Editor’s Pick
MAY 6, 2009 2:42PM

Georgia's latest turmoil: Russian Coup or Misha's stunt?

Rate: 6 Flag

3006769335-georgia-s-saakashvili-faces-down-street-protests

Trouble is brewing in Black Sea Georgia yet again. According to embattled president Mikhail Saakashvili, a group of Russian-backed mutiny-minded Georgian Army officers attempted to overthrow the government yesterday. They wanted to get rid of the president prior to today's scheduled NATO exercise. Saakashvili's forces thwarted the coup and now a pro-government t.v. station is airing taped "confessions" that spell out the diabolical details of Moscow's "treacherous plans."

According to key opposition figures, including former pro-Saakashvili parliament speaker Nino Burjanadze, the supposed coup is a homegrown distraction. They say that Saakashvili has invented this latest controversy to pull attention away from the massive Tbilisi protests that have the president gasping for his political life.

Unfortunately for Saakashvili, this all looks eerily similar to how his government "took care of" the November 2007 opposition protests. Seventeen months ago Saakashvili proclaimed on television that the opposition coalition was in bed with Moscow. He then called in the army to violently disperse the protesters and shut down the main opposition tv station. With the help of some questionable taped "confessions," he drove several key opposition figures into exile and called for a hasty special election. Despite a certain level of popular skepticism, Saakashvili won, thus reclaiming his Rose Revolution mandate.

Ten months later, Russia's well-planned and calculated August 2008 power grab invasion seemed to legitimize at least some of Saakashvili's November claims. But this time around, the popular skepticism seems more likely harden.

The odds are stacked against the American-educated former darling of the West. I personally doubt that Saakashvili will make it to the end of the year. He and his dwindling supporters will tell you that Saakashvili's seemingly inevitable fall will be a huge victory for Moscow. Even now, they may still be right.

(photo of anti-Saakashvili protest banner in Tbilisi)

..........................................................

Update: The Christian Science Monitor's Fred Weir covers the region better than anyone else working in the mainstream U.S. media. Here's his excellent reporting on the tense situation.

Weir frames the current crisis in Tbilisi as a politcal power struggle between Russia and NATO, as well as a clash between Saakashvili and his in-country rivals.

...........................................................

I spent three months in Georgia in late 2007 and I've previously posted Open Salon blogs about the country here:

Moscow expands military influence in Georgia

The E.U. brokered settlement screws Georgia again

U.S. sending new $1 billion aid package to Georgia

Cindy McCain heads to Georgia

Russia is crushing the Georgian economy

Georgia is a victim of a Cold War that never really died

Misha's mistakes... and what about Georgia's 200,000+ IDPs??

Gori Memories

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Fascinating intrigue. I always enjoy your posts on this topic. Thanks for the CS link - will check it out.
Thanks MT. As usual, this important story is getting little attention in the American MSM. Fred Weir is breath of fresh air. They say that all big papers used to employ foreign corespondents of Wier's caliber. I guess I must be too young to remember those days.
I appreciate the eye opener and the excellent references! Rated.
Oh they could both be true. Russia is back, even if Saakasvilli is a corrupt imbecile. Methinks a clever Russian provocation; double agents, embarass the president with semi-false confessions. Russia is back, the Great Game is on.rated.
Don, you're probably right with the "both could be true." If nothing else, Russia has created enough smoke in the past year or two to make almost anything happening in Georgia seem both completely plausible and absolutely preposterous at the same time. This seems intentional. and it is working. After all, Russia's now got Abkhazia and S. Ossettia locked away for the long haul.
while I have no illusions about Russian capacity for intrigue and/or provocation, it is important to remember that Saakashvili percipitated the recent war in a failed attempt to curry western support. The investigation of the supposed "coup" has been ongoing for over 4 months by the gov'ts own admission. Curious that it came to a head during the demonstrations and just before the NATO excercises.
Saakashvili is a bad leader. Defying Moscow doesn't make you smart. He needed to win the hearts and minds of the Abkhaz and Ossetians. (Hint, you don't do it with mortars).

Russia's own stupidity with Chechnya should have been a prime example, but no, the Soviet way of ruling was too entrenched in Georgia.
I mirror what Mad Typist said Edgar. Very interesting story. You can't get away from "Georgia" can ya? :-)
Take care.
Malusinka, Saakashvili inherited a terrible situation in Abkhazia and S. Ossettia. In both breakaway regions, Russian backed puppet governments had been in place for more than a decade by the time Misha took over. You make it sound like Georgia's problems with the breakaway regions are all Saakashvili's fault. That is not true.

It was Gamsakhurdia that needed to win over the Abkhaz, Ossetians and Georgia's other minorities. But the Soviets/Russians sowed the seeds of strife. That was almost 20 years ago.
As always, a good piece, Edgar. I think you're right that this is not a Russian provocation -- it sounds internal, and these protests against the government have been brewing there for a long time. You lose a war and you suddenly become unpopular *anywhere*, but especially in former Soviet countries, where the memory of Soviet military victories past shine awfully brightly.

It's probably time for him to go. If he were really smart, he'd be thinking about a successor instead of holding on to power. I think he's afraid of what the people will discover when he leaves office.