Ringside at the Apocalypse

we're all helbound in a handbasket..but at least it's a fun ride
Editor’s Pick
FEBRUARY 28, 2009 2:23PM

Spackled w/Cylon Goo: the sad end of Battlestar Galactica

Rate: 8 Flag

At this point the condition of the fictional vehicle 'Battlestar Galactica'--falling apart, patched together with magical Cylon goo-- is a pretty good metaphor for the series itself.  Last night's fourth from final episode was also a pretty good metaphor for the series' final season-- an initial three acts of screechingly awful exposition going nowhere, followed by a final act filled with softcore porn and explosions.

What started out as an inventive reimaging of a derivative and supremely schlocky space opera has become itself little more than pointless soap opera in a science fictional setting.  Much of the blame for this rests with the franchise owners.  The Scifi Channel has dragged this show out long past the point where it should ended--for the sole purpose of selling supremely tasteless ad campaigns to fried chicken franchises.  But much blame also rests with the show's creative staff for increasingly sloppy writing, increasing reliance on shock tactics, and the simple core fact that they no longer have a story to tell.

That story was summed up nicely in previous seasons opening credits--50,000 some-odd survivors of a nuclear holocaust (poignantly, the number continually decreased) wandering thru space in search of a legendary lost home world that may or may not be our own Planet Earth. In pursuit: the human-created machine intelligences--Cylons--responsible for the holocaust.

That story ended when the last season ended.  Earth was found and found to be a radioactive ruin, victim of its own Cylon holocaust many thousands of years before.

All that's left now are loose ends and sensationalism.  The audience is diminished as well.  If you are currently watching BSG, you are either someone has nothing better to do on a Friday night than watch hot cyborg babes perform unlikely seductions while waiting for the next outer space dogfight to commence... or you've been watching the show and you just want the writers to answer the questions that kept you tuning in over the last five years.

Last night's episode was a disservice to both audiences.  Whether you were a drooling fanboy waiting for Grace Park to skin out of as much clothing as Broadcast Standards permit or one of the diminish few who want to know how Starbuck came back from the dead, you had to sit thru forty five excruciatingly awful minutes to get there.

The episode was dominated by two parallel story lines: in one narrative, the character of 'Chief' Galen Tyrol must deal with his feelings for a literally returned from the dead lost love who is soon to face trial for treason.  In the other narrative, Kara Thrace, aka Starbuck-- herself returned from the dead under unexplained circumstances-- recalls episodes from her childhood in conversations with an enigmatic piano player who has begun performing in the (inevitable) ship's saloon.

Both story lines drag on interminably through awkward dialog and leaden set pieces, then speed up in the last act to a cliffhanger ending with just enough sex, violence, and new plot twists to retain most of the remaining audience for the last three episodes. But in the process, so many liberties have been taken with the show's setting, premise, and characters that it is impossible to imagine that anyone is watching because actually care about the outcome.

It is fairly evident at this point that BSG creator Ronald Moore and his writers are simply making this shit up as they go along and not even bothering to keep the details straight. In one episode, cancer-stricken President Laura Roslin all but abdicates her office to the younger and more compassionate Lee Adama. But when a subsequent episode requires an uncompromising authority figure to extradite Boomer to an almost certain execution, President Laura is back in harness and as feisty as ever. In a universe where there is one extremely well-known means of coming back from the dead--being a resurrectable Cylon--no one once wonders if that might just be how Starbuck got to build a funeral pyre for her own corpse. The back-story and capabilities of Cylons change from one week to the next as suit the writer's convenience. The technology that propels Humans and Cylons through the galaxy lacks even that much consistency.

Good drama, whether it is science fiction or cop shows or horse opera, consists of situations and characters that audiences believe in and care about.  The blessing and curse of SF is that those scenarios and characters are not part of the world as we know it.  They can be, for example, humanoid machines or refuges from a planetary holocaust fleeing thru interstellar space.  But while that freedom from every day reality offers story-telling opportunities unmatched in any other genre, it also comes with liabilities that other genres lack.

The greatest of these liabilities is that a lack of internal consistency is an even greater audience turnoff than it is in more 'reality-based' forms of drama.  Anything can happen in a fictional narrative.  But when the point is reached that everything can happen, it ceases to be interesting.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Well, "said," certainly.

One or two questions, following a brief selection of yours from above: "If you are currently watching BSG, you are either someone has nothing better to do on a Friday night than watch hot cyborg babes perform unlikely seductions while waiting for the next outer space dogfight to commence... or you've been watching the show and you just want the writers to answer the questions that kept you tuning in over the last five years."

Setting aside the straight-jacket of your false choice, I wonder into which of the above-mentioned camps would/do you place yourself? Socially-stunted sex-ogler leering for his next TV-14(LV) fix, or naive devotee mazed by all the sensationalism? If it's "impossible to imagine that anyone is watching because [they] care about the outcome," and yet you were invested intensely enough in the episode to produce your review, do those premises not lead unavoidably to the conclusion that you too do not care about the outcome (thus immediately and paradoxically undermining your initial foundation of impassioned and strident concern for the show's "sad end" underwriting your review)?

If you don't care, then whence your care? If you do care, then aren't you in fact one of the tasteless hangers-on of your second group (whom you can't imagine caring), in which case, whence your transcendent critical perch?
I'm still watching and some bits still thrill me, here and there. And then some bits make me sick to my stomach. The show is doing some things amazingly well, but it has so far failed spectacularly at women and homosexuality. I'll keep watching--other friends of mine have quit--but in my head, I have another continuity going, one where gay people aren't evil, women can have strong characters without being evil, and everybody isn't sitting around hoping for some miraculously habitable planet nearby when the fabled birthplace of humanity is sitting all paradise-like and generally unused exactly where they left it.

But I don't know on some counts. That Starbuck may have come back through Cylon resurrection technology doesn't seem impossible at all, according to how they're telling it now, and they're dropping enough hints that I *hope* the payoff on this plotline will be worthwhile. But that the main characters themselves wouldn't consider this seems to be internally consistent with what they know at this point, to me.

But, we'll see. Maybe the end will make everything worthwhile. Or maybe I'll spend the rest of my life insisting that it all went very differently in my head.
"If you are currently watching BSG, you are either someone has nothing better to do on a Friday night . . ."

You caught me!

Sigh. And I followed Babylon 5 off the deep end too. Will I ever get a life? Will I ever learn?
I have been watching the show from the beginning and I truly don't don't see the degradation of quality you chronicle. But, I watched the original (and BSG 1980 - utter shite) so take this with whatever size grain of salt you must.
In answer to Michael Norris' well-phrased questions: my wife is literally counting the days until we 'get our Friday nights back'-- as well as trying to find a bar where we can watch the finale while we're vacationing in Portland, as well as frequently cursing me for having gotten her hooked on this crap, too.

So, in terms of my own admittedly forced dichotomy, I'm someone who has watched the re-imaged BSG from the beginning and frequently been dazzled by the sheer audacity of what Ronald Moore and his team have pulled off.

All critics speak from a 'transcendent perch' and it's always a bit of a fraud--lacking a concern or a bias, no one goes to the trouble of stating an opinion. In my case, I'm speaking as someone is both fairly invested in this particular program, as well visual and written science fiction in a broader sense.

A large measure of my critiques remains focused on what I consider bad business decisions by Scifi Channel/NBC Universal that have impacted the creative decisions made by Mr. Moore and his team. Of course, similar decisions forced Patrick McGoohan to expand The Prisoner from 6 to 17 episodes... so I'll freely admit that 'the suits' may actually know what they're doing (at least once in a generation or so).

Thanks for the comments, BTW.
Regarding gender and sexuality: As Frank Zappa put it "Women and Gays do stupid things too."

People consume a medium either to be entertained or for moral instruction. And consumers can be very unforgiving if either one, or both needs are not met. Some here are dissapointed that women and gays seemed to villianized. Villianized?

The President is a strong woman as is Starbuck. They both utilize their physical and mental strenth to the benefit to the survival of the colonies. If any type of woman is villianized is the kind that use seduction, not intellect, to get what they want. The '7' models were designed to be seductresses and to manipulate vain, walking erections like Baltar. If anything, the Cylon women sexual are dolled up juveniles who see sex not as union, but as currency.

As for Gaeta's sexuality, it had nothing to do with his decision to muitiny. In his mind, it was a clear moral choice for the good of the colonies, good or bad.

BSG is not Vegie Tales, its a space opera with complicated characters. People who think media should show 'positive role models' rather than well-rounded characters are asking for propganda, not a good story.

BTW: Pres. Rosilin did not cede her office to Apollo, but acknowledged that he would be the next leader when she passes. She's still the boss.

Keep in mind that Hera is the most important character and now Cavil's Cylons has her. I doubt there will much time for 'skinning down' during the last three episode.
I couldn't agree more with this overview of the downward trajectory of BSG, one of my favorite shows. I wish I were among those who still enjoyed the show, who could look past or explain the apparent inconsistencies, the heavy reliance on clumsy exposition over dramatization, the wild swings in theme and tone, and the obvious fact that this series should have ended much sooner.

In some ways, you can't blame a series that was first envisioned as a four-hour mini series and then turned into a ongoing franchise for making things up as it went along. What you can blame it for is getting away from the things it did best: emphasizing the knotty, prosaic challenges that a human diaspora would surely face as it fled its persecutors through space; addressing "big" themes using small, often disturbing dramas and conflicts of character; and telling these stories with playful and sometimes innovate narrative devices and cinemagraphic stategies (i.e. the look and feel of Baltar's visions or other flashbacks).

As the series went on, BSG lost interest in these things and developed instead a relentless need to expand and explicate its grand mythology. It started painting in broad strokes and promising answers to gaps in its plot as a way of sustaining the series. In doing so, the series also turned away from one of its strengths--its comfort with the suggestive or the unknown. This is the universe we are talking about, after all. Why do the Cylons attack every 33 minutes? This was never explained. And it didn't need to be.

Count me in the minority, but the more I learned, the less I liked the series and found it credible. I don't want my science fiction universe fully explained. The cylons were more fascinating, majestic, and potentially sinister the less we knew about them. I wish, in short, that BSG and its writers had left more mystery and wonder in their universe.
I'm willing to cut BSG some slack now in the hope of a good ending.

My concern is that there are a hell of a lot of things to wrap up and explain, and only three episodes left to do it in. After watching this thing for years I don't want to be left with some, inexplicable mess at the end.

That's one thing I liked about The Shield -- those people knew how to bring things to a close.
I thoroughly wish the show had ended with the cliffhanger of the last season--Earth as a nuclear wasteland. All the mysticism, all the visions, all the intrigue, all wasted because we blew it up before they got here. Now THAT would have been an ending and it would have been in keeping with the series' efforts to make comments about human life/society/politics.

That said, I am holding out hope that there will be a satisfying conclusion. The first episode of this season showed so much promise. But the whole political/mutiny crap went south. It would have been fine had this not been the last few hours of the show and had they not had so much left to say in them. As it was, I thought it was a waste of time.

With only three episodes left, they seem to have so much to wrap up and are not doing it with any kind of urgency. I'm terrified that the final scene of the show will be Starbuck waking up on back on Caprica. She walks into the bathroom and sees Sam looking over his shoulder at her from the shower.

PS: I have more hope for Lost. They can have my Wednesdays.
Since Ellen Tigh's been back, the episodes have stagnated with too much presentation and not enough action in telling the remaining story.

O.k. so Earth is a bust and the urgency, we audience are s'posed to grapple with is to somehow land the fleet somewhere before the Cylon hybrid-ized Galactica implodes?!!

Oh. I. am. so. concerned. It's kinda' like "1984". We're now supposed to accept that we are no longer at war with Oceania and face a new "enemy" that we hardly know or care about.

I hate to be so flip, but I've followed this show religiously and proselytized many a friend to share in my fervent viewing.

With everything that needs to be sewn up, the latest episode has Starbuck spending A LOT of time throwing 'em back with her not-there-at-all-piano-playing Dad (gee, wonder if he's the "Daniel" Ellen was talking about recently?!! Good idea, insert yet another Cylon when the season is drawing down...I'm sure we'll all become emotionally intrigued) AND we're reliving a past breakup between Chief and Boomer. My friend said it best when he mentioned that since BSG is playing out like some South American Telenovela: who's pregnant with whose child, Ex-wife is back, someone with important information is in a coma, Ex-girlfriend is back and someone's Dad was a good for nothing sensitive artist, and Cylon!

Don't let me continue...