Kate Geiselman

Kate Geiselman
Location
Dayton, OH
Birthday
April 19
Title
Associate Professor
Company
Sinclair Community College
Bio
Late bloomer. Writer. Teacher. Procrastinator. Lover of lost causes.

MY RECENT POSTS

Editor’s Pick
JUNE 16, 2011 11:17AM

My Bloomsday Confession: I've never read Ulysses

Rate: 9 Flag

It’s June 16th.  If you were not an English major, are not a lover of all things Irish, or if you don’t listen to NPR, perhaps this date means nothing to you, but to lit nerds everywhere, it’s the day we celebrate James Joyce, his greatest novel, Ulysses, and the day on which all of the events in it took place: June 16, 1904.  

 

But when I say “we,” I mean that more as a collective pronoun than a first person one. I am an English professor who has never read Ulysses.  Moreover, I probably never will.

 

It’s not that I don’t appreciate James Joyce.  Dubliners, “The Dead” in particular, is a personal favorite.  But I have a sort of reverse snobbery about a book that requires so much of its readers--that is, by Joyce’s own admission--completely inscrutable at times.  

 

Perhaps it's intellectual defensiveness, but I do not want to read a book that requires me to work that hard and for that long.  In order to write such a book, you’d have to be either a masturbating egotist or a mad genius.  The literary establishment agrees that it’s the latter, so I’ll have to concede that I’m just not smart enough to participate in that conversation.  Or maybe I’m just lazy. Or maybe it’s just that in the time that it would take to devote that kind of effort to reading a single book, I could read half a dozen others, and my time to read (and write) is precious enough already.  

 

From a distance, I can appreciate Ulysses’ ambition, its structure and scope, but  at the core of what might rightly be called my literary laziness is a suspicion that the writer of such a book is just trying to do something huge in the way that a person who wants to climb a mountain wants to accomplish something to prove they can do it.  As a reader, I feel left out. And engaging in the considerable undertaking of reading it would be like making love to an incredibly handsome guy who fancies himself a great lover, and who’s enjoying himself and making you feel pretty good from time to time...but at some point, you want to yell, “Hey!  Open your eyes!  I’m right here! Remember me?”  That is not the type of guy I want to spend a whole lot of time with.

 

But if I can’t or won’t read the book, I will say to those of you who have or will or who want to defend it: carry on, and have fun.  One of the joys of the virtual world is getting to eavesdrop on these little parties -- the Twitter hashtags, the essays, the commentary and the parodies that Bloomsday and events like it inspire.  Today on McSweeney’s Internet Tendency is a most-hilarious summary of “Feedback from James Joyce’s Submission of Ulysses to his Creative Writing Workshop” that will tickle the funny bone of anyone with even a passing familiarity with the book.  There are quotes circulating around the internet, podcasts, lists of suggestions for how to celebrate the occasion, venues in which to “Re:Joyce,” stories in the news and on the radio, all in celebration of a book. It all makes me want to crash the party, in spite of my lack of acquaintance with the guest of honor.  Or, as one person on Twitter suggested, I could just “Walk around [my] city. Say cryptic stuff. Say [I] read Ulysses (and since no one has actually read it, they'll believe [me]).”

 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Oooo, thank you for this! Confessions of an book collector -- I've never gotten thru Ulysses, myself -- and yet. I still aspire to be in Dublin on Bloomsday, just 'cuz.

BTW - If you haven't seen it, you might get a kick out of my similar rant - posted a few weeks back - entitled Reader's Block. Alas, "plump Buck Mulligan" opening the pages of Ulysses topped the list of books I'm NOT reading. . . ever.
Treat yourself. Just pick a single chapter - maybe check out the easiest of allusions to the Odyssey and not bother to delve into the Irishness of it at first - just that, a single chapter - maybe the last one if nothing else. yes yes yes
I understand. Finnegan's Wake was too much for me. It is right up there on my shelf with other unreadables such as Infinite Jest and Gravity's Rainbow. I know I should read them but won't.
Joyce said it was supposed to be listened to - download a copy from Audible.com - effortless listening. And makes it enjoyable.
"
Perhaps it's intellectual defensiveness, but I do not want to read a book that requires me to work that hard and for that long."

No -- it's arrogant stupidity. Leave teaching and finding something useful to do with what's left of your life. Like flipping burgers.
In my youth, my tiny life was transformed by Joyce's A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man! Inspired, I too tried to tackle Ulysses, but must confess, sadly, I did not get very far.
Mr. Ehrenstein is either a fanatical supporter of all things Joyce, or he has written his own inspired book which, so far, has failed to attract publishers, critical praise or readers. And he is angry. Is he flipping burgers himself? I'm with you, Ms. Geiselman. Read what you love, follow your muse and keep posting.
Math is HARD Barbie (aka. Paul Hastings)
Since you have written about your literary hypocrisy, I will write about mine. I have a copy of Ulysses which I have not yet tried to read. It may be wonderful; I don't know (hope that doesn't offend you). My book that's like that, though, is Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf. I got half way through it, put it down, haven't gotten back to it since. I don't have any desire to, either. Although the back of the book assures you that Woolf sculpted "some of the finest sentences in the English language" I just can't care. I feel especially guilty because Woolf was such a big feminist and I often wish I was more broad minded than I actually am.
Feel free not to read Joyce or Woolf.

Just don't consider yourself a decent English professor.
Frankly, this is something you should repress. Would a professor of physics declare calculus a hard slog? Not really. You do teach the English language and if you are not willing to see how it is used and frankly, if you trivialize others who get it, you are a simpleton.


This is a type of modern snobbery that is actually way more vulgar than the traditional version of snobbery. Carry on being pompous and dismissive of things you care to not try to tackle.
Thank you. Thank you so much. This has also been my guilty secret for years.

I have read and liked Homer's Odyssey ( in translation), Macchiavelli's Il Princip, Paradise Lost and even parts of Moby Dick. I have never made it past page 56 of Ulysses and I've been trying for more than 30 years.
Read for the pure Joy of it, and it's not any work. I guess if I felt like that I wouldn't have read it either. Interesting but everyone has different tastes. I enjoyed it.
My minor quibble is your confusion regarding the the meaning of hypocrisy.

Do you cringe when the word 'irony' is misused?

Hypocrisy involves pretense - you claim to have a belief or moral standard but practice the opposite.

This strikes me as an extended rationalization regarding why this particular book isn't worth the effort.

As such, it is more than satisfactory. And not remotely hypocritical.
Oh well. No biggie. Unless you are an Irish lit specialist, of course. Then, it's a problem.

I have never been a fan of Melville myself. I've read it all, but with the exception of the story of Bartleby, the works didn't appeal. Although I do like the end of Moby Dick because, well, hell, who's narrating it? Fascinating. It took a long time to become a fan of Lyn Hejinian, but now, I think she's fantastic. I love Pynchon, but it's not easy going stuff. Perhaps, for me, that is part of the appeal, honestly. It's better when it's got a bit of inscrutability about it.

Often, certain works appeal only at certain times in our lives. You don't have to adore or even read every great masterpiece to be a good teacher of literature. For example, a lot of lit professors hate Austen, even though her work is amazing. It's just a matter of preference, really, like everything else.

Of course, if you get an Irish lit class, you're going to have to crack that sucker open and learn it. You can start anywhere in it, you know, were you to give it another shot. Also, it's ... if you keep reading it, it begins to come together and really connect. Your brain starts to work on it, and that's a mystery all in itself.
This was fun, and despite what some of the bashers in this thread might think, I'm sure every prof. of every kind has a similar little secret they've been hiding for years. To suggest, as some here have, that you're not worth your salt because you've chosen not to read a particular book is beyond silly. Get a grip folks.

I resently set about digging into the French masters--Flaubert, Camus, Balzac and Proust. I enjoyed the first three immensely, but when I tried to read Proust, I just couldn't dig it. Hard to explain why exactly. It's not that I couldn't handle the material, at least I don't think that's the case. Perhaps it's as you say; I just didn't want to work that hard. I will try again though, if only because my husband has read everything and he has a tendency to get all superior about it.
I actually read Ulysses for a 12th grade term paper, comparing it to Homer's Odyssey. I don't know how much I really understood, since I didn't realize that Molly Bloom was having an orgasm. But hey, I got an A-, so yay me.

Tried Finnegan's Wake once. Got to page two.
Made it through Ulysses and Finnegan's Wake--but couldn't for the life of me, understand either. Maybe it's a guy thing?? Thanks for the link to McSweeney!
Odetteroulette you should try "The Confidence-Man"
Fine post. I too have not read Ulysses, and given all I've read about it will not. Any book that is considered the greatest of the 20th century yet at the same time remains unfinsihed by most serious readers has
got serious issues. Like unreadability.

I have the same problem with many things "modern", notably 20th century classical music, much of which is unlistenable.

Books are to be read, music to be listened to. With joy.
The serious issue is American anti-intellectualism.

We are quite militant about remaining as stupid as we possibloy can be. When something more complex that "run Spot run" comes our way we whine and whine and WHINE about how "hard" it is , Barbie!

That's immediately followed by a "heartfelt plea" for "entertainment."

Those that can't teach should flip burgers.

Those who can't learn should TAKE THE FUCKING GAS PIPE!!!!
I've read part of Ulysses, and I'll dip into it every now and again. But I stopped trying to understand it. It helps if I'm tired, or missed my meds, or have had a few Makers Marks, so that my brain can flow along and make the necessary bumps and surges. This works with Mrs. Dalloway, too, and David Lynch's "Mulholland Drive."