Beth Ingalls

Beth Ingalls
Location
California,
Birthday
October 30
Bio
Writer, editor, columnist, producer, parent, activist, former elected official and lifelong Deadhead. I mainly write about politics, pop culture & tech, but my dream is to work with David Simon on any of his projects. I'm pretty sure he doesn't read this blog, so if you know him please have his people get with my people. Oh yeah - and I've got a killer memoir inside of me that's gonna win a pulitzer prize someday.

Editor’s Pick
JULY 21, 2009 4:55PM

New Syndrome "Attention Deficit (News) Disorder" Rampant

Rate: 14 Flag

Last night I watched the re-broadcast of Walter Cronkite's historic coverage of the moon landing in 1969 and became blubberingly nostalgic for the technologically uncluttered days of my youth. The simplicity of a man sitting at a desk reporting the news while looking straight into the camera is something we don't get anymore. It's also, unfortunately, something that most Americans wouldn't be able to sit still for.

ZVideo_2_new 

I remember the night of July 20, 1969 with crystal clarity despite the four decades which have elapsed. My family gathered around the television and we were transfixed. Unfidgeting, undistracted, four sets of eyes we were -  locked onto the set as we hung on every single word and each grainy image. 

My brother and I would run outside occasionally to the "Command Center" we had set up in our backyard tent to check the lunar surface. We were camping out in the yard that night because I was certain that I could see the astronauts up there walking around - simply with the aid of my dime store binoculars. I was six, he was nine and he indulged my blissful naivete with uncharacteristic generosity that night.

ap11tv1969 

If an event of such enormous magnitude in the history of human civilization took place today, the scenario would be completely different.

We'd be on techno overload. The flat panel display with high def would be on in the living room and we might even all be there together as a family, but that wouldn't be enough. Our laptops would also be humming away and we'd be updating our facebooks, and tweeting and making cell phone calls and uploading photos and videos. We'd be documenting our own experience of the event while any one of a handful of generic broadcasters droned away in the background. Even the news reporters themselves might be tweeting and checking incoming email while the cameras roll! And that would be perfectly acceptable!

It's no wonder 1 in 20 children in the United States are being diagnosed with ADHD.

I think ADHD is caused by ADND - Attention Deficit News Disorder.

Over the past forty years, news coverage has evolved (or devolved) depending on one's perspective, to the point of unrecognizability from the stark days of Conkrite. We demand more stimulation, but assimilate  far less information. We are overly accustomed to swooshing flashes of color and multiple split screens with spinning inserts. Neverending, yet repetitive, news tickers crawl across both the top and bottom of the TV. Station identifiers, accompanied by zooming images and sounds, splash around like miniature explosions. Digital clocks updated from every time zone, every second, remind us unfailingly just how late we are. Ads about upcoming shows featuring miniature holograms of stars interacting with each other play on the bottom right hand corner of the screen, startling us out of our complacency. Full size drag and drop displays are manipulated by the anchors as they walk around the set at random times during the show. With 24/7 news we get it all day and night, but are we even paying attention?

A random progression of screen shots from broadcasts over the years demonstrates how significantly things have changed. 

1970

dan_caesar_wsbt_tv_news_anchor_1970 

1980

Dan_Rather_1980 

1985

image659817x 

1993

a1993danr 

2009

cnn_09_new 

fox_09_new 

cnbnc_09-new 

We are moving so fast, we have forgotten how to sit and listen to someone like Walter Cronkite. We're virtually assaulted with information, but we're less engaged and we aren't any smarter. And even worse than that, we have become so very rude.

Dylan Ratigan's new show "Morning Meeting" is a perfect example of just how far we have fallen. He rants, he raves and he interrupts his guests while they all talk over each other in a classic, unintelligible ADND melee.

And we wonder why children these days aren't learning simple manners and don't know how to be quiet when someone is talking or don't understand what being respectful means.

We shake our heads and shrug our shoulders as the loudmouth in the grocery store line gabs incessantly into his bluetooth device with utter disregard for those around him.

We wonder why the person in front of us lets the door slam in our face, until we realize he's texting furiously and has completely no idea what's going on around him. And we think it's normal. And even worse, we have come to accept it.

Sometimes I really miss the good old days.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Waxing nostalgic but seriously, we have issues.
"I think ADHD is caused by ADND - Attention Deficit News Disorder."

I completely agree.
...not to mention that back then we used to TRUST our news sources and now we are (or at least I am) suspicious of any news source because most of them seem to have an agenda - even if it is only to sensationalize things so that we won't change the channel.
God so true. I HATE it when the news shows have a guest on they are interviewing. They interview them for maybe 2 minutes and then before getting to anything profound or substantive, tell them, "well we need to wrap this up, thanks for coming." But they didn't have time to actually SAY anything!! What is the rush, people? Let your guest talk.
During Cronkite's "day" the goal of journalism was to get the story--get it first, and get it right. Now it's all about the minutae, and the reactions that talking heads have rather than to classic AP journalism "who, what, where, when, why, how". How far have we come with all the technology available? Quite a ways--backward.
Corporate owner ship of the media views the news division as just another profit center. They would not want journalism get in the way of profits.
Thanks for the post, Beth. You have every right to make money for your writings here, but it is unfortunate that this means more noise/stimulus on the page, for the viewer to deal with. Don't mean this as a cut, really I don't, and the article is clearly laid out--noise free, and therefore consistent with the argument it advances. But it is too bad. Nice to see the bottom ads not there, though. They're the worst.
This was a wonderful post, well written and pondered. Rated.
i agree too. i said in a recent post about newspaper layoffs that I was certain the web gave me some kind of ADD, some much news coming from so many directions all the time ... it can be maddening. i was never a big tv watcher, but i recall walter. he wasn't about entertainment, he wasn't about "me me me" -- he was about the news -- he delivered it, was, in a way, removed from it as a personality. he was, in a word, a journalist. nicely done post!
Waxing nostalgic is all fine and dandy, but I think we forget a lot about those times. We all talk about trusting Cronkite, but should we have trusted him? He was certainly there with us for the moon landing, and telling us about the Kennedy assassination ... but why wasn't he telling us about the Kennedy affairs, and other scandals that we now know were open secrets in Washington at the time?

We talk today about reporters being beholden to power, and we think that it used to be different. But Cronkite and his colleagues were just as beholden to the powerful as anyone today is ... if they hadn't been, Kennedy's affairs, the family's dealings with organized crime, all of that would have been exposed by folks like Cronkite, at the time. Instead, folks like Cronkite kept all of that hidden from the American people, even while they claimed to be telling us "that's the way it is."

I respect Cronkite, and I do think we've lost some of what we had when he was in his heydey. But I think we gloss over the negative sides of that time too easily today, and we forget that while we trusted Uncle Walter was telling us "the way it is" there were quite a few things that he didn't tell us anything about. He told us "the way it is" as long as that fit into what he (and his bosses) felt we should know, and things like Kennedy screwing around with Marylin Monroe didn't make the cut.

I do think that news today has gone overboard with stimuli, but I also think the "good old days" aren't quite as good as we try to remember them. We should celebrate men like Cronkite, but we shouldn't forget "that's the way it is" didn't apply to everything. He may have told us a lot of things we needed to know about people in power, but he also left a lot of stuff out. We trusted that he was giving us the whole story, but was that trust not misplaced when we realize that his whole story was really only a part of the story?

Great post, and rated :)
These network execs should take the money they pour into these GAWD AWFUL reality programs and put it into the news.
Great piece Beth and you took the thoughts directly from my mind.
The runners at the bottom, sides and top of the screen are enough to induce a seizure. A.D.D. is the most appropriate term and you nailed it. I long for the old days when it was one on one and intimate.
Rated
Glad you wrote this. I've been pondering the exact same phenomenon the last few days, multitasking meets the news, and becomes the news.
Fabrice Florin, the founder of News Trust, a fact-checking website, suggests that in addition to the proliferation of sites like his, what might be necessary is “news literacy training for the public.” This would go a long way in helping us to sort through and decide what information is important and how we should think about it.
Slate has a video of how the lunar landing would be covered today:

http://www.slatev.com/index.html?bcpid=988327350&bclid=29897817001&bctid=30020544001

Needless to say, Twitter is involved...
Beth, one thing that struck me about some of the retrospectives on Conkrite was how they said he did a two day special on Watergate. Know how long those segments were?

They were 14 minutes. Each.

Can you imagine a 14 minute long story running on the news now? Two nights in a row, even?

NPR, for example, is well known for its in depth coverage of events. Let's take a look at some of its most recent stories. They did something on how redesigning the health care system is an option that isn't being talked about.

The length of this? Four minutes and two seconds. That is for an issue that's on everyone's mind and that's from a source that's known for in depth reporting.

Or how about their piece in the implosion of Lehman? That ran seven minutes and 46 seconds.

Compare that to a two day, 28 minute piece.
Thanks for all the great comments everyone. Except for Miller Smith. Is there anyway to delete the sex invites? Editors...can we screen out the sleeze?
Read and rated this wonderful analysis this morning. I just keep feeling completely in awe of the constant communication and interconnectedness of my kids with their friends. My daughter will be on Facebook while simultaneously listening to TV and texting. I guess my best advice to parents is not to let them have access to the technology too soon. They don't need cell phones in kindergarten. They don't need a Myspace in 4th grade, even if their profile is set to private and every other kid in the grade has one. They will soon enough be spending plenty of time on the latest "devices," and I don't think an early start gives them any advantage.
My feelings exactly. When I was a kid I wanted to be a Cronkite but my family poo pooed it because he was just a newspaper guy and newspaper reports didn't make enough money and drank to much.

My other beef about tv reporting is that you always have to have a picture or film for the everything even the most banal events. And they keep repeating just to fill a screen. How many times in the past week have you seen the footage of the printing of money?

I have found refuge though by going way back to my childhood and listening to radio....only PBS radio that is. A television alternative is BBC television news. They don't even have the same anchor men and women night after night. And they don't shout at you.

Keep the faith!

Dick
Annette, you are so right about the ages and limitations for certain kinds of technology. My son and i battled about myspace last summer(before his 7th grade year) and it was a battle. But then this year I joined facebook and decided it was ok for him. He is very happy with it, and I feel good about it because I'm there too. One thing that's starting to annoy me is the kids are texting while we are talking and that must be stopped immediately. Like anything with parenting, common sense and oversight go a long way! Thanks for the comment.
Beth, click on the more option at the top of the screen. Scroll down to the manage posts option.

You'll see on the left hand side a bunch of options, one of which is manage comments. Click on that, and you can see the comments on your post. Choose the one you want to delete, and click delete.

Spam post gone.
Ah, sweet nostalgia. Wasn't there a time when we mocked our elders for their fond remembrance of simpler times that we could not comprehend? This too shall pass. I hate Facebook and Twitter like my parents hated calculators and digital watches. Oh well. Life didn't end. I must say, Beth -- I discovered you only today and I really like your style.
I posted before reading through all the comments, and something you said about your son and Myspace triggered a flashback. I walked into my living room recently and saw my 16-year old daughter lying on the couch with the TV on, her laptop perched on her chest, as she tapped away on the keyboard of her cellphone. As I walked by I said -- snidely -- that I should start calling her "Three Screen". She responded (without missing a beat), "Fine. Then I'll start calling you Bluetooth." Touche.
Long before this diagnosis of ADND (which I think is spot on), my Mom coined the phrase 'Sesame Street Syndrome' - wherein children are trained to ingest, digest and think only in 30 second soundbytes, before jumping to another topic. Obviously, I wasn't allowed to watch the show; her prediction: we would grow into a generation of adults who couldn't or wouldn't be able to focus on any one thing for a prolonged period of time, and who were in constant search of the next 'new thing.' I often reflect that maybe she was right.