The Utah ski lodge
Mitt.
Republican hopeful Mitt Romney owns homes and adjacent property estimated at $30 million, not including his Canadian home, co-owned by siblings. If the race were to be won on the basis of wealth alone, Mitt would be our man.
According to NewsDaily.com, his net worth is $200 million. He is the richest man to run for president since Steve Forbes who was worth about $430 million when he ran in 1996 and 2000. Romney’s La Jolla, California beachfront compound purchased three years ago and estimated at $12 million, is currently under expansion to quadruple its size. The 3-story, 6-bedroom, 5,400-square-foot lake house in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire where the family “summers,” is valued at $10 million.
In 2009, Mitt sold the 9,500-square-foot Utah ski chalet (photo above), estimated at $5.25 million as well as the $3.5 million 6,400-square-foot colonial in Belmont, Massachusetts where he and his wife raised their sons.
“I wanted to be where I could hear the waves,” Romney told reporters at a book signing in California last year.
“As a boy we spent summers on Lake Huron and I could hear the crashing waves at night. It was one of my favorite things in the world; being near the water and the waves was something I very badly wanted to experience again.”
Some Americans are hoping for a home, any home, a simple roof over their heads. Think of all the soon-to-be-foreclosed-on and homeless Americans he could house in that beachfront property! Still, I can sympathize with Mitt’s love of ocean waves. After all, a multi-millionaire does need a seaside compound to retreat to at the end of a long day.
As former governor of Massachusetts, Romney vetoed $220,000 for state-run homelessness projects. (MassScorecard.org, Bill H.4011, July 14, 2005)
If elected, perhaps he will invite a handful of the estimated 2.3 to 3.5 million homeless citizens to slum with him in La Jolla. Isn’t that why he’s quadrupling it in size?
The La Jolla compound, not yet under construction
Tent community (some of Mitt's future roommates reside here)
Newt.
Newt Gingrich’s 5-bedroom, 4.5-bathroom, 5,206-square-foot house in McLean, Virginia, was built in 1987. The real-estate website Zillow.com estimates the home’s value at nearly $1.275 million.
Newt’s hobbies include studying “dinosaurs and other fossils.”
In December, 2011, Gingrich met with a crowd of people at a restaurant in Spencer, Louisiana. Mechelle Williams, a single mother of four, and factory worker for 16 years, asked Gingrich what he would do to save her family from homelessness.
Ms. Williams said, “On February 21st the kids and I are going to be homeless. Iowa Bankers Mortgage is foreclosing. It’s not because I don’t work hard. It’s not because I don’t pay my bill. It’s not because I’m uneducated. I’ve exhausted all of my resources and I’m sadly not the only family in this position. I’m wondering what you might do for those families?”
His answer was simple: repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank Act (also known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act) is a U.S. federal law which places regulation of the financial industry in the hands of government. Enacted in July 2010, its aim was to prevent another financial crisis by creating new financial regulatory processes to enforce transparency and accountability while implementing rules for consumer protection.
Ms. Williams told the Des Moines Register that she didn’t feel Gingrich’s response would assist her.
Santorum.
Rick Santorum’s Leesburg, Virginia home with 3.76 acres of land is currently valued at $1.4 million. He also has a more modest home in Penn Hills, Pennsylvania.
On the subject of homes, Santorum helped lay waste to the Armed Forces Retirement Home, run by the Department of Defense, a “premier home for military retirees and veterans.” The 272-acre facility is located in northern D.C. and the almost 600 veterans who live there enjoy a view of the city. During its heyday, over 2,000 veterans of World Wars I and II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War lived within its walls. In the past several years, the Retirement Home has been beset by financial difficulties. Hoping to offset their losses, officials running the Home eyed a 49-acre piece of land worth $49 million.
Andy Kroll’s article in Mother Jones of January 20, 2012, explains further, “At the behest of the Roman Catholic Church, and unbeknownst to the Home, Santorum slipped an amendment into the 1999 National Defense Authorization Act handcuffing how the home could cash in on those 49 acres. The amendment forced the Home to sell—and not lease—the land to its next-door neighbor, the Catholic University of America. Ultimately, the Catholic Church bought 46 acres of the tract for $22 million.. The Home lost the land for good, and by its own estimates, pocketed $27 million less than the land’s value and $83 million less than what it could’ve made under the lease plan. Santorum’s amendment sparked an outcry from veterans’ groups and fellow U.S. senators, who barraged his office with complaints.”
Laurence Branch, executive director of the Home’s board, said, “I’m convinced that Santorum is no friend of veterans” despite his pleas to the contrary. It seems that Santorum’s dedication to Catholicism trumped his pledge to our veterans.
Paul.
Ron Paul and his wife Carol own two homes in South Texas. Paul announced in April on his Facebook page that he’s selling the house where he and his family (including son Rand) have lived for more than four decades. They are asking $325,000 for the 4-bedroom, 5-bathrooms home with 2 lofts and a swimming pool. The website “ Buy Ron Paul’s House” says, “generations of Liberty loving kids have grown up here, and you can continue the tradition.”
Perhaps he could have sold that home earlier and given the money to the family of his former campaign manager, Kent Snyder, who died of complications from pneumonia in 2008. He died at age 49 on June 26, 2008, two weeks after Paul withdrew his first bid for presidency; his hospital bills totaled $400,000, and he was uninsured. The bill was given to Snyder’s mother who was unable to pay. Friends created a website to solicit donations.
Jesse Benton, a spokesman for Paul said, “It was Kent more than anyone else who encouraged and pushed Paul to run for president. Ron would not have run for the presidency if it had not been for Kent.”
During a CNN appearance in September 2011, Wolf Blitzer presented a hypothetical scenario for Paul, asking him if the state should pay the bills of an uninsured young man in dire need of medical attention.
Paul said, “That’s what freedom is all about: taking your own risks. This whole idea that you have to take care of everybody—”. He did not complete the sentence but instead told a personal anecdote which implied that it was up to the “churches” to care for the dying man.
What about Dr. Paul helping out his manager? I guess that never crossed his mind. What about the Hippocratic oath, “do no harm.” I’m sure Ron could talk his way out of that somehow.


Salon.com
Comments
I am a `vowed`apolitical.
They need 3- meals a day.
`
Other "sold-outs" fax them.
They are dupes. Memories.
I met rich vineyard boaster.
`
He use to be a lobby launderer.
He a oil slick. He grows grapes.
You talking about my neighbor.
`
same/same sly 'good for what?
nothing.`
`
Secretary's Day . . .
receiving from the V.P.
a rubber hand ball
`
R♥
Newt’s hobbies include studying “dinosaurs and other fossils.”
Is he studying himself?
:)
HUGGGGGGGGGGG
Except, I like studying fossils too, so Newt....
But Rick and Ron sound pretty awesome!!!!
I'M SO CONFUSED!! ~runs into the thorn bushes~
Thanks for keeping us aware of what repugnant creatures they truly are.
Look, about the money factor. Please understand something. If the majority of the voters get turned off by this then maybe there will be an upwelling of populist emotion, as in the Occupy movement, to move the electorate to demand more representative political leaders. But I don't see ordinary people doing that. Many ordinary people are just not that oputraged by these scenes of excess. You may not like that political/social reality but that's the way it sems to be going.
Erica--this is indeed puke-worthy. Clue-effing-less.
Tink, I sure hope you have insurance for all those thorn holes. But you're probably safer there.
Great post. Great!
rated
For shame.
I want to hurl.
I mean look, we in the UK have an idiot who keeps a sledge hammer by his front door to protect himself but at least his name is normal.
You'd be laRfed orf the Nuclear World Map with a Newt running the US.
Why not elect a Tarquine or a Gerald ?????
"press send please FRed(tm)."
Is that a Bombay you have pictured above? Nice cats.
Fusun, you're welcome. I find it hard not to dig deeper into their pasts, kind of an obsession these days.
Linda, Yes, Newt is studying himself. Touche! Hug back.
Matt, or perhaps Mitt's La Jolla compound will be pooped on by hungry, angry seagulls?
Kevin, Yes, scary, clueless and heartless.
Patrick, sociopaths, yes, maybe. Not sure about Mitt's conscience.
Zanelle, yes, ma'am.
Tink, Maybe if we vote for Mitt we'll all become rich by proxy or by the trickle down theory . . . I like fossils too.
L'Heure, money talks and bullshit walks.
Mary, ocean waves definitely make me happy and are good for the skin. Guess that's why he has such a nice complexion.
Jejune, It was my pleasure to read it. Yes, you might be right. I'll just keep blabbing about them in my blogs anyway.
Good Daughter, Yup, clueless is right. Thanks for reading.
Abra, you might be right. It seems you have to be rich to run for office these days.
Shiral, I agree. I really think he should give back to the people, even if it means housing them. But I guess only communists and socialists do that . . .
Thoth, I think we are a world gone mad, hence the mad cheering for the vile would-be leaders of the Free World. Look at the display of citizens shrieking in the streets after Kim Jong Il's death--brainwashing. Maybe we are being brainwashed too.
mission, they don't represent. They rule.
Beauty147, That works too.
CreekEnd, I wish you were right! Nope, that isn't Bombay, that's the US of A.
--VP Biden gave an average of $369 a year to charity, 0.2% of income, over a decade. His Delaware property has a 6850 square foot main home and a 1850 square foot "carriage" home.
--VP Al Gore donated only $353 to charity in 1997. His 20 room, 8 bathroom Nashville home is 10,000 square feet.
--Conservatives contribute, on average, much more to charities than democrats.
--The blood supply for the U.S. would increase by 45% if liberals would match conservative blood donation rate.
--The Romneys contributed 7 million, 16.4% of their income, to charities over the past two years.
When 'giving' back to their community, liberals need to be forced by law to contribute. Conservatives do not.
Hmmmph!
Romney "LET THEM EAT CAKE" moment:
1994 Romney Remark On Homeless Veterans “Not One Of The Brighter Moments Of His Campaign.”
“From all accounts, Mitt Romney’s visit to that veterans shelter just behind Boston’s City Hall Plaza was not one of the brighter moments of his campaign for US senator. When director Ken Smith told him that one of the things the shelter needed was fresh milk, Romney replied jokingly that maybe the veterans should be taught how to milk cows.” (Michael Kenney, “Romney Comment Leads To Milk Run,” The Boston Globe, 11/27/94)
Nancy, if only that would be.
Joanne, what a disgusting comment. He is so out of touch. Did you hear that he put his dog on the roof rack of the car for a 12-hour family trip? He should have been arrested for animal cruelty.
Margie, thanks. I've been on a research frenzy lately.
Jeanette, thanks for reading.
One correction: Romney vetoed 220K, not 220 million, a substantial difference, but yes, one that did impact the homeless in MA, where I live. When Romney came in as governor, we had a huge budget deficit. The legislators refused to present a balanced budget, however; they handed the task off to Romney instead. Romney's spin is that they "trusted" him to do so; they actually gave him no choice, mostly to protect their own reelection campaigns so it wouldn't look at though they were the hard hearted ones; it was generally agreed their was going to be suffering by cuts that needed to made and no one wanted to do it. Of course, it was the populace, not the politicians who suffered here. The MA legislature is a disgrace and predominantly Democrat; our last 3 speakers alone have been indicted! Corruption and self-interest is sadly a blight on both parties.
R