Anarchy Anyone?

Are there protesters because there's a shortage of jobs, or is widespread unemployment due in part to so many preferring to protest? Shades of the chicken and egg, no? 

My money is on the chicken as many protesters, particularly those who have demonstrated the capacity to formulate a declarative or imperative sentence, have voiced the view that getting a job is much too prosaic a response to their needs when system overhaul demands their support.

But what system do they want to overhaul? Obama is doing his level best to produce a socialistic one, yet the mob is clearly not inclined to jump on his bandwagon. And it's doubtful that any spokesman for the system that enables these hippies of all ages to communicate so efficiently would be welcome into the littering tents overnight.

Anarchy would seem to be only other choice and force the only available means of bringing it about in the United States of America.

The protesters would be well advised to define their goals. If they want to lead the country in a particular political direction, they should emulate the Tea Party template and bring about significant change in the halls of Congress.  If they choose anarchy through force, they should have at it and suffer the crushing consequences.