Keep Breathing

Erica K

Erica K
Location
New Jersey, USA
Birthday
September 26
Bio
Grew up in Jackson Heights, New York, but now live in Jersey. Married and the proud owner (servant?) of 4 cats, including a little blind guy named Quincy. Jobs have included: English teacher in U.S. and abroad, cabaret performer and member of a NYC sketch comedy troupe; now a full-time legal secretary and freelance writer. Other jobs: canvasser for NYPIRG/cannery worker in Naknek, Alaska (a fisherman told me it was "the ugliest part of Alaska")/dog kennel cleaner/member of the swine and poultry crew on a California farm. This year a memoir piece will be published in Telling Our Stories Press and poems in The Awakenings Review. Currently working on a one-woman show. "Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." Samuel Beckett

MY RECENT POSTS

Erica K's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JUNE 23, 2011 4:07PM

My Husband Says We Need More Guns

Rate: 22 Flag

“Political correctness is simply tyranny with manners.”
                                Charlton Heston

Guns don’t fit my demographic.  I’m a middle-class suburbanite who was raised by thespian Democrats in New York City.  I stay mute when colleagues speak of the horrors of guns and vow they would never allow one into their home.  I pretend to agree.

As some of you know, I was an activist in my 20’s, considered by some to be a Marxist or a Communist, but I never thought of myself as either.  I’ve seen most of Michael Moore’s films and used to be anti-gun.  Even though I’m a registered Democrat, I don’t agree with everything “Democratic” nor do I consider myself ultra-liberal.  I voted for Obama, but the patina has gradually worn off, not to say that I’ve given up on him.  We are not the nation our forefathers intended us to be, but we still possess inalienable rights, including the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

My husband Lorin has always wanted to target shoot but was not permitted to do so while growing up.  Last year he told me he wanted to buy a gun and reluctantly, I agreed.  I was still anti-gun.  He went through the rigorous process of getting his license which took months:  background checks, three character referrals and fingerprinting.  New Jersey’s gun laws are among the most stringent in the country.  We went to gun shows in Pennsylvania, but he purchased his first gun, a Beretta, at Ramsey Outdoor in New Jersey along with a cleaning kit, goggles and ear muffs.  He asked if I was interested in shooting and, being the good sport that I am, I said okay.  He purchased a used 38 Special, aka “Police Special,” for me.

Beretta 9mm 

Beretta 9 mm.

Police Special 1929 

Police Special, 1929

We joined an outdoor shooting range about an hour north of our home and took the mandatory safety class.  The remoteness of the country setting and the inability to think about my troubles as all the safety precautions ran through my head was liberating.  I pointed the gun downrange, saw the sights, aimed and fired.  It was a moving meditation.  It made me forget how sick my mother was and how tired I was of taking care of her.  It gave me permission to be selfish and free.

I preferred the 38 Special to the Beretta.  When I shot the Beretta, the bullets often jammed or stove-piped, and I lost patience.  The magazine is also harder to load.  I also preferred the action of the revolver; it felt more natural in my hands.

In August, Lorin and I took a full day Basics of Pistol Shooting class sponsored by the NRA.  One of the instructors said, “If revolvers are simplicity, semi-automatics are complexity.”  I guess I preferred simplicity.  We were also told never to refer to our pistols as “weapons”; it gave us a bad name.  After the sit-down portion of the class, each student was assigned an individual instructor to shoot with.  I brought the 38 Special, but because the sight was worn out, I used my teacher’s Smith & Wesson .357.  I felt like Clint Eastwood in Dirty Harry.  I had a blast (no pun intended), but my upper arms quivered from the weight of the revolver so I had to put it down from time to time.  I needed to buff up.  Lorin’s teacher said he was a “natural.”  I was very proud of him.

Smith & Wesson 357 

Smith & Wesson 357

During breaks Tea Party literature was distributed, and people asked if we were going to the next meeting.  Lorin and I smiled and said we probably couldn’t make it.  We had the excuse of living too far away and working in the city.  It’s funny how people assume things if you own a gun.

It surprised me to discover that both my brother-in-law and father enjoyed shooting; neither of them are Tea Party members or remotely conservative.  The three of us went to an indoor range in Los Angeles while I was visiting over Christmas.  Dad and I had one of those father-daughter experiences that will forever be etched in my memory.  When we got home, dad bragged to my stepmother about my shooting ability.  I felt like a kid again.  Maybe this is what Lorin had craved and missed as a kid:  to do something he excelled at and be praised by a parent.

Who would have ever imagined a gun totin’ rabbi?

Here’s an excerpt from a New York Post article from September 4, 2009, entitled, “Go Ahead, Make My High Holiday”

chosen_guns 

“Fearing jihadists will attack synagogues during Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur, a group of badass rabbis has developed a program to turn your average shul-goer into a lean, mean fighting machine.

The group, which calls itself the International Security Coalition of Clergy, was founded by Rabbi Gary Moscowitz, who boasts a black belt in karate, teaches martial arts and was an NYPD cop for nine years.”

See them in action:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGiyQSeDroo

Many celebrities, including Sylvester Stallone, are anti-gun (Rambo is anti-gun?), but they aren’t averse to retaining armed bodyguards to protect them. 

One of the few outspoken pro-gun celebrities was Charlton Heston, who I thought was nuts until I read his entire 1997 speech at the Free Congress Foundation’s 20th Anniversary Gala in which he spoke about our constitutional rights, among other things.  He was engaged in the civil rights cause before Hollywood found it fashionable and marched on Washington with Martin Luther King in August 1963.  Hollywood turned its back on one of their biggest icons when he became a Republican and gun advocate. 

Heston announced that he had Alzheimer ’s disease in 2002.  I recently learned that Michael Moore knew Heston was suffering from AD when he ambushed his home during Bowling for Columbine to badger him about his NRA presidency.  Talk about hitting someone when they’re down!  Always a class act, Heston graciously excused himself from the interview.

George Clooney joked about Heston’s disease in 2003 while receiving an award at a National Board of Review film awards ceremony.  He said, "Charlton Heston announced again today that he is suffering from Alzheimer's."  When questioned about the remark by New York Newsday, Clooney said, "I don't care. Charlton Heston is the head of the National Rifle Association. He deserves whatever anyone says about him."  My love affair with George Clooney has officially ended.

Heston’s response to Clooney was, “"I served my country in World War II. I survived that - I guess I can survive some bad words from this fellow."

In his 2002 video-taped farewell speech, he spoke of his career and his illness: “I can part the Red Sea, but I can’t part with you, which is why I won’t exclude you from this stage in my life."  He also said, “As an actor, I’m thankful I have lived not one life, but many.”

My mother suffers from the same disease but doesn’t know she has it.  Maybe if I told her a fellow actor had it, it would make a difference.  But I know she‘ll never like guns.

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
It is illegal for any private citizen to own a firearm in the United Mexican States with some narrowly and strictly enforced limitations regarding hunting weapons. Now, consider the situation here with that background.

My 9mm Sig Sauer pistol is back in my room at the farm. I wish that I could have it with me here. Yet, I like to think myself as progressive as the next person, perhaps more so.
That is what my husband says, too! I don't even know how many he has. I am afraid of them.
Brass,
That is very strict. We are not allowed to carry guns in the state of New Jersey, that is restricted to police officers and those with armored cars, and the like. Too bad you can't have it.

Miguela, Does your husband hunt or target shoot?
I am at peace with guns regarding my own choice to life long choice to live without them and I support the journey of those who feel they need them and all that entails. Great article! xox
He is an avid target shooter and cartridge reloading afficionado.
I am a progressive, yet I am totally in favor of private ownership of weapons, albeit with regulations and intelligent restrictions on felons, the severely mentally disturbed, and shadow-purchasers from owning and/or purchasing them.
I absolutely loved your post. It is so refreshing to read something that isn't automatically tagged with a political agenda. I have long known it is not a sin to like and own a gun. I've had a love afair with them for 65-years. I was born into it. I simply didn't know any better.

Although I am much to soft hearted to hunt animals, even for food, I love firearms. And I love them for the very reasons you explained so clearly in your article. My heart would be broken if our nation ever went the route England and others have gone and outlaw these firearms. I have a very old six-shooter that dates back to the days of Wyatt Earp. It would be a travessty if someone were to come into my home and seize that piece to be broken and melted down.

I don't particulaly want an assault rifle; I'm not planning any assaults in the near future. But, I can understand the pleasure of firing one on the range. Just as I enjoy firing my old double-barrel .410 shotgun. If you've never done it you will never understand. Again, thank you for your refreshing post.
Very thoughtful post, very. I own the same Beretta, and might suggest that your jamming may be caused by your using hollow point ammo rather than jacketed. Hollow points tend to gum up the works.
If the Beretta jams only when you fire the gun.
It is more likely the way you are holding the pistol. Make sure your elbow and wrist are locked...and your grip is firm.
Thanks for writing a piece that isn't loaded with saccharine political correctness. And for recognizing the many shades of grey that exist in life.
Thanks for writing a piece that isn't loaded with saccharine political correctness. And for recognizing the many shades of grey that exist in life.
Thanks for the comments, everyone.

Rw, I am also against guns getting into the hands of the mentally ill and socially deviant, but I can't change the laws.

Capt America, I'm sorry if I freaked you out. Hope you sleep tonight.

Nice to meet a fellow Joiseyan! Hi.

Planner Dan, thank you. As long as we are safe and responsible, right? I have no agenda as concerns guns, as you pointed out.

BadScot, thanks for the tip.
Good advice, Larry. Thanks.

Thanks, Mary.
Good advice, Larry. Thanks.

Thanks, Mary.
I was totally anti-gun until I had to take care of a child (my son, who was about three years old at the time), my husband was in the Air Force and gone all the time, and a child was abducted about a quarter of a mile from our house and sexually mutilated. The perpetrator was never found. My husband was gone at the time and didn't get back for several days.

When he returned, we bought a shotgun and I went to the range (half a dozen times, at least) and learned how to use it. I had a sore and bruised shoulder but I was confidant that if I had to, I could protect our son, whether my husband was at home or not.

I am more comfortable having a shotgun in the house than a handgun. It is large, bulky, and not easy to use. Obviously shotguns cannot be easily concealed, and our intent in possessing it follows, I believe, the spirit of the Second Amendment. We have never used it outside the firing range and we will never use it unless someone breaks into our home and threatens our lives.
Look, it is very simple. Criminals have guns and will continue to have guns (period) and that is a FACT. I am sorry, I am really sorry, but no argument about guns can start without that premise. You tell me! R
My dad was a gun nut (engineer) whose only hobby was reloading bullets in our basement. He taught all of us kids (all 8) how to shoot and kept a loaded gun in the glove compartment of his car until FL passed a law that if your gun is not properly locked away and used in a crime, you could be an accessory. He finally took it, to my mother's relief. She hated guns, she still hates them, but for some, it is a passion (for my dad it was a passion for velocity).
It is interesting that you bring up so many dichotomies that we all live with...I feel (like Heston said) that I have lived a life as many people, not just one. Then again...I'm not an actor.
Maurene,
Wow that must have been frightening. My husband said a shotgun is the best for defense. You did what you had to do to protect your son.

You're right, Thoth, absolutely. I just didn't choose to write about the criminal aspect of guns.

Kate, do you still shoot?

Brazen Princess, haven't we all lived many lives? Thanks for your comment.
I like the idea of shooting one, but not owning one.
I hear you, Pauline. I don't have my license yet, I use my husband's guns (he owns both pistols) when we're at the range.
Great article. I agree there are many shades of grey.

But for me I prefer the bean-bags for the 12 gauge home defender. For starters, I'd hate to be charged with murder or man-slaughter in my own home. Second, a shotgun blast inside of your home will probably damage your hearing as well as leave huge blood splatter all over the room.

Once you shoot with a bean-bag you can bludgeon them with the stock. That is by far more satisfying...
I don't like guns, but I enjoyed reading your post.
When I was a child at summer camp, I excelled at target shooting and brought home all my targets for my parents to admire. I've substituted other pursuits for relaxation these days, but I can see that target shooting could be enjoyable. I also see that you need a gun in the country if you own livestock. I see a place for hunting in some parts of the country. In the city, though, there is no reason to own a gun unless you expect to kill a human being. And owning a gun for self-defense increases the odds that you'll be killed by your own gun. I think the NRA has done a nice job of making gun ownership into a black and white issue and setting us against each other. Don't let the NRA change your politics just because you do recreational shooting.
Ardee, I can see your point about the dangers of guns in the home; however, we keep them locked in a safe at all times and only use them at the range. The NRA has not changed my politics in the least.
Excellent post. As a fellow resident of northern New Jersey, I can say that I have actually purchased a firearm at Ramsey Outdoor (nice folks), and am also a member of the range you refer to. Funny thing, I have been a member of that range for ten years but have never shot there beyond the orientation class. I really need to make the time to get there -- it's hard to find the time to drive so far north. I used to go to Ray's Sports's range to shoot, but they recently shut down. At any rate it's nice to read anything about guns that is not slanted toward the "anti". I appreciate your remarks about Heston and I had no idea that George Clooney would say such a thing. He just went down several notches in my eyes.
Guns:

A working farm or the like in rural America, a gun makes sense.

In urban America, not so much.

As far as keeping one in one's home, it's important to consider the probability that it will be used by a family member on themselves or another family member.

People get depressed. People get mad. People get scared. People make mistakes.

However, if you are comfortable that you have those risk factors covered, then go for it.

I suppose if I was in a place where I had a strong need (rather than a remote possibility) to have a weapon at hand, I would do everything possible to go somewhere else.

But, sure. I'm for guns in theory.
In my current serial fictional piece, Amber has a Remington 870 for home defense, a Glock 33 for concealed carry, and a Taser for non lethal self defense.
I have no interest in owning or shooting guns. but I live in AZ, and have become a progressive libertarian with socialist leanings. I have come to realize that making issues only about liberal/conservative is stupid. A lot of people live on the land and use guns in their daily lives for protection of themselves and their family. It's necessary for safety, and I don't just mean against humans. Sadly, we don't require the safety classes and many people (children) are hurt because their parents are idiots... with loaded guns.
Perhaps due to my life experiences, my perspective is quite different. Having lived for a good portion of my young life in apartheid South Africa, (I'm no longer young), I can't help but find irony in this article. There, the white masters all enjoyed their gun rights, claiming they loved target practice. Granted some of it was pointed at live targets. There is nothing liberating about holding a weapon of death in one's hands. They also coveted their "right" to own guns, naturally for protection from their feared African adversaries. While Americans here were vigorously protesting Apartheid, I can't help but wonder what similar or identical behaviors were being practiced? Having lived here now for nigh on 27 years, I have a good idea. Being a Democrat, means understanding the difference between owning weapons of mass destruction (a handgun is one of them. It can wipe out six people), and progressing in society by the use of non-violent recreation and dialogue. Body guards, law enforcement and military should be the only individuals trained and licensed to carry weapons. And if the arguement that we need weapons to protect ourselves against dictators or an Orwelian government is used, sorry, it's already happened. No amount of gun ownership is going to protect the citizen from the circling helicopters and men in black. Desiring weapons under the guise of recreation is primitive, much like our obsession with Nazi dogs, like Dobermans, Rotweillers and Pitbulls. Until individuals are willing to face these stark truths, we aren't going anywhere but down. And I see it daily in our nation. It isn't just the GOP who is in dire need of overhaul, improvement and common sense. Our love affair with guns didn't do the individuals of Iraq or Afghanistan much good. Doctors, teachers, lawyers and thousands others have been displaced by violence and tragedy. In the end, law doesn't reside in the barrel of a gun. It resides in intellect. Apartheid SA wasn't dismanted with the bible in one hand and the gun in the other. It ended due to the intellect, adoration and kindness of one man.
SpectralStranger,
How funny. So you are a member of Cherry Ridge Range?

Nick,
I can see your point of view. Again, it is a new hobby for me.

Oryoki, That's awful. Safety comes first. Unfortunately those who are not safe (or crazy) are the ones who end up hurting others.

IceRune, I cannot imagine what your experience must have been like. I am not obsessed with guns, it is merely a hobby, but I can see how even this would be offensive to you. I am not a gun lobbyist or a member of the NRA.
In my part of the rural West, guns are so common as to be politically neutral. Gun control, however, is not, and I do blame the NRA for the fearmongering that has convinced so many on the right that any restriction at all is the first step toward totalitarianism.
Yes, I'm a member of Cherry Ridge. It gets so beautiful at that range when the leaves turn color during the Fall. I really need to get up there.
Spectral,
We haven't been up there in a while, but look forward to going when the leaves change as well.
Erica
A very interesting post. I don't quarrel with gun use as you and your husband practice it as you're being responsible and nobody's getting hurt. With the stress of taking care of your mother, I can understand that it's a big emotional release for you.

I have to admit though, I really hate reading news stories about events like Columbine and Virginia Tech. Or stories about one person with a chip on their shoulder who kills and injures several strangers who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I absolutely disagree with those in our nation who think college and high school students should be able to bring guns to school. There are so many things about that that bother me, I hardly know where to begin. It drives me nuts after tragedies like Columbine and Virginia Tech, that more vociferous gun owners insist on saying "This wouldn't have happened if the victims had been armed!" It wouldn't have happened if the perp had been UN-armed, either. A person who deliberately opens fire on the un-armed without provocation on their part (or even with it) is a badly disturbed indiviual.

We have to be a certain age and demonstrate we're skilled and responsible enough to drive cars in a way that doesn't endanger ourselves or the people around us. If our driving record is consistently bad, we lose the privilege of being able to drive. I can't help feeling that people's right to own guns should require the same level of responsibility to ensure their safety and OURS. I'm sure there are VERY responsible gun owners. Unfortunately, it only takes a few irresponsible people doing idiotic things in public to make gun owners look bad. There are people I don't think should be handed a plastic picnic knife, let alone a gun.

Put a lot of armed teenagers on a high school or university campus, and I have to say I wouldn't ever want a child of mine to attend that school or work on that campus in any capacity myself. I think guns on school campuses in the name of "safety" is one of the worst ideas I've ever heard. I fear the chances that an armed student will cause a monumental tragedy are far greater than the chances that they will prevent one. We can't guarantee the good judgement and emotional maturity of every student in every situation every day. So please, for God's sake and the sake of all the other students at that school, DON'T ramp up tensions by sending them all to school with guns in their backpacks.

rated
Shiral,
I hear what you are saying and am in complete agreement. I also hate hearing of the ever-occurring murders by gun on high school and college campuses and by workers going "postal". Unfortunately all the perpetrators in these cases have been mentally unstable and never should have owned guns in the first place. The problem is with the ease of purchase and lack of background checks, among other things. As I commented in an earlier response to IceRune, I am not a gun lobbyist or member of the NRA. I do not advocate that children come armed to school and the like. Thanks for your comments.
Very interesting, and we were just discussing guns last night with mutual liberal friends who had never considered owning them before. Strange times we're living in, indeed.
Yes, we are living in a "brave" (?) new world, Helvetica.
Good for him, and good for you, and thank you for braving the hoplophobes to post this!
Matt, Great word, don't know that one! Viva la difference!
I wouldn't say I'm against guns, but I have an uncontrollable fear towards them. Even if it's a toy pistol I still shiver. However, I think people should be free to make their choices. There are lots of places nowadays where you can get used guns for sale and I don't blame anyone who does, as long as it stays a recreational activity.