MARCH 5, 2009 3:11PM

A little OS censorship fight: Critical Mess' enormous ego

Rate: 14 Flag

Critical Mess, the anonymous OS user (who likely also writes under another handle on this site) has grown quite popular over the past few months with his/her "Daily Scrawl" blog.

For those who haven't read it, CM touts it as "the people's choice"--an alternative to the Editor's Pick system.

It works like this: CM thinks the editors do a lousy job, so he/she rounds up the "gems" that get passed over for Editor's Picks.  People read the Daily Scrawl and appreciate the links to others' blogs.  But that's not enough for CM. He/she apparently wants more influence over the OS community.

The following is a quote from the largely absurd CM post called "Daily Scrawl Open Mic: Editorial Picks,Policies,Performance," which currently hovers near the top of the "most read" and "most rated" lists.

"I find mystifying this apparent disregard of members' efforts. In the almost two months of the Scrawl's existence and over thirty posts, not a single visit or comment, appreciative or otherwise, has been made by any of The Powers That Be (TPTB). This shows either appalling discourtesy or severe insecurity."

(CM used the red font--so the emphasis is his/hers)

In the rest of that post, CM invites people to engage in a discussion about "editorial issues" (the more critical, the better), something that clearly greatly concerns him/her.  I like to criticize the editors as much as the next guy (I still find no humor in Jocelyn Testes-Harder's posts), but CM's above quote struck me as outlandish and incredibly egotistical.

CM already has a large audience and runs his/her own daily Editor's Pick alternative. Yet, CM is outraged when the actual OS editors leave him/her alone? Isn't that what you wanted in the first place, CM? You now have your (in your opinion) better form of editing. You've got your loyal audience. Yet you complain because the editors don't give you any attention. Your ridiculous outrage makes it sound like what you really want is Kerry's job.

Writing and editing the Daily Scrawl is clearly not satisfying enough for CM.

I called out CM on the above quote in the comments section of that thread. I did it with civility. And CM deleted my comment (hence, this post).

CM also deleted a second comment in which I tried to thoughtfully participate in the "People's Forum."--without criticizing CM in any way.

With a penchant for silencing criticism, CM obviously wants to be THE editor around here. That job is already taken. CM, perhaps you should start your own "best of blog" elsewhere--or better yet, you can create your own open user content forum like OS. There you can be the head boss.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
when one starts deleting fair but critical comments from a supposed "public forum," you know it's long past time to try to take her seriously.
Didn't realize that was going on. What exactly did you attempt to post over there? Do you still have your comments saved somewhere?
No MT, the comment is lost forever (as far as I know), but it was the same gist as this post. I quoted the same segment and basically suggested that it seemed to me that CM really wanted Kerry's job. I think the harshest bit was something like: "well, at least you have a healthy sense of self-worth."

The second deleted quote was about EPs not necessarily being the most widely read. I even gave you a shout out in that one, MT!
And I know that little 'fights' like this are silly. I just don't like having my comments deleted--especially when they are completely absent of vulgarities and posted in a thread with "Open mic" in the title.
Hee. My sad little EPs with their piddly 3-4 thumbs up :)
Never availed myself of it actually. I prefer to wander around myself.
yeah, MT, I think that you, Inchachka and myself are the three musketeers of the unread EP.
First they delete your comments then they flag your posts. Nasty puritanical bunch that they are. monkey fingered.
hmmmm...seems like critical mess needs to start his own open writing site, maybe? I've barely been on this site and have enjoyed getting to know and read other writers' works. I have come to the conclusion that there is a sunny side of the street here and that's where I'm going to play...I'm sure there are writers on this site that appreciate your comments and respond in kind.
Edgar, you make it sound like CM is plotting some sort of coup d'etat with the backing of a battalion of loyal Messheads. (Kerry, keep your friends close, and your enemies closer.)
Well, it is a fact that sometimes the better writers are overlooked for the moresensationalistic. Notice I said "Sometimes". I thought the CM was a good idea, but that whole deletion thing is bothersome.
Certain people at OS delete any comments that fall short of hysterical praise or lavish pity, or that dare to disagree with them. I didn't get that sense from CM so I am surprised to hear this.

It seems odd to me that people would think that controlling comments so rigorously on a blog would be appealing to people who might want to post there. It's getting so that there are quite a few blogs that I avoid now even if the posts interest me simply because I do not want to feel that I am only allowed to comment in a certain way. And then of course, some of those same people also go out of their way to take offense at anything you write, just because they can.
As a not-so-widely read member of OS, I usually read CM's picks. So far, I've enjoyed the recommended blogs listed on his/her posts. I kind of like it that somebody's paying attention to those of us who aren't usually on the cover, and I enjoy reading things I would not otherwise know to look for. Plenty of other people have recommended posts to be listed On CM's posts for the same reason.

Quite honestly, I don't find it "egotistical" of CM to direct a few readers to bogposts here who might otherwise go unnoticed. Or, no more egotistical than the pleasure I get to know that a few people have taken the time to read my posts and enjoyed them enough or were sufficiently provoked to think and give me a little feedback. I'm sure I'm not alone in that feeling. Starting a blog is not something totally disinterested people do, anyway. There's the little voice in all our heads that thinks "I hope somebody sees this." It does get discouraging sometimes to repeatedly go unnoticed. (I don't just post and passively hope to be seen--I alert my friends when I've got a new post, and I'm always trying new writers and commenting on their posts to widen my circle of acquaintances here.) Getting noticed and culling a few ratings and positive responses might be the one thing that keeps a talented newcomer from being discouraged and deciding to post a few more times.
shiral,
thanks for commenting. I do like Critical Mess' Daily Scrawl posts. I think they are a great idea. I think it's a good thing that someone who didn't like the way editors were picking blogs actually did something proactive. CM created his/her own alternative EP structure and earned an audience by doing so. However, I find it mighty big-headed to then insist that the actual editors do more to recognize his/her successful little 'grass-roots' project. To me that sounds like CM would rather put together the front page than publish the Daily Scrawl.

And I also think that it's extremely egotistical and childish to delete critical comments off of an "open mic" thread billed as "the people's alternative."

I didn't mention this previously, but I also don't like the fact that CM uses a pseudonym, because doing so leads me to perceive bias (especially since it seems that CM blogs on OS under other name[s]).

I like the Daily Scrawl, Shiral. But there are others who also compile little read posts (Monte) and tastefully do so with less self promotion.
Edgar, I'm rating you. I like to know who deletes comments around here. Perhaps there should be an alternative scrawl to the scrawl that is an alternative to the EP? Or how about we just give the mutual admiration society its own os chamber?
Edgar A, "hi CM well done" is a tiny four word sentence that is all CM probably is or was looking for when he wrote that about Editors not acknowledging. It is only human nature to want the teacher to notice how nicely monitor does when teacher happens to be out, a good word from her doesn't mean monitor is about to claim her post as teacher! but the good word is simple plain humane acknowledgement of the fact that teacher notices monitor exists and is doing well. We all like to know the work we are doing is good work.
But yes, deleting comments may not be nice. Also the fact that someof our names do not pull up all our posts for some reason. Do you think someone flagged them is why they dont show up? I have 7 posts but when you type in my name in search "nabina" you get to see only 3 !!! Why is that pray? Isn't a moderator somewhere responsible? isn't that a graver issue than someone wanting Editor's notice?

Mind you am not saying you are wrong or that I didn't like your post - all am saying is it doesn't look like he/she wants Kerry's job. and that since there is an EDIT comment function, it is obvious people might want to use it sometimes, altho I wd be hurt if you deleted mine in an open forum and I do think WITH you that it wasnt nice thing to have happened to you.
Thanks.
rated, by the way. since I dont know what it is that was deleted, wdnt go fight with CM about it. I like the word 'fair' that's all. did he/she not answer you on the PM?
I don't about your set-to with CM, but I think it's important to keep in mind that CM's Daily Scrawl is picks of posts other readers have recommended. So if CM is trying to pull off a coup d'etat, he/she is sure going about it very democratically.
Tom, this is not about CM pulling off a "coup d'etat"

This is about a self-promoting egotist who unjustly deletes comments.
I LOVE CM -- the only one on here that values what I write! ha!

denese