MY RECENT POSTS

Grayson Davis's Links

Salon.com
MARCH 4, 2009 4:09PM

I Hate Twitter

Rate: 15 Flag

I am a young twenty-something practically tethered to the Internet, as most young twenty-somethings are. And, don't get me wrong, the Internet is great. It's fantastic. Seriously, it's just plain wonderful. I can't imagine life without it and the idea that the Internet wasn't actually around at some point in my own lifetime is mind-boggling, to say nothing of the fact that the generations before me somehow grew up without it. (I heard they used some kind of “p-mail.”)

But I hate Twitter. I reserve for Twitter one of the greatest, purest hatreds: not one borne out of anger or emotion, but one borne out of philosophy. I do not hate Twitter in the way that I hate stubbing my toe, or in the way that I hate Tracy Morgan. I hate Twitter in the same way that, say, Copernicus hated geocentrism. I'm not being irrational or hysterical – it is just that Twitter is so thoroughly wrong and so prolifically wrong that its very existence undermines our otherwise rational and mostly progressive society.

Let me first say that I do not hate those who use Twitter. I understand that, for most people, Twitter is just the next iteration of the MySpace/LiveJournal/BullShit social networking superfad that threatens to engulf the planet. I understand that most people use Twitter casually and without malice. I understand that most Twitter users do not believe that they can cause so much damage in 140 characters or less. These people I understand, and I can hate them no more than I can hate the average sixteenth century peasant for believing that the sun revolves around the earth. So don't feel insulted.

I am not the first person to hate on Twitter, and I am sure the reasons are obvious. Twitter is the epitome of the current wave of Web 2.0 content, which can be essentially summarized as the following:

“Everybody cares what I had for lunch today.”

It doesn't matter where you are or what you're eating – if you're connected to the Internet or to a phone (a distinction that will greatly date this essay within six months), you're able to tell dozens if not hundreds of people what you just crammed down your throat. Someone could be stranded in the middle of the Amazon Jungle, surviving off maggots and tiger meat, and they would still find a way to tweet “Blegh! Tiger meat again!” And somehow this would make tiger fighting completely boring.

Of course, at this point many readers will wag their finger and object, “Ah, but my Twitter is better than that. I tweet about interesting things in my life, and [worse yet] I tweet hilarious jokes!” Others might object that many celebrities, writers, and other important figures have interesting Twitters that are worth following. Some others might object that, even if Twitter is nothing more than a boring account of people's day-to-day lives, it's still worth reading.

I could respond to all such comments with a simple and deserved “shut up,” but in the interest of argument I will point out three facts.

One: your Twitter is not interesting or funny, and you are no better than people who tweet about their sandwiches.

Two: I have never read a good or funny Twitter from a celebrity, even if the celebrity is a person I otherwise enjoy.

Three: whatever utility Twitter might have as a small-scale personal diary or communication cloud is negated by Twitter's tendency to clog up with @ replies and other nonsense.

Again, I don't hate Twitter users. I understand where they come from. Blogs proved too involved and unwieldy for the average user. Writing a cogent journal entry is too time-intensive and obviously boring. Twitter, on the other hand, not only allows you to limit yourself to trivial bullshit, but mandates you limit yourself to trivial bullshit. Nobody is worried about standards or being interesting when they only have 140 characters to work with. And when even professional comedians are tweeting about dinner, you don't have to worry about other Twitters making yours look bad.

If I sound angry, I am not. My position on Twitter is one of utmost composure and cool reason. I simply believe it is the worst thing happening in the world right now. I believe that the once great dream of an Internet with honest-to-god content has been lost. If modern web design means that breaking news comes through Twitter in between “Mm, a BLT” and “@tweetfan22 I had macaroni too!” then I want no part in the Internet of tomorrow. Just leave me be and I will return to Web 1.0 and publish through GeoCities.

I hold out some hope, though. I hold out hope that our collective intellects will win out in the end and people will snap out of this tweet-induced siren song. I believe that there is the real potential for there to exist some day an Internet with communities of substantial content and the free flow of ideas expounded on rather than excreted. I believe that, some day, perhaps even the most vigorous tweeters will come to realize just how erosive they are.

Because nobody cares what you had for lunch.

Author tags:

technology, comedy, health

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Funny. Accurate. Thumbed.

(But I like following Stephen Fry...OK, shutting up now.)
My feelings exactly. Although I think many blogs devolve into the same sort of triviality. Who are these people who think that every little thing they do from eating a sandwich to going to the bathroom is of the utmost importance to everyone on the planet? Blogging, but especially, tweeting remind me of that Woody Allen line in Annie Hall: "Do you have no unuttered thoughts?" Sadly, the answer today is mostly no.
Thanks for explaining in a well-written piece. I fear it will only get worse before it (maybe?) gets better. Meanwhile, you have OS. What do you think of things here?
And, oh, no Tigers in the Amazon. Could Twitter that but don't care to.
It's a symptom, though, of something even worse: the narcissistic, innocently self-obsessed notion that everybody out there actually cares what you ate for lunch.
What's the difference between your piece on how much you hate twitter, and the twitter tweet on their ham sandwich? Word count? If a ham sandwich tweet is trival, then what of an entire blog post on how most twitter tweets suck?

We're all guilty of navel-gazing. I think that's best limited to 140 words instead of exposes on blogs.
well, I was not being ENTIRELY serious,
A tweet (g*d, I hate even typing that word) about your ham sandwich lunch doesn't really start a substantial conversation to get people thinking. This "trivial" article already has. Is it just me or is that one major difference between the two?
Grayson, welcome to OS! I loved your post. You are a great writer and I really love your sense of humor. I recently joined Twitter and just don't get it. It seems to be the ultimate form of narcissism...and you are so right...no one gives a rip what you had for lunch or whether or not you went to a board meeting, on a bike ride, or whatever. Glad you're here at OS. Hearing more of your perspective, especially from the point of a view of a 20 something will be invaluable. Rated.
It's hard to ask this question and not sound like an elitist git but I'm curious... is this blogging for the lowest common denominator? Or is it some kind of indicator that westerners have way too much time on their hands?
Dorsey: Nu. I still don't see a difference because our theoretical microblog (tweet) on ham sandwiches can elicit discussion, especially if its on a food-focused twitter feed.

Microblogging is fantastic for ideas that don't need to be stretched to over 500 words. Unfortunately, lots of people blog about issues that don't even deserve to be microblogged. And lots of microblogging is dreck.

Sniffing at microblogging, to me, is no different than other forms of intellectual snobbery.
I won't deny that I am indulging in intellectual snobbery.
I am most definitely a provincial elitist. I'd be and intellectual snob too, but I couldn't afford/didn't want/was too lazy to go to college.
too many o's in that too. see. no college.
Hilarious.

I just joined Twitter a few days ago. I enjoy it, but haven't yet figured out the point. Except of my tweets, of course, which are interesting and funny - nay, brilliant and haunting and endlessly entertaining.
@Grayson: I H8 Twitter 2!
I think a person's experience of Twitter depends upon who they are following there. I was following a comedian, and for him it was all about self promotion. I stopped following him. Easy.

Some celebs are interesting. They may be in the south of France or riding around with a stunt double. Since my friends are not doing any of that stuff, I like reading about it. It's kind of cool.

Do I post what I'm eating? Not so much. I do occasionally like reading about what others have eaten. Shrimp cocktail? Oh, great idea. I haven't had that in a while. I think I'll have some. What's wrong with that?

For me the key point is to not follow anybody you find boring. Whatever boring is to you. Self-promotion = boring. This is the "I'm-on-letterman-tonight bunch.

And if you don't want to, you don't have to post anything about yourself. Just read it. Or not. Twitter, like almost everything in life, is not for everyone.
Wow, it's refreshing to hear people who share the same views as me. I often feel like I'm taking crazy pills when I tell people how I hate twitter while they all rave about how Twitter is the most awesomest thing on the planet...ever. I tip my hat to you sir...

I even wrote my very own over 140 character blog post (old school way) on how I Truly Hate Twitter: http://www.benjitao.com/2009/04/i-truly-hate-twitter/
I cannot stand ANY of this social bullcrap networking stuff. Welcome to the 1970's wedding upheaval again. Then it was cocaine and the Latin Hustle, now it is credit debt of others and clawing onto the old friends through these networks and ruining financially stable marriages. Maybe it is the meth and the twitter twitch or the facebook flugle? As far as I am concerned, if I haven't spoken to you in twenty years, there is a REASON! I can honestly say, I don't see how any marriages can survive this crap, because basically your husband or wife can have an entire "social life" behind your back, with support and all of multiple people, and you cannot stop an affair. You won't even know it is going on, it will be THAT well disguised by all of these people, especially if you realized that people that he/she work with will become members of this group of friends online, and then they will be part of the conceal. And, do these "social networking sites" really improve social networking the way speaking and meeting face to face do? No, in fact I know more shut ins spending all day on the computer keeping up or on the cell phone email keeping up, than I do anyone improving their actual social life. They interrupt speaking in person with you to get the phone, text, and email. Church is a thing of the past for so many, membership at the YMCA's is suffering, and soon HDTV will be taking over for whatever is left. One of these days somebody calling my cell phone (Yes, only calls...no TEXTS!!!!) will hear a toilet bowl flushing. I like the old days of the wall phone at home...when you weren't home, you weren't home and you called that person at another time. Our society is starting to crumble, because if marriages can't survive this crap, how will you be able to TRUST anyone? Without trust, no love. Without love, no children. Without children, the country will be overtaken by outsiders. With too many outsiders, the government will fail. Without government, anarchy will set in, and all of humanity will fail, because do you think for one moment that anyone will sit down calmly and paint an oil painting if they think their neighbor will break in and loot the place? Doesn't anyone think about Rome?
Thank you for letting me out of the closet!
I saw that one of the train companies lets you know of any delays on Twitter which, I hate to admit it, seems to have a point.
I agree somewhat with the commenter on social networking these days. I'd really like to see what Twitter could do besides what most other sites on the web can't do, especially Facebook. Twitter, Tweeter, who really cares? I hope Facebook buys it out.
Excellent piece! It's good to find a fellow Twitter-hater like myself. What depresses me are the people who have replied with the likes of "What's the difference between a tweet and your blog posting?" To them, words are words are words because meaning and substance are irrelevant.
I hate Twitter also. What is even more irksome as a web developer is it is now considered a job skill! A couple of years from now Twitter will be just another forgotten fad replaced by something else.
My Die Twitter graphic can be found at
http://open.salon.com/blog/oldschool2009/2009/09/11/die_twitter_die
Select a site like orkut, facebook, netlog, or any other like these. Remove the options of posting images, videos; remove options of creating and joining communities and you get... Twitter!
If you want to post little coments about what you are doing each minute you can do it in other sites.
P.S.: there are no tigers in Amazon Jungle =P
I found this really cool shirt for twitter hatters.
http://www.zazzle.com/stop_twitter_tshirt-235259607559626706
I hate tweeter for the same reason. I don`t believe that one day eyes of tweeters become opened. Internet gives opportunities not only for those who has "big brain". Some day people who have to say more than "what I had for lunch" will find a way to contact each other. Of course today it is a little difficult because of noise made by "lunchers". ) But internet becomes more like real life. There is many boring conversations in real, if you don`t like conversation you won`t listen to it.
On the other hand such things like tweeter gives a tendency and habit even to those who don`t like primitive conversations.
I hate Twitter because to me it is nothing more than another communication path, like telephone, we are not using appropriately to reach out and touch someone. I liked Twitter at first because you come so close to famous people, that in some places, I will never see in person. Then Twitter tells you to "reply" to posts of people, and give comments on people's daily lives. That is fun, but why is it abused so much that they must receive 1000's of "replies" and never give even a thanks! or a LOL? It is very crazy, and eventually all this junk, that is worthless, and means nothing to so many people will be regulated by the FCC or some other Government service because it is just such a waste of regular folks time, to be seduced by such misleading concepts.
The article is great, but no, there are no tigers in the Amazon, although you might find some cool jaguars there. Furthermore, the Amazon is a rainforest, not a jungle. Since there's hardly any cellphone coverage in any rainforest, it's likely that very few people would be able to tweet from there.

Grayson Davis's Favorites

  1. facewall Kerry Lauerman
  2. facewall Joan Walsh

view all

Updates

  1. Kerry Lauerman

    Hit record

  2. Joan Walsh

    Me on Open Salon