We know spam has gotten a lot worse in the past two weeks or so. However, our product team is testing out a new way to filter and delete accounts that should significantly reduce the amount of spam on OS.
On a similar note, I've been getting a few questions about "phantom" comments. (The phenomenon where you receive notification of a comment, but none appears when you check your blog). Here's the explanation: A spammer commented on your blog (resulting in a notification), but we deleted the spammer (along with its comments) before you checked your post.
Thanks for your patience.

Salon.com
Comments
P.S. Kerry: Will you give this woman a freak'in raise already! She's the only Editor you've ever had that actually tells us stuff.
Now as for the beets--- bring on Beet Week!!
Thank you very much for the information, Emily. Like everyone else, I appreciate that immensely.
Lezlie
Here's a ticket for a celebratory song dedicated to your team's effort:
http://open.salon.com/blog/poorwoman/2010/09/14/another_spammer_bites_the_dust
Go staff!!!!!
R
The simple solution is beautifully simple: Put a scroll bar in the frame where the new posts are listed.
The problem with spam comments is that they clog up the system. The problem with spam posts is two-fold: they clog up the bandwidth AND they make it difficult for us to find new posts from the people we like to follow.
IF you put a scroll bar in the New Posts frame, it would enable us to skate right by the offensive spam posts....and find the new posts from our friends and fellow travelers.
Or, if you don't want to do it with a scroll bar....how about a crawl instead of a static page?
R
Please visit our website stopsuspiciousspammers.com and remember to shop ed hardy til you drop,
just kidding.
I do trust that you and the staff are working on this.
Geez Black Jack Davy, why don't you tell us what you really think.
Oh and even though it's none of my business, I will stand by Amy and vote for Emily's raise.
Rated for action!
Oh well, thanks for the update. I still think a block of maybe under a half hour between posts is a good idea, most of these spammers are getting on and like posting a post every 5 minutes, sometimes more, sometime less...
But what the hell do I know, I'm just a cat....
Seriously, keep up the good work, your TroubleShooting/IT folks are actually pretty good(I think there's only like one of them though, you might considered getting a night/weekend person to monitor stuff like this.)
Good night and have a better tomorrow.....
Any chance you could shoot these people some sort of spellcheck thingie?
Thanks for the information. I appreciate all the work that goes into keeping this site running and allowing it to be an artistic yet intuitively running platform for creative folks.
I do encourage you to consider Catherine Forsythe's suggestion carefully. The serious writers here have a vested interest in having this site work well, and between our varied schedules we have "eyes on" coverage 24/7. If we had the ability to temporarily block an account by consensus of, say, half a dozen posters, leaving final judgment to your staff later, I think we could lick the problem in a very short time.
After all, the same dynamic applies to spammers as it does to us - nobody wants to put effort in posting stuff that doesn't get read.
I find, Emily, that when spam situates itself in the comments, it tends to end the string. We've done it ourselves; we're reading along, have something in mind to say, hit a clump of spam, see nothing below it and wander off....
One of you who understands the spam technology? Post an explanation of how it all works; I'm curious.
Lois
Right now, I'm waiting for you to EP em and put em on the Cover!!!!
:D
I'll shut up now!!
Thanks for the update Emily.
:D
Keep up the good work.