It’s The Stepford Wives all over again. Silly me, I thought it was 2012. On March 14, during a discussion of the mandatory ultrasound bill, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett (R) said that that the measure does not go too far. His advice to women: “You just have to close your eyes.” I feel much better now, Tom, thanks.
Once again he affirmed his support of the “Women’s Right to Know” Act, requiring doctors to perform an ultrasound on a patient, offer her two personalized copies of the film and play and describe fetal heartbeat before she can have an abortion. He did not disclose whether or not he considered transvaginal ultrasounds to be invasive procedures.
When asked if he thought the bill went too far by making a woman examine the ultrasound image, he said, “You can’t make anybody watch, okay? Because you just have to close your eyes. As long as it’s on the exterior and not the interior.”
I feel blessed that Gov. Corbett is allowing women to “close their eyes.” I thought the doctors would be instructed to pry our eyelids open with toothpicks or some modern optical device to make us see the error of our ways. Will we then be escorted to the hospital cafeteria for a milkshake and cookies? I like being babied myself. If they are going to infantilize us, why not go all the way?
Pennsylvania’s ultrasound bill, unlike its Virginia counterpart, does not specify the type of ultrasound that would be required. The doctor would have to use the “interior” procedure for most first-trimester abortions to meet the strictures of the law.
The problem is that even if a patient were to close her eyes as the governor suggests, the doctor will have to turn the image toward her face, give her signed copies of the image and describe the number of heartbeats per minute and tell her if the fetus is “normal” or not for its age.
I heard a rumor that Corbett belongs to the modern-day Stepford Men’s Association. He longs for the days of ladies in long frilly frocks who bake and scrub until the skin melts off their hands, who are ever-so-obedient and have sex with their husbands on command. Ah, what a woman wouldn’t give for a man like that . . .


Salon.com
Comments
What I would do with them would be up to the women of America.
HUGGGGGGGGGGGG
Fine post about a lousy guy.
jmac, that's a good one: Republican Clown Bus!
Yes, Joanne, it is true.
This guy is sick, and anyone who voted for him is just as sick! R
I had to read your post again. Creepy man!
And have you ever noticed how Ira Levin, who wrote both "SF" and "Rosemary's Baby" wrote about his heroines who always "lost" in the end by "submitting" to the alpha males" Even Rosemary, after spitting in DH's face, accepted Satan's baby as her own--and though he *was,* I often wondered if Levin wasn't just mysogynistic--or at worst, a Republican...
Thoth, I certainly didn't vote for him, but some people did. Perhaps they didn't know who/what they were getting before he got elected.
Santorum is a disgrace.
Maybe there's something about the air in Pennsylvania that causes this kinda thing.
Male politicians who think it is okay to inflict this kind of thing on women ought to be required, prior to offering their vote, to have their urethras checked with an small umbrella…opened only after insertion and prior to being withdrawn.
Have you heard about Arizona? I fell out of my chair. You'll just fucking die.
The "right to know" act is just an incredibly insulting name, as if the problem were merely ignorance. Meanwhile, many newspapers, including my own local one, refuse to print the "Doonesbury" parody - I guess we don't have a "right to know" that.
It would be nice for a change to be shocked by intelligence and sense (that can't start soon enough and with regularity).
What year is it again?
I hope moderate Republican women are getting as scared and angry as all other women. And I hope they will decide to join in fighting for and protecting all the hard-won rights women have accumulated since the 1970's.
We need to harness this anger in a constructive way and fight back, hard and immediately. We can't back down or let them win, because I wouldn't put it past some of these right wing weasels to try to take away our votes.
Bad news, Republicans. Women don't have any "good old days." Nor are we about to go back to what YOU think are "the good old days." Being so blatant with your disdain for us is not a winning strategy. Presidents can win without the "crazy" vote. No president can win without the women's votes.
rated
If all fails, there's always the Lysistra approach.
.........(¯`v´¯) (¯`v´¯)
☼•*¨`*•.¸.(ˆ◡ˆ).¸.•*
............... *•.¸.•* ♥⋆★•❥ Thanx (ツ) & ♥ L☼√Ξ ☼ ♥
⋆───★•❥ ☼ .¸¸.•*`*•.♥
Surly I'm not the first to notice this problem!
Cranky, I haven't seen the Doonsebury parody, will have to look for it. That is frightening. Fahrenheit 451 here we come . . .
Abra, yes, as if it's something enjoyable. Again, women are being treated as passive subjects who are expected to endure whatever barbaric procedures or abuse these sick old men concoct.
Nancy, right you are.
Various Artists, it's 2012 according to my calendar, but not sure what reality we're living in.
Shiral, it is time to get angry and organize as women. I don't see how a Republican can win in 2012 if they continue to promulgate these medieval measures.
Luminous, I feel the same way. I want to start protesting.
Algis, thanks for stopping by.
Sirenita, it's science fiction incarnate, Brave New World for Women.
libby, Exactly (about England). I can tell you how to imbed a video. Will pm you.
zachery, maybe something is in the drinking water?