Greer McVay's Blog

Humorist, essayist, blogger and prophet...in the making!

Greer McVay

Greer McVay
Location
California, United States
Birthday
December 31
Company
Relatively Speaking
Bio
Greer McVay is an emerging humorist, essayist, Blogger and prophet, clearly sent to earth to share opinions and wax poetic on myriad subjects. During the course of a 25 year career in communications, Greer has worked in the health care and oil & gas industries as well as for a number of non-profits. Opinions come from experience. You can talk. You can do. Or you can do both. I choose the latter. Stay tuned...

MARCH 28, 2009 10:19AM

Brutal Murder is Not a Cause to Support

Rate: 5 Flag

Greer McVay’s Web Log (BLOG)

Volume 1, Issue 4

March 28, 2009

 

 

Last weekend four Oakland, CA, police officers were brutally murdered. Since their assailant also died in the subsequent gun battle we may never know the real motive behind his actions. We can probably assume safely, as do the police, that he simply did not want to return to jail, given the fact that a no-bail warrant had been issued for his arrest. Others, however, seem to feel that this person’s actions were in some way heroic and potentially inspired by retribution for the killing of Oscar Grant on New Year’s Day by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) police. Whatever his motives, he was indeed a monster, despite claims to the contrary by his family.

 

Some supporters of the gunman want to suggest that his personal and financial situation compelled him to do this heinous act. He was struggling to find a job in this down economy; his criminal record exacerbated his failed job search; his parole officer neglected to adequately provide support; his dog barked; his car overheated; his big toe got stubbed; and so on. Who gives a shit?!? Perhaps he did get some tough breaks that propelled him into a life of crime. Perhaps he didn’t have the tools to excel in the dog-eat-dog world we live in. Perhaps his parents didn’t give him enough hugs and kisses as a child. Join the club. None of those things are or should be factors in his decision to kill the officers who had the audacity to just do their jobs on a late-March afternoon. A lengthy discussion with a friend yesterday revealed a possibility that I hadn’t considered: Perhaps he was high on drugs and police would rather not divulge that he was temporarily incapable of making coherent decisions, so that they could perpetuate the monster stereotype versus the stoned out-of-his-mind stereotype. Again, who cares?

 

By showing anything other than disdain for the behavior [murders] and results of the behaviors [five families shattered beyond recognition], supporters of the gunman are hurting any future opportunities of obtaining any real gains in much-needed race relations or police reform because the credibility of those who seek such outcomes will be forever impaired. The man who killed these officers was no Rosa Parks. He is not a cause that any thinking person would or should embrace. Like the boys of the Jena 6 and countless other “causes,” once it becomes clear that the “victim” either provoked the situation or at minimum, lacked innocence and therefore may have contributed to their own dire circumstances and consequences, the do-gooders who support them are fighting a battle that they should not win. There are enough true victims out there that we don’t need to martyr the likes of this cold-blooded killer in order to make a point that in many instances police practice brutality. This is not one of those instances.

 

The individual who committed this crime against at least five Oakland police officers (one was treated at the hospital and released), was not trying to get his life together, as his family would have us believe. Ex-convicts who are trying to get their lives together do not drive around with loaded guns in their cars, nor do they possess assault rifles that they use in gun battles with SWAT. On the contrary, it is a monster that would flee the scene of a murder he just committed, and head to his sister’s home, where she lives with her four year old child and then proceed to have a shootout with police in her home. Who would put their own sister and niece in harms way like that? The fact that he went into her closet with a rifle suggests that he knew he would likely be tracked to that location and might need to defend himself.

 

The difference between a human being and an animal is the human’s ability to control animal instincts. Humans can weigh consequences and make rational decisions—even in the heat of battle. Animals cannot. Monsters are worse than animals because they have malicious intent, where animals do not. This man was a monster and should be reviled as such. His grave should be spat upon. I would recommend sympathy for his family, but their attempts to justify his behavior by making him a victim of a failed system doesn’t make them any better than him. There is no justification for the brutal murder of four men doing their jobs and to suggest that there is is unconscionable.

 

Let the healing begin for everyone associated with this series of unfortunate incidents. And may God have no mercy on the soul of the gunman.

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
Totally agree. And may God have mercy and grace on his supporters. Then after the healing, I pray the so called supporters channel their energies in more positive ways. Starting with taking long hard looks at themselves and their behaviors; banding together to find solutions that lift them up and out; and stop expecting the world to "give" them an education, a job or money. To paraphrase Ghandi, be the change you want to see in the world.
It's a pattern I've seen too many times. The family of the person who commits the crime claims either that the person could not possibly have committed the crime (even in the face of undeniable evidence) or there were circumstances that make it someone else's fault. I think if anyone else is to blame, it is the family that doesn't insist kids accept responsibility for their actions.

I have friends who teach in the public schools and too often, when they try to discipline kids who have done something wrong, a parent shows up demanding that the teacher apologize. It's no surprise that so many of these kids end up in serious trouble. We can (and should) love and support our kids, but if our kids do wrong, "love and support" has to mean helping them face the consequences of their actions, not helping them come up with excuses.
The police are the instrument of oppression for the capitalist oppressor.
Rated. Thank you for one of the most thoughtful and intelligent posts I have ever seen here.
Great post! You said everything I've been thinking and more. Therefore, I rated this post and have added you to my "favorites"! I agree with the other commenters, as well, and they are also on my list of favorites. Thanks, ladies!

One note about the Jena incident. I did some research on lynching because I was working as a manager at the time in a facility that was predominantly white and realized most of the employees didn't get the significance of the noose to African-Americans.

I found so many lynching stories that I still have nightmares about, I ended up writing a horror novel about vampires that also includes lynching stories (real and fictitious) and set it in in my home state (Texas) during 1930, when nearly 500 African-Americans were lynched (see my link "They Just Be Killing White Folks").

One of the stories was about a pregnant black woman who became upset when her husband was lynched, so she was tied upside down from a tree limb and set fire. Then her eight-month old fetus was cut from her belly.

It was alive, so the lynchers (terrorists!) stomped the live baby to death. I wrote an article titled "Acts of Terror" for my column "Chit Chat" (now a blog) and stated that while that white student who was stomped by angry black students in Jena was able to leave the hospital and go to a school event the same day, that baby was stomped to death and never had a chance to live.

Nothing justifies violence in my opinion, since I am and will always be a proponent of non-violent resistance and social change, but sometimes I do understand the violence. I abhor it, am repulsed by it, and will NEVER condone it, but I understand why and how it erupts repeatedly from the frustrated, pent-up anger that so many people feel.

So, while I do understand why some people feel the need to celebrate the Oakland police having the tables turned on them, I can't reconcile that with the fact that people died at the hands of a man who had no right to kill them - no right!
I believe that there was a transformation that occur at some time. One that changed a people from that of community and pride to one on hopelessness and indifference. Where one's life itself has no true value. To have these characteristics and qualities constantly reinforced by those who may be perceived role models (family/friends, movies, music, etc.) only adds snow to the ball. We should all be prepared to see more of the same in these times because those atitudes ARE changing.

There actually getting worse