GeorgiaWinters's Blog

FEBRUARY 3, 2012 7:46PM

Rape of the (original) Artist?

Rate: 2 Flag

The Artist

Kim Novak recently (and oh so subtly) declared in a large advert she took out in Variety that a "rape" had been committed by using Bernard Herrmann's score in the silent, black and white and Golden Globe winner 'The Artist'-for as it is a silent film and the music was not even adapted, it stood out- almost like plagiarism. Which leads me to question at what point does an homage simply become a copy/paste of someone else's work? Does ownership of art actually exist? The French theorist Roland Barthes spoke about the 'death of the author' where a piece of fiction/art lives in the space between that which it is written/painted on and the reader/viewer or in this case listener. I love this theory because it offers up the idea that art belongs to nobody and everybody; inspiration is actually rooted in life (in mime, ideas are literally plucked from above)- it's a heaving great collaboration between so many factors to enlighten the world. Awards like the Oscars and the Golden Globes are really just there to sell films I think, they're nice and fun to watch but why does art have to be made into a big competition when at the root of it, it is supposed to be (in my opinion) the complete opposite? 

 

 

Author tags:

movies, comedy, news, opinion, the artist

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
I agree. With the internet, every other post is about copyright infringement. If you think about it, every Rock & Roll song is basically the same. They play the same two, four or five chords and change the melody and the words. TV shows, Oh Vey! The only original thing is the original, everything else is a copy, or not!
Art is derivative by nature. Rape, on the other hand, is not a word to toss around lightly. She took out an ad with that wording? Oi.