Bisexual.
I hate that word. I cringe when I say it, when I hear it, when someone uses it to confirm or deny my sexual identity. It's the equivalent to "mulatto." It's icky and outdated and strangely detached from feeling. Bi gives me the creeps.
Bi is everything uncertain, everything in-between, everything fence-straddling. Bi is being unable to make up your mind. Bi is not committing fully. Bi is being too afraid to step all the way out of that proverbial closet, or bi is following the latest pop culture trends, clamoring for attention at the bars or having one too many shots. Bi is a hanging chad, an unsigned contract, a half-answered email.
Never -- or, at the very least, rarely -- is a bi a legitimate, understood, accepted sexual identity.
I am bisexual. I've known this from the moment I was ever aware of having crushes, male or female. I mostly liked boys, and like any normal kindergartener, then middle schooler, teenager and college co-ed, I crushed, flirted, dated, fucked, loved, lusted, admired and fantasized all about... boys. Except, of course, when I'd do those things with girls, too.
At first this was my dirty little secret. It wasn't until late college when I dared even drop the tiniest hint that "bi" was a part of my make up. Liking and lusting women was only acceptable in the context of Jill Sobule, Girls Gone Wild, that classic Neve Campbell and Denise Richards movie (you know, that glorious pool scene) and later (for better or worse), Katy Perry and Lindsay and SamRon. That is, my split sexuality was okay in the context of trendy, pop culture, sassy role playing -- but that's where it ended, right? I didn't really like girls for real... except, um, I did.
In some ways, bisexual individuals are the last great sexual frontier. The vast majority of Americans can understand gay, even if they don't agree with it. We can spot it, identify it, rally after it, dedicate a cable network to it. We have the gay rights movement, gay pride parades, gay magazines, gay cruises, even a gay chamber of commerce. We have gay politicians, lawyers, doctors, teachers. We bisexuals? We're stuck with Lindsay Lohan, Cinemax after midnight and a kitschy pop song every decade or so.
Why is bi still in the shadows? Why do bisexuals still feel so alienated, even when LGBT culture is becoming so mainstream? Afterall, there we are right there in the acronym, in between the gays and the trannies.
We're a misunderstood, complicated bunch.
You mean, we want to have sex with men AND women? How do we decide whom to flirt with at a bar or take home at last call? Do we just sleep with one gender and settle down with the other? Do we want gay marriage too? Couldn't we just marry the opposite sex and avoid the whole kurfuffle? Aren't we being selfish? Isn't this a stage? Is this some kind of manifestation of third wave feminism? Are we trying to prove a point?
We raise a whole new crop of issues that people simply don't have the energy to evaluate. Pick a side and stick with it, they think.
The truth is, I've never felt accepted even within LGBT community. I'm not a lesbian. I'm not even your stereotypical (heavy emphasis on “stereotypical”) girl that's into girls. I'm a lipstick-wearing, Sex and the City (rerun) watching, boy-crushing, stiletto wearing, half-lesbian cliché. I'm ashamed to say I haven't seen a single episode of "The L Word," the idea of wearing (or being received by) a strap-on terrifies me to no end and I'm about as attracted to butch women as a gay man is to me. In other words, I have zero street cred in the lesbian community and gay men think my mere existence is minimalizing their cause.
My particular sexuality -- my fondness of men and centerfold-resembling women makes me a joke in the LGBT -- and, in many instances, the feminist -- world. And I understand. Because of the duality of my sexual orientation, I can "pass" for straight when it’s convenient. It's true: I don't know what its like to be gay bashed. I've never had to experience the awkwardness of taking a same sex partner to the company holiday party, the fear of getting bullied in school, the ire of family members who can't accept my lifestyle. When needed, I just slip into my heterosexual identity and no one knows the difference.
But is it that easy?
Sure, I'm not the easily-spotted lesbian archetype, and therefore I don't bear the full brunt of the burden of homophobia -- but this disguise, by default, also closets me automatically. Close friends know that sometimes I'm with women and sometimes I'm with men, but my family, my coworkers, my acquaintances -- not a clue. Nothing about my outward appearance betrays my bedroom preferences, so I hide. This has its own consequences, to be sure, not the least of which is rarely being able to find another woman like myself since we've all got our heads buried in the sand. When I have stumbled upon a girl who also identifies as bi (though few used the actual term), it was merely by accident, perhaps a whispered confession after 10 too many vodka tonics. A former girlfriend, a gorgeous, feminine-to-the-max sorority girl who always dated the hottest guys on campus, wondered how many more of "us" there were out there, keeping the secret shoved so far deep down that we barely even entertained the thought ourselves. There we are, hiding in plain daylight.
Yet even those close to me don't take my sexuality seriously. Boyfriends used to laugh and wink -- did I want to put on a little girl-on-girl show for them? Girl (platonic) friends seemed titillated ("I've always been curious, too.." they'd hint after a night out drinking) or suspicious ("But we're just friends, right?"). Well-meaning pals unintentionally belittled my identity: "Well, we all fall in love with a person," they preached, trying to ignore the issue of gender. Well duh, I thought. No one falls in love with a penis or vagina, no matter what their orientation. Even market research studies, social networking profiles and most dating Web sites ignore us -- "bisexual" is very rarely an option.
It wasn't until I moved to New York that I felt I could own my sexual identity in all of its ambiguity and political incorrectness.
C started at the PR firm I worked at just a few weeks after I did -- we were going to be the new girls together, and for that I was grateful. Instantly I was drawn to her. She was gorgeous in an organic Brooklyn kind of way, and absolutely glowed. I knew immediately she too was into girls -- turns out bisexuals have a "gaydar" afterall. Months later I confirmed my hunch via office instant messaging about my hookup the night before.
"What was he like?" she asked.
"Well... it wasn't a 'he,'" I replied, daringly.
"Me too," she typed.
I think I finally exhaled then. She was, believe it or not, the fist bisexual woman I'd met, aside from the few female hookups I'd had in the past -- although none of them claimed their bisexuality. But C owned it. During a train ride back from a company retreat, we secluded ourselves in a car away from our coworkers, talking the whole time about our sexual identities. I consider it my first "coming out" moment. After 25 long years, I actually said aloud for the first time, "I'm bisexual." And someone else could relate. I was beyond thrilled to have found a confidant in her. Yet even in the excitement of realizing I wasn't alone, I found myself mired in the very bisexual discrimination I couldn’t stand. I often would resent C's boyfriend -- not because I necessarily wanted her, but because I wanted my newfound bi buddy to join the trenches with me, to fight for the cause! How could we spend two hours talking about the secret world of bi and then she could just go home to her banker boyfriend? A part of me felt betrayed, no matter how crazily unjustified it was.
That same summer I continued the bi breakthrough when I went on my first date with a woman. Sure, I'd slept with women before, but it was always under the guise of a party trick, a drunken dare, a freak occurrence, a friendship gone too far.
But N -- N and I went on a proper date. We met at the Flatiron Lounge, a perfectly dark, sexy, gorgeous little haunt. We ordered drinks. We nibbled on appetizers. We shot each other cautious but knowing looks. We giggled uncomfortably when a group of men tried to hit on us, totally unaware that we were the ones trying to pick each other up. Hours later we hailed a cab and on our way to her favorite late-night pizza joint, she kissed me, hard and fast and eager. She invited me up to her place after we gorged on slices and Cokes, but, like any good girl on a first date, I demurely declined. Nothing more ever became of N and I, but I finally felt like I'd owned my bisexuality. I'd vocalized it. I'd claimed it. I expressed it in an evolved fashion, without having to hide my desires behind a trend.
Bisexuality is still the red-headed step child of the LGBT world. We're far from united. I'm the first to admit I've been partly responsible for my own "accidental" closeting -- there were times along the way when I could have casually dropped the b word into conversation, corrected someone when they assumed the date I was discussing was a man, or spoken up when a friend said she "didn't believe" people could go both ways. I was far too cozy in my straight world, even if that wasn't the whole story.
I still don't like the word "bisexual." It's all kinds of ill-fitting ickiness. But it's me, and I'll try to get used to it, one cringe-inducing proclamation at a time. And to all of the other hundreds and millions of secretly bisexual women out there -- hi. I'm glad we had this talk.


Salon.com
Comments
I have often thought that there must be more like you out there that appreciate women physically and for who they are, but find different needs from a man.
But why do we have to define ourselves by sexual preference ( or lack of)? Do we define ourselves by the lingerie we wear, the perfume we choose, the architectural style we choose to admire and live in? We are a hell of a lot more than the sum total of our parts. And being labeled "bisexual" just categorizes to the point that other things are ignored.
Yes it might be your dirty little secret. It's certainly my dirty little secret. But like everything else in life, it's on a spectrum. It flows. It's not limited to what the world wants it to be. It is only limited by what I want it to be. And if I'm feeling "girly" today and not tomorrow, who cares? I am who I am, I'm happy and able to be who I want to be. Why label it?
"Well duh, I thought. No one falls in love with a penis or vagina, no matter what their orientation." Of course not! What a great point to make - I hate the canned platitudes.
I've never thought to much about the labels, or even spoken much about sexuality with people, as I just assume it is all fine and wherever you fit and are comfortable, great! I don't mean that to be minimizing, as I can see this isn't the average attitude, I just mean it as pure acceptance.
Congratulations for your clarity. Rated.
Rated!
theres a few other bi's on here, I see they havent discovered your post yet.
ps you didnt mention the madonna/britney spears kiss. I think that was a real milestone that made it much more mainstream. madonna is very bisexual but has almost never talked about it in interviews or openly dated other women-- to this day.
I like your philosophy of fluidity, but check this out. I could substitute the word "polyamorous" everywhere you used the word "bi" and have an almost identical essay... how do you feel about poly, anyway? its interesting the bi's, priding themselves on such fluidity, have some of the same prejudices [not pointing at you in particular]
ps welcome to open salon
I found this relevant and thought-provoking.
Thanks for putting it out there.
I have to admit, there is a lot of hostility in the gay community to a man who self-identifies as bisexual. The reason is simple: the most common lie I've heard, after the person in the closet who denies everything, is the person who pushes open the door slightly and says, "I'm bisexual."
Usually, it's a short stage: "... really, I guess I like guys and just said it to be comfortable to acknowledge that I liked guys, but want anything to think that I might be, well, gay." Or something like that.
But it's painful to suffer through.
So, there's baggage with the label. I think that some of it is generational - the younger generations seem less driven by labels about their sexuality, or at least less afraid of the labels.
This article is an excellent insight into the worldview of female bisexuals, and succeeds in presenting the inescapable frustration of bi women: which sex do I choose, or if I don't choose, how can I balance both my attractions?
Most people bond in a committed relationship because evolution required it. So it's not unusual to find bisexual women who bond with a woman for a long time. Then if that relationship ends, they are as likely to form a new one with a man. Straight people, at least in our current framework of mores, try not to stray sexually from the commitment, rationalizing in part that they can get at home what they are missing elsewhere (even though that is not really true, because every sexual connection is unique). But bi women are very aware that what they get at home is not at all similar to what they are missing. Is that why so many women in swinging are bi? Is it why a lot of bi women resist marriage?
Ms. Friedland doesn't discuss where she is on commitment vs. open relationships, and how that sorts out for her as a bisexual woman, and I hope she does so in a later article. I commend for her reflection the concept of polyamory, whose advocates hold that keeping the door open for others as a part of one's love life, even in a committed relationship, can be managed successfully if all involved are considerate and tolerant, and hopefully affectionate toward each other. The argument is that we need more loving in this world, not less. I think it's a good one.
I fell into the latter category for a few years before realizing my attraction to men went no further than flirting, with no physical desire or real emotional connection beyond the platonic. However, that's MY experience and I would never presume to project it onto anyone else.
"Bisexual" is such an umbrella term for people who fall along very different points in the spectrum. Among my friends/acquaintances who identify as bi are: A man who has been in a same-sex relationship for 20-plus years; a woman who is serially monogamous with either gender; couples who participate in occasional threesomes to satisfy the bisexual partner's same-sex needs; a guy in his 20's who just loves sex, plain and simple; a young woman who falls into the "scared closet case" category; and so on and so on and so on.
As a gay women who has no issues with bisexual women (except when I happen to fall for one, but that's a whoooole 'nother story!), I find I'm a minority among my Sapphic sisters. It's unfortunate that the prejudice gays are fighting against is the very same discrimination many inflict upon their bisexual sisters and brothers. It seems they've forgotten what the "B" in "LGBT" stands for.
"As a gay women" should read "As a gay womAn."
As the soon-to-be-ex husband of a now-fully-realized bisexual woman, perhaps I can offer some insights into the stigma attached to bisexuals, both in the straight and LGBT community.
Put simply, it's a matter of commitment. There's a subsection of bisexuals who claim that "no matter which side I choose, I'm missing something".
While that may lead to polyamory and be fine in that context, in more traditional (gasp) pairings, it leads to significant insecurity on the part of the partners, be they homosexual or heterosexual, since as a partner you LACK something, no matter what. Also given the number of "I cheated on my husband with my girlfriend" stories and the "married women who love women" support groups out there, there can be a significant destablizing force to commitment in relationships with bisexuals.
This is NOT to say that there aren't bisexuals who do, in fact, make long-term pairing choices and have no issues with fidelity/monogamy. However, as we know, it's those that make the noise who get the attention.
Everyone should be who they are, out in the open, no matter what. I firmly believe that if gender preference wasn't a big deal, we'd all make better choices.
Goodness knows I will in the future.
Best of luck to you!
- ds.
I have married woman twice, and the current marriage is great, but have no doubt that sex with men can be just as much fun, especially once you get past the Catholic upbringing.
I am also a bisexual woman. I have had my experiences with the 'bi curious' straight girls who won't even admit between the two of us we ever happened (for lack of a better word).
*didn't want that sarcasm to be the last comment ;)
I'm a straight guy who sees most of life with a healthy sense of humor.
I'm comfortble with my self/sexuality and am never "threatened' by being around anyone of the LGBT community.
I believe the actual key is the fact that I'm "comfortable' with myself.
I've been around for a long time and have seen those comical times when some RIGIDLY "straight" guy will get all nervous due to being within 100 feet of someone who is gay.
You can actually SEE it.lol
They don't even realize that this reaction/attitude is all about them and not the gay person.
I'm 70Y/O. I've never been this old before even though I've never seen any advantages to 'growing up".
I'm from a small town in Ill.
You may have heard of it~~Chicago.
Well, I've been there/done that/seen that.
I was in Nam in the 60s and, YES, there are atheists(ME) and gays(A FELLOW GRUNT) in foxholes.
There is so much bullshit that has gone down about all of this that too many people are too ignorant about the truth.
Eliz, you have clearly found your own answers and, I'm happy for you.
Now for the real difference concerning sex/sexuality.
The difference is that we can be bisexual whether we are single or married.
When we are married, we are usually limited to buy sexuality.lol
They are in the trenches everyday ...... fighting a war ...... transexuals are brutally murdered every year.
From their perspective, you are just a dilettante, serving your own interests but unwilling to confront the distrust and hate in the real world.
What we really need is people are willing to take stands on the lying destructive behaviors of the species ...... not their sexuality.
I started out hetero but would like to be omnisexual... But I'm old and gross and even the insects aren't attracted.
One of my issues with bisexuality is gender. Bisexual women are accepted, even "cool" and trendy despite the fact that they have to convince most other lesbians that they aren't just doing it to titillate men. Bisexual men? We're not so accepted.
In fact, garbage studies produced with trashy science continue to come out trying to "disprove" that we exist. Bisexual men are generally not very well accepted by either the gay community or the straight community. We're either told that we're sleeping with men to be trendy or sleeping with women because we're somehow desperate not to be gay.
I'm not "desperate" over anything - my family fully supports my life choices, and I've personally always been happiest with both a male lover and a female lover in my life. I wrote a blog post about it a while back -
http://open.salon.com/blog/incandescent/2009/04/24/my_wife_my_boyfriend_and_i_-_polyamory
When bisexual women gain acceptance they'll stop being seen as sex objects that exist to excite men. When bisexual men gain acceptance our sexual orientation won't be the subject of speculation by others and people will simply accept the fact that yes, while we may be in the minority, some men can and do enjoy sleeping with both other men and other women. The same holds true for emotional intimate relationships - I enjoy them (albeit differently) with both men and women.
Great post. Rated.
I found myself muttering agreement throughout your entry as I read it. It is, in some ways, easier to be bisexual than it is to be homosexual. The confusion that comes with it, though... I had a conversation with a couple of close friends, who are both gay males. When I'm hanging out at the "gay" bars, the group I'm with expects me to be lesbian. In everyday life, people expect me to be straight. Why not just be?
or more accurately, some can be more intolerant than anyone....
So those of you who are bisexual should ask these people why we as individuals can't open like both sexes physically and equally in all ways.
I love women, especially their unique bodies and trying to see as many of them between age 16 and 35 as I can naked. I don't care one bit to look at guys. But if that's what other guys want to do, it doesn't bother me. We all should be able to enjoy whatever we want so long as no one is harmed in any way.
As a bi man, I can add that we have a hard time finding partners. Straight women don't want to date us; oddly enough, neither do gay men. I suspect the reasons are the same— what if we are with one person, and then express a desire in someone of the other gender? That frightens a lot of people.
Bi women, on the other hand, are seen as a prize to straight men (I certainly thought like before I came out to myself), even though lesbians show the same distrust of bi women that gay men display toward bi men.
But I suspect that bis find each other without even knowing it. Even before acknowledging the nature of my own sexuality, and dated women exclusively I only seemed to date bi women (or at least women with some same-sex history).
After coming out, the only people who understand what I am are other bis. Even though my experiences are 90% with women, that 10% I tried to suppress for years is a huge part of who I am.
Bless you for being who you are, and keep sharing.
I submit that a lot of the social crap has more to do with presentation; I wear men's shoes because they fit (and accommodate my orthotics) and tend towards butch clothing, so I'm usually taken for a lesbian. I was amused several years ago when I expressed admiration for the male Olympic swimmers on a breakroom TV in earshot of one of my colleagues, who in turn expressed her surprise at my comment, since she thought I was a lesbian. In her defense, she generally saw me in jackets and ties (Windsor knot, thank you very much), the town was (and is) quite small, and she expressed no bias towards or about me as a lesbian or as bi. Still, the gay-straight dialectic is alive and well.
I'll also cop to a certain interest in finding other bisexuals. I was overjoyed to find Catherine Deneuve's role in The Hunger was actually bi, since she had been getting it on with not only David Bowie's and Susan Sarandon's characters, but also others of both sexes in her long vampiric career (visual proof of which comes in the climactic scenes). I admit some of my interest in the careers of Drew Barrymore and Jeremy Brett (among others) is the fellow feeling of bi-ness. And closer to home, I find a certain joy in the bi friends I've had and still have; we can commiserate on the crap we can get from both sides when we aren't discussing health care or war or the movies we're looking forward to seeing or recipes for duck.
That said, I don't care much for the label either--or, more specifically, for the need for a label. I know that categories are a useful strategem for dealing with large amounts of information, but I am also aware that labels can be very limiting, particularly when those labels have negative connotations. Any individual is much more than the sum of hir parts, yet people are inclined to think that when they have others labeled, they have them, "penned down, mapped out, easy to understand." Nobody's really that simple, not you or me any more than R.E. Lee.
Maybe it's because you are cute (at least your avatar).
Maybe because we are all confused a lot of the time.
I think it is because I think it is sort of exciting to have all that sexual ambiguity and possibility. Yes, possibility.
And I don't think you really really need a lot of "cred" in the GLBT community. Not my idea of a serious problem.
So, you are young. Attractive. Well on her way to figuring out exactly what team she is going to play on. Most of the time, anyway. And still able to switch hit if the opportunity arises.
And with the Amelia Earhart movie out and all.
And a sense of humor.
Your future is so bright, you gotta wear shades, etc.
Nick.
I think that what many of us in the LGBTQ community need to remember is that Bi is its own orientation. This is complicated by the "going to be" gay/lesbians that use Bi as a stepping stone and by the sorority girls that "play at it". The “posers” are the ones that upset their gay brothers and sister the most because no one likes to be “played”.
Nonetheless, many Bi people truly DO love both their male and female partners. The interrelationship between gays/lesbians and “true” Bi’s is too deep of a subject to discuss with a comment (and yeah, I feel a post coming on), but as Incandescent, Max the Communist and I have discussed in the past, it IS an issue that needs to be worked on.
I don't agree with your fundamental premise that straight or gay people in the US, particularly among publicists and others who make a living off milking current trends, don't know what to "make of" bisexual people. That they are a sexual minority in that in terms of sexual preferences they represent less than 50% of the population is true, but that means others don't know what to make of bisexuals.
Your article suggests bi people have to hide themselves from society or risk rejection. Everyone in life risks rejection based on summary prejudices and judgments. This is why many won't discuss politics or religion openly. Your article is proof of that - you openly state you are bisexual. I doubt anyone would reject you for that reason (though some may question the premise of this article, as I am doing).
In my life no one has ever suggested I could get paid for writing about how I am straight. However you, as a photogenic young bisexual woman, can not only write about it and get published but paid for it, too. Suppose I could do that if I wrote about how I realized from an early age that I was heterosexual?
If being bisexual worked against you or made people not want to be around you, I seriously doubt you'd be openly advertising this fact to the world though an article complete with work history and picture especially in such a tight labor market. People hiding from the judgments of society tend to seek to avoid the limelight... when was the last time you saw an article written by a bank robber talking about how hard it was to "come out" and tell people what he does for a living? As a young bi female at the height of "modern female bi chic"-ism, you can do nothing but benefit from your self-identification as an "oppressed sexual minority".
Enjoy your next 10 job offers from various glamor magazines, as I am sure you have already started getting them.
I liked one of the above poster's comments: "'Bisexual' is such an umbrella term for people who fall along very different points in the spectrum." It's a garbage term, as we say in the sciences. Everything gets thrown in there. I think this is a big part of why I feel very uncomfortable with the term myself. To me, there's a huge difference between "straight and experimenting," "need a man and a woman to be satisfied," and "fall for a person and don't want to be with anyone but them, whichever gender they are." Monogamy is what feels right to me. It's definitely not right for many others and we really need to refine both our ideas and our vocabulary... I hate that so many people reject me out of hand because they have a mistaken idea of what *I* want based on this crappy label.
My other issue with the term "bisexual" is that it's only about sexual preference (or, well, lack thereof), and not about cultural identity or lifestyle the way our other terms like lesbian, gay, queer, butch, drag queen et cetera are. So, when I tell people I'm bisexual I feel like I'm talking about my sex life. And that's none of their business! I'm pretty reserved and have old-fashioned values. ("Queer" is better in many ways, but honestly, it does have some fairly fixed connotations that don't describe me either.)
And for those who don't understand why a young, attractive, bisexual woman might have anything to complain about... I'm glad you've had positive experiences. That's very cool. But when someone else says they're bruised and scared, they probably do have a reason, and it's wiser to ask more questions than preach.
This was a lovely article. I'm sad, however, that you had to use a disparaging word for trans people. For a lot of us 'tranny' is very hurtful and it's a shame that when discussing discrimination against one group of people (bisexual people), you had to discriminate against another.
As someone who has publicly identified as bi in certain social circles for 20 years, but also never 'come out' on the subject to family or work colleagues, I have spent half my life pretty much in the position you have described. In all fairness, I have been married to man for more than half of that time,. At least one gay female friend of mine to inform me that "just because (I) kiss a girl now and then" I can't actually claim to be bi any more because of my monogamous relationship with a man. (Humorously, she is one of the women I have been known to kiss now and then. With my husband's knowledge.)
I have pretty much lived my life so far in the bi closet, and I think it would take a big change in my romantic life for me to come out right now. Maybe that is cowardice, but certainly bisexual people get little to no acceptance in the gay community (although they still want our votes and our support!) and frequent accusations of trendiness or outright rejection in the straight community. (unless its porn, as someone else cleverly pointed out!)
Anyway, I am betting you will do just fine.
Thanks again for a great post.
and @darkside - married women who love women aren't usually bisexual; they're lesbians who married men. there's a difference.