It’s June 16th. If you were not an English major, are not a lover of all things Irish, or if you don’t listen to NPR, perhaps this date means nothing to you, but to lit nerds everywhere, it’s the day we celebrate James Joyce, his greatest novel, Ulysses, and the day on which all of the events in it took place: June 16, 1904.
But when I say “we,” I mean that more as a collective pronoun than a first person one. I am an English professor who has never read Ulysses. Moreover, I probably never will.
It’s not that I don’t appreciate James Joyce. Dubliners, “The Dead” in particular, is a personal favorite. But I have a sort of reverse snobbery about a book that requires so much of its readers--that is, by Joyce’s own admission--completely inscrutable at times.
Perhaps it's intellectual defensiveness, but I do not want to read a book that requires me to work that hard and for that long. In order to write such a book, you’d have to be either a masturbating egotist or a mad genius. The literary establishment agrees that it’s the latter, so I’ll have to concede that I’m just not smart enough to participate in that conversation. Or maybe I’m just lazy. Or maybe it’s just that in the time that it would take to devote that kind of effort to reading a single book, I could read half a dozen others, and my time to read (and write) is precious enough already.
From a distance, I can appreciate Ulysses’ ambition, its structure and scope, but at the core of what might rightly be called my literary laziness is a suspicion that the writer of such a book is just trying to do something huge in the way that a person who wants to climb a mountain wants to accomplish something to prove they can do it. As a reader, I feel left out. And engaging in the considerable undertaking of reading it would be like making love to an incredibly handsome guy who fancies himself a great lover, and who’s enjoying himself and making you feel pretty good from time to time...but at some point, you want to yell, “Hey! Open your eyes! I’m right here! Remember me?” That is not the type of guy I want to spend a whole lot of time with.
But if I can’t or won’t read the book, I will say to those of you who have or will or who want to defend it: carry on, and have fun. One of the joys of the virtual world is getting to eavesdrop on these little parties -- the Twitter hashtags, the essays, the commentary and the parodies that Bloomsday and events like it inspire. Today on McSweeney’s Internet Tendency is a most-hilarious summary of “Feedback from James Joyce’s Submission of Ulysses to his Creative Writing Workshop” that will tickle the funny bone of anyone with even a passing familiarity with the book. There are quotes circulating around the internet, podcasts, lists of suggestions for how to celebrate the occasion, venues in which to “Re:Joyce,” stories in the news and on the radio, all in celebration of a book. It all makes me want to crash the party, in spite of my lack of acquaintance with the guest of honor. Or, as one person on Twitter suggested, I could just “Walk around [my] city. Say cryptic stuff. Say [I] read Ulysses (and since no one has actually read it, they'll believe [me]).”


Salon.com
Comments
BTW - If you haven't seen it, you might get a kick out of my similar rant - posted a few weeks back - entitled Reader's Block. Alas, "plump Buck Mulligan" opening the pages of Ulysses topped the list of books I'm NOT reading. . . ever.
Perhaps it's intellectual defensiveness, but I do not want to read a book that requires me to work that hard and for that long."
No -- it's arrogant stupidity. Leave teaching and finding something useful to do with what's left of your life. Like flipping burgers.
Just don't consider yourself a decent English professor.
This is a type of modern snobbery that is actually way more vulgar than the traditional version of snobbery. Carry on being pompous and dismissive of things you care to not try to tackle.
I have read and liked Homer's Odyssey ( in translation), Macchiavelli's Il Princip, Paradise Lost and even parts of Moby Dick. I have never made it past page 56 of Ulysses and I've been trying for more than 30 years.
Do you cringe when the word 'irony' is misused?
Hypocrisy involves pretense - you claim to have a belief or moral standard but practice the opposite.
This strikes me as an extended rationalization regarding why this particular book isn't worth the effort.
As such, it is more than satisfactory. And not remotely hypocritical.
I have never been a fan of Melville myself. I've read it all, but with the exception of the story of Bartleby, the works didn't appeal. Although I do like the end of Moby Dick because, well, hell, who's narrating it? Fascinating. It took a long time to become a fan of Lyn Hejinian, but now, I think she's fantastic. I love Pynchon, but it's not easy going stuff. Perhaps, for me, that is part of the appeal, honestly. It's better when it's got a bit of inscrutability about it.
Often, certain works appeal only at certain times in our lives. You don't have to adore or even read every great masterpiece to be a good teacher of literature. For example, a lot of lit professors hate Austen, even though her work is amazing. It's just a matter of preference, really, like everything else.
Of course, if you get an Irish lit class, you're going to have to crack that sucker open and learn it. You can start anywhere in it, you know, were you to give it another shot. Also, it's ... if you keep reading it, it begins to come together and really connect. Your brain starts to work on it, and that's a mystery all in itself.
I resently set about digging into the French masters--Flaubert, Camus, Balzac and Proust. I enjoyed the first three immensely, but when I tried to read Proust, I just couldn't dig it. Hard to explain why exactly. It's not that I couldn't handle the material, at least I don't think that's the case. Perhaps it's as you say; I just didn't want to work that hard. I will try again though, if only because my husband has read everything and he has a tendency to get all superior about it.
Tried Finnegan's Wake once. Got to page two.
got serious issues. Like unreadability.
I have the same problem with many things "modern", notably 20th century classical music, much of which is unlistenable.
Books are to be read, music to be listened to. With joy.
We are quite militant about remaining as stupid as we possibloy can be. When something more complex that "run Spot run" comes our way we whine and whine and WHINE about how "hard" it is , Barbie!
That's immediately followed by a "heartfelt plea" for "entertainment."
Those that can't teach should flip burgers.
Those who can't learn should TAKE THE FUCKING GAS PIPE!!!!