Blog Blog Blog Fishcakes

Perfectly Logical Essays Without Digressions (True Story)

Floyd Elliot

Floyd Elliot
Location
Chicago, Illinois, USA
Birthday
January 05
Title
Lord Snarky
Bio
Floyd Elliot is species of rare vine native to the Chicago Lakefront. Once so abundant that they darkened the skies as they flew over (and the ground too), Floyd Elliots were hunted almost to extinction for their plumage and haunting cry; today, thanks to conservation efforts and an outpouring of credulity on the part of the public, Floyd Elliots can again be spotted outside a zoo; inside a zoo, they're striped.

Floyd Elliot's Links

Salon.com
SEPTEMBER 24, 2009 11:43AM

I Say, "AUUGGGHHHHH!!!" Inside My Head

Rate: 15 Flag

            I spend a large part of each and every day screaming silently inside my head. (In space, no one can hear you scream.) It makes me bellow in silent rage whenever our language, the feel and taste and of course sound of which I love, is treated like a two-dollar whore, a fuck-and-forget. "Whatever, as long as I get my point across, you know?" No, no, I do not know. My bland blank-eyed smile at your idiotic assertion masks the fact that inside my head I am screaming, "Nooooooooooo!" and a murder of crows is flying out of a tree against a sunset sky. (Yes, there are trees and crows inside my head. And a chocolate fountain.) (White chocolate, because of how I'm allergic to cocoa.) I'm not talking about usage mistakes; I'm talking about willful ignorance, sloppiness, pretention and pomposity. Say "ain't" all you like; I grew up with and respect "ain't." Say "fuck" all you like; I've already expressed my fondness and dependence on that word. Say "gnarly," "awesome," and "dude" all you like; ever since Buffy, I've loved dudespeak. (Fine, think of it as Valley Girl; I have my manly reputation to protect, also and only inside my head.) Just don't fucking say "prioritize," because a) dude, that ain't a word and 2) it totally makes you sound like a fuckwit.

A long time ago, when I worked for Zenith Electronics Corporation as a young hopeful software geek (that's how long ago it was; there was a Zenith, and I had hope), I walked into my boss's office--he knew my grammar douchery well--and lay down the pamphlet for the chip I was supposed to write code for. "I'm not programming this," I said. He glanced at the pamphlet; on the cover I'd underlined, "Fully prioritized interrupts." He laughed. Then he told me to get the fuck back to work and docked my pay. Which, you know, fair enough.

I am currently screaming inside my head at the misuse of presently. "Presently" does not mean, "at present." That's "currently." Or "now." "Presently" means, "in a little while." So when the pilot announces that "We are presently at our cruising altitude of 35,000 feet," I want to scream, "So where are we now?!?!" then do a lap around the plane, throwing  dictionaries to the passengers and crew. Until I get tackled and Tased by a Federal marshall, then handcuffed and shackled and rendered to Gitmo. (I'm not going to do it; I do have some rudimentary impulse control, the testimony of those who've seen me with a bag of yogurt peanuts to the contrary.) A word does not mean just what you choose it to mean, Humpty Dumpty; "glory" does not mean "a nice knock-down argument" and "presently" does not mean "currently."

I've more or less given up on trying to convince people not to use "hopefully" to mean "I hope." (It doesn't.) I haven't given up on screaming inside my head whenever I hear it, though. (Seriously, it's a wonder those crows even go back to that tree, what with how often they get startled off it.) "Hopefully, we will have lunch on Tuesday," means "On Tuesday, we will have lunch with hope in our hearts," (and, depending on where you eat, possibly also burn in your hearts) not "I hope we have lunch on Tuesday." Now, this has been a pet peeve of mine (I've bought it a leash and collar and a stupid little pet-sweater) for a very long time, since I was a wee little grammar douche (not that at 5'3" I'm a giant) (except in the midget bars where I like to hang out), so I was surprised to find that David Foster Wallace didn't mind "hopefully."

Wallace, who was even more of a grammar douche than me, despised solecisms so subtle that neither I nor my BFF who teaches college English (and is a fine grammar douche in her own right) could figure out why they even were solecisms. Wallace argued that "hopefully" was a general "sentence adverb," like "clearly," "surely," or "luckily." I think that's wrong--"hopefully" used that way doesn't indicate the mood of the sentence, but specifically that the speaker hopes something will happen--but Wallace definitely gave me pause. (Sadly--and yeah, that's another one--he didn't give me paws, because I'd be way fucking cute with paws.) (And, like a raccoon, I would open up all the neighbors' garbage cans and toss their trash around.) So, fine, go ahead, use "hopefully" to mean, "I hope." Just remember that every time you do, a cute little baby seal will die. Even if I have to kill it myself.

If you really want to immobilize me in order to rob me at leisure of my wallet and my iPhone, just make me scream inside my head by using "That begs the question of…" (Not my iPhone, dude, come on; I love my iPhone.) (Take my kid instead.) (Which one? Why, that's like Sophie's choice, but easy: whichever one is costing me the most money.) So let's say you're a brain-dead TV newsmannequin. (Oh, stop crying; it's just hypothetical.) Let's say that one day, back when you were in college, you happened to come out of your decerebrate coma in the middle of a logic class where the professor had been attempting to pound the concept of logical fallacies--specifically, that day, the logical fallacy of "begging the question," meaning, assuming the thing you're supposed to be proving--through your impermeable skull and somehow that phrase wormed its way into what passes for your consciousness, though not its actual meaning. And then, that night, at the kegger at your frathouse, you were chatting up some hot babe and you said, "Well, that begs the question: do you put out?" And she did! So you kept using that phrase, and others heard it, and they started using it in the totally ridiculous and fucktarded way that you had (and many of them also got laid), and then all of you went to work for television news shows, where one can hear your smooth baritone voices intoning, "Well, that begs the question of…" followed by some idiotic and obvious question. Despite the fact that "to beg the question" does not mean and has never meant, "to bring up or lead one to the question of..." You know what else you can hear, if you are inside my head? Me screaming. Again. Some more. The fucking crows just sent me a cease-and-desist. And give me back my fucking iPhone. Don't make me pretend to know karate.

Also, just as a courtesy, the crows would like you to know that they would appreciate it if you--you being the writers of articles, essays and posts in the blogosphere, or blogiverse or blogateria (I'm not up on the latest blogging lingo that all the kids are using) (or should that be blingo?)--would also cease and desist from using the phrase "A Modest Proposal" in your titles. The original "A Modest Proposal," Jonathan Swift's, is the  masterpiece of satire in the English language and remains, to this day, perhaps the most outrageous and fucked-up essay ever written. If you are not writing satire, you may not use that title. Seriously, I will hunt you down. And if you are writing satire, and you use that title, it had better be funnier and…satirier…than Dean Swift's essay. Here, read it, then think carefully before you slap that title on: is your modest proposal funnier and weirder than selling Irish babies for food? Do you have a better sentence than, "I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout?" Because if not, just put the title down and walk away quietly, and no one gets hurt. Except, of course, the Irish babies.

Look, I don't expect you to take pity on me, or the crows in my head. (And we do have that white-chocolate fountain.) There's probably like three people alive who will know or care how you made me scream in my head. (Six, now, including the three people who'll read this essay all the way through.) Plus, you get an iPhone out of the deal, or at least one of my kids. (Dude, really, give me back my iPhone.) So, sure, go ahead, make yourself sound moronic. I couldn't care less. (Not "I could care less," because of how that doesn't even fucking make sense and also makes me scream inside my head some more, again.) (So I guess I lied, and I could care considerably less.) Knock yourself out, you know?

No, really, knock yourself out. That'll make me laugh inside my head. The crows too. Like me, they're kind of mean.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Your crows and trees are no match for the marshmallow pterodactls in my head.
I love your use of "Humpty Dumpty" as an insult--hopefully I can borrow that from you and you won't mind.
I'm allergic to cockroaches, so I can't eat regular chocolate or coffee because of the cockroach factor in them. Luckily, I can presently eat only artisan, hand made chocolates...which begs the question...

Are you allergic to cocoa or the cockroach in it?

(Swift rocks)
Oh! Now it's going to be so hard for me to not use "A Modest Proposal" in the title of my next blog post.

I love the non-word, irregardless.

I would be totally with you, Floyd, except that I took The History of the English Language and I learned that language is fluid. It's constantly changing. We the people choose what words mean. If enough people use a word incorrectly for long enough, it will become correct.

But we don't want the masses knowing that, do we?

(Also I apologize for any and all misuses of the English language that I may have made. I know I've probably made quite a few mistakes in my blog posts. I need a personal editor. To work for free. Do you know of any?)
Oh boy, can I identify with that, Floyd (One of my posts was about what happen to "geogrifie and gramer?" What kills me is "her and I went to the movies" and garbled sentences like those. Plus, the rampant misuse of "fewer" and "less." Not to ention "ireegardless."
I coud go on. Let's write a book. R
I don't mean to infer that your taking this to seriously, but for all intensive purposes, words mean what people think they mean and the English language is in no danger of eminent demise. To site a few examples of words who's meanings are different then they used to be, creates the allusion that people are more illiterate then before, but proves nothing. Hopefully, this will cause the crows in you're head to return to there perch.
Okay, okay. I'll get you the damn raccoon paws for Christmas this year. I'm glad to see that with you two (thousand) wrongs make you write.
A) Thank God, there's more cocoa for me. B) In Buffyspeak, you're being all Grammar Douche Guy.

The Stim household currently is railing against dickweeds who use "over" before a numeric value, e.g. "The building is over 10 stories high," or "The price of gas is over $2.50 per gallon." It's "more than," people. More than 10 stories. More than $2.50. "Over" is a physical location, as in "That boulder hanging over me weighs more than 10 tons and will fall on me if I ever say that it weights "over 10 tons."
I'm pretty sure AUUGGGHHHHH is not a word.
Note to self: "That begs the question..." gets one laid. Good to know.
I was thinking of Wallace while I was reading this. Glad you brought him up. And glad I'm off the hook for hopefully.

I have my only silent scream about A Modest Proposal, which at some point, hopefully, (as in with hope in my heart people will stop misusing it) I'll blog about. Thanks for reminding me.
Dude, you lost me at the title! I see's your point but I still can't always be grammatically correct!!! It is NO FUN! Don"t hate me cause I'm simple.........
I wanted to prioritize the number of ways this made me laugh, but that begged the question of whether you *could* send crows across the internets to peck my eyes out. Hopefully, not.
I think the mathematical corollary here, is that where the application of effort is concerned, it is IMPOSSIBLE to give 110%.

You can get a 110% return on your money. Inflation rates in banana republics have been known to be 110% in a single month. This year's corn harvest can show a 110% return over last year's.

But, no matter how vehemently a coach may exhorts his players to do it, they CAN NOT give 110%. Can't be done.
I understand the screaming, Floyd. I hear it too.
Impactful.
Modality.
And my gay boyfriend loves to use "suspicion" as a verb, as in "I suspicion my jeweled Princess Leia bra will be the hit of the Halloween Dance!"
Then crows fly out of my ears, covered in chocolate.
ahhh...business speak. is there anything more cringe-inducing than listening to business execs regale the entire company with the lexicon of the most recent trend in management metaphors? And having to keep a straight face and nod, understandingly, when you really want to move their cheese right up their arse!

And, can people please stop "tasking" me with things? Assign me a task, fine. But doofus, - it's a noun! You can't just make it into a verb because you're too lazy to use an extra word or two!
A modest proposal? Candide is the greatest satire in the, uh, nevermind. As you were.
Actually I've read a ton of satire. Modest Propsal is brilliant, but how about Catch-22? A Confederacy of Dunces? Tristan Shandy? Ecce Homo, actually latin title, presumably in German, an possibly not a satire but sign of mental illness. there's Gulliver's Travels. Huck Finn, Devil's Dictionary, Dickens, Silence Dogood, and the presidency of Geroge W Bush to consider.
Of course I won't mind, spotted_mind--Humpty is yours to use as you will. Wow, that sounds dirty...

marcelleqb, I'm not sure I've ever been tested for a cockroach allergy, but either way, I'm not eating that stuff.

And Rod starts the screaming...

Yes, Gwendolyn, the language changes, but if people start just using any old word to mean any old thing--and especially if they do to make themselves sound a little bit more smart in the pants--it just gets stupid. I have no objection to new words and giving old ones new meanings. It's when the new usages are pompous and obnoxious that the screaming starts. So, using "awesome?" Good. Using "proactive?" Crows flying off a tree in my head.

John, oh, man, like a spike through my temple, that is--well, all of those. And we should totally write a book; I already have a computer, and as Dan Brown so richly--le mot juste, eh?--demonstrates, that's all you need to write a book.

fin2theleft: So, the screaming started soft, then grew in volume, and I think it ended with whimpering. Well done!

Aw, sis. You've been promising me paws for decades now. And all I've got are still just hands. So disappointed.

Stim, I am so Grammar Douche Guy.

Shaggy, it is inside my head. Also, I wouldn't count on "It begs the question of..." getting you laid. To clinch the deal, wear cologne and only date alcoholics.

Juliet, yeah, I just finished Infinite Jest. It damn near is. I really like Wallace a lot, but day-um. I have a post about that, written when I was about halfway through the book.

It's not grammar, lunchlady; it's using the words correctly, giving the language enough respect.

Donna, hey, where's my iPhone?

fins2theleft: I had a boss who could give 110%. There were two of us who reported to him, and he took credit for 55% of our work.

Oh, "verbing nouns," Mary-Anndroid: that truly sucks. But mmmmmm...chocolate-covered crow.

fins2theleft (hey, you keep getting back in line, don't you?), I didn't mention Bizspeak (except just that little bit about prioritize) because it's so huge and pernicious that it would have made this post several thousand words long. My favorite to hate is "going forward." Erm, hey, you know, we have a perfectly good phrase in English for that; it's "in the future." Why'n'cha check it out sometime, 'k, Mr. Pompous?

The Invisible Man: there's not a satire that you mentioned that I would not agree is brilliant (except maybe the Asshat Presidency); the thing about "A Modest Proposal" is that it's so compact. Boom! It just explodes right in your face. You have to love the spareness of it.
Rated for roasted babies!