I have some suggestions for the companies about to be bailed out. I believe that the bailout should be contingent on a few small requirements.
1. The CEO and top executive pay packages should be funneled into an account which will serve to paydown the debt assumed by the government. Now I am not heartless, the CEO should keep a
salary equal to the lowest middle manager currently employed.
2. All bonues for CEO and top executives will go into this account.
3. All "extra" perks, such as stock options, jet, homes, etc, will be liquidated at put into the account.
4. If the CEO, or top executive leaves the company, he or she will NOT receive a golden parachute. Rather, the parachute will be funneled into the account as well. The CEO or top executive will receive 2 weeks severance.
5. Due to the extraordinary measures of the bailout, the contract for CEO & top executive compensation will be considered null and void.
6. Any company who does not accept these terms will not be part of the bailout.
I think this is a viable solution to partially pay for the bailout. And, if this becomes the law of the land, forfeiture of pay and bonuses for a bailout, I predict that the companies will be run a bit better from now on.
dvorasnell
- Birthday
- September 20
- Bio
- I consider opinions to be sacred, except when set in stone. I am 43, and finally tired of voicing my opinion in obscurity. OK, I know that this may be completely obscure....but I am excited to share! For more, please check out my blog http://debzrantz.blogspot.com
MY RECENT POSTS
- WHY THE HELL SHOULD I PAY
TAXES!
March 28, 2012 09:55PM - A Question and a Dare for Mitt
January 09, 2012 08:29PM - Rand Paul and the Amazing
Sleight of Hand...
May 21, 2010 10:43PM - Dating Sucks! and other
Singles Laments
January 14, 2010 06:09PM - Open Call: Who am I?
January 12, 2010 05:37PM
MY RECENT COMMENTS
- “Thanks Stathi! I just
had to get it off my
chest!”
March 28, 2012 11:52PM - “That we pay for!! For
life! It makes me sick! Thanks
for your
comment
Myriad!”
March 28, 2012 11:50PM - “What I'd like to know is
WHERE ARE THE CRIES OF DEATH
PANELS
NOW? If the
Governm…”
March 28, 2012 11:39PM - “Amen sister!!! As a
Mormon, "radical" myself, I
like your
list of
radi…”
March 13, 2011 06:32AM - “No, a man who has railed
about "family values", most
likely
DOMA,
abort…”
February 10, 2011 04:44AM
Dvorasnell's Links
- New list
- debzrantz

Salon.com
Comments
Dave Cullen's No blank check without concessions. I think there have been others. But it doesn't hurt for everyone to add their own. I'm just adding cross-references here so it's easier for someone to find them all.
I like your point #6 is theoretically a good way of getting around the "ex post facto" restrictions of the Constitution, although the problem is that the US Government would not be negotiating on this if they didn't think this company was too big to fail. So I don't know if it will work in the early bargaining, but it might save later legal challenges under Constitutional protections against ex post facto laws. The sweet irony of it is that credit card companies use this kind of dodge all the time in order to change interest rates on people, telling them that if they don't want the new higher rate they can cancel their card instead.