A Life Without Armor

(From the novel Breakfast With Buddha)

Gwool

Gwool
Birthday
February 25
Bio
This serves as a recreational hobby about all sorts of stuff. For my real job I own a boutique Market Intelligence firm working with high technology companies on go-to-market strategies, due diligence, organizational analysis and various benchmarking studies. Enjoy distribtuion channel analysis immensely. Former political operative. Advance man for then candidate HW Bush. Congressional field operative and fund raiser. 17 years of small town municipal experience. A rare elected Republican town official in the People's Republic of Massachusetts. Four kids 21, 19, and 17 year old boys and an 11 year old girl. Topics will be all over the map. Kids, humor, rants, politics, economics, you name it. The liberal arts degree makes me a jack of all trades, master of none. Or just really full of myself. Take your pick. You like it, feel free to receive Tweets from http://twitter.com/gwoollacott.

Gwool's Links

Salon.com
OCTOBER 28, 2009 4:27PM

An Old Twit Tweets

Rate: 25 Flag

I created a twitter account today.  Seems odd to establish a mechanism by which people can absorb my errant thoughts.  Errant thoughts I equate to sounds that might be made from a BB rattling around in a tuna fish can.  Every once in a while the BB-sized idea gets moving and rattles around in the tuna fish can skull, going "pink, pink, pink" at increasing speed until such time as you rationalize the thought as well formed and go "Brilliant!  I must tell someone."

 In older forms of communication you had to then find a writing instrument, something on which to scratch out the thought, something in which to enclose the thought now on paper, find the address of someone to which to send it, lest you make multiple copies somehow, and then pony up the $0.42 to drop it into a mail box.

Go back far enough and it was an effort to chisel the thought into a cave wall.  Maybe those folks were incredibly more measured in their communication based on the effort it took to express it.  I mean you really "had to wanna" to paraphrase George Carlin in the days of cave wall billboard advertising. 

Now your fingers can fly on the keyboard with a 140 character capacity, and the whole world can tell what's on your BB-sized brain.

So it becomes easy to connect, but with what?  

Waking up and scratching oneself, you might grab the phone to tweet: "I think I want a blueberry pop tart for breakfast." 

 Brushing your teeth you can breathlessly update them with: "Scratch that, I want cornflakes."

 In the kitchen, it can be: "Damn, no milk.  Pop Tarts it is."

And so on.

Now, on the flip side, a Tweet in a crisis can have profound impact.  We saw the value of this communication during the Iran kerfuffle that tragically had broadcast to the world the death of a young female protester.  Iran could not suppress that information.   It truly makes government accountable to the people when the people can get their message out so quickly.

But the power of electronic communication does not have the traditional filter of an ink stained, season editor pushing the cub reporter for more facts idealized in the movie around the Watergate event.  Watergate opened the Pandora's box of investigative journalism in ways that now over reaches into the personal lives of our leaders that are none of our business. 

So this old twit put out a first tweet that simply said: "Trying out a new technology.  Brevity of expression is something I need to figure out anyway."  I likely needed a comma before anyway, but figured it was a waste of a precious character in the 140 limitation of that world.

Next I went to the profile where you can make your tweets available to anyone.  This gave me pause, so I said no at first.  Twitter came back to admonish me for such privacy, so I changed my mind.

I was then pleased to see I had an instant follower, and eagerly clicked to find out who it was.

It was some porn spambot mentioning nude pictures in their profile.

Terrific.  The number one activity on the internet found me in a nanosecond.

I guess "Ooh baby!" can be uttered 14 times and make the 140 character delimiter, but is it really that arousing when the real beauty is looking into the eyes of another?  Cave men might have had that one right all along, although the sales approach of dragging the object of their desire back by the hair to close the deal was likely an obstacle to a lasting relationship.  Thank God for the Mastadons at the door to win the hearts and minds in spite of the approach.

Then again, their hands were likely tired and weak from chiseling love letters on the cave wall, so perhaps it was just all an act to begin with. 

So those were the BB-sized ideas rattling around in my tuna fish can of a brain as I tip toe into the Twitter world.  It could have value for professional networking as well as for musings that find their way to this communication device I have come to value so very much. 

So this old Twit tweeted for the first time.  Care and attention in the form of self filtering will be the order of the day in that medium to preclude from blasting out ill-formed thoughts before the BB has settled back into the tuna fish can comfortably making nary a peep before the fingers hit the keyboard. 

 Perhaps I will take to chiseling rough drafts in stone to return to my roots before deploying them in the new world of instant communication.   

That's a tough call, though.  In cave man years I'm dead, so who knows how long the hands can put up with the punishment? 

An Old Twit Tweets.  Film at 11. 

 

Your tags:

TIP:

Enter the amount, and click "Tip" to submit!
Recipient's email address:
Personal message (optional):

Your email address:

Comments

Type your comment below:
A very wise technologist once told me that to locate the cutting edge of media and communications, "Follow the porn." You're starting to tweet; they're already onto the next big thing...whatever that is..
Also: Yeah. I get the point.

Jeff: How much further removed from the beauty of the act can they take it?
At least you have a following. r
OE: I blocked said devotee.
I'm too long winded for Twitter. I mean one mintue I'm talking about the dog and next thing you know I'm ranting about the economy.

I just won't shut up. :) Besides no one wants to know what I'm REALLY thinking most of the day . . . LOL


Rated! (great new avatar by the way!)
Geoff I meant your OS following.
re: porn. Will the next leap be Internet-based instant orgasms at reasonable rates? (I'm not sure I would prefer it that way.)

re: tweets. Except in emergencies like: "Get out before the bomb blows" or "the Bay Bridge has fallen into the water" ---I don't know how much useful information can be crammed into 140 characters. Haiku perhaps....perhaps that's the answer...Basho:

Scent of chrysanthemums ...
And in Nara

All the ancient Buddhas
reading old guy blogs (and writing my own) lol. IMHO need another glass of water
Sitting on the dock of the bay...not really but it's all I can think of besides...um-m Good for you!
Reading your excellent post. Go Phillies!
Ah, another one bites the dust. I'm sticking to telegrams.
Ann forced me to download TweetDeck today.
I'm sure you're next.

(thumbified for upward technological mobility)
Gwool, I'm about a week ahead of you on Twitter. The most useful thing I've found so far is that it helps my editing skills, forcing me to say more in fewer words, er, characters. I hope to realize real value of my Tweets someday. I wonder, would there be a market for my nude photos?

Rated
I was excited when I joined Twitter, and I still do sign on from time-to-time, but I've found it to be tedious. However, I will freely admit that I haven't even scratched the surface of Twitter's potential.

I became disillusioned when I started reading "Tweets" that people were "out of milk" or "not in the mood for pizza."

Rated, of course.
Lady: I fear I will suffer from the same affliction.

OE: Oh. Does that mean I should have the tweet thing in here? It's my real name....

Berry: I prefer the former the old fashioned way, thanks. Ah, the ancient buddhas ...

Noah: Old guy blogs have value, damn it. As does water.

Buffy: If one *IS* sitting on the dock of the bay, then why in the hell would they want it intruded by a mindless twit tweeting about their morning pop tart?

Sally: Better them than the Yankees.

John: Telegram? Is a chisel and a cave wall next.

Jodi: TweetDeck? Yikes, you mean there's more? Good to see you around.

Harvey: I am with you on that. Likewise methinks our in the buff shots are best left in the caved walls of our mind.

Roger: That's the fear. Might be useful to push information (sales) to potential research customers, but not necessarily for letting old friends every though pinging around like a BB up there.
Well, if you don't like my porn, I'll just "follow" someone else.
Steve: What can I say, your Florida trip was SUCH a disappointment.
Hope you'll update on this at some point. Personally, I don't think I'll tweet much.
I appreciate the fact that this is a humor piece, but really, anyone who thinks that Twitter is about what they send out to the void is missing the point entirely, sort of like going out to buy one of the first television sets and staring at your reflection in the glass, and forgetting to plug the thing in and turn it on.

If you don't start following interesting people and accounts on Twitter, you might as well not bother being there at all. It would be like coming to Open Salon and not reading anyone else's blog, but just putting your own stuff out into the void.

People here are tweeting all the time, they just don't realize it.
You blocked me??? You bastard!! ;)
All I can think of is, "So easy, even caveman can do it. "
I'm still haven't twitted, I mean tweeted. Hope it works out for you!
Quit calling yourself old. YOU ARE NOT OLD. Especially since you're younger than me. See you on Twitter.
Scupper: So far just a (blocked) porn spambot and a wonderhorse have wanted to follow my musings.

Kathy: I get what you are saying completely. It's the double edged sword of social networks and all the rest. At its best it brings down a government's effort to suppress individuals as seen in Iran. On the other side, it has useless data flooding into your personal space, be it nitwit twits tweeting about the traffic jam they are in or what not or be it some spambot doing the equivalent of the "Me love you long time" line used in so many black and white WWII movies.

Tink: You earned it, man.

O'Really: Cavemen are always easy.
Tai: We'll see. Not sure what to do with it yet. Then again, I was not sure what to do with a blog, either, when I finally wandered in here.

Mary: Rationalizing can be healthy for a person. When it comes to the new communications mechanisms, we are old and hence need to remain open and curious to figure out these things.
Gwool, the only data that floods into your stream is the data you choose to follow. I recommend being selective. I don't know how you can be reading anything in your Twitter stream unless you put it there by choice.
Kathy: I understand that. It is the fear of not being selective enough, versus missing out on something interesting. I mean, I love Jeremy Priven, but do I need to know where he's having lunch? It's the filtering and the need to stay on top of it. I see this on my facebook page, for example. Children's friends seek you out, you say yes, and then it floods the feed. Just a question of boundaries such that chatter does not have you miss out on substance.
to tweet or not to tweet...should that be the question?
Nikki: More like what you need to know to practice safe tweet.
So we get to choose between "Indian subcontinent missing" and "Pop Tarts?"
Old New: Those would be the two "Black and white" values of utility and uselessness. As always the reality is a grayscale somewhere. Our personal filters on what we put out and what we seek to let in happens to be the mix to make it the right shade.

Same goes for political discourse, my good man, with precious little mixing going on these days. :)
This is very funny. I've forwarded it to my friends of a certain, ahem, age for their enjoyment.

Did you read about the Molesting Twitter on the front page? Funny, too.
Connie: Yes, I did read it. The younger generation is more familiar with these things. We geezers will have to walk around with cell phones the size of the ones from the 1980s in order to see the LED read outs if we forget our glasses....
If John B. is sticking to telegrams, I shall one up him and use smoke signals instead. Telegrams are too fancy. I also like two tin cans and a string for really personal conversations.
My pop tart days ending when my kids turned 11 or so. Bad excuse for a meal. I was bad mommy for falling for that crap!

I have a Twitter account as well and hardly go there. Keep getting "followers" as well and just ignore them and their porn pics, if I do not know them personally.

So much Internet interference in our lives as it is!

Fade to static...