fingerlakeswanderer

fingerlakeswanderer
Birthday
May 09
Title
cassandra
Bio
Lorraine Berry lives in the Fingerlakes region of New York, although it's her transplanted home. On weekends, she can be heard throughout the area, cheering on her beloved Manchester City F.C. When not writing at Does This Make Sense? or Talking Writing, she can be found hiking with her two dogs, hanging out with her two daughters, eating what her beloved Rob has cooked for her, or teaching creative writing at a small college in the area.

MY RECENT POSTS

MY RECENT COMMENTS

Editor’s Pick
AUGUST 6, 2009 9:25AM

Men Are Being Raped

Rate: 19 Flag

29215965

photo from the New York Times

Men are being raped.

GOMA, Congo — It was around 11 p.m. when armed men burst into Kazungu Ziwa’s hut, put a machete to his throat and yanked down his pants. Mr. Ziwa is a tiny man, about four feet, six inches tall. He tried to fight back, but said he was quickly beaten down.

“Then they raped me,” he said. “It was horrible, physically. I was dizzy. My thoughts just left me.”

For years, the thickly forested hills and clear, deep lakes of eastern Congo have been a reservoir of atrocities. Now, it seems, there is another growing problem: men raping men.

Does this horrify you? Are men being raped by other men somehow more disturbing than the rape of women? This question has knocked around my head for years, ever since an incident in the Seattle area years ago. A young boy was kidnapped, raped and had his penis severed. At virtually the same time, a three-month old baby girl was raped in her crib at a party at her parents' house. The damage to her reproductive track was so severe, surgery was required to reconstruct it. But guess which story garnered more attention, caused more outrage, caused folks to scream out for the maximum punishment for the perpetrator, and caused more people to contribute to a fund-raising drive to aid the victimized child? I don't suppose I have to tell you it was the story of the young boy. 

Please understand. I am not drawing a distinction between the rape of men or the rape of women. Both are crimes of savagery, violence, and the wholescale humiliation of their victims. But I do find myself wondering, sometimes, if somehow the rape of men is more serious than the rape of women. And whether, if we knew that this was going on on a system-wide level in The DRC, just as we have known about the rape of that nation's women, whether we might be more moved to do something. 

 Just so there is no misunderstanding about my motives here, I have been writing about the women of the DRC for a while now, and I do not have any intention of stopping soon.

But the new stories, about men being raped in the DRC, made me pause for just a moment. I am almost afraid to admit this, because it makes me sound callous, but I thought to myself, "well, maybe now the UN will get serious about doing something to stop the atrocities in the Congo."

Sometimes, in my deepest, darkest hours, I find myself believing that as long as women are the sole victims of a mass crime, it will be taken less seriously. Certainly, we oppose genocide. But what do we do when we are faced with femicide? Do we automatically discount it as a less serious crime? Have we ever, as a nation, intervened on a humitarian level because women are being targeted for violence?

After all, one of our closest allies in the Gulf region denies women basic civil rights. We're watching women bear the brunt of the atrocities in Afghanistan, and yet, we're so concerned about getting out of there that to even bring up what's being done to Afghan women elicits a "meh" or "you're just a Western woman trying to impose your imperialist views on another culture." But I cannot think of any culture that condones rape. And I certainly cannot think of a culture that doesn't see the rape of its men as untenable. Tell me, will it be the mass rape of men or of women that finally leads to charges of war crimes against the perpetrators in the DRC?

Again, from the NYT:

The United Nations already considers eastern Congo the rape capital of the world, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is expected to hear from survivors on her visit to the country next week. Hundreds of thousands of women have been sexually assaulted by the various warring militias haunting these hills, and right now this area is going through one of its bloodiest periods in years.

The joint military operations that began in January between Rwanda and Congo, David and Goliath neighbors who were recently bitter enemies, were supposed to end the murderous rebel problem along the border and usher in a new epoch of cooperation and peace. Hopes soared after the quick capture of a renegade general who had routed government troops and threatened to march across the country.

But aid organizations say that the military maneuvers have provoked horrific revenge attacks, with more than 500,000 people driven from their homes, dozens of villages burned and hundreds of villagers massacred, including toddlers thrown into open fires.

And it is not just the rebels being blamed. According to human rights groups, soldiers from the Congolese Army are executing civilians, raping women and conscripting villagers to lug their food, ammunition and gear into the jungle. It is often a death march through one of Africa’s lushest, most stunning tropical landscapes, which has also been the scene of a devastatingly complicated war for more than a decade.

The DRC is a humanitarian disaster area. It really is enough to make you throw up your hands in disgust or exhaustion and say, "I've done what I can." 

But how do you do that? I am glad that Secretary of State Clinton is on her way to the Congo to talk to people there. I would like to believe that the letter-writing campaign we organized here--the one where we wrote to First Lady Michelle Obama and President Kabila of DRC, may have led to this moment where our most senior diplomat is on her way to see for herself. 

What then? What then must be done? 

I know that, once again, I will be hosting a teach-in at my college, selling tee-shirts, and trying to raise money for the Panzi Hospital in the Bukavu, which treats the victims of rape. More importantly, it is in the midst of building a safe community in which women may live. 

 Dave Cullen and I have been involved in an interesting discussion about whether it's the media's job to point out when crimes are specifically targeted against one sex or the other. We were talking about the latest mass shooting in the United States, where the victims were women, shot by a man who had a lot of anger inside of him toward females. Is that news-worthy? This discussion was sparked by Jennifer Pozner's excellent blog post on the topic.

Do we need a national dialogue on violence against women? Or has that subject been beaten to death? (mind the pun)

 

With the violent insertion of male rape into the DRC picture, it will be interesting to see what happens now. 

I wish I could say I have an answer.

I don't.

But once again, if you want to write letters, here is where they should go:
Ten Things You Can do About the DRC

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I hardly know what to say. These atrocities are so unspeakably vile it takes my breath away. Here I sit, in my sweet little apartment with the sun shining through the big (closed) windows and the AC purring quietly to keep me in comfort--and reading about the evil happening half a world away. And knowing I have a side of me that says, "Man, I'm so glad I live here instead of there." And another side saying, "No one can rest until everyone can." And the best I can do is write a letter. And I will, of course. But it seems like so little when my brothers and sisters "over there" are suffering and dying, just because of where they had the misfortune to be born. It breaks my heart.

There's a Christian song called "And God Cried," about witnessing the crucifixion from Heaven. It's a good song, emotionally powerful if you believe the dogma, but when I hear it I can't help but think that God cries all the time because of what humans do to one another. I don't think this is the way he planned it.

Thank you for this, Lorraine. I'm hoping I live long enough to see a time when you don't have anything but good news to write about. In the meantime, however, I urge you to continue to observe, think about what you see, and write about it in your own powerful and eloquent voice. It hurts to read--but we need to know. Rated. D
Yarn Over,
After a while, I don't know where to go with this anymore. Honest. I can't not write about it, and I can't not think about it, but I wish there were more concrete ways I could help. I'm actually working on a grant proposal that may help me out in that respect. We'll see.
In the meantime, thank you so much for what you've written here.
Thes atrocities are so difficult to fathom. Is there any way to stop them? I'm not sure I think so, but I do hope so. It seems that when you cure one area the problems emerge in other areas faster than you can think.
Something in the depths of the human brain lies a monster that has to punish and abuse other humans. I realize that some of it is environmental conditioning, but there has to be something else to it. It's been going on forever and the more populated the planet the worse the problem becomes.
It's difficult to hold any moral high ground when this sort of thing happens everyday in our own penal colonies. I wish I had some answers. I can't see any difference in the rape of a woman or a man. They are both disgustingly violent acts.
Rape is a crime of violence and domination. Whether the rape is of men or women really makes no difference to the perpetrators.

Then factor in that the majority of the world STILL considers women to be chattel – making the rape of someone’s “property” somehow less heinous than that of the person (man) himself.

The net result is that in places like the DRC the rape of hundreds of thousands of women is going to be considered less important than the rape of one single man.

I hope that when action is taken to protect the few men that have been accosted, it will carry over to protect a few tens of thousands of women, as well.
Thanks for this thoughtful and powerful post. I'm grappling with differences between rape as an act of war-aggression and rape as an act of aggression. And then there's all the other forms - rape within marriages, so called "date rape".
Rape as an act of war has usually been men raping women - the final act of conquering. Men raping men as an act of conquering doesn't surprise me - sodomy with objects is common in cases of aggression over the "enemy".
I have to read more of your links and blogs to understand how this affects men culturally in DNC - even here, there would be some shaming. Other cultures - the man would be encouraged to commit suicide, or be shunned and eventually killed.
As long as our societies are patriarchal in structure, the rape of women will take a back seat. When women are truly given societal equality, when women can help form the power structures, then you will see action. It appalls me that we even make distinctions. Rape is rape, doesn't matter who is the attacker and who is the victim. The CRIME needs to be dealt with, forget about the gender. When they give statistics for civilians killed in air raids in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Gaza, do they say it was so many women and so many men? No, because in the context of the act it doesn't matter one friggin' bit.
Keep writing about it, Lorraine. Keep talking about it. The only way to change the current world view is to affect those who will be stepping into it very soon (your students).
Good, necessary posting. Perhaps now that more men are the victims of this violent crime, the level of tolerance will be lowered for us all.
This morning on MSNBC, the talking "expert" head on Dylan Rattigan's show tried to spin this as a "postal" type killing, inspired by economic frustration. To his credit...fellow commentator Eliot Spitzer(!?) said that crimes are actually DOWN during the recession, and that theories about the economy causing violent crime are sort of hogwash.

Not mentioned was the fact that, contrary to assertions of financial angst....this murderer had actually recently received a raise AND a promotion. It wasn't the economy that led to this massacre.

His blog and you tube videos show a person with a pronounced emotional disorder. In the blog, there are rants about white women, whom the killer is angry with because they are having sex with black men, but not him. He shows pronounced anger and frustration with women in general, and a load of racism is thrown into the mix for good measure. I, too, wish the media would mention his motivations.
This a post that had to be written. There is a double standard and it needs be acknowledged. The reality is that both are abominations and both are simply evil, whatever the motive. None of it surprises me, but the lethargy with which US citizens approach the rape of women is disgusting in itself.

One irony for me is that the killing going on in the DRC is indiscriminate: men, women, children; and yet that has not moved the world to any real action. So for me a big question is not only whether men raping men will get us off our butts, but whether or not things that go on among and to BLACK people in Africa will ever get the white dominated nations to give a damn.

Great post.

Monte
Even though it hurts to read, I hope you won't stop sounding the alarm. This is so disturbing.
I'm just so sad that I don't actually have words for it. I don't understand how human beings can treat each other this way. It's incomprehensible.

Thank you for sharing again. For working tirelessly to communicate these issues. Once again, I wish I believed in prayer the way I did when I was a teen. I would pray for hours for hurting people around the world and I believed that this helped. I don't know. Do any of you believe that sending out positive energy helps? I truly hope so.
I read about this in the NYT and wondered if these atrocities due to gender specificity would cause world condemnation. But rape is rape... and for too long the atrocities in the Congo have been ignored. When does sanity rule supreme? I wish had an answer. rAted!
Let me answer that question for you: 4.5% of men are raped in prison and this is considered an epidemic by human rights groups and the media. Over 16% of women are victims of a completed rape yet to discuss this is considered "male bashing". When I write of rape, very few men on this site comment. Many of those who do comment complain about how much harder men have it and that I'm attacking men when I say that 98% of rapes are committed by them.

On another post there has been some heated debate about a female dancer who was aquitted of raping a man. Some of the same men have harped on how this is a double-standard and that women would have been screaming bloody-murder if a male dancer had been aquitted of raping a woman. My comment is that the only double-standard is that a case with so many holes in it was able to see the light of day in a court room when half of the cases of women being raped never lead to prosecution and only a tiny percent of those lead to conviction. That stastic, along with the statistic that 72% of female rape victims never go to the police means that raping a woman in this country is the single safest violent crime a man can do.

We live in a country where laws were made by men, for men and usually enforced by men. Men being raped speaks to their fears. If a woman being raped speaks to their fears, it's only as their fear that they might be accused of rape. When I've discussed the differences between our attitudes of men being raped versus women being raped, I often hear things which make it sound as though a woman being raped is somehow more "normal" and therefore less of a crime. I also frequently hear that these women are "cock teases" or otherwise had it coming.

I also have been working on a post about the Pittsburg shooting and have been considering comparing it to the shooting by the elderly man of his wife and autistic grandson. The sad thing is, these acts of violence are so common as to barely make the news for a day if they even make the news at all. I wonder how much coverage we would see if a woman shot up a class full of men or a female caregiver decided to kill her husband and grandson?
It never ceases to disturb me. Persons' inhumanity to persons.
I feel another round of cursing coming on. I'll just send it on up to God this time.
In about 1979-80, when I was an undergraduate I was in a class where 1 in 3 of the female students polled said that they had been sexually molested or raped. At the time I was both shocked, and I also felt a little less alone with what had happened to me. There weren't any men there that day, the two guys who had the courage to take a women's studies class weren't in class. I don't know if they would have made that admission, or if they would have had anything to report.

After a while when those admissions sunk in, I felt more than a little angry that it was apparently okay for that to be the atmosphere that women could expect. These were college students. I couldn't help but think that lower income women probably had higher incidence, but that's because I grew up poor and it was what I knew at the time. I also clearly remember that not one person of authority spoke to me and tried to help me figure out who I was going to be about what happened. Would I choose to be strong and brave? Would I let what happened to me oppress the possibility of my life with fear that it would happen to me again? Not one word from anyone that was helpful.

That men being raped is worthy of a headline points to the phenomena that tolerates the abuse of women and children and begins to draw a line when that abuse begins to extend to men. How many comedians make male prison rape jokes? How often is it used as a threat in television crime dramas and in movies? Those are indications of where our culture stands. Sexual violation of a man is used as a plot point, and when it is, it amps up the tension and the 'ick' factor. When the same kind of violence is directed toward women in drama, it is often simply "something sad & horrible that happened" that could happen to YOU if you aren't careful.

As a political issue this is pretty damned tough. As Monte points out, there is also a race factor in this for the US and other Western countries. Will we care? Will we act? I find that hard to predict. We haven't cared enough so far.
maybe if you concentrate on america, you can get something done. when america is civilized, you can help the rest of the world. right now, hillary is criticizing kenya for for not applying the law to the powerful.

that would be funny, if the corpses of america's crimes were not so many. rape is happening in america, folks. start there, if you want to do, instead of talk.
start there, if you want SAILBOATS!
How often do you see rapes of men being reported by the media? Almost never.

so, either it happens routinely and is totally ignored by the media and society. Or, it rarely happens or is reported so that when it does it gets attention.

so, it has nothing to do with the media NOT reporting women being raped. That happens all the time - it's not "news".

Anyway, that's my explanation.
Good post and well said, sir. But one thing, a long long time ago, people didn't know about all these things happening all over the world, these unspeakable crimes, because there was no global interconnected media. I am talking about 1853 or so, or 1425 or 808 AD. People were being mean and cruel to each other in Africa, in Asia, in North America and South America, and Europe way back then, too, but we didn't have to wring out hands in despair every day because back then we did not know what was happening outside the vicinity of where we lived, maybe a 50 square mile area. Sometimes I think those days way back when were better for the human psyche. God is not crying, as that song says, because there is no God, and there was never any God or gods. What we should really be worried about is the future, when climate change turns the Earth into Mad Max versus The Road. That's what you should be focusing on, not rapes a million miles away. Those are not your people. That is not your fight. Act locally, sir. All is local. The far away is an illusion.
Sorry I disappeared there for a while. I got an injection in the emergency room for my migraines, and it knocked me out for 19 hours. I will come back soon to comment.
But I do want to say this. I DO act locally. Does that mean I can't give a damn about what's happening in other places?
Instead of sending in a useless envoy of U.N. peacekeepers, which won't help anything, the global community must enforce anti-trust efforts on DeBeers and break up their global monopoly. That is the beginning of the only plausible way to end this war.

Putting "boots on the ground" isn't going to help (much), education isn't going to help, giving these people a way to use their natural resources peacefully, and blockading them when they choose to act this way is the only way to stop the atrocities of war.

Rape, killing, genocide, they are all symptoms of the greater problem. You can't fight poverty and an almost infinitely inequitable distribution of wealth with guns or books. You can only do so by creating the conditions where it is possible for a country to start building a middle class.

If the only choice I saw in my future was starving to death, or eventually getting killed, tortured, and raped myself, once I'd lost my fighter's edge, I'd probably be capable of some pretty atrocious things too.

Telling someone who has chosen to live by the wages of evil that "rape is wrong" is laughable, and bigoted. They already know it's evil, that's why they're doing it.
Last time you'll hear from me. Your concern for women being raped is in the right place too bad you care only for the women. Rape is rape is rape regardless of the gender. You and the RL who seem to think that the whole goddam world is some kind of paradise for men and that men are the only ones who gain in it are to be pitied. You sem to think that gender sterotypes are bad when applied to your gender but never fail to spout them out as absolute fact when it suits your own bias. If men are so god damned all fucking powerful why are so many in despair and poverty begging for food and shelter? Why can a woman walk in to a public aid office and be served with not just food stamps but medical care as well. I'm so sorry that male on male rape is being reported. If attention to the crime reduces it then why not just be hopeful for the change that all victims need may come about due to this? Is it because your prejudice and gender bias is not at the fore front? Why is it okay for you to make these claims about male rape as though it were a prison crime? are prison crimes okay in your eyes. Many people in prisons are not there for violent acts. Does this mean that in your eyes they deserve to be raped? Did they "ask for it" when they were imprisoned? What about rapes that don't occur in prison? Are they to be discounted since there are fewer male rapes? How many people have to be sexaually assaulted before in your eyes it matters? Is it okay to play down male on male rape as long as more women are raped? at what point does this horrble violent crime itself become the problem? and not just aboout the gender of it's victims? I'm sick of it. Sick of the demeaning of this crime based on the gender of it's victims. you folks pat yourself on the back and tell each other that somehow it is worse for your group and that men are the totally evil bastards that are the problem. Completely un deserving of the kind of disgust that male on female rape gives you. What makes you any different than the men you claim wouldn't care about female victims of sexual assault? You make the same statements and hold the same attitude that you find so offensive by men. The bottom line is that the crime is rape, not male on female rape, not male on male rape and even though I'm sure that this will be denied vehemently by some of you female on female rape and female on male rape. You want things to change in the arena of sexual assault laws, maybe you should be offended by the crime itself and not the gender of the victims.
In Victorian England, rumor has it, that male homosexuality was illegal but female homosexuality was not, for the simple reason that Victoria herself could not believe it existed.

Rape of men has almost certainly always existed, but, like ole Vickie, no one wants to believe it. Remember what the news was like when Monica Lewinski was in it; local anchors saying "penis" right and left, because they had an excuse to, and conjuring images of sex with cigars. Imagine what the MSM reporting on this crime would be like. Anal rape? Dicks, assholes, mouthrape, the lot? Not a lot of people want to hear about it, much less think about it, much less work to stop it.

Thank you for a thought-provoking and needed post.
Open apology to Lorraine.

I was knee jerkng a bit when I commented on your post. i do in fact like you, read you, respect your opinion, and will continue to do so. As indicated by the title of this my ire is at the unequal representation of opinions and the continued misuse of statistics to support a sexist position. Those positions were in the comments of others and are not yours and my reflection makes it seem as though it was. For that I am sorry.
Thank you for this post.

I wanted to post our organization's link for like-minded people to connect and talk more about the issue of rape, sexual assault and gender violence. We can't do it alone: http://womenspeakout.wordpress.com/
http://www.womenspeakoutnow.com/