New Syndrome "Attention Deficit (News) Disorder" Rampant
Last night I watched the re-broadcast of Walter Cronkite's historic coverage of the moon landing in 1969 and became blubberingly nostalgic for the technologically uncluttered days of my youth. The simplicity of a man sitting at a desk reporting the news while looking straight into the camera is something we don't get anymore. It's also, unfortunately, something that most Americans wouldn't be able to sit still for.
I remember the night of July 20, 1969 with crystal clarity despite the four decades which have elapsed. My family gathered around the television and we were transfixed. Unfidgeting, undistracted, four sets of eyes we were - locked onto the set as we hung on every single word and each grainy image.
My brother and I would run outside occasionally to the "Command Center" we had set up in our backyard tent to check the lunar surface. We were camping out in the yard that night because I was certain that I could see the astronauts up there walking around - simply with the aid of my dime store binoculars. I was six, he was nine and he indulged my blissful naivete with uncharacteristic generosity that night.
If an event of such enormous magnitude in the history of human civilization took place today, the scenario would be completely different.
We'd be on techno overload. The flat panel display with high def would be on in the living room and we might even all be there together as a family, but that wouldn't be enough. Our laptops would also be humming away and we'd be updating our facebooks, and tweeting and making cell phone calls and uploading photos and videos. We'd be documenting our own experience of the event while any one of a handful of generic broadcasters droned away in the background. Even the news reporters themselves might be tweeting and checking incoming email while the cameras roll! And that would be perfectly acceptable!
It's no wonder 1 in 20 children in the United States are being diagnosed with ADHD.
I think ADHD is caused by ADND - Attention Deficit News Disorder.
Over the past forty years, news coverage has evolved (or devolved) depending on one's perspective, to the point of unrecognizability from the stark days of Conkrite. We demand more stimulation, but assimilate far less information. We are overly accustomed to swooshing flashes of color and multiple split screens with spinning inserts. Neverending, yet repetitive, news tickers crawl across both the top and bottom of the TV. Station identifiers, accompanied by zooming images and sounds, splash around like miniature explosions. Digital clocks updated from every time zone, every second, remind us unfailingly just how late we are. Ads about upcoming shows featuring miniature holograms of stars interacting with each other play on the bottom right hand corner of the screen, startling us out of our complacency. Full size drag and drop displays are manipulated by the anchors as they walk around the set at random times during the show. With 24/7 news we get it all day and night, but are we even paying attention?
A random progression of screen shots from broadcasts over the years demonstrates how significantly things have changed.
1970
1980
1985
1993
2009
We are moving so fast, we have forgotten how to sit and listen to someone like Walter Cronkite. We're virtually assaulted with information, but we're less engaged and we aren't any smarter. And even worse than that, we have become so very rude.
Dylan Ratigan's new show "Morning Meeting" is a perfect example of just how far we have fallen. He rants, he raves and he interrupts his guests while they all talk over each other in a classic, unintelligible ADND melee.
And we wonder why children these days aren't learning simple manners and don't know how to be quiet when someone is talking or don't understand what being respectful means.
We shake our heads and shrug our shoulders as the loudmouth in the grocery store line gabs incessantly into his bluetooth device with utter disregard for those around him.
We wonder why the person in front of us lets the door slam in our face, until we realize he's texting furiously and has completely no idea what's going on around him. And we think it's normal. And even worse, we have come to accept it.
Sometimes I really miss the good old days.


Salon.com
Comments
I completely agree.
We talk today about reporters being beholden to power, and we think that it used to be different. But Cronkite and his colleagues were just as beholden to the powerful as anyone today is ... if they hadn't been, Kennedy's affairs, the family's dealings with organized crime, all of that would have been exposed by folks like Cronkite, at the time. Instead, folks like Cronkite kept all of that hidden from the American people, even while they claimed to be telling us "that's the way it is."
I respect Cronkite, and I do think we've lost some of what we had when he was in his heydey. But I think we gloss over the negative sides of that time too easily today, and we forget that while we trusted Uncle Walter was telling us "the way it is" there were quite a few things that he didn't tell us anything about. He told us "the way it is" as long as that fit into what he (and his bosses) felt we should know, and things like Kennedy screwing around with Marylin Monroe didn't make the cut.
I do think that news today has gone overboard with stimuli, but I also think the "good old days" aren't quite as good as we try to remember them. We should celebrate men like Cronkite, but we shouldn't forget "that's the way it is" didn't apply to everything. He may have told us a lot of things we needed to know about people in power, but he also left a lot of stuff out. We trusted that he was giving us the whole story, but was that trust not misplaced when we realize that his whole story was really only a part of the story?
Great post, and rated :)
The runners at the bottom, sides and top of the screen are enough to induce a seizure. A.D.D. is the most appropriate term and you nailed it. I long for the old days when it was one on one and intimate.
Rated
http://www.slatev.com/index.html?bcpid=988327350&bclid=29897817001&bctid=30020544001
Needless to say, Twitter is involved...
They were 14 minutes. Each.
Can you imagine a 14 minute long story running on the news now? Two nights in a row, even?
NPR, for example, is well known for its in depth coverage of events. Let's take a look at some of its most recent stories. They did something on how redesigning the health care system is an option that isn't being talked about.
The length of this? Four minutes and two seconds. That is for an issue that's on everyone's mind and that's from a source that's known for in depth reporting.
Or how about their piece in the implosion of Lehman? That ran seven minutes and 46 seconds.
Compare that to a two day, 28 minute piece.
My other beef about tv reporting is that you always have to have a picture or film for the everything even the most banal events. And they keep repeating just to fill a screen. How many times in the past week have you seen the footage of the printing of money?
I have found refuge though by going way back to my childhood and listening to radio....only PBS radio that is. A television alternative is BBC television news. They don't even have the same anchor men and women night after night. And they don't shout at you.
Keep the faith!
Dick
You'll see on the left hand side a bunch of options, one of which is manage comments. Click on that, and you can see the comments on your post. Choose the one you want to delete, and click delete.
Spam post gone.