lame seeming update os of May 12th 2012.
Everyday, this post gets hits . Of course, I'm curious as to why. I imagine that the ruthless, reckless, and insane, Notaro, is still trying to benefit from utilizing me as her stalker. Makes her feel famous like her pal, Sarah Silverman. Sarah Silverman must be a rotten person to so befriend and promote such a vicious liar as Notaro. Shame on her-- if she has any shame.
Anyway, readers off in the air: Please, look at this link. It is less complicated .
Also, If you are coming across a post that says, "Tig Notaro is a wierdo."
Please understand, I wrote that because when Notaro would make up mean things she would claim I said on internet, and try to pass it off as crimes in order to punish me, she sent letters to the police and the prosecutors saying. " It's obviously that wierdo trying to contact me."
Well, it turned out they found out that whatever crap she was sending them was written by someone else. I'd bet she wrote it to herself. It looks immature and ugly to to say " Tig Notaro is a wierdo," but it was a private non-joke response made when I saw papers where Notaro was calling me a "wierdo."
Then, that disaster, Scott Boxenbaum, in order to get more than 12 hits to his dreadful youtube comedy clips started telling everyone I was "the town wierd0." and to "shun' me.
How gross can you get? Seriously? Adults?
Scott Boxenbaum makes dirt on the bottom of a shoe look like a beautiful flower arrangement by comparison. I can't wish on him worse cause he is already doomed by genes and fate to be a talentless, soulless cretin of mammothly embarrassing proportions. My god, he gets an average of 3 hits a year to his plentiful youtube "comedy" bits.
Somehow and somewhere this post is of interest to too many people to be a coincidence.
So let me make all the below a little clearer: Tig Notaro and her disturbed sociopath peon, Stef Willen have told and are telling dangerous and destructive lies. Their lies led to huge waste and devastation to innocent human beings. The quickly rotting, Notaro,
can wave the illegally obtained appeal around all she wants and she can go around telling her crappy comedy all she wants but the truth is she is liar of the worst kind who won't live down such LIES
. She is a false accuser who makes up ugly lies in order to harm those who never harmed her. She invented a story of a a push or shove. Then, she added a "verbal tirade." She got away with it all because she managed to snag an obese and vicious lawyer named Allison Hart Sievers. Allison Sievers was able to get her dead eyed pal, John Gregozek, to do what it took to please Allison Hart Sievers and by proxy-- Martin Singer/Marty Singer. At times, Gregozek even started dragging his feet and just couldn't abide the absurdity so Allison Hart Sievers starting pressuring Kelly Boyer at the City Attorney's office to do something to punish me for making fun of Notaro on a humorous message board called Datalounge.
Allison Sievers writes, " Dear Kelly." And, soon after "Kelly," obliges "Allison" by agreeing to add charges based on no evidence, no link, no reason that would satisfy any reasonable man. But, Kelly Boyer, even, can't get herself to really add the charges because it is just too obvious that Allison Hart Sievers is nuts and no crime has been comitted and this is just a maniac's vendetta.
Kelly Boyer disappears. And, no charges are added despite Gregozek writing up, in reports, that 4 charges are added that related to someone calling Notaro a perjurer on a facebook page.
But, this is all too complicated for a multitasking world.
What needs to be known is that no one ever pushed Notaro or even insulted Notaro on August 29th 2007. The proof is here that Stef Willen and Mathilde Notaro are deranged little shemen, and false accusers bent on destruction. And, the proof is here ,and elsewhere ,that from beginning to end they lied and were rewarded for lying . Notaro would lie about 50 times about everything else. Everytime she opened those rancid looking lips-- lies would pour out.
Willen would get even more vengeful and sick with time and would try so hard to lie some more before it was all done with. Then the pretense was that some restraining order was violated when in truth it was all retaliation cooked up by Allison Hart Sievers et al for me suing Notaro after having such solid proof of her lies and her defamation.
There was never a legal order to even violate, but even if there had been: No one violated it.
Had Gregozek just gone to talk to Sam C-- this all would have ended on May 7th 2008. Instead, John Gregozek, never spoke to a soul other than the clearly spiteful and stupid, Stef Willen and Tig Notaro , and he only talked to them "via phone." Then, Gregozek and Hoffman and others would all be informed of five witnesses (and more on call) who would prove that nothing said by Notaro and Willen was true and this would just make them more intent to close the case in any way that would spare them the liability that anyone would infer after realizing how terribly they had conducted themselves throughout. We were ignorant. We never thought that when we threatened them with a lawsuit if they didn't stop with what was a persecution-- that we'd spur them on to a coverup and much worse.
Who is he?
He works at the Tsumani coffee house in Silverlake, CA.
Did he work the exact time and day,August 29th 2007, where Notaro alleges a major scene of verbal tirades and physical violence( shove/push) took place?
Why is he important?
Because he is a “witness’ to the only alleged incident of violence- that is the basis for the appellate decision- and Grime’s decision, and many other terrible decisions that led to so much damages. He was right there in a tiny place and Notaro will keep changing her story -but she will maintain all the way to trial- that a huge spectacle happened at the tsunami coffee house that night. Stef Willen will completely change up the story too but she will keep repeating this lie till the bitter end. She since has gotten jobs from this Tig and has been rewarded with trips and gifts for her lies.
When did Spitzberg seek Sam out and why?
In October of 2008 to void the order and prove it was a fraud as she was ruined in the comedy world for no valid reason.
Would he testify for the defense in a court of law under penalty of perjury
Yes, according to the Public defender- he would do so with enthusiasm. According to this Pubic Defender, Sam couldn't believe that this was all happening and woulld enthusiastically affirm that nothing happened that night between anyone in that coffee shop.
What does he say occurred on August 29th 2007
That there was "no activity or fight at all ." and, that many were there who could testify to this fact. He spoke to me and just seemed baffled and more than sure that everything alleged by Stef Willen and "Tig" Notaro was a lie.
Here are his statements. The public defender refuses to hand over the notes, she surely must have taken. Those will be posted when that information is obtained by subpeona etc.
Then, something spooked him but he still was man enought to make an "excited utterance." But, by the time this went to trial he was no longer spooked and ready and willing to do the right thing.
When was he scheduled to testify for the defense.
In March 2010
Did the police or the prosecution ever try talk to Sam Consuegra even after being told about him many times?
No. They kept lying about a push in "Supplementals" and no probable cause search warrants long after knowing about Sam C., and the testimony he would give.
Did Spitzberg mention his presence that night and that he was a witness.
Yes, Over and over again. Spitzberg told John Gregozek and Hoffman in May of 2008, Jeffrey Dunn in February of 2009 , Martha Defoe in early 2009, Jennifer Abrams Waxler on March 25th 2009
She told Felise Cohen Kalpakian on August 12th 2009 . She told Martin Boags on September 11th 2009 .
She told many Judges throughout(show transcripts)
The public defender told Katie Ford in March of 2010. This prosecutor, Katie Ford, would now know for a fact that their was no push or verbal tirade, that all that Notaro and her false witnesses had said on May 28th 2008, was perjury. She would know that each "incident" alleged by Notaro and those she had rewarded for false testimony had comitted crimes in the course of Notaro and Willen's madness, and she would just repeating the lies in the hopes that judges and jurors wouldn't know any better. It was a tiny misdemeanor case and they counted on judges just not paying attention. Such tactics worked on all but the trial judge who soon enough grasped the true nature of this persecution.
Does Katie Ford pretend these witnesses don’t exist in the disbar worthy “Trial Breif. She would write up in a desperate attempt to get an innocent person convicted so to spare herself and her buddy, Gregozek, liability?”
Was it easy to get a hold of Sam C?
Very. Just a visit to the Tsunami coffee house.
I think truth vs. fiction is a big and rich topic. I think this mad thing where two stupid and rotten people such as Stef Willen and Tig Notaro were able to manipulate the legal system up to the appellate court is incredibe.
I think there are elements to my story that are mind blowing and of interest to all Americans. I think that the link that was sent to Jerusalem mike has destroyed my life. Not my OS life. My offline life. Not because it is a skeleton in a closet. It is not. It is a brutal lie and a huge injustice that occurred here. I am very very aware of other's opinions and brains and I am not laying bare this hideousness(it is rank!) to get support or agreement. I think it speaks for itself. And, I need it to speak for me because I 've been silenced beyond your wildest imaginations. Well, not silenced... but discredited .degraded and done for. I literally have lost it all to this, and I want the "world" to see. When my name is googled I need to find a way to counter the lies and I hope this shows up near it. So, please, if you find it unintersting or too strange - just ignore this as it will be a continual thing. This story becomes very scary- you will see what happens when someone just won't give in to a system that is used to people giving in.
I am using OS as a vehicle right now because it says, " Make your own headlines." I also know that there are many here with keen minds and I want them to get a gander,Doing this is part of the story. I am well aware that it opens me up to all sort of adjectives and I'm okay with that. I get that it comes off as bizzarre and odd ,and it is. Any opinions or comments or anything on the below is much appreciated but not expected(well, I sure hope one does.)
Appeals statement in red. The rest in black.
My side of the story as corrobarated by the employee that worked there and prospectively- anyone who was at Tsunami Coffee House on August 29th 2007.
Spitzberg and Stephanie Willen had a three-month relationship, which ended in May 2007. In August 2007, Notaro and Willen were in a cafe having coffee when Spitzberg approached their table and began to yell insults at them, including fucking dyke, ugly, cunt, and bitch. They ignored Spitzberg, who followed them outside, became more belligerent, and shoved/pushed Notaro. Spitzberg denied pushing Notaro.
Spitzberg and Stephanie Willen had a three-month relationship, which ended in May 2007.
Spitzberg and Willen had a failed friendship at best. They didn’t see each other very much and mostly did not get along. This was not a “relationship.” Spitzberg heard only some negative things about Notaro and had not the slightest animus towards Notaro. There has never been nor can there be any evidence that Spitzberg would ever push or even say a mean thing to Notaro. In fact, Alisa Spitzberg, declares that none of what these people, Tig Notaro, and Stef Willen say is true. She never went near their table . She did say, “ You are wearing the same pants” and then they talked about comedy and a particular comedian and then they talked about the Sarah Silverman show. There was no argument at all. Spitzberg at one point, went outside to smoke, and Stephanie wouldn’t respond to Spitzbergs’ question of who she was sending her mail and Spitzberg said to Willen , “ Dumb Dyke,” . She had ample reasons to say it to Willen, but this had nothing to do with Notaro. Spitzberg was pursuing a comedy career and would not want to alienate Notaro .Notaro simply had nothing to do with her life except for Willen, at times, trying to make Spitzberg jealous and failing(ample evidence available through e-mails.)
Her statement is in the appellate record, and these judges had it and more evidence at their disposal. Spitzberg was polite to both women except for 2 nasty words to Willen for a very specific reason, and there was nothing but an awkward meeting overall. Spitzberg never got into anyones space and if you look in any way carefully and this and then the next supposed incidents you can see that this is all invented by the sick and stupid heads of Tig Notaro and Stef Willen. But, here are the statements unadorned.
What the appellate court states in their unpublished opionion that was immediately published while Spitzberg was illegally incarcerated.
In August 2007, Notaro and Willen were in a cafe having coffee when Spitzberg approached their table and began to yell insults at them, including fucking dyke, ugly, cunt, and bitch.
According to the Police report Notaro made on April 30 th of 2008In September 2007 - Spitzberg arrived at the coffee shop and confronted Willen and Notaro.
Sworn affidavit of Mathilde Notaro- as to the August 29, 2007 “incident.In late August of 2007, I accompanied my friend Stephanie to the Tsunami Café in Silverlake, CA. Alisa Spitzberg approached us at our table and aggressively yelled insults at the two of us, including, “fucking dyke,.” “ugly.” “cunt,” “bitch.” Etc.
this is not something Notaro would forget. And, then she does forget what her story was to be and puts this elsewhere but not here. I did say they were wearing the same pants but that was the sum of my commentary on these two woman's character or attire. See April 7th 2008 and email where Willen claims this same thing happened where Notaro is accosted by other people who curse her with these same exact words.It is also interesting to note that Notaro claims this happened with other perpetrators at another time. It is also interesting to see this from comedians magazine online. Notaro's words:
"Notaro points out that there’s a bug flying around her room and then recounts a less rosy moment with an audience, “I was doing this joke called Wheelchair Becky. (from jokes.com by ComedyCentral - “It’s just so hard for me to accept the fact that Mattel would OK the name of this product to help teach tolerance and open minds. Like, maybe some more dolls are gonna come out, like Black Byron, Chinese Charlie, Faggy Frank, Big ‘Ol Dykey Darlene. These are not Barbie’s friends. She would never hang out with these people. She’s a snob.”) Basically the idea is that Mattel put that out to show that people in wheelchairs are like anyone else. My joke is- well, then just call the doll Becky. Some people got up during the set and walked out. I asked them, ‘Where are you headed?’ and they said ‘Maybe you’ll think twice before you make fun of people.’ One of the woman pointed at somebody she was with and was like, ‘He just got over cancer...’ I was so baffled, so confused. Everybody was baffled! I don’t know where they read in that I was saying, ‘Haha you have cancer.’ Nowhere. I don’t know where it came about. So, they left and started yelling with the owner of the bar, it turned into a brawl and the cops came. I was still on stage this whole time. A fist fight broke out... This is all during my set. I had to stay focused and talk to audience while people were pinning each other down and screaming. And one of the guys that left, the police broke his leg while they were holding him down.”
What Notaro says happened, under oath, on May 28th 2008 to Judge Gerald Rosenberg
SO I HAD COFFEE WITH STEF, AND ALISA WALKED IN. AND WHEN SHE SAW US SITTING TOGETHER, SHE SAID -- SHE SAT DOWN AND WAS LIKE: OH ARE YOU GUYS BACK TOGETHER?AND WE WERE JUST IGNORING HER. SHE WAS VERY AGGRESSIVE, AND VERY JUST PERSISTENT AND GOT IN OUR SPACE WE IGNORED HER.
(in court Notaro forgets that I did the ugly cunt bitch thing here and instead now tells the court that I said those exact words 9 months later. And then she forgets that and adds it elsewhere and then I have e-mails and interviews where she accuses others of these exact same words and is constantly accusing others of harrassing her and threatening her and police coming . She is insane. And, no one had the time to figure that out or they did and didn't care because it was all about making Lavely and Singer happy at some point.
Notaro statement to Spector –investigator- given in February of 2009- about August 29, 2007
While sitting together and waiting at tsunamis café late one night for this deaf landlord to show up Notaro said that Alisa all of a sudden and surprisingly walked in. Notaro stated that Alisa immediately walked up to their table and “accused” them meaning herself and Willen of being together. Notaro stated Alisa then began yelling and cussing at the two of them. Notaro said is was very much a verbal tirade against the two of them. While Alisa continued yelling at both of them Notaro said a mini bottle of vodka fell out of one. of Spitzberg’s jacket pockets. At one point while all of this was going on Notaro said she then stood up and she was now standing right next to Alisa.
All this is now alleged to have happened inside . Here vodka falls out of jacket rather than a purse. Here I yell and curse at both of them.
The entirety of waht Notaro said to Martin Boags, City attorney, in February 2010 about August 2007
The parties were at the coffee shop when the defendant showed up. Initially, the defendant was focused on Willen Exclusively Defendant asked Ms. Willen, “ are you trying to avoid me?
What Stephanie Willen says about the “incident” on August 29th 2007 to John Gregozek of the Threat management unit of the LAPD. Given in May of 2008
Notaro waited with Willen at approximately 2000 hours, Spitzberg arrived at sat down next to Willen and Notaro.. Spitzberg appeared intoxicated and began interrupting and insulting Notaro and Willen. Spitzberg told Willen that she was “horrible and despicable.” And “how could I be so wrong about you?”
Here I am in R.O hearing and Notaro is desperate to defraud this court so she can get me back for someone mocking her on the Datalounge Message board . We learn later that she is convinced that it is me and she has her lawyer draft tons of cease and desist letters. The Webmaster complies as Lavely and Singer is highly litigious but Notaro is smarting and Lavely and Singer have no recourse other than coming up with a quasi criminal proceeding and the help of their buddies John Gregozek and Jeff Dunn of the LAPD's threat management unit. Members of this unit will play act and this will scare the poor and powerless Spitzbergs and end of story. Well, the Spitzbergs love their rights and have large senses of self and so the story just won't end there or maybe ever if true justice doesn't occur.
What willen said under oath to Judge Gerald Rosenberg on May 28th of 2008- she doesn’t mention the entrance just tells him I sat down
THE COURT: DID SHE SPEAK TO MS. NOTARO
MS. WILLEN: YES, SHE SPOKE AT US.THE COURT: OKAY. WHAT DID SHE SAY?WILLEN: A SLURRY OF HOSTILE WORDS. SHE STARTED WITH WHAT BASICLY --"OH, YOU GUYS ARE TOGETHER.YOU LOOK GREAT. YOU LOOK GREAT. TOGETHER. NO WONDER ALL THE GALS LIKE YOU. LOOKS LIKE YOU ARE WEARING THE SAME PANTS." THEN IT MOVED ON TO -- WE WEREN'T RESPONDING TO HER.
You would think that the police reports made up by Notaro on April 30th 2008 (see first version) would be included in the file to obtain the R.O. But, it is not. Because the hairbrained Notaro messes up and changes her story and that would only harm her case. Notice how Willen isn't asked about any push and she doesn't volunteer. All the talk about "You look good together' is Willen's invention. She hoped for jealousy and a scene such as this but it never occurred.
Willen evaded the investigator for the defendant but she then did make this statement to Martin Boags, City attorney, or maybe in was Katie Ford, in March of 2010. In August of 2007:
Alisa walked in and saw me and Tig and looked shocked. Witness said Alisa "got in our space." very agressively, sitting down right across from them at their table, w/o being invited. At one point a bottle of vodka fell out of her purse. Alisa seemed humbled and retreived it. Alisa also showed Stef willen some loose papers in her bag and claimed to have something Stephanie Willen needed to hear. there was an open mike poetry night at the time.
Here it is heading to trial and they need a narrative because the story never made any sense- Now I have loose papers and am wanting to read Willen something. Pure invention- For the first time they admit that there was an open mike poetry going on. It begs too many questions and so they managed to keep it out before they knew that Sam was on call to testify and that other witnesses were set to testify.
They ignored Spitzberg, who followed them outside, became more belligerent, and shoved/pushed Notaro. Spitzberg denied pushing Notaro.
Notaro’s statement to TMU- as to the August 29, 2007 “incident.
Willen ignored Spitzberg and walked out of the shop with Notaro. Spitzberg stepped in front of Willen and said, “You trying to avoid me.” Willen ignored Spitzberg who then pushed Notaro. Notaro and Willen left without reporting the incident. PUSH OUTSIDE- NO STEPPING INFRONT INVOLVED. They have changed the invented dialogue yet again.
Notaro statement to Spector -investigator
At one point while all of this was going on Notaro said she then stood up and she was now standing right next to Alisa. After standing up, Notaro stated that Alisa then Shoved her with both her hands, as well as she next said, “ are you Steph’s keeper.” After that had occurred Notaro advised that both she and Willen then left this coffee shop, due to the fact they didn’t want any more violence to occur on Alisa’s part. As they quickly walked out of this coffee shop, Notaro said that Alisa continued to follow them out of this location on foot.
Here this alleged push happens inside. Here no on e stood in front of anyone. They run out this time after the push but in the other version they run inside from the outside to retrieve belongings. Here the lies really help because here we have tons of eyewitness at the ready who would have heard or see such behaviors. Tsunami is a tiny and very quiet place btw. There an open mike in progress and an open poetry night. Yet, only Notaro and then Willen see, feel, or hear pushes and tirades.
Sworn affidavit of Mathilde Notaro- as to the August 29, 2007 “incident.
In late August of 2007, I accompanied my friend Stephanie to the Tsunami Café in Silverlake, CA. Alisa Spitzberg approached us at our table and aggressively yelled insults at the two of us, including, “fucking dyke,.” “ugly.” “cunt,” “bitch.” Etc.We ignored her and went outside, but she followed us and became angrier and more belilligerent. As I motioned for Stephanie to gather her belongings to leave, Alisa came closer and pushed me.
Here I curse them inside and push Notaro outside. I don't sit down or have any vodka etc. No one steps in front of anyone either.
Court testimony of notaro describing August 29,2007
I KEPT SAYING TO STEF TO JUST IGNORE HER, JUST IGNORE HER. THEN ALISA SAID: "OH, ARE YOU HER FUCKING KEEPER?" I SAID, "GO GET YOUR STUFF. LET'S JUST GO." AND WHEN I DID, ALISA GOT IN MY FACE AND PUSHED ME. AND THEN STEF WENT IN TO GET HER STUFF. WE WALKED OUT OF THE CAFE TOWARDS THE -- WHERE WE WERE PARKED ON THE STREET, AND ALISA FOLLOWED US AGAIN CALLING US DISGUSTING BULL DIKES, CUNTS, JUST ALL THESE HORRENDOUS NAMES. Here I'm outside and it is now me saying "are you her fucking keeper as well as notaro telling willen to get her "belongings' that provokes this "push."
Notaro to Martin Boags about” September 2007” given in February of 2010
Initially, the defendant was focused on Willen Exclusively Defendant asked Ms. Willen, “ are you trying to avoid me. The witness told Ms. Willen, “let’s go.” at which point Ms. Spitzbeg directed her attention to the witness and asked, what are you, her fucking keeper?” Defendant shoved the witness, who left with Ms. Willen.
Now Nutso Notaro is really at a loss for memory and the invented dialogue is "are you trying to avoid me," directed at Willen. Now I'm focused on Willen not her while before it was always her. Here I am asking someone if they are trying to avoid me while I am supposedly in their face. They are now sticking with the fake "are you her keeper," thing because they are being coached for consistency. This makes no sense . They are trying mightily to invent some reasoning but they fail because there is just too many versions out there at this point.
I never would say " Are you her keeper." That is the most annoying part of this-- They give me language and words that idiots like them use. I had zero animus towards Tig Notaro here and only mild disgust for Willen . But, now... you can imagine. Now, I am not a fan. Ha. Willen has committed a crime by lying to the police and and then to a prosecutor much later on when the pressure was on her from Tig. But, she never did invent the push story for the court hearing and so Willen is not guilty of perjury.And, she wasn't called to testify in the criminal matter (that arose as retailiation for a civil suit brought against Notaro for defamation, )so Willen was smart enough or lucky enough to avoid the felony charges that must result soon.Here there is no mention of inside or outside because they are aware of the witnesses and they are aware that Notaro and willen are filthy liars.
Willen’s Statement from Follow up investigation - august 29th 2007 “incident.”
Willen walked outside and spitzberg called Willen a, “ Dumb ugly dyke.” Spitzberg then pushed Notaro. Willen stepped between Notaro and Spitzberg, and Notaro suggested they leave. Notaro and Willen walked away while Spitzberg shouted insults at them.
Here now the brave Willen is stepping between Notaro and Spitzberg. Now, the curses change to just include, "Dumb ugly dyke.Here no one follows them by foot. Willen will then invent that spitzberg chases them down in one car- though oddly enough both say that they came in different cars.
I did call Wille a Dumb Dyke outside after she wouldn't answer me a civil question. Mind you, at this point everything was a 100 percent civil and I've always admitted to calling Willen Dumb Dyke. But that was IT. And she knows it and the filthy Tig Notaro knows it. And, it was unremarkable and outside and there was three boys out there smoking too and it wasn't even noticed it was said so mildly. Notice how here now I shout insults but they don't name the insults. Notice how the insults are now outside not inside.
In later version I am chasing down there car or following them. This is all lies and retaliation for daring to mock " You're wearing the same pants' these two narcissistic sociopaths. Notaro and Willen think they are demigods . You should seem them strutting around in court. And, I dared insult them and they sure got their revenge.
Court testimony of willen as to august 29,2007- transcript --- pg. 20
WE WEREN'T RESPONDING TO HER. WE WERE JUST TALKING AS IF SHE WASN'T THERE. SHE GOT MORE HOSTILE AND MORE IN OUR FACE. AND SHE JUST DID STUFF -- TRYING TO DENIGRATE OUR CHARACTER;YOU KNOW:YOU GUYS ARE UGLY. HOW COULDYOU DO THIS TO ME. HOW COULD YOU NOT TALK TO ME; YOU ACT LIKE YOU DON'TLIKE YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW ME."
me talking: Willen isn’t asked about the “push” by the judge and she doesn’t volunteer this information. Now I'm doing stuff. No push. No hardcore curses such as "Dyke cunt bitch." My version and the truth: Never was anywhere near their faces or even near them. I sat as far as I could from them in that coffee shop. That is why no one noticed the three of us together that night or anything about us though it turned out we were the only 3 females in this tiny and crowded place.
Willen's statement to Martin boags or Katie ford, City Attorneys, given in March 20010 .
They kept replacing these stupid and corrupt city attrorneys. Here they are changing it up because they realized a jury will see it now.They have to invent a narrative for this jury to buy. they have to invent jealousy etc because there has never been any evidence of it. Tig Notaro and Stef Willen according to many e-mails were hanging out all the time. No one would be shocked to see them together. willen had told spitzberg that they hung out all the time and so this is all a fake story created when the real story long ago indicated that willen and notaro were shameless and obvious liars. The true story is that not one of these cliche statements was made and there was no saracsm or mocking that ever occurred. NOTE: Here
Witness said a couple of things like, "Alisa, not now," or " No,we're not together." as Alisa kept looking at Tig and Stef Willen and joking about what a wonderful couple they made and Alisa knew all alolng this would happen... match made in heaven... Alisa's tone was very sarcastic and mocking. Tig just ignored Alisa completely. Finally witness got up to go outside and look for landlord. Alisa followed and got "into witnesses face" Stef Willen doesn't recall exactly what Defendant said, But basically told Willen she didn't have any humanity etc. Alisa was very aggressive, inches from Willen's face. Tig tried to help and stepped between Alisa and Willen and said they should go. Willen agreed. Then Alisa got in Tig's face and started yelling asking who she thought she was, "her keeper>" etc. Tig ignored her. The Alisa pushed her! Willen ran inside to get her bags. Willen and Notaro began walking quickly away and Alisa started after them for a ways, yelling something like " You stupid dumb bull dykes, stupid cunts."
Willen forgets her lies and now says that Tig "tried to help." and stepped in front of spitzberg and notaro. In her last statement she said that she was the hero and stepped in front of Notaro and spitzberg. Notaro doesn't remember any of that. Stef Willen is a wannabe writer and is adding more and more fiction without conferring with Notaro first. Willen is a grifter who depended on Notaro for a place to live and jobs and saw this all as a great opportunity to win back the favors of Notaro.
Martin I unbenched my own father Boags was taken off the case because he was, at this point, really messing up with soviet era competency ploys and the addition of charges that would open up everythign to scrutiny. Soon after he started interviewing "witnesses" against me he was yanked off the case. Because, it turned out that it was obvious that they all were lying and now he'd gone and added four charges based on this date and the upcoming ones. He added these four charges saying that what happened here was stalking and criminal threats. He added this after the competeny and jail tactics didn't scare me off.
So, I'm all happy that he added these charges because my legalish brain figures this gets me to open up the fraudulent restraining order and cross examine all of the liars and to bring in my witnesses, Heidi, Sam, Julius, and the Largo Bartender and to get the videotape made by STeve agee that night. My Pd is like- No four charges added are bad. I say no no... it is great. Of course, the new cretin, Katie Ford, is too smart to allow these charges to stand. She gets that this will not only show that I didn't commit any criminal acts but that the restraining order was obtained by extrisnsic and intrinsic fraud. The charges are added on January 21st of 2010 and dropped in early March of 2010. They didn't succeed in getting me to plea and or Meanine Mousie Katie Ford gets that the inclusion of these fake four charges will open up the R.O to collateral attack. It turns out that by law that I had the right to attack the R.O collaterally but the prosecution begged and needled the judge that this would take too long and cost even more money so I wasn't allowed this legal right because they had messed up so badly and the opening of the order would, as the judge said, " Open up that Pandora's Box."
Now, I'm forced to do it in other ways. I won at trial without benefit of being allowed this collaterall attack on this order. The prosecution begged and sweated and whined about not letting in anything to do with this order because they long knew it was a sham and everything would go kaput just on the supposed push alone. Why else bother with competency ploys and coercive confinement? Why beg the judge not to include anything from before Judge Gerald Rosenberg signed his nefarious name to this fraudulent order. You would think they would want that kind of stuff. They begged that this not be included and they requested that it not be mentioned that my mother is a holocaust survivor. No one asked to say that and the fact that they were so scared that this would come in is telling. They wanted nothing but to win on a techicality they wrung from some void order. By creating a spectacle the jury was bamboozled that such a technicality must have occurred if this matter merits a 15 day trial. Still, that judge knew what was really up, at this point, and thank god for him and that one highly perceptive juror. I was given no defense on the bogus did I or did I send a message to Notaro through Martha Kelly. Did I do so willfully etc. Well, it was never reported either way until Notaro was served with a civil suit and had the jury known that the prosecution would be the laughing stock they should be. But, I was thrown under the bus by a city worker, and so that was denied me. In the end, one juror and one judge came out smelling like a rose. Bless them. The court reporters were fine too. And, I have no beef with bailiffs though of course some of them are beady eyed little maniacs.
Not to mention that they left an e-mail trail that shows conclusively that they engaged in malicious prosection- they knew that Notaro was a liar and now they were doing this from malice- ie. I mocked Boags kalpakian Waxler some judges on my blog. Ample evidence and witnesses to show that too.
What a completely unbiased witness says about what really happpened in this coffee house on August 29th 2002 can be found on my blog - link to the right.
And, here's the truth about the second "incident."http://losangelesjusticesreeks.blogspot.com/2011/03/284-keyword-searches-with-tig-notaro.html