
"It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous crime,” Judge Robert Maranger stated as he listened to the jury's verdict, Guilty of premeditated murder, rendered on three members of an Afghanistan-born Montreal family on Sunday, January 29, 2012.
Ever since four bodies were discovered floating inside a submerged Nissan Sentra on June 28, 2009 in the muddy waters of Kingston Mills Lock, Kingston, Ontario, the Shafiah case has been attracting as much attention as any, among the modern detective-murder news. In the days following the retrieval of the bodies of Zainab (19), Sahar (17), Geeti(13) and a 52 year old woman Rona Amar Mohammad, Canadians poured out much sympathy towards the unfortunate family who emigrated from Afghanistan to make a better life for themselves.
Today, almost two-and-a-half years after the trial which started on October 11, 2009, the cause of their death by drowning is established, but the how or the exact when of it has never been determined. The prosecution can only speculate.
Along the trial's path, very disturbing facts emerged. Words such as “honour killing”, “polygamous marriage”, “ family honour”, “man's need to control woman's power” started to float. The story, pieced together through forensics and witnesses, as well as the testimony of two of the alleged convicts, convinced the jury that this was no more than a cold-blooded, premeditated, mass murder of four innocent women whose only wishes were to integrate into a society and live like human beings.
The alleged murderers were the father, Mohammad Shafia(58), his second wife Tooba Mohammad Yahya(42), whom he took because the first one, Rona Amar, could bear him no children, and Hamed, their eldest son. Although the sisters were not often seen wearing headscarves by their neighbours, they complained of abuse at home to their teachers and to the police. They wanted to be more like their Canadian peers, but they feared the heavy hand of their brother, Hamed. (This is an authoritative behaviour I have seen – first hand – assumed unquestionably by the eldest male in line, in strict Islamic families, and when I sense it, my internal alarm system warns me to stay away from such people.)
I don't often follow murder trials no matter how big the headlines they make. Somehow, I did this one. My curiosity was more to learn about the state of an Islam that is unfamiliar and fearful to me. I hoped I could perhaps get a glimpse into the mind of a creature who remained cool and composed throughout the entire case and the reading of the verdict that will not let him see a day in sunlight again. Nor his accomplices.
I learned that there was a kind of liberalism that prevailed in the Shafiah house, but also there was much darkness and chaos. The restrictions were apparently stifling, the girls longed for more freedom. At one point, Zainab ran away to a women’s shelter. Sahar tried to kill herself after an argument with Tooba, and the youngest begged a detective to place her in foster care. The eldest daughters also had secret boyfriends. Zainab got married to hers, though it was annulled after just one day. Rona, the first wife who lived with the family and introduced as an “aunt” meanwhile, apparently asked for divorce at one point.
The Shafia case has shed a strong light on the clashing disparity between the lives the young victims were trying to lead in Canada, and the one which the defendants would allow them.
Shahrzad Mojab , a professor at the University of Toronto (and an expert in honour killings) who co-edited a book called Violence in the Name of Honour was The Crown’s last witness in making its case. According to her, [honour killings] don’t have direct connection with religion at all and such killings are not restricted to Islam, though the United Nations report suggests it’s more prevalent in these societies. “It is not unique to any particular religion. We see it among Hindus. We see it among Jews and Christians in the (Middle East) region. It is also not limited to the Middle East or the Arab world.”
“If a man cannot control his own household, which is represented by the behaviour of the female members of the family, he cannot be trusted for any other public matters, including financial relationships,” Dr Mojab explained and went on that feeding that violence is the belief in the control of the female members of the family in a patriarchal society.
According to experts, honour killings are on the rise in the world. They occur most often in the Middle East, North Africa and parts of South Asia. As many as 5,000 girls and women are murdered every year in these types of killings, (2000 United Nations Population Fund report). In 1999, at least 1,000 women were killed in Pakistan alone.
At the core of these cases are often the issues of virginity and sexual chastity, although in many instances the women who are killed have been raped by a member of her own extended family. In some places, the perpetrators of the honour killing are excused or given light sentences because the family’s “dishonour” is taken into account.
“A woman’s body is considered to be the repository of family honour,” Dr Mojab said, refrerring to an Arab adage, “A man’s honour lies between the legs of a woman.” For some, an honour killing may even be seen as an act of mercy, she continued. “It is part of the continuum of love and care. Living as a dishonoured member of the family — the suffering of that is greater than death.”
So if a woman’s reputation is perceived to be tainted, through premarital sex or rape, taking a boyfriend, asking for divorce, even exerting her independence, “Cleansing one’s honour of shame is typically handled by the shedding of blood,” Mojab said.
“It’s really about men’s need to control women’s sexuality and freedom.”
And that is exactly what the jury decided Hamed and Mohammad Shafiah did, despite their numerous denials otherwise. I still fail to grasp how Tooba Yahya could have gone along with them.
Rob Tripp, an award-winning crime reporter for CBC, announced in an interview that he is working on a book depicting the compelling story of this mass murder which will delve into much of the untold story of the victims who died only because they wanted to live a life like that of their peers: having friends, seeing movies, trying make up or speaking out their mind. The working title of his book is "Dead in the Water". It is picked up by Harper Collins Publishers of Canada, and is projected to be out in January 2013.

The victims, four women, now rest in an Islamic cemetery in Laval, Québec
~~*~~*~~*~~
Recommended Reading
The Politics of Theorizing "Islamic Feminism':Implications for International Feminist Movements
BY:
Shahrzad Mojab
Photos: Courtesy of Canadian Press, The Toronto Star, & Globe and Mail
~~**~~**~~**~~
Füsun Atalay ~ Copyright © Will of my Own - 2012


Salon.com
Comments
♥
Now its awful.
HUGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
Very sad.
Imagine killing your three children...
(But I was just reading something today about Thomas Jefferson, yes, THAT Thomas Jefferson, creator of the phrase "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", who was a big-time slave-owner....among whose slaves were a number of HIS CHILDREN.)
@Abrawang- It seems to be only natural in these families that the young males are trained to carry on the sick tradition.
@Myriad - Jefferson pursued happiness alright - only his own.
@Desi, Mary, Christine, John, Linda - Thank you all!
The only thing that could be worse would be if some fool whined that we Westerners just don't understand. No, we don't understand and that is why we call such people monsters.
On Jefferson, he freed his children and his lover in his will, which makes it interesting, since it gives his lover a huge incentive for choosing him over a fellow slave (according to researchers, Hemings had some choice, like choosing to return to the US after living in France where she could have declared her freedom, or maybe it's just a statement about what life as a free black in 18th century France would have been).
It raises interesting questions about what free choice means in the context of a system like slavery which abolishes freedom.
I've always failed to see the question of honor in these matters.. it reminds me somehow of the 'age honored tradition' of falling on one's sword to redress a shame, to family or one's self :-/. Not the same thing but connected by similarly and terribly twisted 'logic'. Humanity + organized (man's) religion = really weird reasoning way too often.
Rated for promoting awareness.
rated
Whether its JSOC forces killing pregnant women and then digging the bullets out with a knife to cover it up, dropping drones on civilians, or mass slaughters like Haditha, Nissor Square, Fallujah or countless others, the United States justifies their killing behind the theme of honor as well.
__❁✳❁✳❁_____❁✳❁✳❁
❁✳_______❁_❁______✳❁
❁✳________❁________✳❁
_❁✳________________✳❁
__❁✳______________✳❁
___❁✳____________✳❁
_____❁✳________✳❁
_______❁✳____✳❁
❁✳_______❁✳❁_______✳❁
There can't be anything in the texts of any of the world's major religions, inclucing the Koran, that condone honor killing.
As for counselling, Brazen: Our prisons (at least before the present Conservative government cut back on stuff in the prison system) offered quite a lot in the way of programs. Effectiveness, of course, depends on the attitude of the inmate. The father in this case is in his 50s and has no chance of parole before 15 years, and then it is called "faint hope". He will probably have to serve the whole 25 before being eligible for parole, which gives him a fairly good chance of dying first. The son might benefit from his prison 'education', and might even have a faint hope for the "faint hope" parole after 15 years, having been a young and impressionable Good Son rather than the chief instigator. If he does his whole 25 years and then is successful in getting parole (which is lifetime parole in murder cases), he'll likely be pretty 'institutionalized' and hard put to make it on the outside, whatever counselling he gets in prison.
What the family patriarch here did was not only destroy the lives of his first wife and his three daughters, but the lives of his second wife, his son and himself. He probably feels 'honourable', however. Honour is more important than life to people in this culture. (Culture, not religion...tho these days it does seem most prevalent in Islam.)
I wonder what happened to the little boy.
Tragedy started with the honour killing.
Füsun,thank you for this insight and the book links.
Rated
Interestingly, as I read this entry the TV was on and CNN was doing a report on the very same case.
rated with love
I am also challenged by this: I am holly unaware of any incidents among Near East Jews of honor killings and so I will try to look into this. It would, of course, sadden me.
Rated.
Honor killings are most reported in Hindu/Muslim cultures as far as I am currently aware, but a parallel exists with any group which feels it "owns" its constituent members. be it God/Church/Soul,- Government/community/individual, - or patriarch(matriarch)/family/kinsman.
Honor killings are much more "culturally shocking" to a nation which has "Free will" as its founding tenet.
You are responsible for your own individuality- but you are also responsible for the self aware exercise of free will within your community. That's what it means to be an individual- or more formally, an Individualist who believes in Free Will.
Do you OWN your children? Can you own another Human Being? The answer to that must always be "no". in our society.
That's why it is so shocking and incomprehensible when we encounter the workings of a culture or code where the answer to the question is "Of course I own them!"
You must support the informed exercise of free will in whatever form. That's how we become and remain Human, rather than units of a Borg.
The result of the ruling is expected to encourage more women to come forth and speak out, however, the social measures to protect and and help them have to be in place first so that the same tragedy will not be repeated.
------------
@Oryoki:
The justice system unfortunately failed in this case, not taking the women seriously. The following is from The Montreal Gazette -Jan.30.2012:
"Geeti also told police that her father often threatened that he was going to kill them," prosecutor Laurie Lacelle said, reading into the court record a statement from the officer.
Geeti and other Shafia children spoke to police in April 2009, roughly 10 weeks before their deaths. They told officers they feared violence from their father because their sister Zainab had run away from home. Geeti told the police that a week earlier her father had pulled her hair and hit her in the face. She said her brother Hamed punched her in the eye with his fist. The assaults came after the children returned home at 9 p.m., after their curfew, from a trip to a shopping mall."
This is the link on the case in Germany in February 2005.
...be in Love, not fear...
Liz
Lezlie
In other parts of the world, the matters usually weigh in favor of the aggreieved family member who would have had to live with the shame if they had let their female family member live.
All I can say about this is: It proves to me once again that people who think this is okay are only slightly better than wild animals, living for the exactance of bloodlust, revenge and will resort to violence for controlling others, especially women, in the name of "honor" of which there exists none when you can justify murder in the name of shaming a name.
--r--
When I heard of the verdict, I thought "Great. Another blemish on Islam" As a Muslim it is important to let the world know that these actions are not indicative of the religion, but instead cultural and deep rooted in a patriarchal society.
I feel sorry for those girls who were only being "just girls". American Muslim girls, in most families, are allowed to be themselves with limitations, but don't worry about being killed for not wearing hijab.
I know of an honor killing here in Georgia, but that was because of intercultural marriage; and not for fear that your Daddy's gonna kill ya because you wear lipstick. Haram!
Thank you for sharing this post with us. You do these women great honor with your words.
Nice work. / r
Montréal's Afghan community disassociates itself from the actions of Mohammad Shafia and his accomplices. The spokesman for the community stated that the heinous crime is not part of any Islamic belief, it is a tribal or cultural practice which is not common. The Shafias were not seen as practising Muslims. Saima Ishaq of Concordia University, who did her masters thesis on the topic of honor killings agrees. She said in a news interview that this is a case of cold blooded, pre-meditated murder which cannot be justified by religious beliefs in any way. Islam does not promote killing. Ignorance with hatred does.
The difficulties that people have in new environments and the solutions for them, rest on what they have seen or believed, or knew as their positive reaction to the difficult situation. The influence of the western culture is rejected if it upsets the tradition and comfort level of the male household occupants who have the power by tradition in the family. It is a patriarchy.
There are religions in this country that support the same type of influence and often use violent means to keep their power and control "their women." The example here involving the murder of these women is that same ideology and power, taken to the utmost extreme. It is very important to understand that religion does play a role, but there are many religions or sects of many religions that do not. Honor killing is something that there is no real justification for in our society. When we hear of these events in our westernized society, we know that it is not "our normal". People who immigrate to our western culture cannot change that culture, so they try to prevent their women from integrating into it.
That is not possible except by force in some cases. The best thing that could have happened here in my opinion was for the people involved to be deported. To return to their culture where there would be no changes in their familial authority. Perhaps the women could have applied to stay. There should be a process that allows these people to be separated from what we would call their abusers in our culture, much as a battered woman can do to escape their tormentors. That should be a universal concept.
This must be stopped and that stops by women being accepted as equals to men. That is a concept that is not embraced by many religions, cultures, countries and even other women. Until that is overcome, we can expect to see this kind of behavior and we must continue to punish it and work globally to prevent this kind of extreme patriarchy.
This is not anything unique to any one religion. It is a pattern of behavior that hides under the cloak of power and religion.
I hope I have made my argument clear and not offended anyone's religious feelings, experiences or faith, that is not my intention.
R
If you are interested, you can read more at:
http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1097462--dimanno-kingston-canal-trial-hears-expert-testimony-on-honour-killing
I'll pm the link if it doesn't show up properly here.
Thank you so much for honoring the women!
Congrats on the well-deserved EP!
am glad to have read this, painful as it is. Rated, love
1. The murders have nothing to do with honor.
2. The murders have nothing to do with Islam.
3. The murders have everything to do with Afghan culture.
R
And I hope you had a wonderful birthday.
Toilet Paper Coupons