As I read the commentary written by David Sirota, , Obama, be progressive! Voters want you to go big and go liberal -- and not channel Clinton-style incrementalism.
I fell that David Sirota missed the whole point of what the election of Obama really is about. His commentary was pretty much what He wants of this election, not what the overwhelming majority of us who voted for Obama wishes for. One statement stood out as definitive of what he wants,
“President Obama cannot credibly claim he lacks the political capital to legislatively steamroll a humiliated GOP and its remaining senators.”
This election was not about steamrolling anyone, it was significant in that it was about bringing all together, we are all a part of this nation and it is time to bury the kind of politics which smacks of partisan politics and “let’s get even”.
We don’t need to “get even”, we need to heal. We have had enough of the Tom Delay, Karl Rove style of politics. All it has done has split our communities as enclaves, families into divisions for which defining Americanism as ether Red or Blue, either for us or against us.
We are a unique Nation, the most diverse Nation on earth. We are not so steeped in tradition that inhibits progress. That diversity is our strength. To divide and conquer is to make us weak.
Yes Obama perhaps has the political capital to steamroll and humiliate the GOP, but why should he, they have done such a good job themselves I see no need to rub their collective faces in it.
“They must, for instance, acknowledge their progressive mandate, rather than denying it as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did on Tuesday. "This is not a mandate for a political party or an ideology," he fearfully told reporters.”
Sorry David, Harry Reid is right, this was a mandate for change, change from partisanship more than for a liberal agenda. Yes it is a progressive mandate, but progressive in it most definitive form, not something which happened when some Liberals decided that as the word having become out of favor, they hijacked the term Progressive and define it in a very narrow context, that of their narrowly defined “Liberal” agenda.
To be truly progressive is not being of any political rigid philosophy, but to be pragmatic in how you can accomplish that which is needed to restore this country’s economic, social, environmental, and educational infrastructures. To be progressive is to build stability for the future and for ourselves, our children, their children and grandchildren. To respect others who share this planet.
That is the mandate that was given Obama.


Salon.com
Comments
Let's just say that you took the words right out of my mouth!!!!
A quality, clear and righteous post.
Thanks,
Monte
oh yeah, and rated.
A thumb for you.
Very well said. I agree, andmost wholeheartedly that more partisanship is not what is needed. Less partisanship must be the order of the day or our nation will just become a seesaw tug-a-war that the Repubs always love but that we must eschew and for the good of our nation.
I admit that I first thought the Repubs deserve some come-uppance. But now realize that will accomplish nothing and just serve to make us like them. I abhor that much more than I want some measure of revenge. I'll gladly forgo any satisfaction for the good of our nation. To me, that is true patriotism, the real thing.
So I'll set my pettiness and baser instincts for revenge aside and push for reconciliation. Obama seems to want that and I will support and even demand that. I hope Obama can assemble like minded people who will also support an agenda of reconciliation. I will watch for it and holler whenever it gets lost n the shuffle and fog of government.
That MUST be our progressive manifesto. Mayhap, we will need to do a bit of shin-kicking but absolutely no strangling must be allowed, by anyone.
Fokmuse, thanks for your clear-eyed thinking.