Editor’s Pick
JUNE 15, 2009 5:39PM

Investigative reporters dig up good news

Rate: 5 Flag

By Katharine Mieszkowski: In between ferreting out corruption and scouring public documents, the nation's investigative reporters and editors held their annual conference this weekend in Baltimore. Salon's own Mark Benjamin was there, tweeting: "It is all about nonprofit journalism at the annual IRE conference."

Two pieces of news came out of the event: The Associated Press announced that it will soon begin distributing the work of four nonprofit news organizations to the 1,500 newspapers that are its members, and the Knight Foundation announced that it's investing millions in investigative reporting.

Starting in July on a six-month trial basis, the AP will begin syndicating the works of the Center for Investigative Reporting, the Center for Public Integrity, ProPublica and the Investigative Reporting Workshop. The Knight Foundation is investing $15 million in investigative reporting, with some of those monies going to those same organizations, namely the Center for Investigative Reporting and ProPublica.

"Communities are harmed by what they do not know. A community can't clean up a toxic dump, or remove a corrupt official or right any other wrong if its citizens do not know about it," said Eric Newton, Knight Foundation's vice president for journalism in a statement announces the funding. "We're awash in information, yet it seems to be getting harder to find good investigative reporting." Newton noted that newspapers today employ some 10,000 fewer journalists than they did a decade ago. 

As newspapers scale back and sometimes go under, investigative reporting has been hard hit. The hope is that the new funding and distribution for these nonprofits will help fill the gap. But as David Weir, a former Salon editor and one of the founders of the Center for Investigative Reporting back in 1977, blogged, the good old days for newspapers weren't that great for investigative reporting either: "When they were flush, original investigative stories were being scaled back at many media operations. Why? Because by the early '80s, the typical media executive was schooled in not 'rocking the boat,' i.e., not to upset the advertisers, who were providing most of that precious cash."

 

Your tags:

Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Jim Hopkins of the wonderful Gannett Blog (http://gannettblog.blogspot.com/) is doing a fundraising challenge for IRE. Check out his site if you're interested. And if you'd like to know more about Hopkins, I did a piece on him for Open Salon last month (http://open.salon.com/blog/maria_stuart/2009/05/29/i_have_seen_the_future_of_journalism_requiem_for_a_blog)
That is good news. But I have a question. How does nonprofit journalism get paid for?
This is interesting news. It invites us all to consider the last few years' push to favor advertising over in-depth reporting. We're a scandal-hardened society. Abu Ghraib, fraudulent wars, and other contemporary quagmires don't always resonate with an electorate who feel we've already lost control of our government. But more in-depth local and regional reporting may be what's needed to re-energize the industry. Eric Newton's focus on "community" is a step in the right direction.
Kudos to Knight!

As goes investigative journalism, so goes participatory democracy. I hope you cover this regularly. There is no future, journalism's or any other, without watchdogs.

With teeth.