GaryBaumgarten

GaryBaumgarten
Location
New York, New York, USA
Title
Director of News and Programming
Company
Paltalk.com
Bio
Award winning journalist Gary Baumgarten hosts the News Talk Online show on Paltalk.com. He asks critical questions, and invites people from all around the world to talk directly to his newsmaker guests using Paltalk's voice over IP technology. Gary came to Paltalk as director of news and programming from CNN where he was the radio bureau chief and correspondent in New York for a decade, where he covered, among other things, the 9/11 attacks in New York and Hurricane Katrina. He was previously reporter and assistant news director at CBS all news radio station WWJ in Detroit. Prior to that he was managing editor at Detroit Radio News Service and a reporter for the Jackson (MI) Citizen-Patriot, the Detroit News and a number of weekly newspapers. Paltalk is the largest multimedia interactive program on the Internet with more than 4 million unique users. News Talk Online is also syndicated by CRN Digital Talk Radio to cable systems serving an additional 12 million households.

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 7:25AM

Economists Oppose Bush Bailout Plan

Rate: 1 Flag

Last night, Pres. Bush made an impassioned plea in an address to the American people for swift action on his Wall Street bailout plan. Which he says needs, and is getting, bipartisan support.

The president used dire language to underscore the need for quick action. Asserting that the "entire economy is in danger."

He needs to sell the $700 billion plan to the American people, because so many citizens are phoning and writing their representatives saying they are opposed to it. And many, on both sides of the congressional aisle, are expressing reservations.

A poll suggests that about one-third of Americans support the plan. One-third oppose it. And the final third are confused about it and undecided.

Among those not confused are 166 economists from colleges and universities across the United States who are in the second third, and are staunchly opposed.

They've signed a letter addressed to the House and Senate, explaining why it's not good for the nation.

While they agree with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson's assessment that the current financial situation is "difficult" and there is need for "bold action" to ensure that the economy will continue to function, they see three "fatal pitfalls" in his plan.

First, they say in their letter, it is unfair.

"The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense," they write. "Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses."

This is a theme that's oft repeated by non-econonomists, regular Americans who are wondering why they have to foot the bill. Why give money, their money, they ask, to the very people who created this mess? And what about the victims of these bad lending decisions? Those who face foreclosures on their homes? No one is offering to bail them out.

The economists suggest in the letter that it's possible to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers without bailing out institutions whose choices "proved unwise."

The economists also feel the Paulson plan is ambiguous.

"Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight is clear," they write.

Finally, they argue, the plan fails to address long-term effects, which, they note, will be with us for generations. "For all their recent troubles, America's dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity," the letter says.

"Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted."

For these reasons, the economists are urging Congress to slow down the process, hold hearings and "carefully consider the right course of action."

This is a point we all can agree upon. The administration, for some reason, is trying to to ram this down the nation's throat.

"The government's top economic experts warn that, without immediate action by Congress, America could slip into a financial panic and a distressing scenario would unfold," Bush said last night.

Immediate action. That's the advice of the government's top economic experts.

The 166 economists who signed the letter to Congress would beg to differ.

The bailout plan will be the topic on today's News Talk Online on Paltalk.com at 5 PM New York time. CLICK HERE to join in the conversation.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I don't understand how the $700 billion would be used. If I read right, then taxpayers would buy worthless assets with these funds from investment banks, and such like. What if, instead of buying the assets, the investment banks were approved for a $700 billion loan, which would be collateralized with the companies' assets, paid back with interest, and that the boards of directors of these companies be replaced with boards appointed by Congress to ensure responsible governance? Would that achieve an equivalent economic result but with at least some semblance of a guarantee that the $700 would someday be restored to the treasury?
You are doing good work here.
If helping banks with bad asset portfolios and making sure businesses maintain access to credit is REALLY the issue, then wouldn't it be better if we used the $700 Billion to:

1. Provide homeowners with government backed loans so they can negotiate with a bank to buy back their own mortgage at the market rate.
2. Extend the powers of the Small Business Administration to provide credit to businesses.

If we must have government internvention, then at least put the power to fix the problem in the hands of those most affected and not in those of the people who caused the problem in the first place.
Where can one read the contents of the letter from the economists?
Sorry I meant to hyperlink it when I posted the original story.

Here's the link to the letter from the economists.

http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/john.cochrane/research/Papers/mortgage_protest.htm