dvorasnell

dvorasnell
Birthday
September 20
Bio
I consider opinions to be sacred, except when set in stone. I am 43, and finally tired of voicing my opinion in obscurity. OK, I know that this may be completely obscure....but I am excited to share! For more, please check out my blog http://debzrantz.blogspot.com

MY RECENT POSTS

Dvorasnell's Links

New list
MAY 21, 2010 10:43PM

Rand Paul and the Amazing Sleight of Hand...

Rate: 1 Flag

I was finally able to watch the amazing segment on Rachel Maddow, in which she masterfully deconstructed Rand Paul.  I would have watched earlier, but I was finally offered a job this week after a two year dry spell (Yay Me!), so my ability to be up to the minute has been up to the week....  But I digress.

 I was eager to watch the segment because I love Rachel Maddow and how smart, incisive and yet, polite she is, and the segment did not disappoint.  As I read in Crooks and Liars and Salon, Rachel did, indeed, mop the floor with Dr. (Mr.) Paul, and it was a thing of beauty to behold.  But it occurs to me that Mr. Paul was a bit wilier than I initially thought. 

 In the segment, Mr. Paul rambled on about the 2nd Ammendment and equating it with the struggles of blacks and minorities in the '60's,  He wouldn't let that point drop, and accused Rachel of using "red herrings" to make him look bad.  But I see a more disturbing thread here. 

 By equating the Civil Rights movement with the rights of gun owners to carry loaded guns into public restaurants, Mr. Paul apparently feels one of two things: 1. Both Gun owners are deluded into thinking they deserve a right, eating at lunch counters - holding jobs, or carrying loaded weapons into public places) or 2. The civil rights act is just as much an act of civil disobedience as carrying a loaded pistol to TGIFridays.  Either way, it's a scary thought.

 On the one hand, he appears to be making the line that poor put upon gun enthusiasts are like black people, downtrodden, in need of shelter and hope.  But more than anything, I really think he is coming more from the deluded category.  He is trying to downplay the importance of the civil rights act, and how most of us have benefitted from it, since, and place basic human rights with a so-called privledge.   

 It is a truly frightening sleight of hand Mr. Paul pulled on Rachel Maddow's show the other night.  But I do wonder if it may not continue to bite him in the patooky....  Frankly, I doubt that the gun enthusiasts  like being compared to black people. I'm just saying....

 Now back to work for  me!  I apologize if this post is a bit choppy, but I grabbed a couple of moments to post.  Thank you for reading!

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
As a rabid gun enthusiast, I have no problems being compared to black people, as I really wish I did have a little more 'soul'. I just don't like the gun rights movement being compared with the civil rights movement, especially by this jackass.

I don't see gun rights as a 'civil rights' issue at all, and the comparison is just stupid.

The 2nd Amendment issues are constitutional in basis and are focused more around specific cases of law regarding regulation and restriction.

I have never felt "oppressed." I mean, how oppressed can one feel with a .45 cal on their side?

Anyhoo, I really wish I could 'disinvite' certain people from standing on the same side of an issue as me.

Perhaps I'll write a letter...and CC it to Palin while I'm at it.
Good stuff - and congrats on the job!!!
Thanks for the comment Doug. I quite agree with you! Rand Paul is disingenuous at best and a rabid liar at worst. I really think that Paul short changes both the minority community and the gun lobby.

Thank you Triliogy!!
the media is indeed focusing on Red Herrings. the big one is the Fed. I wonder how long the MSM can circle like stupid moths around the flame before seeing the light on that one.