fingerlakeswanderer

fingerlakeswanderer
Birthday
May 09
Title
cassandra
Bio
Lorraine Berry lives in the Fingerlakes region of New York, although it's her transplanted home. On weekends, she can be heard throughout the area, cheering on her beloved Manchester City F.C. When not writing at Does This Make Sense? or Talking Writing, she can be found hiking with her two dogs, hanging out with her two daughters, eating what her beloved Rob has cooked for her, or teaching creative writing at a small college in the area.

MY RECENT POSTS

MY RECENT COMMENTS

APRIL 30, 2009 11:37AM

President Obama: Sign FOCA Now

Rate: 11 Flag

I got that feeling again last night. It swelled again this morning, when I read Nicholas Kristof's piece (about how rape is not treated as a priority crime) in the New York Times. It's that "it's not your turn," feeling. That "don't be so pushy," feeling. That "you're being selfish; don't you realize that there are much more important things going on in the world that you?"


As a woman, I've heard that argument more times than there are members of Congress. I heard it first as a little girl, when it was made clear to me that I need to wait my turn, to not ask for too much, to stop thinking that everything was about me.


The question last night was to President Obama, who was asked about his campaign promise to sign the Freedom of Choice Act in his first 100 days. FOCA has not been signed, and last night, listening closely made me uneasy. Yes. The Obama administration has lifted the international gag rule. And yes, the courts have ruled that the Bush administration used politics over science to decide who could have access to the Morning-After pill.


But President Obama, when questioned about FOCA last night, sounded suddenly like a man who was brushing off a question he no longer found all that important. Here is the full transcript of the exchange between him and the reporter:


REPORTER: As a candidate, you vowed that one of the very things you wanted to do was sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which, as you know, would eliminate federal, state and local restrictions on abortion. And at one point in the campaign when asked about abortion and life, you said that it was above — quote, above my pay grade.

Now that you’ve been president for 100 days, obviously, your pay grade is a little higher than when you were a senator.

Do you still hope that Congress quickly sends you the Freedom of Choice Act so you can sign it?


OBAMA: You know, the — my view on — on abortion, I think, has been very consistent. I think abortion is a moral issue and an ethical issue.

I think that those who are pro-choice make a mistake when they — if they suggest — and I don’t want to create straw men here, but I think there are some who suggest that this is simply an issue about women’s freedom and that there’s no other considerations. I think, look, this is an issue that people have to wrestle with and families and individual women have to wrestle with.

OBAMA: The reason I’m pro-choice is because I don’t think women take that — that position casually. I think that they struggle with these decisions each and every day. And I think they are in a better position to make these decisions ultimately than members of Congress or a president of the United States, in consultation with their families, with their doctors, with their clergy.

So — so that has been my consistent position. The other thing that I said consistently during the campaign is I would like to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies that result in women feeling compelled to get an abortion, or at least considering getting an abortion, particularly if we can reduce the number of teen pregnancies, which has started to spike up again.

And so I’ve got a task force within the Domestic Policy Council in the West Wing of the White House that is working with groups both in the pro-choice camp and in the pro-life camp, to see if we can arrive at some consensus on that.


Now, the Freedom of Choice Act is not highest legislative priority. I believe that women should have the right to choose. But I think that the most important thing we can do to tamp down some of the anger surrounding this issue is to focus on those areas that we can agree on. And that’s — that’s where I’m going to focus.

I'm sorry, Mr. President. I don't care about the Right's ANGER on this issue. I care about the fact that there are millions of women in this country who cannot get access to abortion because of the myriad restrictions that have been placed upon the medical procedure by legislators who have no business telling women what they or cannot do with their reproductive capabilities.


I used to be a lot more moderate in my views. I used to be a lot more willing to listen to the other side's arguments about what's involved in abortion. But not anymore. Women die every day in childbirth. Women die every day from botched abortions. Women die every day in Africa from injuries, caused to them by rape, that are exacerbated by pregnancy. THIS IS NOT A MORAL ISSUE. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEALTH ISSUE.


Mr. President, this is also an economic issue. If you do indeed care for the working class and middle class who are suddenly struggling to put food on the table, don't you think you should be worried about the woman out there who can't put food in one more child's mouth? And don't tell me she should be using birth control. EVEN WITH INSURANCE, insurance companies manage to get away with charging outrageous co-pays for birth control pills and other devices. (One pack of pills is $25 a month co-pay. That's a lot of money when you're struggling.)


If we were talking about any other health issue out there, would we be having this argument? Why, when it comes to women's bodies and their rights to control their fertility, do these issues suddenly become about morals? Why are you, President Obama, backing away from a promise that you made so that you might spend some time trying to appease those people who do not want women to have abortions at any time for any reason? They are not to be reasoned with.

You cannot make them happy. You cannot make them like you on this issue.

Please stop. Please just do what you said you were going to do. Lift the restrictions on a woman's health options.


PLEASE.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
This issue is too important--even with other things going on--to be shoved to the back of the bus.
"You cannot make them happy."

No, he can't. So he should do the "moral" thing and let women decide for themselves.

Rated
Well, somehow the lack of response to this post feels like it proves my point.
I listened to his speech and echo your disappointment. Methinks Michelle is not too happy about it either.

There are so many states with such limited access to abortion services it might as well be illegal. Then there are states such as South Carolina that have limited access AND a new law that forces a woman to wait 24 hours between appointments at a clinic before an abortion can be performed. So a woman of limited means, forced to travel far to obtain the abortion must now pay for somewhere to stay overnight as well. This kind of shit enrages me.
I have yet to hear of a single man being turned down when trying to have a prescription for Vi**ra or Ci**is filled, or of a single man having his provider refuse to cover the cost of same.

It is hardly a fair fight... when the sperm gets ALL of the advantages and the woman none. In fact, lots of women actually have serious hurdles to surmount if they want access to contraception (just off the top of my head... mfg/distr problems, exorbitant co-pays, pharmacies that don't stock BCP, and pharmacists whose consciences seem to strike them only when women appear before them, but never when men do...).

And, yes, I do think that "fight" is the proper word to use above.

As for Obama's position(s) on Abortion. His words and his actions do not match. They are already in conflict. I knew they would be, though, as soon as I heard him say something about a woman considering an abortion consulting with her husband and pastor.

Mighty presumptuous of him... A woman in those circumstance just might not be married. And she might also not choose to consult a pastor. She might even be an atheist. ;~)

Apparently, a woman may eventually be free to make such a choice, but the expectation will still be that some man or other will have input into her decision.

It's HER body, for crying out loud!!!!!

[Sorry for yelling... ]
I'm here! I second Boanerges1 -- they won't be happy, so let's take that majority position and ram it down their throats.

Women don't matter to these people; it's as simple as that. We are nothing more than bodies to be controlled, managed and repressed.

Rated. Let's get this back in the feed.
ktm,
I think we should yell. I'm fucking sick and tired of being told to wait our turn.
Ablonde,
I wonder if his wife said anything to him last night after his talk? He just sounded as if it was suddenly not so important to him, that he was looking for that elusive "bipartisanship" on an issue where there is none. It sounded like stalling to me.
AshKW-
I'm with you. I've been listening to their arguments for years, and they just dig their trench deeper. Because they thought they were going to get to ban all abortion under the last administration, they became absolutely obstinate and unwilling to listen to anyone or any amount of reason on the issue. They even argue about whether birth control is abortion now. We're back to the all sperm is sacred argument.
There is NO LOGIC in their reasoning. Why do they hate women so much? Why do they hate sex so much? And why, oh why, is the president sticking his head in the sand like an ostrich on this issue? Let's raise the motherfucking roof, cause this is NOT acceptable behavior!

We voted this guy in; let's make him accountable.

Write letters here:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Call here:
202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414

Let's clog the phone lines and flood the White House with letters. Call your senators and representatives too, if they're pro-choice. Ask why they haven't pushed the president on this.
It's not like it would take much to make it happen. Thanks for pointing this out, FLW.
You can also contact the President here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

I sent him a letter. Please feel free to do the same.
Rated. This fence-straddling is so typical of Obama. It mirrors his stance on Prop 8 - he said he was against it, but he didn't call for people to vote it down, so it passed.
Lorraine: Thanks for bringing this to our attention. I agree with a lot of the things other commenters have said about women's reproductive rights being pushed onto the back burner, and about how important this issue is. So rather than repeat all that, I want to make a broader point.

To me, it's just another betrayal in the series (torture; bailouts; Gitmo; Afghanistan; etc.). I've been trying not to say "I told you so" in so many words, but I can't help it any more; my tongue is starting to hurt from all the times I've had to bite it. Not you personally, of course, Lorraine - that's a generic "you" addressed to progressives who pinned their hopes on Obama.

When will people stop voting for Democratic candidates? No one who is beholden to the capitalist system, no matter how progressive they sound when they are on the campaign trail, will or can implement all, or even most, of the policy changes we all want and need. Only a political organization that is totally and unilaterally controlled by working people, with no ties whatsoever to corporate capital, will ever be free to serve working people's interests. As long as organized labor and many progressives keep supporting the Democrats, that organization will never achieve the necessary strength to challenge the established two-party system. Gotta happen, folks - the stakes are just too high for it not to!
So much for promises. monkey fingered.