality, our lives, our way of life and whether or not there are enough people out there who can and will listen to reason.

I believe that the message of change comes from the individual and speaks, once let loose, to the masses; to either follow or ignore, depending on the waves of diffraction and differentiation of ideas, beliefs and higher human principles over materialistic desires.

Thanks all for reading and commenting!