Critical Mess, the anonymous OS user (who likely also writes under another handle on this site) has grown quite popular over the past few months with his/her "Daily Scrawl" blog.
For those who haven't read it, CM touts it as "the people's choice"--an alternative to the Editor's Pick system.
It works like this: CM thinks the editors do a lousy job, so he/she rounds up the "gems" that get passed over for Editor's Picks. People read the Daily Scrawl and appreciate the links to others' blogs. But that's not enough for CM. He/she apparently wants more influence over the OS community.
The following is a quote from the largely absurd CM post called "Daily Scrawl Open Mic: Editorial Picks,Policies,Performance," which currently hovers near the top of the "most read" and "most rated" lists.
"I find mystifying this apparent disregard of members' efforts. In the almost two months of the Scrawl's existence and over thirty posts, not a single visit or comment, appreciative or otherwise, has been made by any of The Powers That Be (TPTB). This shows either appalling discourtesy or severe insecurity."
(CM used the red font--so the emphasis is his/hers)
In the rest of that post, CM invites people to engage in a discussion about "editorial issues" (the more critical, the better), something that clearly greatly concerns him/her. I like to criticize the editors as much as the next guy (I still find no humor in Jocelyn Testes-Harder's posts), but CM's above quote struck me as outlandish and incredibly egotistical.
CM already has a large audience and runs his/her own daily Editor's Pick alternative. Yet, CM is outraged when the actual OS editors leave him/her alone? Isn't that what you wanted in the first place, CM? You now have your (in your opinion) better form of editing. You've got your loyal audience. Yet you complain because the editors don't give you any attention. Your ridiculous outrage makes it sound like what you really want is Kerry's job.
Writing and editing the Daily Scrawl is clearly not satisfying enough for CM.
I called out CM on the above quote in the comments section of that thread. I did it with civility. And CM deleted my comment (hence, this post).
CM also deleted a second comment in which I tried to thoughtfully participate in the "People's Forum."--without criticizing CM in any way.
With a penchant for silencing criticism, CM obviously wants to be THE editor around here. That job is already taken. CM, perhaps you should start your own "best of blog" elsewhere--or better yet, you can create your own open user content forum like OS. There you can be the head boss.


Salon.com
Comments
The second deleted quote was about EPs not necessarily being the most widely read. I even gave you a shout out in that one, MT!
It seems odd to me that people would think that controlling comments so rigorously on a blog would be appealing to people who might want to post there. It's getting so that there are quite a few blogs that I avoid now even if the posts interest me simply because I do not want to feel that I am only allowed to comment in a certain way. And then of course, some of those same people also go out of their way to take offense at anything you write, just because they can.
Quite honestly, I don't find it "egotistical" of CM to direct a few readers to bogposts here who might otherwise go unnoticed. Or, no more egotistical than the pleasure I get to know that a few people have taken the time to read my posts and enjoyed them enough or were sufficiently provoked to think and give me a little feedback. I'm sure I'm not alone in that feeling. Starting a blog is not something totally disinterested people do, anyway. There's the little voice in all our heads that thinks "I hope somebody sees this." It does get discouraging sometimes to repeatedly go unnoticed. (I don't just post and passively hope to be seen--I alert my friends when I've got a new post, and I'm always trying new writers and commenting on their posts to widen my circle of acquaintances here.) Getting noticed and culling a few ratings and positive responses might be the one thing that keeps a talented newcomer from being discouraged and deciding to post a few more times.
thanks for commenting. I do like Critical Mess' Daily Scrawl posts. I think they are a great idea. I think it's a good thing that someone who didn't like the way editors were picking blogs actually did something proactive. CM created his/her own alternative EP structure and earned an audience by doing so. However, I find it mighty big-headed to then insist that the actual editors do more to recognize his/her successful little 'grass-roots' project. To me that sounds like CM would rather put together the front page than publish the Daily Scrawl.
And I also think that it's extremely egotistical and childish to delete critical comments off of an "open mic" thread billed as "the people's alternative."
I didn't mention this previously, but I also don't like the fact that CM uses a pseudonym, because doing so leads me to perceive bias (especially since it seems that CM blogs on OS under other name[s]).
I like the Daily Scrawl, Shiral. But there are others who also compile little read posts (Monte) and tastefully do so with less self promotion.
But yes, deleting comments may not be nice. Also the fact that someof our names do not pull up all our posts for some reason. Do you think someone flagged them is why they dont show up? I have 7 posts but when you type in my name in search "nabina" you get to see only 3 !!! Why is that pray? Isn't a moderator somewhere responsible? isn't that a graver issue than someone wanting Editor's notice?
Mind you am not saying you are wrong or that I didn't like your post - all am saying is it doesn't look like he/she wants Kerry's job. and that since there is an EDIT comment function, it is obvious people might want to use it sometimes, altho I wd be hurt if you deleted mine in an open forum and I do think WITH you that it wasnt nice thing to have happened to you.
Thanks.
This is about a self-promoting egotist who unjustly deletes comments.
denese