FEBRUARY 8, 2011 3:21PM

Gun Control in the USA: When is enough, enough?

Rate: 0 Flag

I always knew a gun would alter my life. I have no idea how I knew, but I did. One of the most vivid dreams I ever had was when I was just 18 or19 years old. I saw myself, clearly older, sitting in a chair, rocking a child, and I was staring into the barrel of a gun. Who was holding it? I had no clue. But the dream disturbed me enough that I wrote it down.  And I remembered it years later, when a single gunshot shattered my life.

In an instant, my husband was gone. While I never had a burning desire to have children, I liked knowing I could do so one day. But my ovaries became diseased while I was still very young; and so my fertility and eventually the ovaries themselves, were also gone. The child did not exist, and never would.

When the subject of children comes up, I exclaim, “Oh, my gosh! I forgot to have them!” Over the past 19 years, I’ve gotten pretty good at the acceptable responses. I know most people don’t mean to hurt by their words. I shrug it off most days, and I consider all children my own. I don’t have to be a parent to know they are precious.

IT, the bullet, the suicide, the aftermath, is something I rarely speak about anymore, and the few people who do know tend to forget it is part of my fabric. I try to never let it show. Some days it’s hard, like when people say things in passing like “I’m going to shoot myself in the head.” Or do that awful pantomime where they make the gun with one hand, and mimic the bloodshed with the other. I just pretend to not really hear the words, or worse, visibly wince at the gesture. But each time I turn on the news, IT is all brought back fresh. Another life wasted. More lives shattered. More dreams destroyed.

And the pain is always there. It’s not all internal. It shows on my outside, through the extra weight I carry, and in health issues stemming from prolonged periods of intense, unimaginable stress. On certain days, the pain is just lurking beneath the surface. And I’m never sure when those days will be.

When I am under stress, I dream of being chased; fleeing for my life. I am being hunted methodically and then I am shot point blank, or I am trying to protect loved ones (usually my nieces and nephews) from some unknown assailant’s bullets, shielding them with my own body as best as I can, trying to save them. Those dreams stick with me for a while before I can shake it off again, and go back to “normal”. I never talk about those.

Today, I understand that I suffer from PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), although I would be considered as very high functioning. It’s something I only recently recognized. I saw aspects of myself in the story of friend, who was brave enough to write a book in hopes of helping others. (She did. And is.) My self-diagnosis was confirmed by a doctor, years after the onset. What I do with that, I don’t know. But at least I can stop silently berating myself for not being over something that it may not be possible to “get over” because it has literally become part of my biological chemistry.

Yep, this girl has baggage that was thrust upon her by someone else’s actions, someone else’s undiagnosed, untended mental illness; one that ended for him that cold night in September, 1992 when he put a single bullet through his head at our home, leaving behind a huge pool of blood, bone and brain matter spattered everywhere, and an indelible stain on my life. I could have just as easily been a casualty that night. Actually, I was. I just wasn’t part of the body count. Nor were all the others who were affected by his death. The ripple, the aftershock, spreads further than you might imagine.

In more recent years, the sudden descent into the depths of mental illness happened twice within my own family, and I learned firsthand about the perils, pitfalls and pathos of the human mind, our health care system, and of just how far you have to push to get help for those who need it the most. Their right to be crazy trumps your right to try to get them proper treatment, to save them.

And now it’s 2011. I’m still waiting for my pain to stop. I’ve had enough. I don’t mean that in the sense that I would put my family and friends through the type of suffering I have gone through. I wouldn’t wish this on my worst enemy, as the saying goes.

What I do I mean is that I am sick and tired of people going around shooting themselves and shooting one another, simply because they can access a gun. Even worse, they can get hold of big, juicy ammo clips that hold an awful lot of death and destruction, and then go forth and wreak as much death and destruction as they possibly can before they “punch their own ticket”, as my father says, or someone else puts a bullet into them.

That’s a tremendous amount of power and responsibility to hand out to whomever decides they want it and shouts that they have a right to wield it. No matter which side they’re on. Our forefathers would shudder at what we’ve become in their name.

I long to put my baggage down, but I’ve finally realized that the only way I can possibly do so is by picking up the proverbial pen and speaking out. I’ve made my living, and continue to do so, by writing for an ad agency. Over the 25+ years of my career, I’ve learned that every sales problem can be boiled down to a single point. “What’s the pain?” we ask. In this case, the pain is literal, the pain is widespread, and it’s time we talked about it. It’s time we stopped letting a relatively small group of powerful lobbyists for the NRA tell us we don’t matter, they will not negotiate EVER on gun control so don’t even TRY to take away our precious assault rifles or big juicy ammo clips again. I say BULLSHIT. The time for us to be heard and FIGHT is NOW.

So here I sit. Deciding to stop pretending it’s all OK, and asking myself what is the point of me, of anyone, having to suffer like this if we don’t learn from it; grow from it; effect CHANGE so that others don’t have to go through it. Indeed. And what about our collective pain? The things we’ve been touched by and grieved as a nation in my lifetime alone?

Dallas. The McDonald’s Massacre. Columbine. Memphis. Luby’s Cafeteria. Omaha. Virginia Tech. The Amish School. These sit at the top of my consciousness, but sadly, no, horrifically, there is no end to the madness. Especially not for those directly involved. The people left behind after the news cycle. The ones left behind as the door closes quietly as the police take their leave. The ones who slump to the floor, trying to figure out whom to call first to break the terrible, awful, blood soaked news even as their hands shake uncontrollably, too unsteady to dial the phone. The ones trying desperately to learn how to simply keep going in the aftermath.

It’s so easy and so simple for people to push away the reality when it’s someone else’s child. Someone else’s father. Brother. Sister. Wife. Husband. Mother. Daughter. Son. Friend. It’s time to stop pushing things away, and start pushing for change.

And so I ask you, when is enough, enough?

And now, Tucson. In the aftermath, our President challenged us all to be better people. To make this country a place that lives up to the expectations of a nine-year-old child who was born on the day this nation was stricken by an incomprehensible tragedy. A child who died on the day this nation was stricken by an incomprehensible tragedy. A child who we CANNOT allow to have died in vain.

Many died that day; others lived, and their stories were heart wrenching; they were valiant and most of all, they hit home. The young intern, who cradled Gabby Giffords to his chest and tried to staunch the flow of blood from her head.

The elderly man who shielded his wife’s body with his own. He gave his life so that she might live.

The mother who threw herself in front of her teen daughter, and was shot three times. My nightmare, playing out in full, bloody technicolor. In real life, they both lived.

The kindly family friend who brought a bright, inquisitive nine-year-old girl to see their Congresswoman. Whose anguish at not being able to save this beautiful child entrusted to her care haunts her, even as she struggles to recover from three bullet wounds.

The two men who pinned the gunman to the ground, even as he struggled to reload.

The middle-aged mom who wrested a big fat, juicy clip full of death from the gunman as he struggled to reload.

The gunman, who was once a nine-year-old boy, the embodiment of the hopes and dreams of his parents. Now he’s forever the child who slipped away into madness, and took others with him.

These people are not someone else. They’re our family. Our neighbors. Our friends. THEY ARE US.

So when will enough be enough?

I’m sick and tired of hearing hateful words pouring out of people, and in turn, feeling hateful by being exposed to it. I’m sick and tired of ignorance and fear. I’m sick and tired of seeing homeless people who are clearly mentally ill, and who are homeless primarily because there is no health care available for them. There are 34 families each day who lose a loved one to gun violence, lost for no good reason other than the prevalence of guns in our society.

I’m sick and tired of the NRA shouting about the constitution and their Second Amendment rights and of zealots touting Second Amendment remedies. I’m sick and tired of politics and divisiveness and “us and them” mentality. We are ALL human. WE. ARE. ALL. HUMAN.

Since I was nine, more than one million sons, daughters, moms, dads, wives and husbands, neighbors and friends have been killed though gun violence and suicide by gun. ONE MILLION. And I look at my soon to be nine-year-old nephew, and I pray that he doesn’t have to live in a world where this is acceptable, where this is the norm. I pray the same for the child down the block. And down the next one, and the next, to Tucson, and beyond. I don’t have to be a parent to know they are precious.

We don’t have to live in a world where this is the norm. Why, I ask, is this acceptable? It’s NOT. We have to make a choice. Let’s make the right one. We can start by reinstating the Federal Assault Weapon Ban, which was allowed to expire in 2004. By closing gun show loopholes that allow anyone to walk in and purchase massive firepower without a background check. By requiring background checks.on ALL gun purchases and getting better at sharing information. And then by having a civil discussion about what we want our society, and our lives and our children’s world to be like going forward.

We are Columbine. We are Tucson. We are Virginia Tech. We are human.

Don’t push away the reality because it’s someone else’s child. Someone else’s father. Brother. Sister. Wife. Husband. Mother. Daughter. Son. Friend.

It could just as easily be you, or someone you love. And if it were, would it be enough then?

When is enough, enough?

Please, please, let it be NOW.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
That's nice, flowery language you have in your essay. And my sympathies go out to you for the loss of your loved one. But you fail to address exactly how to fix this current predicament. Aside from re-instating an expired firearms regulation (which had no provable beneficial effect) your writing is all argumentation and no explanation.

This, I'm afraid, is a constant trend in the argumentation process of all anti-gun lobbyists (or rather, the ones who's arguments I've taken the time to read.) You make a great deal of emotional finger pointing, but very little logical citation or presentation. How do you hope to prove your point if you can't show statistical data on the pros or cons of the solutions in question?

Please, if you want to plead your case, stop using emotion bias to "swing the jury". This is a legislative matter. Present some facts.
Just b/c you've had a run of bad luck you want to take away my right to defend myself and my family? Why should anyone ever give up their rights b/c somebody somewhere did something that was already against the law? More laws are the answer? How about less emotion? The Brady Campaign are nothing but the lowest swine. All they do is try to convince everyone that the constitution is an anachronism.

Women are the future of firearm ownership. It's important that they be taught the value of firearm safety, and also the importance of exercising their right to self defense. The 2nd amendment isn't about hunting, it's about checking tyranny. The Brady Campaign seeks the disarm women and make them victims of violent crime. The more victims, the more the Gun grabbing fascists like Brady Kamp Prez Paul helmke get to trumpet their totalitarian measures. Paul Helmke is probably the most abusive male ever, he wants to see all women ruled over by physical intimidation. Women who embrace their second amendment rights are embracing true equality with males and a life free of fear.
Beautiful. Thank you for writing this. It's sad that your story is lost on the gun nuts who are incapable of grokking your sentiment. Unfortunately, their lives are mired in fear and paranoia and so having a rational discussion about reasonable gun legislation is an impossible task. They use the same tired, fear and irrational based arguments to justify their need to carry guns and ultimately what looks like their desire to off someone in some fantasy western scenario. Thank you again for having the courage to write this - the gun nuts are relentless in their "right" to destroy other people's lives. Sorry for your pain and loss.
Dripping with pathos, absolutely bereft of logos. Sure, people die because of gun-toting loonies; however, most people die because the gun-toting loonies happen to be on the side of a tyrannical government, hence the 2nd Amendment.
@ sundavis: lol, nice. you tell 'em. I especially like the part about fear and paranoia...but wait...if "gun-nuts" are such then aren't anti-"gun-nuts" also such?

If "gun-nuts" are "mired in fear and paranoia" about falling victim to an armed criminal by wanting to prepare to defend themselves, then aren't anti-"gun-nuts" also "mired in fear and paranoia" about falling victim to a gun-toting criminal by wanting to strip everybody of an effective means of self-defense?

Rationality...reason...such bummers, eh?
I don't really get the criticism of "You haven't solved the gun problem so this is pointless". If I could solve this problem myself, don't you think I would do it? And statistical data is just that -- and it's appallingly high, unless you don't have a problem with children and government officials and others being shot in the street. God forbid we actually put a name and a face and a description of the REALITY of what guns in the hands of the wrong people ACTUALLY DO.

I shared my personal story and have asked that we have a civilized talk about COMMON SENSE gun laws.

@Katherine So by your logic, citizens have no right to tell their story, emotional or not, in the process of creating legislation. Have you EVER actually been to a Public Hearing when a bill is being proposed?

@Will: Women need a gun to embrace their true equality with men? WTF? (Penis substitute, anyone?)

@jqs73 Most people die because the gun-toting loonies happen to be on the side of a tyrannical government, hence the 2nd Amendment. (Seriously? I don't even know how to BEGIN to address this one.)

@sundavis I've heard a lot of shouting and knee jerk reactions from both sides of the issue, but I like this insight of blog: http://gortnation.blogspot.com/2011/02/happiness-is-warm-gun.html?showComment=1297871781873#c3639496883872560763
@ErinAZ: "Seriously? I don't even know how to BEGIN to address this one." Yeah, it's usually hard to have a logical debate when your entire argument is based in emotion. Nonetheless, let me BEGIN for you...

It would be inhuman of me not to feel sorry for your losses, but it is sub-human of you to write such a letter in an attempt to exploit others' emotions in order to get them to sign away a basic human right.

The FACT of the matter is that governments throughout the world in just the last century have oppressed and killed many MILLIONS of people. You cry over the million people who have died because of random gun violence in the US since you were nine.

I'm sure you were alive in the late 1970s when 2 to 3 million innocent people were killed in Cambodia by a tyrannical government, the Khmer Rouge. Do you cry over them?

Maybe you were alive in the early 1970s when the Bengalis were oppressed by the Pakistani Armed Forces and as many as 3 million people were killed. Do you cry over them?

Maybe you're familiar with Rwanda. Do you cry over the half a million to a million unarmed Tutsis who were killed there in the mid-1990s?

Maybe your parents or grandparents were alive during the Holocaust. Do you cry over the 6 million Jews and many, many others who were killed by Nazis SHORTLY AFTER gun-control measures were enacted?

China: as many as 45 million were killed during the Great Leap Forward. Any tears for them?

These and countless many more lives are taken by oppressive governments throughout the world even as we speak. Do you cry for any of them? Would you tell them that they are better off not being able to check a tyrannical government with their own firearms, because it might save relatively few lives who fall victim to random gun violence each year?

To you proponents of the 2nd Amendment are just gun-nuts and hill-billy hunter types, when they should be viewed as protectors of the rest of the rights you hold dearly.

Do you think we don't care about those who die due to random gun violence? Lest you be mistaken, we do care. However, to be completely honest, I don't care if a man chooses to take his life with a gun -- that's his decision, and though a tragic one, it should have no place in a debate on gun-control.

You people miss the point. You whine about how someone like Jared Loughner had access to a "big fat, juicy clip full of death" when you should whine about why people in our society would commit such travesties; what motivates them; what pushes them toward such acts; and how we can prevent people from becoming such monsters.

But, of course, with you people, the primary blame will always be placed on an inanimate object made of metal and plastic.
Gun ownership is NOT a basic human right. And I don't blame the inanimate object, I blame the ease of which we allow these deadly items to fall into ANYONE'S hands. Oh, and please note that NOWHERE have I said we should ban all guns.

Since I was talking about the US, forgive me if I missed your "transition" into worldwide genocide and Nazis in your statement that "Most people die because the gun-toting loonies happen to be on the side of a tyrannical government, hence the 2nd Amendment." So you're saying the American government (I assume you mean the government under Barack Obama) equals that of China, Rwanda or Nazi Germany? And that Gun Control???!!! caused the Holocaust? Glenn, is that you?

Why are people this way? What motivates them? Read the blog I linked to...there's a very insightful dissection of precisely that topic.

For the record: 1/ Yes, I feel for these world tragedies and loss of so much potential, and 2/ nearly the entire European branch of my family was murdered in the Holocaust and 3/ The fact that you describe me as "sub-human" and a whiner says to me you have more in common with those tyrannical regimes than you know.
"Gun ownership is NOT a basic human right."

Really?

I guess you haven't read the 2nd Amendment where it says "the RIGHT to KEEP and BEAR ARMS...shall NOT be infringed."

Am I equating the current administration to that of tyrannical governments throughout history? I really wish I could have a reasonable discussion with someone among your crowd. Tyrannical governments have come and gone throughout history in almost all nations of the world. Do you pretend to assume that the United States of America will always be a paradise of republican democracy? Sure, today things are pretty swell, but can you speak for the political circumstances that will exist in the US 100 years from now? How about 50 years from now? 25? 20? The fact of the matter is, neither you nor I know what the future of this country will be, but history shows that violent revolutions and tyranny are only a matter of time.

You people always say you don't want to ban all guns, but you never stop at anything less. You want to start with "assault" rifles even though they are almost never used in crimes. But then you guys want to get rid of handguns, because they have no utility for the ordinary citizen. Then it's "let's register everybody's remaining weapons." After which follows: "we live in a modern society where hunting and sport shooting is not necessary to survive." Then, guess what: no one owns a single firearm...except for criminals and government authorities. And what if sometime in the future, the political landscape of America changes enough that a tyrannical form of government takes power? Is this absolutely outside the realm of possibility? Do you think the Jews 20 or 30 years before the Holocaust had any idea what their fate would be? The political landscape in a country can change in a single generation. When it does, how will the oppressed millions fight against it?

Like the old saying goes: "It's better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it."

Love, Glenn
Actually, I have read the Second Amendment: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

You're ignoring the qualification of the first portion of the amendment (the early US didn't have a standing army) in favor of the second. Our founding fathers would cringe at what we're become in their name.
Actually, I 'm not ignoring the first part at all. Militia does not mean military. The militia, as termed in the 2nd Amendment, refers to a body of citizen soldiers, as opposed to professional soldiers, who were organized whenever an emergency dictated the need.

And when the need arose, did they gather at a predetermined place where they were assigned rifles and weapons for battle?

Nope.

They brought their own personal firearms. This was the norm then. Their guns weren't kept in a communal locker somewhere until needed. They kept their guns at home with them. They bore these guns for anything from hunting to personal protection. These guns were their own personal property.

I'm not ignoring the first part at all. I simply thought it was clear to anyone what this part meant.

I agree with you, though, about the Founding Fathers "cringing" over what we've become, and the whimsy with which we toss aside our freedoms for a little security.
Hello,
You do have a nice articulate way of writing and I felt your pain from this story you shared, but I hope to have a reasonable and readable response to your article.

I disagree completely with the reasons you give for banning firearms. I did read through the entire comment section and there were some valid points by everyone, and I hope to convey some information (and I plan on doing it in the least hostile way I know).

You talked about the second amendment to the Constitution of the United States that states that talks about Militias. There is a law on the books that specifically talk about militias that no one seems to bring up.

If you read US code 10 section 311 title 32 it states. (current law as of Feb 1, 2010)
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/311.html

(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.

Now that basically means every able bodied person can be called into service at any time by the government, be it natural disaster, riot, or defense of the country.

My state the age is actually 60 per the state constitution where I live.

This is from the Supreme Court rulings when it talks about what firearms we do have (to stop the "nuclear arms" comment), is from a court case from 1939 which sets a prescient for all other court cases pertaining what guns we should be able to bear.

U.S. v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/bills/blusvmiller.htm

"...These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense. 'A body of citizens enrolled for military discipline.' And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of the kind in common use at the time."

Read that last sentence again. It clearly states that if and when the "Unorganized Militia" is called up for whatever reason, there is no quartermaster handing out rifles, ammunition, boots, and even uniforms. We would probably be assembled and told what to do and where to go.
Now I have no Red Dawn dreams, and I hope I never take another persons life, but I will if I have to to keep breathing myself. Take for example my state who has made a mandatory lifetime sentence on carjacking. The people who would do that have no rule of law, and now will just shoot someone when they take the car to keep them form identifying you. I have the right to keep from dying, and no call to 911 is going to show up in time if this happens.

Please keep writing, but also, never forget to weigh logically choices to respect others choices to defense... it is as sacred of an American principle as the right to assemble, and the right to practice religion (or absence of) freely, to write blogs criticizing things without government agents bashing down your door and putting you in prison, or even to wear a shirt with a vulgarity on it.
I don't like certain things, but I respect the right for them to be there, thus is the ultimate American right.

Thank you for taking the time to read this.
and apparently I should proofread better :)

darn the comments section for not having an edit button.