Eric Ross's Blog

Quills from The Porcupine

Eric Ross

Eric Ross
Location
Falls Church, Virginia, USA
Birthday
November 24
Title
Visiting Professor of Anthropology
Company
George Washington University
Bio
Eric B. Ross is a U.S.-born anthropologist, specializing in questions of equitable development, who has lived and taught in Europe for 27 years. During that time, he authored such heterodox works as The Malthus Factor: Poverty, Politics & Population in Capitalist Development and (with the late Marvin Harris) Death, Sex & Fertility: Population Regulation in Preindustrial and Developing Societies. He also was the chair of the MA program in development studies at the Institute of Social Studies in The Hague. Prior to that, during his years in the UK, he was an active campaigner against the Tory government and a member of the Steering Committee of the Public Health Alliance, which fought to defend the NHS. He returned to the DC area (where he lives with his daughter, Mimi) a year and a half ago and, among other things, edits a political magazine called The Porcupine (www.theporcupine.org). He has just finished his first novel and is looking for a publisher.

MY RECENT POSTS

OCTOBER 26, 2009 1:41AM

Trigger is a Horse, Not Health Reform

Rate: 2 Flag

I am running out of things to say about the health care reform process in Congress.  Like other supporters of single payer, the so-called public option already represents a big compromise, so when President Obama let Senator Baucus, a man in the pocket of the insurance industry, frame the Finance Committee Bill without even a public option, he slipped substantially in my estimation.  It will take a lot for him to redeem himself. 

Now that it suddenly looks as if it may have a slight chance of reappearing, he has his chance.  We wait for the President to send out a strong message, endorsing it.  This is no small thing, because it is one of the key reasons we elected him.  But, no, once more, in the name of Senator Olympia Snowe's vote, he prefers to dither (My god, is Cheney right?)  It is said that, in order to gain her support, he will support a public option with a trigger.  This is, frankly, the lamest excuse for presidential initiative that I have ever seen. But, I will admit that it opens up enormous new possibilities.  How about linking military escalation in Aghanistan to a trigger?  Like, if Olympia Snowe votes to legalize gay-marriage, or, better yet, becomes a relief pitcher for the Boston Red Sox?

Or maybe the trigger for the public option should have nothing to do with Snowe.  How about we just say that the public option kicks in after 40,000 more people die because they don't have insurance?  A trigger isn't health-care reform.  It's Roy Rodgers' horse.  It's the device that fires a gun.  It's another name for murder.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Obama believes/d that the Clinton attempt at health care reform failed because it offered a target to be shot at. His plan was to get Congress to produce a bill and then be able to shape it. This view was pretty standard before Obama took office and he put his method into action.

The idea of a trigger is a compromise. One side is firmly against a public option, sure that without it insurance will be affordable and available. The other side thinks this is tosh. So, the trigger is way to blend them. If the system doesn't work without a public option, it will be triggered. If it does, then we won't need it or have it.

Since the Senate has to pass the bill and the senate is far from representative of the nation, this is something that they hope will pass. (CA has 36M citizens and 2 senate votes. The least populous 4-5 states have a combined population of 3M, and 8 to 10 senate votes. )
Malusinka: you think the trigger is "a compromise," that "If the system doesn't work without a public option, it will be triggered. If it does, then we won't need it or have it." It is already obvious that the system can't work without a public option, because that's what we have: a system in which health care is for profit, run by corporations. In the meanwhile, you want us to wait for more definitive proof of this urgent reality, before the "trigger." One year? Two years? Each year that goes by will mean tens of thousands of needless deaths, hundreds of thousands of ruined lives. You can't compromise with death.
Any reasonable "trigger" would have occurred well in the past. We are so far beyond the notion of a dysfunctional health care system that it is tragic.