Keep Breathing

Erica K

Erica K
Location
New Jersey, USA
Birthday
September 26
Bio
Grew up in Jackson Heights, New York, but now live in Jersey. Married and the proud owner (servant?) of 4 cats, including a little blind guy named Quincy. Jobs have included: English teacher in U.S. and abroad, cabaret performer and member of a NYC sketch comedy troupe; now a full-time legal secretary and freelance writer. Other jobs: canvasser for NYPIRG/cannery worker in Naknek, Alaska (a fisherman told me it was "the ugliest part of Alaska")/dog kennel cleaner/member of the swine and poultry crew on a California farm. This year a memoir piece will be published in Telling Our Stories Press and poems in The Awakenings Review. Currently working on a one-woman show. "Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." Samuel Beckett

MY RECENT POSTS

Erica K's Links

Salon.com
Editor’s Pick
JANUARY 11, 2012 9:45AM

Pharmaceuticals "R" Us

Rate: 29 Flag

“God damn the Pusher Man.”

            Steppenwolf

I don’t know about you, but I find that some of the most entertaining TV commercials are those for prescription drugs.  The networks show them around dinner time.  The ads are inherently upbeat, showing “average” people in idyllic / fantasy settings; the voiceover artists’ mellifluous voices lulling us to indulge in a drug-altered Eden.  When it comes to the side effects, however, they typically speed up so their words are barely intelligible.

The only two countries where direct to consumer (DTC) advertising of prescription drugs is legal are the U.S. and New Zealand.  In our country, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates these ads to ensure they are neither false nor misleading.  However, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the FDA for its inability to ascertain that all ads are reviewed adequately. 

 “As of May, 2011, the average number of prescriptions for new drugs with DTC advertising is nine times greater than prescriptions for new drugs without DTC ads.”[1] 

According to the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, pharmaceutical companies make $4.00 for every $1.00 spent on advertising.  The money spent by advertisers is then passed onto the consumer.  The consumer is far more likely to ask his/her doctor for drugs that he/she has seen in a TV commercial, and if the doctor does not comply, the consumer may become irate or go elsewhere for a fix.

Among my favorite commercials are:

1.  Mirapex for restless leg syndrome or RLS.  Side effects include drowsiness, and increased gambling, sexual or “other” intense urges.

 2.  Yasmin or Yaz, birth control pill.  Side effects include deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, blood clots and risk of blood clots, weight gain, kidney failure, depression, seizures, stroke, heart attack and death.  Women over 35 who smoke are at increased risk of these side effects.  According to Jane Mundy (LawyersandSettlements.com), many young women contracted gall bladder disease after using Yaz.  Whoops, no gall bladder, but at least they won’t get pregnant.

3.  Ambien, for insomnia.  Side effects include worsening of, or development of, depression, hallucinations, suicidal ideation, aggressive behavior, sleepwalking and “bizarre behavior.” (Narconon).

4.  Abilify for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.  Side effects include blurry vision, constipation, drooling, high blood pressure, vomiting, dizziness, headache, uncontrollable movements of the face, tongue and other parts of the body, stroke, heart attack and death.  It should not be prescribed to elderly dementia patients.

My mother was prescribed Abilify and took it for months before we knew she had Alzheimer’s disease.  Who knows if this contributed to or worsened her condition.

 

 Mom’s former GP, aka “Dr. Feelgood”, prescribed Ativan (Lorazepam) for many years, although she knew she was overmedicating.  I spoke to Dr. Feelgood many times about this, but Mom had her wrapped around her little finger.  Mom would freak out if she could not get her prescription filled immediately.  On the one hand, it calmed her down; on the other, it could have killed her.  She was supposed to take 1 mg twice a day, but she routinely took at least 3 mg at night to help her sleep, putting her into an almost comatose state.  Ativan is contra-indicated for elderly patients because it can cause unsteadiness, resulting in falls and hip fractures. 

I feel somewhat responsible for not curbing the flow of Ativan into her veins, which went on for many years, but she was an independent woman so there wasn’t much I could do.  When I was a child, she took Valium to sleep, and later Nardil and a host of other drugs for anxiety and depression.

Confession time.  I take prescription drugs too:  Pantoprazole for acid reflux, Celexa for depression, Klonopin for anxiety and the occasional Ambien to sleep.  My whole life I swore I would never take psychotropic meds because I grew up with a mentally ill, addicted mother, but here I am.  My goal is to eventually get off the psychotropics, not a New Year’s resolution, but a goal.  First I have to start a new exercise regime.    

I say today’s Pusher Man is Big Pharma and our friendly neighborhood doctors.  Don’t let those white coats and Ultra Bright smiles fool you.


[1]           Congressional Budget Office (CBO), “Potential Effects of a Ban on Direct-To-Consumer Advertising of New Prescription Drugs,” www.cbo.gov, May 26, 2011

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
We're a nation of zombie consumers, grunting, groaning and grabbing at whatever the voices on TV tell us to grab. No wonder cartoon characters like Romney and Santorum are serious contenders for the world's top job.
Well, we don't really consume zombies, yet. At this point we're a nation of consumer zombies.
This is a society raised on the newest and latest "pill". They get them in elementary school with Ritilin and it never stops. My parent's generation would not take an aspirin unless they were bleeding to death. I quit smoking and was off blood pressure medicine within the week. I'm also trying to change my diet to get off of all drugs except pain meds, which fortunately, keep me alive. A worthy trade-off I think!
although the intent of direct consumer advertising by big pharma is to increase sales, i don't advocate curtailing the right to advertise (censorship of free speech)

as long as the ads are accurate, and contain the appropriate warnings, i see little problem.

in fact, when I watch the network news in the evening - which is almost 100% sponsored by medicines - i often wonder who in their right mind would jot downt the convoluted latin name of some obscure drug which promises side effects such as nausea, elevated blood pressure, headaches, and risk of heart failure.

as far as advertising goes, i feel the nation is more undermined by beer ads on TV.

alcohol is still the nation's number one killer. and none of the budwiser ads contain a warning that side effects include obeisity, loss of brain function, and fatal car crashes. as an addictive over the counter mind altering substance, it should be required to have a more complete disclosure.
This is excellent and yes we swallow whole these pills and their ads. A nation, at times, of lemmings. r.
I think the chance of many -- not all -- of these extreme side effects actually occurring is small. The drug companies have to list every conceivable side effect for liability reasons. My beef with the pharmaceutical companies is the obscene profits they make at the expense of those who legitimately need the meds to function.
My favorite has always been "May cause anal leaking". Ewwww. On a serious note the ability of drugs to help people with any of these problems is not in question. If they can, they should. I've had both ends of the spectrum in my family. My mother was so anti drug that she was in a lot of pain and my father was seriously over medicated in the last months, if not years, of his life. The biggest problem I have is the inability for some people to get the drugs they need because of lack of money and reasonably priced healthcare and prescription drugs in this country. If a quarter of this advertising money went for that it sure would help. Of course there is also the problem of just how awkward I feel when that cialis commercial comes on when I'm watching with my sons.
Know about this culture all too well from the years I spent as a major university medical center spokesperson. Also have seen what constant use of Ambien does to people. Ativan too.

Things maybe won't change until the zombies start causing real danger. Major motion picture level.

Very sad. Thanks for posting this story.
Thanks for posting this and raising awareness to this problem, Erica. I'm amazed at how many of the horrible side effects are common to most of the drugs that are supposed to make people sleep restfully, cure erectile dysfunction, slow down memory loss, fight depression, and prevent heart attacks. And, as you wrote, these side effects are quickly mentioned while often a couple sits in separate bathtubs, set out in a field overlooking a lake at sunset.
R♥
The thing is, if you visit your doctor and ask for a med you saw on TV, and he prescibes it for you, he's basically a drug dealer.
Matt, right you are. Excellent point about cartoon characters running for office! Ha ha! Maybe that's why there are so many movies and now a hit show about zombies, "The Walking Dead."

Scanner, Absolutely. Of course you have to take your pain meds and whatever else is essential. I take meds too. I'm just against the grotesque overzealous advertising of often unnecessary, dangerous drugs.

Baltimore, Points well taken. I agree about the alcohol ads, they are obscene. And, yes, alcohol is another killer. I agree completely.

Jon, lemmings "r" us.

Divorcedpauline, Yes, the side effects don't strike everyone, but they do strike some. As a living example, I took a new sinus spray today (have bad allergies and frequent sinusitis) called Omnaris, prescribed by my ENT yesterday. I've been feeling manic for the past 3 hours and almost had a nervous breakdown in the car while taking my cat to the vet.

Barbara, Yes, I love the anal bleeding (eeew!). Yes, it is awful if you can't afford the drugs you need and the drugs should be more affordable. Without insurance, I'd never be able to buy my prescriptions. Each costs about $300 a bottle (30 tablets). It's sickening.

Mary, that's right. The zombies must unite! Thanks for stopping by.

Fusun, Thank you. Yes, I love that commercial too, bathing outdoors by sunset. Dreamy!

John, Exactly. So many die of prescription drug overdoses, including the King, Elvis. Died in a hotel bathroom choking on his own vomit. What a way to go.
I, too, am uncomfortable with the aggressiveness with which pharmaceutical companies advertise their drugs. That being said, I find the backlash to this practice often very extreme and unfair to people who actually need those drugs. As I've written before, many medications-- especially psychiatric ones-- are dismissed as "unnecessary" and "the easy way out," when, in fact, many people need to take them. Sometimes, the side effects are worth the benefits.

I'm not saying all this in your post as much as I am to the inevitable stream of comments about how medication is a cop out, people's problems are made up, etc. etc.

By the way, I'm really sorry to hear that about your mom. You shouldn't feel responsible; there isn't much you could have done.
While it's obvious that Big Pharma has it's ethics issues (my day to be very understated) I think baltimore aureole's take is just as relevent. Humans make choices everyday that include a lot of risks. The fact that we selectively choose to ignore the bad ones in favor of the "risk" that something good will happen, isn't Big Pharma's problem, it's Big DNA's problem. One should also note that the incident of such side-effects is extremely low (as in single digits out of thousands) for FDA approval (for some insight into the incredible complexity, jargon and yes, possible obfuscation involved in that process: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Testimony/ucm161673.htm ). Obviously, it's far from perfect and far from immune to the influence of big money, but what isn't?

If we were rational, you couldn't advertise cigarettes at all, everyone who currently smokes would need an RX to continue and no one could buy them over-the-counter otherwise.
If we were rational, alcohol wouldn't be advertised either, nor any substance with such obvious addictive qualities which impair judgement and do so much harm.

And if we were rational, we would have started subjecting many forms of advertising to scrutiny and proof testing, long before Big Pharma came along to use the same techniques to make you believe that the good sex life, freedom from pain and ability to turn back the tide of bad living (more irrational decisions, given how much information is out there for anyone to learn about nutrition, exercise and *preventive* medicine) without the anal leaking, came along.
Jacqueline, I agree with you 100%. I don't think the use of psychotropic drugs is a cop out at all. It is essential for many people, like my mother, and right now, they are helping me too. I just hate the aggressiveness of the advertising.
According to my doctor, this has become a huge problem as patients "demand" drugs which are usually not suited to their "syndromes." And the consumer pays for it. Pharmaceutical ads not only increase the cost of prescription drugs, but also increase the likelihood of malpractice. Disastrous policy. How can we change this? Thanks for writing.
Samasiam, Yes, I hear you on that. I agree with baltimore aureole. Big Pharma has a right to advertise and we as adults have the right to refuse drugs with harsh side effects. And yes, we are not rational.
Elizabeth, I wish I had an answer. Some of the highest paid lobbyists in DC are gunning for the pharmaceutical industry. I will have to do more research.
Excellent piece and right you are! I have shared that surprising fact, about how only two countries allow pharmaceutical ads on TV, with many over the years and no one ever seems to be as shocked as I was when I first learned it. It has been long evident to me that these ads foster over-consumption. It doesn't take a Phd. Of course they do. People fall all over themselves to defend the free market system, but don't often consider the full ramifications thereof. When there is money to be made, public health be damned.
Three ways to avoid the message. Hit the mute button, hit the mute button, hit the mute button. I am amazed that when the ads reveal the side affects, which usually include flatulence and death, that anybody would ask their doctor for an advertised drug.
Erica K: Blows my mind when I watch Amr. TV and see all the drugs that are advertised. Most often the range of side effects listed are deadlier that the condition/disease. This does not mean I don't support the use of meds when they work for people. I remain wary in many instances though considering the Pharma profit bottom line. I also recognize I may have benefitted from the use of some meds at certain times in my life. Instead, I used recreational drugs.

My Mum took Lorazepam too. She kept the bottle hidden in her dresser but I saw it as a kid when rooting around. Once I learned what Ativan was, I could identify the anxiety I grew up with.

Fantastic song to fit your post.
There is a hypocrisy here, but to argue it would be to spend more time than is prudent. Simply put, I hear those ads and am amazed at the list of side effects (and I don't think them being statistically "low" makes them safe, but that may just be me, if death is on the list, then death is on the list of things to avoid, right?) At the end of the listing of side effects, I usually laugh and say something like, "Wow, I'd definitely take liver trouble, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, blurred vision and erectile dysfunction to cure my acid reflux, that shit burns!"

One less zombie consumer or consumer zombie to the mix.

Sadly, the big Pharma and alcohol and tobacco can advertise, but the Medical Marijuana issue is being hotly contested as "dragging our country into the gutter" after all, it's the gateway drug -- unless you have a prescription. I mean a prescription for a drug some company sells legally, that's okay.

Another great song to cap this off is, "Mother's Little Helper" by the Rolling Stones, which came out very close in time to "Pusher Man" and has a catchier tune to boot.

And if you take more of those,
You will take an overdose,
No more running for the shelter
Of your Mother's Little Helper
Helps to get you through your night,
Helps to minimize your plight.

--r--
Occupy Your Mind
I like the antidepressant ads that say "if your current antidepressant medication is not working, take this one in addition to it!" That makes sense, right? If the first two don't work, take a third on top of the first two. (I think that's called 'stacking'). I read that 40% of the retail cost of prescription drugs sold in the US is the cost of advertisement and promotion, passed on to the consumer (or the insurance company). Physicians who prescribe a lot of certain drugs sometimes end up (coincidentally) collecting large sums in "speaking and consulting fees" from the drug's manufacturer. [R].
Erica:

My friend Kat is from Belgium, but has had several American friends. She is amazed that we all know the names of most drugs and what they do and their side-effects. Europeans are not nearly as pharmaceutically inclined as Americans are to address health issues. Less is more for them, and their overall diet, exercise and occupation play a far greater role in their health care (and most Euopeans have universal coverage, so that says something about their attitude toward drug companies trying to convince people they need their product). It is illegal to advertise drugs there. Their opinion is it is up to the doctor to keep up to date on new drugs, and only doctors should be making these decisions.

My first doctor in Beijing was an 80+ year old from some European country. I take Seroquel nightly for insomina, and clonazapam for anxiety as needed. After one prescription for 10 tablets, he refused to fill the clonazapam further because it could "cause dependency". (I have bi-polar and have taken both those drugs since 1997). I switched doctors, (there are only 5 shrinks in all of Beijing) and love my new one, and asked her why did he act that way about the clonazapam. She said, "He is a dinosaur who should not be in practice anywhere. ALL bi-polars have anxiety."

I have never become dependent on clonazapam because I do not take it daily. There are times when under a lot of stress my brain won't calm down enough for the Seroquel to kick in, so I take the clonazapam one hour before the Seroquel, and that way I do not have to take a "double dose" of that VERY EXPENSIVE drug, but it is a miracle drug. It saved my life, and at the end of that, that is what counts.

Great post!
It is embarrassing and it shows the hopeless ignorance of the American consumer; at the same time, it is sooooo American. It is called "business." Excellent post. R
This makes me think one thing. A person on a podium addressing a large audience. Person: "You're all individuals." Audience in unison: "Yes. We're all individuals."

Regretfully, this is the state we are in today. We listen to a nameless voice on the telly (a paid voice actor with no medical knowledge to speak of) tell us what medications we need, instead of acutally heeding the advice of our medical care provider who has many years of college and medical practice under his/her belt.

We eat zombies...er...wait, I mean we as consumers are zombies. (Thanks Matt Paust for the chuckle) We are sheep...lemmings even. It saddens me.

Very well written.

(r)
Good for you for wanting to get off too many things...but I don't think it's wrong to use things to help when they are in fact helping. The question is one of moderation.

And though I appreciate that much of advertising supports arts and entertainment production, I distrust the whole business side of the medical industry. Individual people (shareholders) should not be personally profiting off of people's illness. The whole thing should be a network of non-profits, with unpaid, expert governance boards, from research to service to production. Not government, but NGO. At least, that's what I'd like to see happen. That might swing the balance towards more helpful approaches, as opposed to greedy selfish ones.
I think they should ban television advertising of these products. And I think that the pharmacy rep bribery system should be regulated too. I have a friend who's a doc, and he has literally never had to buy a lunch; pharma reps cater in for him and his whole staff (they take turns) every day. I got to share once; it was delicious. ....I am not about to say drugs are bad - I love that my high blood pressure is totally controlled and that I can breathe despite me asthma - but I think there's got to be better ways to get and keep drugs in the market.
With pressure on doctor's fees, too often, diagnosis is limited and a pill is prescribed. With psychological problems, it is even faster. Sure, some people need psychotropic drugs, but does everyone who gets diagnosed?

Where's the voice saying maybe you need to change your life? It's pretty much understood that many unhappy housewives were prescribed Valium when maybe what they needed was a divorce, a career, and a new life.

We need to get over bipolar craziness of assuming that either no one ever needs a drug or that all that are prescribed are necessary.

I was shocked when I had some prescriptions filled in the States at the cost. It was what should have been a cheapish generic and the cost for a small bottle was over 30$. It's crazy. All the drug stores assumed I'd have coverage for medications, something I never thought was needed, until I saw US prices.

When is the country going to stand up and admit we're being gouged?
For the sheer number of such ads you are right, but prescription ads are also run here in Italy, they are just fewer and duller.....
saluti
Ok, I want to know what drug causes anal leaking! That is just sick! And that bath tub ad is silly! If the drug is doing it’s job just why are they in separate bath tubs anyway?

I befriended a pharmacist who does drug pricing for a huge pharmaceutical company. She won’t take anything but aspirin because of side effects and how often drugs are taken off the market. That really scared me. I guess you have to do your research and weigh your options and do the best to take care of yourself.

Please don't feel responsibile for your mom taking too much meds. Dr. Feelgood shouldn't have prescribed so much to her, and I'm sure you couldn't watch her all the time.

Thank you for your post. And for weaving your funny sense of humor into it!
Bluestocking Babe, exactly. Profits over people, always. When will it end? Thank you for reading and commenting.

aboudd, I often hit the mute button, but sometimes I need a good laugh, so I keep the volume on.

Scarlett, I think you probably benefited more from the recreational drugs. So your mom took Lorazepam too. Valley of the Dolls!

dunniteowl, medical marijuana will not yield profits for the pharmaceutical companies and might indeed lessen their profits if people find more pain relief from Mary Jane than they do from Percocet, Vicodin and other painkillers. I was hooked on Percocet for almost a year when I had a cervical spine condition, but perhaps, some pot may have done more good.

Donegal Descendant, Absolutely right. The doctors and other medical professionals (nurse practitioners for one) can make a fortune from speaking engagements promoting the latest drugs.

Kate,
I know. I lived in Germany for a year and even though I was working part-time as a teaching assistant on a Fulbright scholarship, I was covered 100% for all doctors' visits and prescription meds. Amazing. And yes, they are healthier, less pharma-oriented people.
I hear you on the Clonazepam. I take it to settle me down when I have panic attacks. I feel totally non-functional sometimes at work and must do something to calm down. Thanks for reading.

Thoth, Yes, in America it's business as usual. Thanks for stopping by.

Heinz, I hate to say that even doctors wrongly prescribe meds at times , but yes, better to heed their advice given on a TV commercial.

Helvetica, Absolutely not. As I said in the post, I take drugs too. Wish I could be drug-free, but some of us need drugs to stay alive.
That is an excellent idea. If it were non-profit, consumers perhaps would reap the benefits instead of Big Pharma.
Laura,
I like that, the "pharmacy rep bribery system." Well said. Thank you for reading.

Malusinka, Good question. When are we going to stand up?

Roberto, I'd like to see some of the ads in Italy. Aren't any of them funny? Saluti

Joanne, I'm not sure about the anal leaking drug. Will have to get back to you on that one. Ha ha!
Great point, you are funny.
Thanks.
Since the PHrma Code was instituted, many states and hospital systems have banned physician lunches from office, also more than 100,000 "pharma bribers" have lost their jobs. Companies that follow the Code also cannot give gifts or take spouses to dinner, or take physicians on trips anymore.
Way more money is spent on advertising than on individuals passing out samples; way more money was spent on samples than rep salaries. Without the samples, many people would be in way more trouble financially.
You will see more and more change. The paradox of all this is that some drugs might never have existed without pharma research. The statin has saved tons of lives, for example.
Many of the regulated psychiatric drugs in this country can be purchased OTC in other places. I'm not sure that's a good thing.
The "free market" comes with bad and good, and in pharma, its not looking very good.
Bernadine, thank you for the information, I'm glad to hear that some changes are being instituted for the better.
Thank you Erica for this enlightening post. You're a courageous human being, and in no way responsible for your mom's condition or her use of medications. Your mom's illness is a tragedy, and you've handled it grace, strength, and humor. Your own use of pharmaceuticals is understandable. The meds are there to ease our suffering-and improve our quality of life.

In my opinion pharmaceutical advertising is irresponsible. It raises the costs; and the consumer/patients end up with the tab...its criminal that some people have to choose between buying food and buying their prescription meds in this country. Selecting medication is a very personal and at times difficult decision made with one's physician. It should not be out there in the public forum of choices along with cereals, sodas and car insurance. I live with auto immune diseases and have been on numerous pharmaceutical medications for almost 20 years. A few are advertised and Enbrel is one, for rheumatoid arthritis. It enrages me to no end when I see healthy perky people portrayed-enjoying life without a care in the world. Enbrel costs over $3000 a month for those without insurance. It's for folks with moderate to severe RA. We are not perky; we are severely and chronically ill, struggling with pain and fatigue that would knock an elephant out. There's no cure-and yet Enbrel and the other medications (biologics-chemotherapy drugs) have numerous, serious side effects-some can land us in the hospital. It's a difficult choice to weigh out the side effects and benefits in selecting one of these medications. Advertising has corrupted our society; and its high time to educate ourselves-fight back against consumerism-and the high costs of pharmaceutical drugs.
Thank you, Nancy. Yes, the drug commercials are run as or more frequently as those for car insurance, cereals and other products for the mass consumer. It must be anger you to see these commercials, in light of your disease, where, as you said, they show healthy-looking, happy people without a care in the world. The cost of these medications will continue to rise proportionately to the amount spent on advertising. Shameful.
I'm pretty sure we have direct advertising in Australia, too, but it may not be as explicit, and we are advised to ask our doctor. I've just done a quick search and it seems that DTCA of S4 drugs (presecription only) is not permitted.

Nonetheless, there's definitely an ad for an ED product (prescription only) on Australian TV, but it may only mention the manufacturer's name, not the actual drug (the famous one). I'm pretty sure it says to ask your doctor if you are experiencing ED difficulties.
My favorite was always the one about if you have an erection lasting for four or more hours, to call your doctor. I always thought most men would call the local papers, the TV station and all of the names in their little black book first.
My understanding is that the point of all this consumer advertising is that we, the patients, "suggest" these brands of drugs to our doctors when visiting about a specific problem.

This obviates, I suppose, the need for an effective sales force for the manufacturer of the drug. *We* become the salesperson for the drug. Brilliant.

I love unrestrained capitalism! I just love it.
I noticed this as well, wonder why they chose dinner hour for pushing this stuff? Either way the mute button is a powerful weapon and one further is to lose the TV in the kitchen.
Here's one of my songs to add to your list:

Down on the Pharm

Tune in on the boob tube any time a day
Big Pharma on the TV tryin' to make some hay
Got a purple pill for this, a yellow pill for that
Got ninety-nine ways to try and skin this cat
Big Pharma, first do no harm
You’re an over-priced drug pusher
That’s why I’m down on the Pharm

If you’re feelin’ low down, you can’t get it up
Take a little blue pill, feel like a young pup
Erectile dysfunction done got outa hand
Ain’t no older woman wants a four-hour man
Big Pharma, first do no harm
You’re an over-priced drug pusher
That’s why I’m down on the Pharm

Big Pharma hit the big time – Medicare Part D
The Devil’s in the D-tales, but they can’t fool me
Pimps all over K-Street, tryin’ to make a score
You might be a rich man, but you’re still a whore
Big Pharma, first do no harm
You’re an over-priced drug pusher
That’s why I’m down on the Pharm

Congress in their pocket; Pharma in the dell
People in the poor house, we're all bound for hell
I called down to DC, my congressman said quote
“Like to help you, son, but they done bought my vote”
Big Pharma, first do no harm
You’re an over-priced drug pusher
That’s why I’m down on the Pharm

Look at my poor momma, purse is full a pills
Don’tcha know them doctors is a bunch a shills
My back’s about to give out; I’m blind in my one eye
So leave me the hell alone, and just let me die
Big Pharma, first do no harm
You’re an over-priced drug pusher
That’s why I’m down on the Pharm

©2011 Tom Cordle
By the way, exercise and learning to play a musical instrument are excellent ways to get off the pills.
Nicely done; a clever mix of humor and hard (and sad) truth.
R
thefathippy, thanks for the info. I guess the "ED" epidemic is world-wide. Thanks for reading.

Karen, Yes, that is nuts, isn't it?

the flylooper, yes, I believe that is part of the agenda. Capitalism "r" us!

Andrew, I think they want us to break out into cold sweats during or after dinner and call our doctor the following day. We are a fear-based culture.

Tom, great poem! And I agree, exercise helps a lot, but I had a serious injury 5 years ago that has made it nearly impossible for me to get onto a regular exercise regimen. Going to start kung fu class on Monday!

Annie, thanks. I try to blend the light and the dark.
I'm sure everyone has a story. My wife is prescribed Ambien for insomnia. She cuts them in half and then breaks off pieces to get to sleep.
I cut my high blood pressure pill in half (a 40 mg pill costs the same as a 20 mg pill and I only need 20 mg.) One morning i got out of the shower, took my BP pill, dressed and left. I recovered several hours later lost, unable to remember where I was supposed to be, and hallucinating. Eventually I got enough orientation to get back home. My wife thought I had had a stroke. We counted pills and figured out that I had taken her half Ambien by mistake. I have no idea what i did for the hours that I don't remember.
DTC marketing was what created the FDA in the first place; snake oil salesmen on the back of a wagon were bilking consumers with at best worthless potions. The FDA accepted its role of monitoring the testing of new drugs for safety and efficacy, but abandoned the role of preventing direct marketing. In most cases the potential side effects are much worse than the condition the drug is supposed to address. R
Rodney, well said. I had a terrible reaction to a nasal spray called Omnaris a few days ago. I became manic, my heart rate increased dramatically, my hands became very shaky and I was altogether a mess. During this episode I was driving my cat to the vet and prayed I wouldn't have an accident. Took me about 24 hours to recover from this. Although I have chronic sinusitis and allergies, I will never take this spray again. Allegra D during the day and other over the counter sinus meds will have to suffice.
Damn, those ads are creepy. I love the upbeat way they convey scary information. It's so perfectly bizarre. Thanks for this - a piece with content that always needs to be forefront to our pill baby nation.
"I say today’s Pusher Man is Big Pharma and our friendly neighborhood doctors."

The alternative doctor we see now, got out of mainstream when the big pharma companies "paid" another doctor at his hospital with a trip to the Bahamas because the guy sold the most prescriptions of Prozac that year. If this isn't the definition of corruption, I don't know what is...excellent post
Erica, I know the song. I have been singing it for years. So have my three daughters and former husband. We are all on anti-depressants. I wrote, too, about my Doctor the Pusher, which he actually read. He does what he knows, and supports me in whatever I want to do to make my life better, including exercise. I guess we do the best we can, and we are still responsible for our own bodies.
Beth, thanks.

Heidi, yes, the docs are financially rewarded for "pushing" the drug du jour onto his/her patients. Not the way it used to be (back in the stone ages, when we were growing up, LOL).

C. Berg, yes, we are ultimately responsible for what we put into our bodies. We all do the best we can. Thanks for reading.
Psychotropic drugs ideally should be prescribed by psychiatrists, not internists. There are so many interactions and contraindications that it's downright dangerous not to have a specialist involved. On top of that, people should do their own independent research on any new medication. There is a lot of BS on the internet, but if you root around and use reliable sources (NIMH, Mayo clinic etc.) you can end up knowing about side-effects that you internist may not pick up on. The research will have the statistics on the side-effects, so that you can tell which are common and which are possible but unusual.
lc224, I agree that psychiatrists should be prescribing psychotropic drugs, but the reality is, and I am saying this from first-hand experience, GPs are prescribing them as well. I have done a lot of research on the various drugs and side effects too.