Fay Paxton's Blog

just thoughts

Fay Paxton

Fay Paxton
Location
Chicago, Illinois,
Birthday
March 12

FEBRUARY 16, 2012 9:22AM

Birth Control and Government - Uncle Sam was an Abortionist

Rate: 16 Flag

eugenics5 The government has a history of taking over people’s reproductive future.  In the first half of the twentieth century, the United States promoted efforts to “breed better human beings”.  The pseudoscience,  called eugenics included forced abortions, sterilization, and other methods of family planning.

When the Nazis went on trial after World War II, for war crimes in Nuremberg, they justified their mass sterilizations by citing the United States as their inspiration.  And just as the rich and powerful promoted the Nazi Holocaust, in the United States, eugenics was driven by the elite.

Its supporters included Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill; Alexander Graham Bell, inventor of the telephone; activist Margaret Sanger founder of Planned Parenthood; Leland Stanford, founder of Stanford University; novelist H. G. Wells;  playwright George Bernard Shaw; and hundreds of others. 

It was approved by Supreme Court justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis, who ruled in its favor.   Nobel Prize winners gave their support, as well as the National Academy of Sciences, the American Medical Association, and the National Research Council. Eugenics was even introduced into the curriculum at high schools and universities.  Work was done at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford and Johns Hopkins.

eugenics 9
Southwestern State Hospital, originally called  Southwestern Lunatic Asylum, is now called Southwestern Virginia Mental Health Institute

The belief that there was a gene pool... homosexuals, Negroes, foreigners, immigrants, Jews, degenerates, the unfit, and the "feeble minded...  leading to the deterioration of the human race was widely shared:

H.G. Wells spoke against "ill-trained swarms of inferior citizens."

Theodore Roosevelt said that "Society has no business to permit degenerates to reproduce their kind."  

George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind.

Even though the eugenic description of human life reflected political and social prejudices rather than scientific facts, eugenicists effectively lobbied for social legislation to keep racial and ethnic groups separate, to restrict immigration from southern and eastern Europe, and to sterilize people considered "genetically unfit."

eugenics8 Beginning with Connecticut in 1896, many states enacted marriage laws with eugenic criteria, prohibiting anyone who was "epileptic, imbecile or feeble-minded" from marrying. Eugenics were applied to bring about more restrictive state laws banning interracial marriage: the so-called anti-miscegenation laws. The most famous example was Virginia's Racial Integrity Act of 1924. The U.S. Supreme Court overturned this law in 1967 in Loving v. Virginia, and declared anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional.

The first American entity associated officially with eugenics, the Immigration Restriction League lobbied for a literacy test for immigrants.  Literacy test bills were vetoed by Presidents in 1897, 1913 and 1915; eventually, President Wilson's second veto was overruled by Congress in 1917.  

Eugenicists were then able to influence  the passage of the Immigration Act of 1924.  The Act restricted the immigration of Southern and Eastern Europeans as well as prohibited the immigration of Middle Easterners, East Asians and Asian Indians. 

Eugenics7
                    President Calvin Cooidge signs the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924

He wrote:

"These are racial considerations too grave to be brushed aside for any sentimental reasons.  Biological laws tell us that certain divergent people will not mix or blend.  The Nordics propagate themselves successfully. With other races, the outcome shows deterioration on both sides.  Quality of mind and body suggests that observance of ethnic law is a great necessity to a nation as immigration law."

The Immigration Act of 1924 also identified other undesirables banned from entering the country, including  “homosexuals”, “idiots”, “feeble-minded persons”, "criminals", “epileptics”, “insane persons”, alcoholics, “professional beggars”, all persons “mentally or physically defective”, polygamists, and anarchists. It barred all immigrants over the age of sixteen who were illiterate; people from  eastern Asia and the Pacific Islands.  The Act governed American immigration policy for 40 years, until the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965.
Eugenics In 1907, Indiana became the first state to pass eugenics legislation, followed soon after in 1909 by Washington and California. More than 30 states would enact eugenics legislation.  Most operations were performed  to prevent reproduction, but Oregon and North Dakota had laws which called for the use of castration.

Sterilization rates across the country were relatively low until a1927 Supreme Court legitimized the forced sterilization of patients at a Virginia home for the mentally retarded. The number of sterilizations performed per year increased until another Supreme Court case, Skinner v. Oklahoma, 1942, complicated the legal situation by ruling that sterilization of criminals could not exempt white-collar criminals.

After World War II, public opinion turned against eugenics and sterilization programs because of the connection with the genocidal policies of Nazi Germany.  In the end, over 65,000 individuals were sterilized in 33 states under state compulsory sterilization programs in the United States. The Oregon Board of Eugenics, later renamed the Board of Social Protection, existed until 1983, with the last forcible sterilization occurring in 1981.   

eugenics2 Too many have either forgotten or never learned the lessons of the Nazi Holocaust. So, when today’s Americans witness widespread violations of human rights  by our country’s leaders, they don’t recognize them for what they are.  Evil is hard to confront, especially on such a far-reaching scale.  But we must not have naïve faith in the decency of our leaders.  It is totally unwarranted by any serious examination of the facts.

The U.S. Constitution provides no guarantee against tyranny. It only provides a master plan that enables us to recognize when our rights are in jeopardy and exercise sufficient vigilance to maintain them.

Image Archive on the American Eugenics Movement

Payment Set for Those Sterilized in Program

Toritto has an excellent article called Indiana, Eugenics and Facism.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
"George Bernard Shaw said that only eugenics could save mankind."

GBS is sometimes to be taken with a grain of salt. When Isadora Duncan suggested that their pairing might produce offspring of great intelligence and great beauty, Shaw replied, "But what if the child has my looks and your brains?"

Actually, I think eugenics might be useful, but only if we started with the sterilization of banksters, political pundits, wingnut politicians, and religious nutjobs.
Great post. I wrote one on the same subject not too long ago.

http://open.salon.com/blog/toritto/2012/02/02/indiana_eugenics_and_fascism

regards. / r
Hi Tom:

I wish I could take all this crap with a grain of salt, however I do so agree with your final conclusion. :)
Thanks for dropping by Toritto. I look forward to reading your post as soon as I return... I just dropped and stepped on my glasses. I can only hope what I'm typing makes sense. :)
"The Immigration Act of 1924 also identified other undesirables banned from entering the country, including “homosexuals”, “idiots”

Drat... just a little bit to early for some of those Republicans that are running.

HUGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Outstanding post, Fay.

"But we must not have naïve faith in the decency of our leaders. It is totally unwarranted by any serious examination of the facts. "

This is a warning that needed to be given. Our history, no matter how much we try to sanitize it, is less than stellar when it comes to human rights.

Lezlie
I can understand the restriction on idiots, since we usually elect them to Congress. A very fine and informative post, Fay.
Bless you, Fay, for this.

rated.
The Old Dominion's slogan should read, Virginia is for Loving. Thanks for this, Fay. Great report. (I hope you have shatterproof lenses.)
I knew about this from historical reading. The facts are just horrifying.
Well, no such thing as a one-hour service here in Mayberry, so I'm sporting an old pair and doing my best. Thanks to each of you for stopping by.

Right you are, Linda.

L, as I looked around at the great debate about women's reproduction, I couldn't help but remember this dreadful time.

Stim: the only problem is idiots decide who is worthy.

Trying to keep it real, Jonathan.

No Matt, they weren't shatterproof...nor insured. :)

Yes, CC, I had to decide what to edit. I could have gone on for pages.
What an excellent post, Fay. I didn't know so much of this. The IRL link you included states that the immigration restrictions were made because these immigrants took jobs away from the natives. It gives no reference to eugenics. So the truth was hidden with such excuses.
R♥
Hi Fusun:

If you think about it, job security is always the so-called argument against immigration. Not only was the truth hidden, but some people actually believed the surgeries were beneficial. In one state social workers were charged with deciding who could be sterilized. The Immigration Act of 1924 actually spells out the outcasts; homosexuals, idiots, beggars, etc.

Forgive me for going on, but when I think about today's argument about women's reproduction rights, it just drives me mad.
Interesting look back Fay. I remember reading of how some folks in the 1920s decried Italian immigration because the good ones (northern Italians) weren't coming in as great numbers as the slow-witted ones from the south. And for a long time the Irish were though to be an inferior breed - Joyce, Shaw, Wilde, Yeats etc. notwithstanding. The rebel song Whack Fol the Diddle satirizes this prejudice amongst the Brits. Dunno if you're familiar with it but if you're curious, here's the YouTube clip:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5BYfvLBs_9Y
Well, I'd vote to sterilize husbands (after the desired number of spawn has been reached), but there probably aren't enough women in power to enact that law.

Seriously though, this is serious business, when you talk about the control each and every one of us should have over our bodies -- and the history and motivations (and monstrous outcomes) when government tries to take that away.
Great, informative post. Most people easily forget out history. Things we are very shocked at now were common place. That is one reason why we have to be diligent about human rights and personal autonomy. We don't want to give up what has been fought so hard for. Our children will never forgive us.
Very interesting. I can see myself as perhaps a failed eugenics project, skewed in every way, incomplete like the genes didn't all line up as planned. Ah, but I make do. Nice piece, Rated with RRR
highly informative, and scary as a result. thanks for bringing it forward.